I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains. Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?
When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?
When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?
It's probably not that simple. Even if he didn't benefit directly he could still be found to have caused damages.
Another thing to keep in mind is that this is a civil lawsuit. So not "beyond reasonable doubt" but "more probable than not".
Every allegation against Fraser directly implicates Garza, and vice versa.
There is no separating the two.
It's all or nothing, IMO.
Judge could easily throw it out -- or delay 5.000 years until after SEC makes its move.
Stay tuned.
Not even sure what the next step is? Judge's decision time I think. Don't recall there being an indication of another tit 
tit for tat for tit. 
