Game Protect flag - page 22. | Bitcointalksearch.org

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: game-protect on July 26, 2019, 04:05:13 PM

Quote from: misleaded victim to lawyer

Also u have read information online that suggests gameprotect itself if a scam (she refers to bitcointalk.org).

Then you won't mind sharing lawyer's contact details so someone could contact lawyer and ask them about full flush poker litigation, which, according to your website, started 3 years ago (http://archive.is/fhi5x)?

Why don't you address this:

Quote from: Jenniraye88 on March 26, 2019, 09:27:32 AM

Quote

Why don't you contact lawyer, I suppose you got contact info of lawyer which is running your case.

No i don't have any contact detail's for anyone other than Game Protect - and that's just an e-mail address. No name, number, post address at all.

I have kept all the e-mails i have including one from Game Protect confirming they have received the 5% of my claim up front and would start with "legal proceedings". I suppose i will just have to keep on waiting...

You edited your post:

Quote from: ?? on ??

1) You did not send anything from your pocket.

2) As soon as there is an update you will be instantly informed. If there is no update, you will not be informed, simple. I understand that you see only your case, but we handle hundreds of cases.

3) In legal proceedings 3 months is nothing and enforce claims from Curacao fake licensed casinos can be time-consuming.

Unedited post: http://archive.is/hFglD

Is this how your service works, someone sends you money and they can't talk to lawyer who represents their case?

yogg

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 3158

Quote from: game-protect on July 26, 2019, 04:05:13 PM

Quote from: misleaded victim to lawyer

Also u have read information online that suggests gameprotect itself if a scam (she refers to bitcointalk.org).

That "victim" may not be that wrong here !
There is a lot of informations suggesting game-protect is a scam; starting with the flag every new user and guest will see.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=435

If you like that read, wait until you get to the part where someone paid game-protect upfront a percentage of the "scammed amount" to represent the player.
(or "gave a donation", sorry me no talk coocoo fluently)

Guess what ? Money gone, no investigation, victim got slandered twice.

Do you really think some shady 3rd party service can protect you from your lacks of due diligence ?

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Quote from: misleaded victim to lawyer

Also u have read information online that suggests gameprotect itself if a scam (refers to bitcointalk.org).

Stedsm

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1273

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: xtraelv on July 26, 2019, 05:48:26 AM

Quote from: game-protect on July 24, 2019, 09:40:47 PM

Here is an example posted in a support ticket:

Quote from: misleaded victim

We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect (he refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here. bye

It appears that his clients struggle with grammar and spelling the same way that game-protect does. It is like it was written by the same person.

You don't have to be a brain dead to see their brains are just both mentally ill and they have brain dead brains. They should have to take a brain test before writing, it might come back positive for brain death! Cheesy

Think I might have to nominate myself for biggest troll.

Heck, that's too many of those "brain dead" here! Roll Eyes

I find it silly on GP's part to collaborate with the community with such idiotic arguments and that "child abuse" thing was still my favorite one. But, he believes we must contact him if we were scammed by an online casino? Why the fuck? He's got a delusional that he got such an Authority that he wants to help everyone and do public welfare jobs maybe? Go, join a Charity GP!

And very sorry nutlidah, but you still didn't beat GP here and he wins the "Troll of the Era Award".

xtraelv

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1926

฿ear ride on the rainbow slide

Quote from: game-protect on July 24, 2019, 09:40:47 PM

Here is an example posted in a support ticket:

Quote from: misleaded victim

We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect (he refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here. bye

It appears that his clients struggle with grammar and spelling the same way that game-protect does. It is like it was written by the same person.

babo

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 4343

The hacker spirit breaks any spell

Quote from: game-protect on July 25, 2019, 05:10:32 AM

~snip~

The schizophrenia of some bitcointalk accounts is surely limitless!

a person who writes false accusations is normal then?

you're just a piece of shit

you accuse for false 'child abuse' and talk of schizophrenia? REALLY?

you're just a piece of shit, and piece of shit will be erased

AB de Royse777

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 3878

Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com

Quote from: game-protect on July 25, 2019, 05:10:32 AM

~snip~

The schizophrenia of some bitcointalk accounts is surely limitless!

