Topic: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.3.8: 30Mh/s (Ethash) on RX 480! - page 147. (Read 214410 times)

Quote from: zawawa on April 01, 2017, 04:23:34 AM

Hi, can I mine with GG some forks of ETH or only ETH is supported? And GG it's for both AMD & NVIDIA cards?

Somebody reported in this thread it's possible.

Probably not every ETH fork can be mine by GG, trying ti mine some fork with gtx1060 and getting an error

[16:17:33] Probing for an alive pool
[16:17:34] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool 213.154.202.174.
[16:17:34] Startup Pool No = 0
[16:17:34] 213.154.202.174 difficulty changed to 0.466
[16:17:34] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174
[16:17:35] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:35] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:36] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:36] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:37] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:37] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:38] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:39] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:49] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[16:17:55] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174
[16:18:58] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174

So what is the problem can be with it?

Well, I need to know, at the very least, which coin you were trying to mine and which pool you were trying to connect.

Hi, zawawa
I'm trying to mine this coin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-arabianchain-dubaicoin-dbix-smart-contracts-from-dubai-to-the-world-1811194, the pool is http://213.154.202.174:5550
May be I'm doing something wrong?
I'll try to mine some other ETH fork, it's became an interesting to myself)

Here is batch
@echo off
@set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
@set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
@set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
@set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
@set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
gatelessgate.exe --gpu-platform 1 -k ethash-new -o stratum+tcp://213.154.202.174:5554 -u wallet.rig -p x --xintensity 4620 --worksize 192 --gpu-threads 2 --no-extranonce
pause

Tried to mine this coin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annmusic-musicoin-blockchain-upgrades-to-v30quantitative-tightening-1776113 with pool http://musicoin.nomnom.technology/#/, mining with GG don't even started.
Seems that GG do not working with different ETH forks or maybe some of them.

lupanar

sr. member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 252

Quote from: lupanar on April 01, 2017, 04:20:25 AM

Quote from: lupanar on April 01, 2017, 04:20:25 AM

Hi, can I mine with GG some forks of ETH or only ETH is supported? And GG it's for both AMD & NVIDIA cards?

Somebody reported in this thread it's possible.

Probably not every ETH fork can be mine by GG, trying ti mine some fork with gtx1060 and getting an error

[16:17:33] Probing for an alive pool
[16:17:34] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool 213.154.202.174.
[16:17:34] Startup Pool No = 0
[16:17:34] 213.154.202.174 difficulty changed to 0.466
[16:17:34] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174
[16:17:35] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:35] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:36] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:36] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:37] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:37] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:38] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:39] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:49] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[16:17:55] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174
[16:18:58] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174

So what is the problem can be with it?

Well, I need to know, at the very least, which coin you were trying to mine and which pool you were trying to connect.

Hi, zawawa
I'm trying to mine this coin https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-arabianchain-dubaicoin-dbix-smart-contracts-from-dubai-to-the-world-1811194, the pool is http://213.154.202.174:5550
May be I'm doing something wrong?
I'll try to mine some other ETH fork, it's became an interesting to myself)

Here is batch
@echo off
@set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
@set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
@set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
@set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
@set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
gatelessgate.exe --gpu-platform 1 -k ethash-new -o stratum+tcp://213.154.202.174:5554 -u wallet.rig -p x --xintensity 4620 --worksize 192 --gpu-threads 2 --no-extranonce
pause

zawawa

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 304

Miner Developer

Hi, can I mine with GG some forks of ETH or only ETH is supported? And GG it's for both AMD & NVIDIA cards?

Somebody reported in this thread it's possible.

Probably not every ETH fork can be mine by GG, trying ti mine some fork with gtx1060 and getting an error

[16:17:33] Probing for an alive pool
[16:17:34] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool 213.154.202.174.
[16:17:34] Startup Pool No = 0
[16:17:34] 213.154.202.174 difficulty changed to 0.466
[16:17:34] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174
[16:17:35] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:35] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:36] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:36] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:37] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:37] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:38] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:39] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:49] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[16:17:55] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174
[16:18:58] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174

So what is the problem can be with it?

Well, I need to know, at the very least, which coin you were trying to mine and which pool you were trying to connect.

lupanar

sr. member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 252

Hi, can I mine with GG some forks of ETH or only ETH is supported? And GG it's for both AMD & NVIDIA cards?

Somebody reported in this thread it's possible.

Probably not every ETH fork can be mine by GG, trying ti mine some fork with gtx1060 and getting an error

[16:17:33] Probing for an alive pool
[16:17:34] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool 213.154.202.174.
[16:17:34] Startup Pool No = 0
[16:17:34] 213.154.202.174 difficulty changed to 0.466
[16:17:34] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174
[16:17:35] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:35] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:36] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:36] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:37] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:37] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:38] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:39] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[16:17:49] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[16:17:55] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174
[16:18:58] Rejected untracked stratum share from 213.154.202.174

So what is the problem can be with it?

zawawa

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 304

Miner Developer

Quote from: zawawa on March 31, 2017, 02:38:04 PM

Hi, can I mine with GG some forks of ETH or only ETH is supported? And GG it's for both AMD & NVIDIA cards?

Somebody reported in this thread it's possible.

lupanar

sr. member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 252

Hi, can I mine with GG some forks of ETH or only ETH is supported? And GG it's for both AMD & NVIDIA cards?

zawawa

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 304

Miner Developer

Ah, I see... There is a patch for sgminer-gm and nicehash. That should work with suprnova, then.

SunStruck

sr. member

Activity: 676

Merit: 250

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 02:07:20 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

Look like im getting 28.8 vs 29.9 on claymore. Not sure if its running your ASM version though.

The ASM version is only for Ellesmere for now. I will prepare binaries for other cards shortly.

Yea I have Ellsemere cards but its loading the normal .bin kernels. I did remove the pre-built .bin and built new kernal binaries using ethash-new.cl in /binary-kernal by moving it to /kernal and that bumped up the speed to 29.2, but still a bit short from claymore.

The current version was working fine with Ubuntu, though. Strange, strange...
I just pushed a fix to the repo anyway.

got an update from the suprnova front.

just had a similar problems with claymore miner and he has a special mode to mine on suprnova

Code:

-esm Ethereum Stratum mode. 0 - eth-proxy mode (for example, dwarpool.com), 1 - qtminer mode (for example, ethpool.org),
2 - miner-proxy mode (for example, coinotron.com), 3 - nicehash mode. 0 is default.

And for suprnova it is the nicehash mode (-esm 3)

Maybe that helps digging further why gg-miner doesnt work with it.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 03:19:41 PM

Quote from: laik2 on March 31, 2017, 02:33:11 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 02:07:20 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

Look like im getting 28.8 vs 29.9 on claymore. Not sure if its running your ASM version though.

The ASM version is only for Ellesmere for now. I will prepare binaries for other cards shortly.

Yea I have Ellsemere cards but its loading the normal .bin kernels. I did remove the pre-built .bin and built new kernal binaries using ethash-new.cl in /binary-kernal by moving it to /kernal and that bumped up the speed to 29.2, but still a bit short from claymore.

For me it's quite the opposite...using 2 threads gains additional +0.3/0.4 but too many hw errors.
As you can see in the picture 29.42(1 thread) does gg vs 29.8 on claymore vs 30 (2 threads gg).
EDIT: Did some timings mods and now hw errors are acceptable ~1/2 every minute.

Your running 4.10 kernel...im on the stock 4.4. I think thats where the difference is from.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B72yKpOokCMcVnV5LWNMS2ltYmM
I've uploaded some of my kernels. 4.10/4.11 are tested and working fine.
Just remember to update only opencl packages from amdgpu-pro 16.60.
Ditto about the asm ...

jstefanop

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1400

Quote from: laik2 on March 31, 2017, 02:33:11 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 02:07:20 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

Look like im getting 28.8 vs 29.9 on claymore. Not sure if its running your ASM version though.

The ASM version is only for Ellesmere for now. I will prepare binaries for other cards shortly.

Yea I have Ellsemere cards but its loading the normal .bin kernels. I did remove the pre-built .bin and built new kernal binaries using ethash-new.cl in /binary-kernal by moving it to /kernal and that bumped up the speed to 29.2, but still a bit short from claymore.

For me it's quite the opposite...using 2 threads gains additional +0.3/0.4 but too many hw errors.
As you can see in the picture 29.42(1 thread) does gg vs 29.8 on claymore vs 30 (2 threads gg).
EDIT: Did some timings mods and now hw errors are acceptable ~1/2 every minute.

Your running 4.10 kernel...im on the stock 4.4. I think thats where the difference is from.

jstefanop

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1400

Quote from: zawawa on March 31, 2017, 02:38:04 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 02:07:20 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

Look like im getting 28.8 vs 29.9 on claymore. Not sure if its running your ASM version though.

The ASM version is only for Ellesmere for now. I will prepare binaries for other cards shortly.

Yea I have Ellsemere cards but its loading the normal .bin kernels. I did remove the pre-built .bin and built new kernal binaries using ethash-new.cl in /binary-kernal by moving it to /kernal and that bumped up the speed to 29.2, but still a bit short from claymore.

The current version was working fine with Ubuntu, though. Strange, strange...
I just pushed a fix to the repo anyway.

It does load the .bins in binary-kernal, but how do you use the asm file? (ethash-new-gcn3-ocl20.asm)

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

If you manage to beat claymore zawawa, thats impressive work.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: zawawa on March 31, 2017, 02:38:04 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 02:07:20 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

Look like im getting 28.8 vs 29.9 on claymore. Not sure if its running your ASM version though.

The ASM version is only for Ellesmere for now. I will prepare binaries for other cards shortly.

Yea I have Ellsemere cards but its loading the normal .bin kernels. I did remove the pre-built .bin and built new kernal binaries using ethash-new.cl in /binary-kernal by moving it to /kernal and that bumped up the speed to 29.2, but still a bit short from claymore.

The current version was working fine with Ubuntu, though. Strange, strange...
I just pushed a fix to the repo anyway.

It is

It's currently hashing with constant 30Mh vs. 29.7 with claymore. But I still have to copy binary-kernel/* to $gatelessgate_install_dir/bin

I am still wondering how your temp/fans were working but mine are not...Did you start gg with root priv and mining GPU as main one?

zawawa

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 304

Miner Developer

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 02:07:20 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

Look like im getting 28.8 vs 29.9 on claymore. Not sure if its running your ASM version though.

The ASM version is only for Ellesmere for now. I will prepare binaries for other cards shortly.

Yea I have Ellsemere cards but its loading the normal .bin kernels. I did remove the pre-built .bin and built new kernal binaries using ethash-new.cl in /binary-kernal by moving it to /kernal and that bumped up the speed to 29.2, but still a bit short from claymore.

The current version was working fine with Ubuntu, though. Strange, strange...
I just pushed a fix to the repo anyway.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 02:07:20 PM

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

Look like im getting 28.8 vs 29.9 on claymore. Not sure if its running your ASM version though.

The ASM version is only for Ellesmere for now. I will prepare binaries for other cards shortly.

Yea I have Ellsemere cards but its loading the normal .bin kernels. I did remove the pre-built .bin and built new kernal binaries using ethash-new.cl in /binary-kernal by moving it to /kernal and that bumped up the speed to 29.2, but still a bit short from claymore.

For me it's quite the opposite...using 2 threads gains additional +0.3/0.4 but too many hw errors.
As you can see in the picture 29.42(1 thread) does gg vs 29.8 on claymore vs 30 (2 threads gg).
EDIT: Did some timings mods and now hw errors are acceptable ~1/2 every minute.

jstefanop

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1400

Quote from: jstefanop on March 31, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

Look like im getting 28.8 vs 29.9 on claymore. Not sure if its running your ASM version though.

The ASM version is only for Ellesmere for now. I will prepare binaries for other cards shortly.

Yea I have Ellsemere cards but its loading the normal .bin kernels. I did remove the pre-built .bin and built new kernal binaries using ethash-new.cl in /binary-kernal by moving it to /kernal and that bumped up the speed to 29.2, but still a bit short from claymore.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266