The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
I already received the highest trust rating someone can get on bitcointalk and thanks a lot to the community.
I think it is a good idea to give flags to show to the community that someone is not a scammer
Sent 3 emails within 3 weeks and never received a response!
If offenders think they can get away with ignoring Game Protect, I can inform they are wrong.
What game-protect messaged one of our players (shared with their permission):
The larger the casino is (for example stake / primedice or bitcasino) , the higher is the chance they will settle Because otherwise they will lose unlike more And as I already informed, the owners like Tim and Miroslav and Stunna likely also committed the criminal offenses of tax evasion in their countries of residence! Or do you really think that they informed the tax office of their home country about the exact amount they collected from players? And if they let it go to legal enforcement, they are at high risk of getting sued for AML laws breach in Curacao and in the country where their physical office is Why would they take all the risk for 30 or for 50 BTC? I mean the money laundering they committed can bring some years in prison as well Money laundering in the height of bitcoins worth $ millions This can bring some years prison time And btw, the managing director and licensor in Curacao is also liable. And 1668/JAZ made uncountable millions And 8048/JAZ as well. These are the 2 big You want to win and risk your bitcoins with - 1% or even more expected value, so you should definitely risk your bitcons with + 50% expected value I already gave you a lot of info, but I know unlike more, so I am almost confident that they will settle and if not latest lose at the court 1668/JAZ was also wrong, but they were stubborn, until they got sentenced
What you are offering is blackmail/racketeering as a service, not only is this highly unethical but I strongly question the legality of what you are doing. You are making the claim that these websites are "probably breaking X law" so you can blackmail them for money back to keep quiet? I have no interest in responding to your emails and you can consider this a written ban from using Primedice/Stake.
3/5 of the sites you feature on your homepage are members of the crypto gambling foundation. One of them that isn't is "betonline" which is very widely known to be a scam site, video evidence exists of them
rigging games. If you continue to fill up this thread with your bullshit you can be certain I will make certain no website in this entire industry wants your business. The fact that you aren't banned from this forum is a travesty, you promote known scam sites, you prey on players who are put in a bad position by online casinos and then try to gouge them for an extra 10% of what they were scammed for and best of all you pretend to do so with the most ethical intentions. The worst part of your presence on this forum is legitimate complaints and attempts to rectify issues are flooded out by your non-sense spam which makes it easier for casinos to ignore issues entirely.
Go ask theymos to make positive-flags.
