Game Protect flag - page 12. | Bitcointalksearch.org

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: game-protect on October 11, 2019, 06:27:42 AM

It meanwhile turnned out that h4ns is lying!!!

No, he didn't lie about anything. He published all that information in his first post on the matter.

The only one lying here is you. You said you would refund your client. You failed to do this. You (game-protect, or Game Protect of game-protect.com) are a scammer.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Quote from: NeuroticFish on September 09, 2019, 01:59:38 PM

I guess it worth adding it here, at least for the record.
I've just read a scam accusation against gp: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/game-protectcom-did-not-refund-my-money-and-stopped-replying-to-my-emails-5183189 (and a copy http://archive.is/H1Q4h )

It meanwhile turnned out that h4ns is lying!!!

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: game-protect on September 20, 2019, 10:26:34 AM

Quote from: Astargath on September 20, 2019, 09:55:49 AM

''A blind person always will claim that it has not seen any evidence! Cheesy

'' So, you? You keep claiming there is no evidence of you scamming when there is plenty.

Game Protect always refer to evidence based on real world rules and regulations and not based on extreme mental illness and or brain deadness!

A mental healthy person is not able to hear the voices or see the fictive proof extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts can see! Roll Eyes

How are you going to use Lawyers when your English is garbage? Are you claiming the guy accusing you fabricated the evidence? Or what exactly is your defense here? because I'm confused.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Quote from: Astargath on September 20, 2019, 09:55:49 AM

''A blind person always will claim that it has not seen any evidence! Cheesy

'' So, you? You keep claiming there is no evidence of you scamming when there is plenty.

Game Protect always refer to evidence based on real world rules and regulations and not based on extreme mental illness and or brain deadness!

A mental healthy person is not able to hear the voices or see the fictive proof extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts can see! Roll Eyes

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: game-protect on September 20, 2019, 09:47:16 AM

Quote from: actmyname on September 20, 2019, 09:40:06 AM

Quote from: game-protect on September 20, 2019, 09:21:02 AM

Who is the online casino claims enforcement expert, you or I?

Well, you certainly haven't shown any evidence of you being an "online casino claims enforcement expert" yet.

Only because you are too blind to see the evidence does not mean that I have not shown evidence! Roll Eyes

A blind person always will claim that it has not seen any evidence! Cheesy

Or maybe your eyes have seen the evidence, but your mental disorder hindered you to understand it?

''A blind person always will claim that it has not seen any evidence! Cheesy

'' So, you? You keep claiming there is no evidence of you scamming when there is plenty.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Quote from: actmyname on September 20, 2019, 09:40:06 AM

Quote from: game-protect on September 20, 2019, 09:21:02 AM

Who is the online casino claims enforcement expert, you or I?

Well, you certainly haven't shown any evidence of you being an "online casino claims enforcement expert" yet.

Only because you are too blind to see the evidence does not mean that I have not shown evidence! Roll Eyes

A blind person always will claim that it has not seen any evidence! Cheesy

Or maybe your eyes have seen the evidence, but your mental disorder hindered you to understand it?

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: game-protect on September 20, 2019, 09:21:02 AM

Who is the online casino claims enforcement expert, you or I?

Well, you certainly haven't shown any evidence of you being an "online casino claims enforcement expert" yet.

Pragmatically, you are as much of an "online casino claims enforcement expert" as I am.

Quote from: game-protect on September 20, 2019, 09:21:02 AM

Real world court, police, lawyers or private detectives do not spam its signature for cents. Roll Eyes

You do not know this and are stating an opinion.

Quote from: game-protect on September 20, 2019, 09:21:02 AM

Therefore your opinion is not worth 5 cents! Cheesy

It is your opinion that my opinion is not worth 5 cents.

This may or may not be true, but the answer to the question "is my opinion worth 5 cents" depends more on what my opinion is, what the topic is about, and what the value of 5 cents is.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Who is the online casino claims enforcement expert, you or I?

Real world court, police, lawyers or private detectives do not spam its signature for cents. Roll Eyes

Therefore your opinion is not worth 5 cents! Cheesy

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: game-protect on September 19, 2019, 07:05:10 AM

The claimant needed to sign a NDA Roll Eyes

And there it is. The ever-expected excuse.

It is pretty easy to come up with a couple dozen reasons as to why you can't provide some information: you want to imply, "the onus is on the accuser," but of course when we look at the bigger picture, what we see is that someone is claiming you helped them... without any evidence.

This means that pragmatically, we know not whether the user in question is you, me, or anyone that actually was helped by you.

You might say that this is similar to the scam accusation, but the issue is that by ignoring a scam accusation rather than positive feedback you are merely showing a selective bias against any dissent. This leads me to assume that despite any scam accusations that have come out, are coming out, or will come out, you will refuse to answer them regardless of validity.

That, in my opinion, is not behavior indicative of a professional service.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

The claimant needed to sign a NDA Roll Eyes

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: Foxpup on September 15, 2019, 10:19:19 PM

Good for you. I'm sure you won't mind telling us the name of the casino in question, or the exact means by which you got your BTC back, or any other little details that might back up your story.

Shame on you, Foxpup!

Of course the victim can't give out any personal details... that would be obviously compromising their information, and we can't have that. Roll Eyes

(there's always an excuse)

Foxpup

legendary

Activity: 4542

Merit: 3393

Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023

Quote from: Rooftop Sniper Rifle on September 15, 2019, 07:59:59 PM

gameprotect helped me get back my btc from a scam casino, see most posters here are paid by these scam casinos so of course they will defend them. GP is helping people and gambler shills are trying to bring him down

Good for you. I'm sure you won't mind telling us the name of the casino in question, or the exact means by which you got your BTC back, or any other little details that might back up your story.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Rooftop Sniper Rifle on September 15, 2019, 07:59:59 PM

gameprotect helped me get back my btc from a scam casino, see most posters here are paid by these scam casinos so of course they will defend them. GP is helping people and gambler shills are trying to bring him down

I was wondering who was behind this recent onslaught of weirdly-named noob accounts. Thank you for letting us know. You're still a piddly scammer with a net worth of about 200 euro.

Rooftop Sniper Rifle

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

gameprotect helped me get back my btc from a scam casino, see most posters here are paid by these scam casinos so of course they will defend them. GP is helping people and gambler shills are trying to bring him down

yogg

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 3158

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on September 10, 2019, 01:57:07 AM

Quote from: yogg on September 09, 2019, 02:14:35 PM

This claim still needs some development, but the OP of that thread would be able/allowed to open a type 1 flag against GP.
With sufficient support, it would give GP the "!!!" tag next to his trust score, and show a red notice (instead of neutral yellow) above his threads.

You are wrong, as type 1 flag would not give GP this tag "!!!" you are talking about. GP already has 2 active type 1 flags on his profile.

Hah.
Thanks for rectifying my post.

I thought type 1 flags were the ones for the breach of agreement, and the type 3 the ones based off forum users opinions.
Mistaken both, but anyway, OP of that other thread can give him the type 3 flag. Based off elements I'll support that as well.

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

Quote from: yogg on September 09, 2019, 02:14:35 PM

This claim still needs some development, but the OP of that thread would be able/allowed to open a type 1 flag against GP.
With sufficient support, it would give GP the "!!!" tag next to his trust score, and show a red notice (instead of neutral yellow) above his threads.

You are wrong, as type 1 flag would not give GP this tag "!!!" you are talking about. GP already has 2 active type 1 flags on his profile.

You would have to go with starting a contract violation flag, which would give the user a " Trade with extreme caution" and "!!!" sign on his profile.

But there is a thing to be followed , to start such type of flag against anyone.

Quote from: theymos on June 11, 2019, 11:09:00 PM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on June 11, 2019, 11:08:31 PM

Just to confirm, you are not allowed to create a contract violation flag unless you were personally harmed, correct?

Correct.

So, if the victim in the mentioned thread would do so, it would be better.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: yogg on September 09, 2019, 02:14:35 PM

This claim still needs some development, but the OP of that thread would be able/allowed to open a type 1 flag against GP.
With sufficient support, it would give GP the "!!!" tag next to his trust score, and show a red notice (instead of neutral yellow) above his threads.

Yep, that's what I thought. If that claim is genuine, that OP has to be helped in this direction (flag).

Quote from: yogg on September 09, 2019, 02:14:35 PM

GP is a trickster. But yeah, scams are not moderated. Undecided