Your problem is that you do not see your hypocrisy. You are a liar, false accuser, stupid non-sense. I have no idea how you claim you are going to solve other's problems, protect others when you are not able to protect yourself and surely is failing to solve your own problems.

Stop pretending to be a savior. You are a complete package of nonsense and fake.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Quote from: actmyname on July 24, 2019, 09:59:00 PM

Typically, when people provide examples, they are used to support their argument rather than detract thereof but perhaps you are taking an avant-garde approach to defending yourself.

Why do not you support your claims?

Quote from: actmyname on July 24, 2019, 08:43:39 PM

Your lottery is a scam. QED.

Or even more interesting, why do not you put the proof on the table who and for how much my lottery scammed? Cheesy

The schizophrenia of some bitcointalk accounts is surely limitless!

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: game-protect on July 24, 2019, 09:53:22 PM

Quote from: actmyname on July 24, 2019, 09:49:10 PM

Where did they say that you were called a scammer, or a blackmailer?

In support tickets and emails.

I don't see those keywords in your example.

Typically, when people provide examples, they are used to support their argument rather than detract thereof but perhaps you are taking an avant-garde approach to defending yourself. I support your modern twisting of the orthodox but I don't think that we should deviate from the classics, especially on a forum like this one. After all, the ancestral roots have cemented themselves because they brought forth a strong foundation from which we have grown, and because of that, the basics and fundamentals are truly the most crucial part of the process. All modern twists are rooted in the originals and their development is fueled because of it. It would be rash to completely ignore them and plant a completely new tree: even quite disrespectful at that.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Quote from: actmyname on July 24, 2019, 09:49:10 PM

Where did they say that you were called a scammer, or a blackmailer?

In support tickets and emails.

Quote from: game-protect on July 24, 2019, 09:40:47 PM

Over the years several online casino victims wrote in the support tickets or emails that they read on bitcointalk.org negative things like Game Protect is a scammer or blackmailer and based on this they did not give the order to enforce its claims!

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: game-protect on July 24, 2019, 09:40:47 PM

Over the years several victims wrote in the support tickets or emails that they read on bitcointalk.org negative things like Game Protect is a scammer or blackmailer and based on this they did not give the order to enforce its claims!

Here is a support ticket example:

"We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect (he refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here.
bye"

cat post | grep (scammer|blackmailer) yielded no results.

Even in your own examples they don't align with what you're saying. Where did they say that you were called a scammer, or a blackmailer?

Your secondary remark about "high-risk" feedback relies on the first.

game-protect

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 507

Quote from: bones261 on July 23, 2019, 08:38:37 PM

Also, his class action lawsuit is going to have an uphill battle convincing the court that our warning against him caused damages to other people. He will have to establish that the warning flags and negative feedback deterred individuals from seeking his services and that his services were more likely than not to recover the funds for them.

Over the years several online casino victims wrote in the support tickets or emails that they read on bitcointalk.org negative things like Game Protect is a scammer or blackmailer and based on this they did not give the order to enforce its claims!

Until recently bitcointalk.org publicly warned that some bitcointalk users strongly believe that Game Protect is a scammer! Only recently it changed to "high-risk".

Here is an example posted in a support ticket:

Quote from: misleaded victim to Game Protect

We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect ( refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here. bye

Lafu

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 3213

Guess that falls under hardcore abuse at the feeback system !

and there are more of that replys.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: hilariousetc on July 24, 2019, 05:32:37 AM

but there's never really been anything concrete presented

There is something in Meta https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/posting-deceptive-hyperlinks-to-gain-traffic-3112348, however, some posts are missing from forum.

Quote from: hilariousetc on July 24, 2019, 08:33:13 AM

Quote from: AdolfinWolf on July 24, 2019, 08:21:55 AM

Did he himself actually remove the feedback about abusing children or did an admin/moderator interfere? Just curious.

No idea. He either removed it himself or theymos did.

Is removed trust feedback stored somewhere?

Latest mental gymnastic:

Quote from: ?? on ??

If the definition for a red flag is "high risk of losing money" why do not all the casinos promoted on bitcointalk.org get a red flag? Cheesy

Are you able to see the schizophrenia? Game Protect is not a casino and victims can not lose money!

hilariousetc

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 3060

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: AdolfinWolf on July 24, 2019, 08:21:55 AM

Quote from: hilariousetc on July 24, 2019, 05:32:37 AM

Someone temp banned him from all the spam after he went crazy, but as you can see he reappeared yesterday.

Did he himself actually remove the feedback about abusing children or did an admin/moderator interfere? Just curious.

No idea. He either removed it himself or theymos did.

AdolfinWolf

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1427

Quote from: hilariousetc on July 24, 2019, 05:32:37 AM

Someone temp banned him from all the spam after he went crazy, but as you can see he reappeared yesterday.

Did he himself actually remove the feedback about abusing children or did an admin/moderator interfere? Just curious.

Substratra has a special place in game-protect's heart it seems Tongue

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=874254;page=sent;offset=50

hilariousetc

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 3060

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: Initscri on July 16, 2019, 03:07:20 PM

Quote from: Hhampuz on July 16, 2019, 11:05:37 AM

Quote from: actmyname on July 16, 2019, 11:02:54 AM

Not banned. Signature still there and they aren't shown as banned on BPIP.

Looks like they're just taking a break - maybe finally veering off the forum and now into sanity?

Depends on the ban I guess? When I got a 7-day ban my signature was still there.

Don't worry, we'll know the minute he gets back.

Someone temp banned him from all the spam after he went crazy, but as you can see he reappeared yesterday. I've had lots of complaints about this guy over the years and he sure seems shady but there's never really been anything concrete presented other than him being annoying. It's likely his business model is to just harass companies in the hope that they'll pay him something to leave them alone, and people have accused him of extortion before, which is what that would be if it was the case, but when I asked for proof of extortion ie has he explicitly asked them for money then nothing has really been given. On the flipside, a lot of these companies probably don't have licenses to operate in some of the countries they do so that's his level of attack so there's probably not much that can be done about his business practises unless he is breaking the law himself and trying to extort people.

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Quote from: bones261 on July 23, 2019, 08:38:37 PM

Quote from: Initscri on July 23, 2019, 08:26:23 PM

Well, looks like there's a new set of negative feedback today lol.

Honestly wondering when there is going to be put a stop to this. I have 10 now from GP alone.

"is extremely mentally ill" and threatening a lawsuit, well, that's mature.

https://i.imgur.com/2VDWkay.png
https://i.imgur.com/MGS4W2E.png

Well, this threat and accusation that we are all mentally ill is slightly better then accusing us all of abusing children. Roll Eyes

Also, I hope he learned his lesson from his little break not to go around spamming the sig campaign threads with accusations.

Well, apparently not.

Still wanting to know if it's confirmed that he got a temp ban or not. If so, who the hell get's a temp ban for spamming, gets unbanned, and then continues to spam trust.

He knows he gets away w/ bloody murder when it comes to the trust abuse, that's how cocky he is. Mods should definitely make a stance on this. I know they don't want to interfere/modify trust, but nonetheless, he's clearly that arrogant about it.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: Initscri on July 23, 2019, 08:26:23 PM

Well, looks like there's a new set of negative feedback today lol.

Honestly wondering when there is going to be put a stop to this. I have 10 now from GP alone.

"is extremely mentally ill" and threatening a lawsuit, well, that's mature.

https://i.imgur.com/2VDWkay.png
https://i.imgur.com/MGS4W2E.png

Well, this threat and accusation that we are all mentally ill is slightly better then accusing us all of abusing children. Roll Eyes

Also, I hope he learned his lesson from his little break not to go around spamming the sig campaign threads with accusations. Also, his class action lawsuit is going to have an uphill battle convincing the court that our warning against him caused damages to other people. He will have to establish that the warning flags and negative feedback deterred individuals from seeking his services and that his services were more likely than not to recover the funds for them.

Initscri

hero member

Activity: 1582

Merit: 759

Well, looks like there's a new set of negative feedback today lol.

Honestly wondering when there is going to be put a stop to this. I have 10 now from GP alone.

"is extremely mentally ill" and threatening a lawsuit, well, that's mature.

https://i.imgur.com/2VDWkay.png
https://i.imgur.com/MGS4W2E.png

Topic: Game Protect flag - page 22. (Read 7234 times)