NEW from The Merkle: https://themerkle.com/us-judge-denies-latest-stalling-tactics-by-gawminers-lawyers/
Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 107. (Read 3377922 times)
March 28, 2017, 09:06:05 PM
NEW from The Merkle: https://themerkle.com/us-judge-denies-latest-stalling-tactics-by-gawminers-lawyers/
March 28, 2017, 06:43:42 PM
Don't worry, @truckinusa
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
What if I told you all that Matlack isn't alone this time around?
We have plenty of time until November.
In the meantime.
Any guesses to whom is helping Matlack this time around?
"See Million?" ( C. Millian)
Mordica?
Dorman?
Hash King himself?
Oh, I know! ELON MUSK!
Def. not Stu Fraser
March 28, 2017, 06:32:00 PM
Don't worry, @truckinusa
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
What if I told you all that Matlack isn't alone this time around?
We have plenty of time until November.
In the meantime.
Any guesses to whom is helping Matlack this time around?
March 28, 2017, 05:30:23 PM
GAME ON! 
Whole nother year though, who's got the stamina for that. 
Quote
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Garza et al
Monday, March 27, 2017
ORDER RE SCHEDULING: The parties' Rule 26(f) Planning Report (Doc. #37 ) is hereby APPROVED, as amended. All discovery shall be completed by November 7, 2017. Dispositive motions shall be filed by December 7, 2017, or within 30 days of the close of discovery. All other dates requested in the parties' Rule 26(f) report are also approved. The parties' joint trial memorandum is due by January 5, 2018, or within 30 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, whichever date is later. This case will be ready for trial by February 12, 2018, or within 60 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, whichever date is later. The parties are encouraged to commence discovery forthwith and to arrange their schedules in contemplation of the briefing deadlines for any dispositive motions, because the Court is unlikely to grant a future request for an extension of the scheduling order absent extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances. If the parties do not anticipate dispositive motions, they are encouraged to contact chambers at the earliest possible time in order to have a trial date set. Please refer to Judge Meyer's webpage on the District of Connecticut website for Judge Meyer's "Pretrial Preferences" and "Trial Preferences" and for Judge Meyer's "Instructions for Discovery Disputes" and "Instructions for Joint Trial Memorandum." A telephonic status conference will be held July 14, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. Plaintiff shall initiate call. Once all parties are on the line, please call chambers at (203) 773-2105. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/27/2017. (Gruber, Sarah)
Monday, March 27, 2017
ORDER RE SCHEDULING: The parties' Rule 26(f) Planning Report (Doc. #37 ) is hereby APPROVED, as amended. All discovery shall be completed by November 7, 2017. Dispositive motions shall be filed by December 7, 2017, or within 30 days of the close of discovery. All other dates requested in the parties' Rule 26(f) report are also approved. The parties' joint trial memorandum is due by January 5, 2018, or within 30 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, whichever date is later. This case will be ready for trial by February 12, 2018, or within 60 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, whichever date is later. The parties are encouraged to commence discovery forthwith and to arrange their schedules in contemplation of the briefing deadlines for any dispositive motions, because the Court is unlikely to grant a future request for an extension of the scheduling order absent extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances. If the parties do not anticipate dispositive motions, they are encouraged to contact chambers at the earliest possible time in order to have a trial date set. Please refer to Judge Meyer's webpage on the District of Connecticut website for Judge Meyer's "Pretrial Preferences" and "Trial Preferences" and for Judge Meyer's "Instructions for Discovery Disputes" and "Instructions for Joint Trial Memorandum." A telephonic status conference will be held July 14, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. Plaintiff shall initiate call. Once all parties are on the line, please call chambers at (203) 773-2105. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/27/2017. (Gruber, Sarah)
Whole nother year though, who's got the stamina for that.
Upside: His kids are getting old enough to understand what a scammer Garbanzo is.
Telephone Status hearing in July.
Gotta love this from the Judge:
Quote
the Court is unlikely to grant a future request for an extension of the scheduling order absent extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances.
March 28, 2017, 05:27:28 PM
Don't worry, @truckinusa
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
New edit: Hashcoin
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
New edit: Hashcoin
I mean, I wonder what they got on their own? Any computer hardware, cell phones, filing cabinets(was he smart enough to keep records?), bank accounts, etc. I mean there is a slim chance this asshole has a bunch of bitcoin stashed somewhere.
pictures upload March 28, 2017, 02:40:39 PM
Well done Homero, well done!
First at last for something!
https://themerkle.com/top-6-bitcoin-cloud-mining-scams/
First at last for something!
https://themerkle.com/top-6-bitcoin-cloud-mining-scams/
Quote
1. GAWMiners
It is impossible to discuss bitcoin cloud mining scams and not refer to GAWminers. This infamous Ponzi Scheme, operated by Homero Joshua Garza, made investors lose millions of dollars in funds before it was eventually shut down. Although the company seemed legitimate in the beginning, things unraveled once PayCoin got introduced as part of the GAWMiners platform. In the end, Garza fled the country with millions of stolen funds and no one has been able to recover their losses since that time. Moreover, no one knows the whereabouts of Mr Garza as of right now.
It is impossible to discuss bitcoin cloud mining scams and not refer to GAWminers. This infamous Ponzi Scheme, operated by Homero Joshua Garza, made investors lose millions of dollars in funds before it was eventually shut down. Although the company seemed legitimate in the beginning, things unraveled once PayCoin got introduced as part of the GAWMiners platform. In the end, Garza fled the country with millions of stolen funds and no one has been able to recover their losses since that time. Moreover, no one knows the whereabouts of Mr Garza as of right now.
March 28, 2017, 08:52:44 AM
GAME ON!
Whole nother year though, who's got the stamina for that.
Quote
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Garza et al
Monday, March 27, 2017
ORDER RE SCHEDULING: The parties' Rule 26(f) Planning Report (Doc. #37 ) is hereby APPROVED, as amended. All discovery shall be completed by November 7, 2017. Dispositive motions shall be filed by December 7, 2017, or within 30 days of the close of discovery. All other dates requested in the parties' Rule 26(f) report are also approved. The parties' joint trial memorandum is due by January 5, 2018, or within 30 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, whichever date is later. This case will be ready for trial by February 12, 2018, or within 60 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, whichever date is later. The parties are encouraged to commence discovery forthwith and to arrange their schedules in contemplation of the briefing deadlines for any dispositive motions, because the Court is unlikely to grant a future request for an extension of the scheduling order absent extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances. If the parties do not anticipate dispositive motions, they are encouraged to contact chambers at the earliest possible time in order to have a trial date set. Please refer to Judge Meyer's webpage on the District of Connecticut website for Judge Meyer's "Pretrial Preferences" and "Trial Preferences" and for Judge Meyer's "Instructions for Discovery Disputes" and "Instructions for Joint Trial Memorandum." A telephonic status conference will be held July 14, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. Plaintiff shall initiate call. Once all parties are on the line, please call chambers at (203) 773-2105. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/27/2017. (Gruber, Sarah)
Monday, March 27, 2017
ORDER RE SCHEDULING: The parties' Rule 26(f) Planning Report (Doc. #37 ) is hereby APPROVED, as amended. All discovery shall be completed by November 7, 2017. Dispositive motions shall be filed by December 7, 2017, or within 30 days of the close of discovery. All other dates requested in the parties' Rule 26(f) report are also approved. The parties' joint trial memorandum is due by January 5, 2018, or within 30 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, whichever date is later. This case will be ready for trial by February 12, 2018, or within 60 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive motions, whichever date is later. The parties are encouraged to commence discovery forthwith and to arrange their schedules in contemplation of the briefing deadlines for any dispositive motions, because the Court is unlikely to grant a future request for an extension of the scheduling order absent extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances. If the parties do not anticipate dispositive motions, they are encouraged to contact chambers at the earliest possible time in order to have a trial date set. Please refer to Judge Meyer's webpage on the District of Connecticut website for Judge Meyer's "Pretrial Preferences" and "Trial Preferences" and for Judge Meyer's "Instructions for Discovery Disputes" and "Instructions for Joint Trial Memorandum." A telephonic status conference will be held July 14, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. Plaintiff shall initiate call. Once all parties are on the line, please call chambers at (203) 773-2105. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/27/2017. (Gruber, Sarah)
Whole nother year though, who's got the stamina for that.
March 27, 2017, 10:42:57 PM
Funny how they dropped Garza from the GAWsuit.
Just sayin'
March 27, 2017, 08:15:56 PM
Don't worry, @truckinusa
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
I mean, I wonder what they got on their own? Any computer hardware, cell phones, filing cabinets(was he smart enough to keep records?), bank accounts, etc. I mean there is a slim chance this asshole has a bunch of bitcoin stashed somewhere.
pictures upload March 27, 2017, 05:13:21 PM
yeah, guy is like crypto cancer. Let's hope they nuke his butt someday. I can't believe we are all still here. I never imagined it would go on so long and so deep. 
Crypto Cancer. Spot on.
It's worth the wait. SEC is sharing with the FBI.
March 27, 2017, 05:06:57 PM
yeah, guy is like crypto cancer. Let's hope they nuke his butt someday. I can't believe we are all still here. I never imagined it would go on so long and so deep.
March 27, 2017, 04:29:57 PM
What did I forget?
Mineral, although maybe that's Phil's not Homero's...
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/yet-another-sketchy-bitcoin-exchange-implodes
Good one! That reminded me of how GARZA RUINED CoinSwap Exchange and contaminated Cryptsy Exchange too.
March 27, 2017, 04:27:30 PM
What did I forget?
Mineral, although maybe that's Phil's not Homero's...
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/yet-another-sketchy-bitcoin-exchange-implodes
March 27, 2017, 03:54:57 PM
Don't worry, @truckinusa
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
They got the whole forum history, (Hashtalk), BCT threads, pics of Joe Mordica's fake DC, all Josh's emails, including attached images, (it's a crime to transmit XXX right?)
They got the Twitter account, the CCN / Scott Fargo lies, the deceptive advertisements, Matlack's ION scam, even the GAW Slack.
Let's recap for the ABCs, shall we?
GAW Miners
Paycoin
Hashlets
BTC Lend
PayBase
CoinStand
CPIG
What did I forget?
Edits: CoinSwap
Prime Controllers <------
Cryptsy Prime Controller
March 27, 2017, 09:50:37 AM
Here's a better explanation: https://www.law360.com/articles/24620/rule-26-f-and-automatic-stays-in-securities-litigation
I think it boils down to this
The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolution
Just a means to speed things up.
We got the emails, photos, etc if the SEC needs them. Did I say we had the photos?I think it boils down to this
The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolution
Just a means to speed things up.
SEC got all of it. Trust me.
I'm being serious, but I wonder what kind of information they really have. The government always strikes me as bumbling and stupid when things are incredibly obvious.
March 27, 2017, 08:48:55 AM
Here's a better explanation: https://www.law360.com/articles/24620/rule-26-f-and-automatic-stays-in-securities-litigation
I think it boils down to this
The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolution
Just a means to speed things up.
We got the emails, photos, etc if the SEC needs them. Did I say we had the photos?I think it boils down to this
The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolution
Just a means to speed things up.
SEC got all of it. Trust me.
March 27, 2017, 06:45:12 AM
Here's a better explanation: https://www.law360.com/articles/24620/rule-26-f-and-automatic-stays-in-securities-litigation
I think it boils down to this
The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolution
Just a means to speed things up.
We got the emails, photos, etc if the SEC needs them. Did I say we had the photos? I think it boils down to this
The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolution
Just a means to speed things up.
March 27, 2017, 06:37:00 AM
Here's a better explanation: https://www.law360.com/articles/24620/rule-26-f-and-automatic-stays-in-securities-litigation
I think it boils down to this
The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolution
Just a means to speed things up.
I think it boils down to this
The new Rule 26(f) is aimed at encouraging parties to meet and confer over the preservation and discoverability of electronically stored information (“ESI”) early in the litigation to “avoid later difficulties or ease their resolution
Just a means to speed things up.
March 25, 2017, 10:19:22 PM
Speak of the devil, the SEC has woken up
Not every exciting, think we have been down this road before:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26
Is this some sort of arbitration between the parties? It looks like it may have a 14 day time limit. Just another delay tactic perhaps? Quote
Friday, March 24, 2017
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Shields, Kathleen)
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Shields, Kathleen)
Not every exciting, think we have been down this road before:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26
March 25, 2017, 08:42:02 PM
Speak of the devil, the SEC has woken up
Not every exciting, think we have been down this road before:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26
Quote
Friday, March 24, 2017
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Shields, Kathleen)
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Shields, Kathleen)
Not every exciting, think we have been down this road before:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26
Jump to: