Topic: Fulfilling signature campaign post quota by recycling own posts - page 2. (Read 1003 times)

i'm pretty sure something like this is against forum rules (i may be wrong on that),
a ban would do much more to stop this shit show.


who?

Thanks for sharing those threads, and to be honest I have never gone through those threads, however now I know that some people did that in past and others who are lazy are trying to follow their pattern once again even now.

I don't know what to say but I believe such members are somehow a disgrace to the campaigns that they join because instead of contributing anything good, they just delete and recycle their own previous written work.

This user should not only receive negative trust rating but should also be banned. Copy-pasting content is prohibited in this forum, right? This is totally a type of copy-pasted post. If I wer the admin here I surely ban this user. Anyway you already tagged him negative trust rating, its like she already ban because having a negative trust rating can't joined any signature campaign unless the campaign manager have consideration to accounts with negative trust rating.

Now If she have an alternate account, she will surely abandon this account and focus on their alternate account rather than defending themselves here.

Haven't you read these threads? Looks like someone is just adopting this behavior.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5283810
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/user-smokerface-recycling-posts-for-sig-campaign-new-way-of-cheating-5320033

I'd say that's exactly what spammers do.

Wild guess: they don't care.

I think they got their manager from in-house. But it would be better if they asked one of the legendary campaign managers to handle the campaign instead, since it clearly looks like it's getting overrun with spammers.

In fact, wasn't this campaign banned before for this exact reason? Or was it another campaign I am thinking about? (I am not talking about YoBit - I already know about that one - but I specifically remember that there was an old version of the Stake campaign that got banned for spam.)

This is not usually spam. He posted the same content in 38 posts, at least this is what morvillz7z found. He was certainly quite aware of what he was doing and his explanation that he accidentally copied from a notepad is a poor attempt at justification. You can make the same mistake once or twice, but not 38 times.
I see this as a red tag.

I would also like to hear how these four Stake managers see the whole matter.

See:

Stake "campaign managers" have a very weird way of determining post "quality". It's certainly not in the interest of the forum. This topic is over 5 years old: Stake.com (SteveStake) is encouraging spam.

We have seen similar excuses more than once when spammers write that they first create messages in a notepad and then publish them on the forum.



But if we assume that managers of signature companies will at some point prohibit publishing posts after the fifth or even tenth page without turning topics into megathreads, then such actions with preliminary posts will be difficult to carry out.
Why not communicate normally, as usual, without turning the forum into some kind of academy or school, with homework and typing posts in advance? I opened the forum and wrote a response, and that’s it.
You shouldn’t go to fortune-tellers and say that when posts are prepared in advance, it means that there are still accounts that are in a hurry just to make money, forgetting about ordinary communication.

The problem with Stake or at least the manager and those who are reviewing the posts of their participants is that they don't know what to look at their signature participants. They even defending participants that posted long sentences and paragraphs because that's what the campaign manager wanted to see. The longer the post, the better for them.

Them even don't look at the merits as they say that there could be participants that posted good but was not merited by the members here. And I don't think that they are going to hire a campaign manager from this community who has the experience to grade the participants.

It's not impossible that farmed accounts are using some scripts and semi-automatic bot replies.

There was a clear intention with all your actions, but I am sure you will move on business as usual with your other alt accounts, forget about this one for any future campaigns.
I hope you learned your lesson.

I think problem is much bigger than just one member spamming and recycling his posts, and I wouldn't be surprised if others are doing something similar.
Gambling board needs cleaning.

They actually have 4 persons who monitor the participants since 2 years ago, guess what? they give good ratings to QueenVera, Adrian aka one of the reviewer said this week QueenVera is a good poster.

How can one of them didn't notice if QueenVera recycled own posts when they're reviewing his post every week, it's surprising morvillz7z who're not the reviewer can notice this lol.

 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14VXHQRQBbRVz_QXGz6dSjvtZZ7VCTksk1jfW6AdsrkY/edit#gid=2095975102

I think this is how the Stake's reviewers looks like during reviewing the participants.

Many people have been complaining of the management of the campaign, is like the management lack attention to their participants and secondly they have higher number of participants which I know very well that may be the result of not figuring out people who is not taking the campaign serious.

Theirs one certain period i encounter a place they said that they have a team that do grading to their participants, so their is a team I don't think they will be having numbers of low quality posters, let them hire a reputable members of this forum that will help them for grading posts made by the participants...if stake reduced the number of post quota, participants who is involve there will make a quality post. The problem come from the tax they give to their participants as weekly post, they should minimize their post to 30 post weekly.

I'm disappointed at myself and I don't want to come here defending myself as it mightn't change anything from what is being written about me but I just want to let my conscious clear that at least I tried my best. I only have some points I want to defend, I write on my notepad before responding on the forum and I see there is a mistake by me posting the same post on two different threads, I didn't intend to do that on purpose and I'm willing to return the money made on that post if that is possible. I didn't know the second post I wanted to copied didn't copy correctly and I was still with the old posts. I do not think this has happened before therefore it was a honest mistake but I know nobody will believe me since I'm not in the best position to plead my honesty but I'm sorry for this mistake and I'm willing to do anything it takes to rectify myself.

I put numbers on the post I want to respond to and delete them before I post them on the forum but sometimes I can make a mistake to leave them there after posting. If I come across the mistakes I could delete it as the numbers aren't important in the replies but they are only there as I mark them for me to know the replies that I'm responding to. The numbers aren't there as it was posted by an AI but just a way I use to know which reply that I'm responding to and how I position my replies to make it make sense.

I love Atalanta and I would have unconsciously used the same words again and again and possibly use the same opening sentence but I plead with everyone that I'll look for other sentence and words to use to experience my feelings. We are discussing sports and the discussion aren't that different, we are mostly discussing the same thing on different instances and when I join the discussions, I might repeat my words but I try to add something else to the discussion. The first lines or paragraphs would had sound or look the same but I try to bring something different in the other paragraph. It might not work out as I visualize in my head but I don't use AI for posting or plagiarised. I'm sorry as it was never an intended offense and don't mind getting punished for it but please know that i never intended it to cause a mess in the forum and I'll be better please.

It's funny, they've made four new posts since this topic was created, i shit you not all four are reposts. I'm starting to think this account is 100% botted. 



I vaguely remember coming around a screenshot of that particular signature campaign in which participants' posts were reviewed and rated by different people. I mean, how could you miss it? It's blatant right in your face stuff. How can you miss it if you read/check their posts every week instead of just count and pay, right? It's been going on for such a long time.


If anyone is in contact with Carollzinha, please send them a link to this thread. I see they haven't logged into their account for over a week now.

Can someone tell my such a user shouldn't be tagged (negatively) for spamming. I mean, they are literary cheating the campaign that is hiring them by recycling posts. This is similar to some chap who decided to make reserve posts prior to pay day deadline, and then he would later edit the posts to make the longer so that they can be counted

I think such people should be tagged, and I am about to do so. Just seeking out some opinions from other members.

A few years ago, spammers like QueenVera would not be tolerated for long.
Do you remember the @Limx dev's case, when he was banned because he reposted the same post, although it was an announcing update or an airdrop?

At least he is honest about it. When you had to post in the different topics with the same context over and over again for weeks, you’ll be eventually doing the same thing. By “same thing” I don’t mean what he did exactly, we all are doing a variant of what he is doing.

Maybe we don’t copy paste our old posts like him but we are pretty much doing the same thing when we write another post about:

“Which alts are the best?”
“Who will win the presidential race?”
“How to become a good trader?”
“Are meme coins gud?”
…

It is because we already talked about these topics a million times before but we still see another topic asking the same thing :d

Yes, there have been cases of many members of that campaign who were breaking the rules of the forum and doing things which this community doesn't accept. However, it's not possible for single person to look after all of those things and that's why spammers do their spamming activity without any fear.


I believe a large campaign like Stake should have more than one manager or a manager with some assistants. There are some good members who are also part of that campaign but it's also a fact that some members of that campaign are taking advantage of the manger who's hiring them as participants.

It's a quite hard job to manage a campaign where most members have to make so many posts and for a single person it's not possible to go through all of the members and their posts to verify that are those posts legit or those are recycled ones or are AI generated ones.

Good find morvillz7z.
I don't understand how any campaign manager is accepting and keeping participants like this  
This member earned neutral feedback from me, but I think that repeated spam behavior like this deserves even negative feedback and removal from all signature campaigns.