Topic: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.3.8: 30Mh/s (Ethash) on RX 480! - page 133. (Read 214410 times)
There seems to be a problem with packaging. Let me see...
zawawa, can you add short instruction for compiling your code? I just newbee in that...
I just uploaded the first alpha version for testing purposes:
https://github.com/zawawawa/GatelessGateSharp
Feedback is much appreciated. Enjoy!
https://github.com/zawawawa/GatelessGateSharp
Feedback is much appreciated. Enjoy!
keep getting wrong ethereum address
and if i try nicehash i get failed to initialize the miner
I just uploaded the first alpha version for testing purposes:
https://github.com/zawawawa/GatelessGateSharp
Feedback is much appreciated. Enjoy!
https://github.com/zawawawa/GatelessGateSharp
Feedback is much appreciated. Enjoy!
May I ask when you plan to release it and can you also give us some details?
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore
.
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore
. If you are really curious, you could build it yourself with VS 2013:
https://github.com/zawawawa/GatelessGateSharp
Although you can use it only with Ethash and NiceHash at this point,
I am planning to add all the relevant algos as well as support for major pools.
The DEVFEE will probably be 1%, but it will be waived for some pools.
I will take my time to polish the miner this time around.
I hope to announce the first release within a month or so.
In the meantime, I will keep updating the GitHub repository.
We will see.
Waiting!
I can add neoscrypt and dual-mining for sure, but I don't know about the no fee option.
Honestly, I was not making much money with the original GG, and I don't expect I would be making a whole lot with GG# either.
I just need the DEVFEE to cover the cost of development, including hardware for testing. I hope you understand.
Gateless Gate # now supports the following major pools: NiceHash, ethermine.org, ethpool.org, DwarfPool, and Nanopool. I must say C# is surprisingly usable for miner development. The UI is coming along quite nicely, and there hasn't been a major performance hit.
May I ask when you plan to release it and can you also give us some details?
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore.
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore
. If you are really curious, you could build it yourself with VS 2013:
https://github.com/zawawawa/GatelessGateSharp
Although you can use it only with Ethash and NiceHash at this point,
I am planning to add all the relevant algos as well as support for major pools.
The DEVFEE will probably be 1%, but it will be waived for some pools.
I will take my time to polish the miner this time around.
I hope to announce the first release within a month or so.
In the meantime, I will keep updating the GitHub repository.
We will see.
Waiting!
May I ask when you plan to release it and can you also give us some details?
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore.
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore
. If you are really curious, you could build it yourself with VS 2013:
https://github.com/zawawawa/GatelessGateSharp
Although you can use it only with Ethash and NiceHash at this point,
I am planning to add all the relevant algos as well as support for major pools.
The DEVFEE will probably be 1%, but it will be waived for some pools.
I will take my time to polish the miner this time around.
I hope to announce the first release within a month or so.
In the meantime, I will keep updating the GitHub repository.
We will see.
Hi
GatelessGateSharp without neoscrypt?
If you may, to add please
Best Regards
May I ask when you plan to release it and can you also give us some details?
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore.
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore
. If you are really curious, you could build it yourself with VS 2013:
https://github.com/zawawawa/GatelessGateSharp
Although you can use it only with Ethash and NiceHash at this point,
I am planning to add all the relevant algos as well as support for major pools.
The DEVFEE will probably be 1%, but it will be waived for some pools.
I will take my time to polish the miner this time around.
I hope to announce the first release within a month or so.
In the meantime, I will keep updating the GitHub repository.
We will see.
is this miner designed only for AMD GPUs?
I wanted to try gateless gate for FTC mining, downloaded this version: gatelessgate-0.1.3-pre6b-win64
after that changed only conf for my pool and executed. This occured:
[22:27:42] Started Gateless Gate v0.1.3-pre6
[22:27:42] * using Jansson 2.9
[22:27:42] Loaded configuration file gatelessgate-Feathercoin.conf
[22:27:42] clDevicesNum returned error, no GPUs usable
[22:27:42] All devices disabled, cannot mine!
running on: i3 3220, 10GB ram, GTX1060 6G, Win7Pro64b, Nvidia driver 384.76
Other ccminers are working great (klausT, Alexis, ...). Only this yours not. I tried every algo bat file provided in your archive but it is not able to detect my GPU. Where could be a problem?
I wanted to try gateless gate for FTC mining, downloaded this version: gatelessgate-0.1.3-pre6b-win64
after that changed only conf for my pool and executed. This occured:
[22:27:42] Started Gateless Gate v0.1.3-pre6
[22:27:42] * using Jansson 2.9
[22:27:42] Loaded configuration file gatelessgate-Feathercoin.conf
[22:27:42] clDevicesNum returned error, no GPUs usable
[22:27:42] All devices disabled, cannot mine!
running on: i3 3220, 10GB ram, GTX1060 6G, Win7Pro64b, Nvidia driver 384.76
Other ccminers are working great (klausT, Alexis, ...). Only this yours not. I tried every algo bat file provided in your archive but it is not able to detect my GPU. Where could be a problem?
I won't be supporting the original GG anymore. Sorry!
is this miner designed only for AMD GPUs?
I wanted to try gateless gate for FTC mining, downloaded this version: gatelessgate-0.1.3-pre6b-win64
after that changed only conf for my pool and executed. This occured:
[22:27:42] Started Gateless Gate v0.1.3-pre6
[22:27:42] * using Jansson 2.9
[22:27:42] Loaded configuration file gatelessgate-Feathercoin.conf
[22:27:42] clDevicesNum returned error, no GPUs usable
[22:27:42] All devices disabled, cannot mine!
running on: i3 3220, 10GB ram, GTX1060 6G, Win7Pro64b, Nvidia driver 384.76
Other ccminers are working great (klausT, Alexis, ...). Only this yours not. I tried every algo bat file provided in your archive but it is not able to detect my GPU. Where could be a problem?
I wanted to try gateless gate for FTC mining, downloaded this version: gatelessgate-0.1.3-pre6b-win64
after that changed only conf for my pool and executed. This occured:
[22:27:42] Started Gateless Gate v0.1.3-pre6
[22:27:42] * using Jansson 2.9
[22:27:42] Loaded configuration file gatelessgate-Feathercoin.conf
[22:27:42] clDevicesNum returned error, no GPUs usable
[22:27:42] All devices disabled, cannot mine!
running on: i3 3220, 10GB ram, GTX1060 6G, Win7Pro64b, Nvidia driver 384.76
Other ccminers are working great (klausT, Alexis, ...). Only this yours not. I tried every algo bat file provided in your archive but it is not able to detect my GPU. Where could be a problem?
May I ask when you plan to release it and can you also give us some details?
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore.
Wouldn't mind giving 1% to you instead of Claymore
. Just to be clear, the new version of GG is still under development.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
Just hope it wont be as buggy as excavator on AMD. I just couldn't get to work because of the phymem, just hang my pc every time
I know... To be honest with you, that feature was too experimental for production use.
I am working on the new version of GG as a redemption, so to speak. We will see.
I see new miner! Its beautiful. Please, if you have time, compiling version for Windows x64
Where? Give a link please! Or a screenshot at least...
Just to be clear, the new version of GG is still under development.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
Just hope it wont be as buggy as excavator on AMD. I just couldn't get to work because of the phymem, just hang my pc every time
I know... To be honest with you, that feature was too experimental for production use.
I am working on the new version of GG as a redemption, so to speak. We will see.
I see new miner! Its beautiful. Please, if you have time, compiling version for Windows x64
Where? Give a link please! Or a screenshot at least...
Just to be clear, the new version of GG is still under development.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
Just hope it wont be as buggy as excavator on AMD. I just couldn't get to work because of the phymem, just hang my pc every time
I know... To be honest with you, that feature was too experimental for production use.
I am working on the new version of GG as a redemption, so to speak. We will see.
I see new miner! Its beautiful. Please, if you have time, compiling version for Windows x64
Just to be clear, the new version of GG is still under development.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
Just hope it wont be as buggy as excavator on AMD. I just couldn't get to work because of the phymem, just hang my pc every time
I know... To be honest with you, that feature was too experimental for production use.
I am working on the new version of GG as a redemption, so to speak. We will see.
Just to be clear, the new version of GG is still under development.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
Just hope it wont be as buggy as excavator on AMD. I just couldn't get to work because of the phymem, just hang my pc every time
Just to be clear, the new version of GG is still under development.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.
zawawa, can't you say how in gg (or sgminer) force to not initialize 1 of cards? F.e. if i have 2 cards even with option --devices miner initializes both of cards and load kernels for them but on 1 cards just stay OFF.
I want to mine though gg miner 1 algo on 1st card and 2nd algo via other miner on 2nd card. But gg initialize 2nd card and reduce speed on other miner.
I want to mine though gg miner 1 algo on 1st card and 2nd algo via other miner on 2nd card. But gg initialize 2nd card and reduce speed on other miner.
I don't think that's possible with GG or sgminer.
I am rewriting GG in C# now, and I will make sure to fix the problem.
GG in C# .exe for windows 
Jump to: