Author

Topic: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.3.8: 30Mh/s (Ethash) on RX 480! - page 146. (Read 214431 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
zawawa, thanks! What about nicehash ethereum comatibility?
And what is the optimal parameters for 280X and 270X?

On Claymore Dual miner 8.1 I got 15.6M on 280X and 11.6M on 270X with -etha 1,1 parameter (auto is -etha 0,0 wich is slower on my cards).
On sgminer-gm 5.5.5-gm-nicehash-8 with gg 0.1.3pre5 ethash-new kernel and bins I got only 15M on 280X and 10.7M on 270X.
Even with 1% fee Claymore is quicker on tahiti and pitcairn... Or I do wrong something?

Well, I don't maintain sgminer-gm-nicehash, so I have no idea.
gg miner is not work on nicehash. All shares rejecting. Because of it I use sg-miner with gg kernels and bins.
Please add support for nicehash ethereum.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
zawawa, thanks! What about nicehash ethereum comatibility?
And what is the optimal parameters for 280X and 270X?

On Claymore Dual miner 8.1 I got 15.6M on 280X and 11.6M on 270X with -etha 1,1 parameter (auto is -etha 0,0 wich is slower on my cards).
On sgminer-gm 5.5.5-gm-nicehash-8 with gg 0.1.3pre5 ethash-new kernel and bins I got only 15M on 280X and 10.7M on 270X.
Even with 1% fee Claymore is quicker on tahiti and pitcairn... Or I do wrong something?

Well, I don't maintain sgminer-gm-nicehash, so I have no idea.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
zawawa, thanks! What about nicehash ethereum comatibility?
And what is the optimal parameters for 280X and 270X?

On Claymore Dual miner 8.1 I got 15.6M on 280X and 11.6M on 270X with -etha 1,1 parameter (auto is -etha 0,0 wich is slower on my cards).
On sgminer-gm 5.5.5-gm-nicehash-8 with gg 0.1.3pre5 ethash-new kernel and bins I got only 15M on 280X and 10.7M on 270X.
Even with 1% fee Claymore is quicker on tahiti and pitcairn... Or I do wrong something?
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
i just uploaded a new pre-release with Ethash assembly kernels for all GCN1/GCN3 devices, including Fury, Fury X, and Nano:

https://github.com/zawawawa/gatelessgate/releases/tag/v0.1.3-pre5

The default settings in .bat/.sh files are improved as well.
As always, I really appreciate your donations and feedback. Enjoy!
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
How to minimize the hardware error? Got a lot HW.. using default intensity from github.
sr. member
Activity: 652
Merit: 266
With newer kernel HW error rate has increased a bit, Using your asm binary kernel reports 29.5 stable with less hw errors. When  I delete bins and ethash-new.cl generates binary kernel rate reaches 30.1 but with about 3.66 hw errors per minute average, last one was with 2.33 average.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
@nimy

You have to download the source from github and extract the binary-kernel, and Kernel folders to GG pre4 folder then I use the settings provided by OP. You should be able to get 28 - 29.

Note: I have been tweaking my cards bioses for quite some time now to achieve the speeds I have. I have been monitoring the timings thread to learn and nerdralph has a tool that got me a 1MH boost to my old mem shift timings. (I don't share my bioses as I believe everyone can take the time to learn if they want more.)
Thanks.. now i got 28mhs.. worth it.. next need to optimize my memory timings..
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 255
Yea, The miner was only reporting 27-30MH/s but pool side it was always more.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
asm version ethash-new results
Mem Type:Version:Brand:Model:GG:Claymore:Run Time:Core Clock:Mem Clock:
Hynix470 4GBPowercolorRed Devil28.5MH/s28.4MH/s24Hr11501925
Samsung470 4GBPowercolorRed Dragon31.3MH/s30.5MH/s24Hr11502125
Samsung470 4GBAsusStrix32.3MH/s31.8MH/s24Hr12402175

Hashrates are 24Hr average at ethpool not via the miner Program.
System specs
Intel core 2 duo
4GB ddr2
60GB SSD
Windows 10 Anniversary

Thanks for the report!
So GG is officially faster than Claymore's, albeit in a totally unexpected way, huh?
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 255
@nimy

You have to download the source from github and extract the binary-kernel, and Kernel folders to GG pre4 folder then I use the settings provided by OP. You should be able to get 28 - 29.

Note: I have been tweaking my cards bioses for quite some time now to achieve the speeds I have. I have been monitoring the timings thread to learn and nerdralph has a tool that got me a 1MH boost to my old mem shift timings. (I don't share my bioses as I believe everyone can take the time to learn if they want more.)
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
asm version ethash-new results
Mem Type:Version:Brand:Model:GG:Claymore:Run Time:Core Clock:Mem Clock:
Hynix470 4GBPowercolorRed Devil28.5MH/s28.4MH/s24Hr11501925
Samsung470 4GBPowercolorRed Dragon31.3MH/s30.5MH/s24Hr11502125
Samsung470 4GBAsusStrix32.3MH/s31.8MH/s24Hr12402175

Hashrates are 24Hr average at ethpool not via the miner Program.
System specs
Intel core 2 duo
4GB ddr2
60GB SSD
Windows 10 Anniversary
May i know your configuration bat file? mine rx480 only got below 28mhs
and how do i know i'm using the asm version ethash? i just download the precompiled binaries for windows.
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 255
asm version ethash-new results
Mem Type:Version:Brand:Model:GG:Claymore:Run Time:Core Clock:Mem Clock:
Hynix470 4GBPowercolorRed Devil28.5MH/s28.4MH/s24Hr11501925
Samsung470 4GBPowercolorRed Dragon31.3MH/s30.5MH/s24Hr11502125
Samsung470 4GBAsusStrix32.3MH/s31.8MH/s24Hr12402175

Hashrates are 24Hr average at ethpool not via the miner Program.
System specs
Intel core 2 duo
4GB ddr2
60GB SSD
Windows 10 Anniversary
member
Activity: 129
Merit: 10
Quote
[19:51:57] Building binary ethash-newEllesmeregw192l8.bin                   
[19:51:58] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024       

only nets like 24Mh

does that mean its not loading the asm? 
sr. member
Activity: 652
Merit: 266
Oh well, I will get to that when I have a chance.
The Ethash kernel is a tad faster now. I will push the change to the repo soon.
These Ethash kernels are so weird... Seemingly innocuous changes cause hardware errors for no obvious reasons.
It is so refreshing to work on a different kernel after tackling with Equihash for so long, though.
What is the situation with Equihash? You can increase speed close to Claymore miner results? Whan we can test it?

I am currently working on a new sorting algorithm.
It's hard to give you a definite time frame now, though.
Just to report Smiley

Quote
gatelessgate 0.1.3-pre4 - Started: [2017-03-31 22:57:51] - [1 day  02:59:13]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):29.18M (avg):29.98Mh/s | A:2612000000000  R:4000000000  HW:4074  WU:27.426/m
ST: 1  SS: 1  NB: 6639  LW: 123015  GF: 12  RF: 0
Quote
Block: 9c7fe57e...  Diff:0  Started: [01:57:11]  Best share: 70.8T
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0:                | 30.01M/29.98Mh/s | R:  0.2% HW:4075 WU:27.429/m xI:4620
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
Oh well, I will get to that when I have a chance.
The Ethash kernel is a tad faster now. I will push the change to the repo soon.
These Ethash kernels are so weird... Seemingly innocuous changes cause hardware errors for no obvious reasons.
It is so refreshing to work on a different kernel after tackling with Equihash for so long, though.
What is the situation with Equihash? You can increase speed close to Claymore miner results? Whan we can test it?

I am currently working on a new sorting algorithm.
It's hard to give you a definite time frame now, though.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
Oh well, I will get to that when I have a chance.
The Ethash kernel is a tad faster now. I will push the change to the repo soon.
These Ethash kernels are so weird... Seemingly innocuous changes cause hardware errors for no obvious reasons.
It is so refreshing to work on a different kernel after tackling with Equihash for so long, though.
What is the situation with Equihash? You can increase speed close to Claymore miner results? Whan we can test it?
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
Oh well, I will get to that when I have a chance.
The Ethash kernel is a tad faster now. I will push the change to the repo soon.
These Ethash kernels are so weird... Seemingly innocuous changes cause hardware errors for no obvious reasons.
It is so refreshing to work on a different kernel after tackling with Equihash for so long, though.
sr. member
Activity: 676
Merit: 250
also it could be the same reason why claymore doesnt work with your dbix coin (ethash), only after the blockchain reached height #30000.
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 252
The problem is not with GG but with stratum server different pools are using.
Maybe, but ethminer have no problems with stratum server of different pools.
sr. member
Activity: 652
Merit: 266
The problem is not with GG but with stratum server different pools are using.
Jump to: