Here's some shitty reviews
Great Auk Wireless is A RIP OFF
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/canaan-vt/THJFBNV4MIFIR075C
Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1544. (Read 3377857 times)
January 26, 2015, 07:06:18 PM
January 26, 2015, 07:01:47 PM
Years later, detractors would use one of the original GAW’s biggest scrapes to discredit the second GAW, though it was a textbook example of why major providers avoided rural services. GAW was offered a $40,000 grant to serve Ashfield, Massachusetts, but the city went years without access before Garza gave up in 2012, unable to find a tower location. He never completed the job.
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Not to stand behind mr. garza and crew, but the true fact is:
“They never received a dollar from the ($40,000) grant they were awarded from the Mass. Broadband Institute.”
http://www.recorder.com/home/3333268-95/ashfield-service-speed-internet
Anyone can be a grant writer and even on occasion get a grant awarded to them, but if they don't have all their ducks in a row, which is very common for Garza, their project is doomed before it even begins.
Scott-
Just to chime in - a lot of that is flexible. If GAW was just handling the hardware, right-of-way, and peering contracts, AND the broadcast license is provided to the municipality, it's a very different case than if a private operator does it all. Demarcation points and who-owns-what are half the fun of telecom
(that fun is sarcastic, btw)
January 26, 2015, 06:49:34 PM
Years later, detractors would use one of the original GAW’s biggest scrapes to discredit the second GAW, though it was a textbook example of why major providers avoided rural services. GAW was offered a $40,000 grant to serve Ashfield, Massachusetts, but the city went years without access before Garza gave up in 2012, unable to find a tower location. He never completed the job.
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Not to stand behind mr. garza and crew, but the true fact is:
“They never received a dollar from the ($40,000) grant they were awarded from the Mass. Broadband Institute.”
http://www.recorder.com/home/3333268-95/ashfield-service-speed-internet
Anyone can be a grant writer and even on occasion get a grant awarded to them, but if they don't have all their ducks in a row, which is very common for Garza, their project is doomed before it even begins.
Scott-
Just to chime in - a lot of that is flexible. If GAW was just handling the hardware, right-of-way, and peering contracts, AND the broadcast license is provided to the municipality, it's a very different case than if a private operator does it all. Demarcation points and who-owns-what are half the fun of telecom
(that fun is sarcastic, btw)
January 26, 2015, 06:38:36 PM
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/2015/0126/For-cryptocurrency-tycoon-Josh-Garza-both-fame-and-fortune-in-peril
Wonder how long till this is ddossed
Just read the whole thing lol, quite interesting actually. Wonder how long till this is ddossed
January 26, 2015, 06:32:08 PM
Years later, detractors would use one of the original GAW’s biggest scrapes to discredit the second GAW, though it was a textbook example of why major providers avoided rural services. GAW was offered a $40,000 grant to serve Ashfield, Massachusetts, but the city went years without access before Garza gave up in 2012, unable to find a tower location. He never completed the job.
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Not to stand behind mr. garza and crew, but the true fact is:
“They never received a dollar from the ($40,000) grant they were awarded from the Mass. Broadband Institute.”
http://www.recorder.com/home/3333268-95/ashfield-service-speed-internet
Anyone can be a grant writer and even on occasion get a grant awarded to them, but if they don't have all their ducks in a row, which is very common for Garza, their project is doomed before it even begins.
Scott-
Oh I agree with all of that, I certainly don't purport to know any or all of the true facts, and yes I know about grants as well.
My point was just level-headed thinking. I saw someone accuse someone else of stealing 40k. I knew it not to be true. I pointed out said fact.
BTW, i'm not on his side, i'm on yours/ours. Maybe it's because my father was a judge IRL.
January 26, 2015, 06:26:06 PM
Interesting industry news: http://us8.campaign-archive2.com/?u=a87f67248663abe55ad9325d6&id=528da3f490&e=1eb9c9493d
Thanks to Ms. Boring of http://boringbitcoinreport.com and the Digital Chamber for compiling it all.
Scott-
Thanks to Ms. Boring of http://boringbitcoinreport.com and the Digital Chamber for compiling it all.
Scott-
Good read. I am not a marketing guru, but I sincerely think Ms. Boring would increase her readership by a factor of ~1,000,000 if she posted her pic on the front of the blog....
I know, I know, I am a total caveman.
January 26, 2015, 06:20:07 PM
Interesting industry news: http://us8.campaign-archive2.com/?u=a87f67248663abe55ad9325d6&id=528da3f490&e=1eb9c9493d
Thanks to Ms. Boring of http://boringbitcoinreport.com and the Digital Chamber for compiling it all.
Scott-
Thanks to Ms. Boring of http://boringbitcoinreport.com and the Digital Chamber for compiling it all.
Scott-
January 26, 2015, 06:19:22 PM
Gotta love the part in the wireless fail article about "Duh? Peeples wants Munney fer tah uze therr land fer com towerz? DUUUUH!?"
Absolute retard with a crisp con-man coating and creamy scammer filling is Garza, Um Hmmm.
Absolute retard with a crisp con-man coating and creamy scammer filling is Garza, Um Hmmm.
January 26, 2015, 06:16:52 PM
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/2015/0126/For-cryptocurrency-tycoon-Josh-Garza-both-fame-and-fortune-in-peril
Wonder how long till this is ddossed
Wonder how long till this is ddossed
January 26, 2015, 06:08:33 PM
Years later, detractors would use one of the original GAW’s biggest scrapes to discredit the second GAW, though it was a textbook example of why major providers avoided rural services. GAW was offered a $40,000 grant to serve Ashfield, Massachusetts, but the city went years without access before Garza gave up in 2012, unable to find a tower location. He never completed the job.
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Not to stand behind mr. garza and crew, but the true fact is:
“They never received a dollar from the ($40,000) grant they were awarded from the Mass. Broadband Institute.”
http://www.recorder.com/home/3333268-95/ashfield-service-speed-internet
Anyone can be a grant writer and even on occasion get a grant awarded to them, but if they don't have all their ducks in a row, which is very common for Garza, their project is doomed before it even begins.
Scott-
January 26, 2015, 06:05:04 PM
This just in:
two member's verifies
I guess BitJane has the day off.
she quit doing the edits a while ago. She made a thread about that.
Still, doesnt stop her trying to stamp her authority as a grammer nazi - she even hates when peoplr use that term. Maybe she believes the nazis were good guys and the holocaust didn't happen. Otherwise who fucking cares, the nazis lost, they are bad guys they deserve any shit their way, and WE the winners of the wars can use that term however the fuck we like.
She needs to eat a big bag of cement and harden the fuck up, her baby boomer attitude can fuck off too. Your time is over. Generation X is where its at - the last generation before generation Y get some power and fuck it all up for everyone.
I think you are over generalizing an entire generation. But who am I? Just one of the the oldest Gen Y persons here that made Josh back down from a public debate he himself called with me
.Just with cryptos, infighting between generations does nothing productive (unless its calling out obvious scammers).
I was highly drunk when I wrote this and prone to exaggeration, so the generation comment was the only thing I exaggerated. Was Australia day yesterday mate and I'm hungover as
Generation X is where its at - the last generation before generation Y get some power and fuck it all up for everyone.
And then it's Z - zombie apocalypse?
You know things are truly screwed up if even Putin is pulling out:
https://hashtalk.org/topic/30252
January 26, 2015, 05:54:02 PM
Years later, detractors would use one of the original GAW’s biggest scrapes to discredit the second GAW, though it was a textbook example of why major providers avoided rural services. GAW was offered a $40,000 grant to serve Ashfield, Massachusetts, but the city went years without access before Garza gave up in 2012, unable to find a tower location. He never completed the job.
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Not to stand behind mr. garza and crew, but the true fact is:
“They never received a dollar from the ($40,000) grant they were awarded from the Mass. Broadband Institute.”
http://www.recorder.com/home/3333268-95/ashfield-service-speed-internet
January 26, 2015, 05:52:21 PM
Ok, ok guys, can we just move along now? I mean, really? Are we going to devolve to this level? What's the point?
Let's get back on track, eh? meaning.... ALWAYS MAKE MONEY! :-)
Let's get back on track, eh? meaning.... ALWAYS MAKE MONEY! :-)
Edited 2020-11-28 to fix a broken image
January 26, 2015, 05:51:08 PM
Years later, detractors would use one of the original GAW’s biggest scrapes to discredit the second GAW, though it was a textbook example of why major providers avoided rural services. GAW was offered a $40,000 grant to serve Ashfield, Massachusetts, but the city went years without access before Garza gave up in 2012, unable to find a tower location. He never completed the job.
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
Why am I not surprised, he pocketed the cash. Probably used it for the tummy tuck and breast implants for the wifey
January 26, 2015, 05:42:57 PM
Everybody is copying the success of Paybase:
https://hashtalk.org/topic/30318
https://hashtalk.org/topic/30318
Quote
sciborg
New Ripple Gateway Looks Like Paybase
Hmm..This is interesting
This picture of the Ripple gateway sure resembles Paybase ALOT
https://twitter.com/GateHubNet/status/559803516643209216/photo/1
New Ripple Gateway Looks Like Paybase
Hmm..This is interesting
This picture of the Ripple gateway sure resembles Paybase ALOT
https://twitter.com/GateHubNet/status/559803516643209216/photo/1
What success are we talking about?
hehe By the way, aren't gateways able to be run by third parties as well?
January 26, 2015, 05:38:17 PM
I have never even heard of it and regardless of if you think most of their stuff is secular they are named The CHRISTIAN Science Monitor.
You're being a hypocrite now for not seeing before commenting.CSM has been easily available since Google Reader days with their RSS feeds. Then, Google Currents and now Google Play Newstand.
Just read their articles and try to find anything that drips with conservative religious bias. I find them to be the polar opposite of the Washington Post, in fact which does drip ...
CSM also surprises me with its tech news -- and it's not just dipping toes.
Oh please do explain to me some more how I'm being a hypocrite for "not seeing before commenting", whatever the hell that even means. I'm all ears and waiting with bated breath. And again, they get no respect and no trust from me as long as CHRISTIAN is in their name. I can go elsewhere to get my news and never have to read another single article from them and never be any less informed. Yes my atheism is that strong.
Dude it's a well known publication with a good history. You're an idiot.
No you're an assuming fucking prick. It most certainly is NOT very well known and that's coming from a multi-degreed engineer and math teacher.
January 26, 2015, 05:37:52 PM
Dude it's a well known publication with a good history. You're
January 26, 2015, 05:29:57 PM
I have never even heard of it and regardless of if you think most of their stuff is secular they are named The CHRISTIAN Science Monitor.
You're being a hypocrite now for not seeing before commenting.CSM has been easily available since Google Reader days with their RSS feeds. Then, Google Currents and now Google Play Newstand.
Just read their articles and try to find anything that drips with conservative religious bias. I find them to be the polar opposite of the Washington Post, in fact which does drip ...
CSM also surprises me with its tech news -- and it's not just dipping toes.
Oh please do explain to me some more how I'm being a hypocrite for "not seeing before commenting", whatever the hell that even means. I'm all ears and waiting with bated breath. And again, they get no respect and no trust from me as long as CHRISTIAN is in their name. I can go elsewhere to get my news and never have to read another single article from them and never be any less informed. Yes my atheism is that strong.
Ok, ok guys, can we just move along now? I mean, really? Are we going to devolve to this level? What's the point?
Let's get back on track, eh? meaning.... ALWAYS MAKE MONEY! :-)
January 26, 2015, 05:27:30 PM
I have never even heard of it and regardless of if you think most of their stuff is secular they are named The CHRISTIAN Science Monitor.
You're being a hypocrite now for not seeing before commenting.CSM has been easily available since Google Reader days with their RSS feeds. Then, Google Currents and now Google Play Newstand.
Just read their articles and try to find anything that drips with conservative religious bias. I find them to be the polar opposite of the Washington Post, in fact which does drip ...
CSM also surprises me with its tech news -- and it's not just dipping toes.
Oh please do explain to me some more how I'm being a hypocrite for "not seeing before commenting", whatever the hell that even means. I'm all ears and waiting with bated breath. And again, they get no respect and no trust from me as long as CHRISTIAN is in their name. I can go elsewhere to get my news and never have to read another single article from them and never be any less informed. Yes my atheism is that strong.
Dude it's a well known publication with a good history. You're an idiot.
January 26, 2015, 05:13:14 PM
I have never even heard of it and regardless of if you think most of their stuff is secular they are named The CHRISTIAN Science Monitor.
You're being a hypocrite now for not seeing before commenting.CSM has been easily available since Google Reader days with their RSS feeds. Then, Google Currents and now Google Play Newstand.
Just read their articles and try to find anything that drips with conservative religious bias. I find them to be the polar opposite of the Washington Post, in fact which does drip ...
CSM also surprises me with its tech news -- and it's not just dipping toes.
Oh please do explain to me some more how I'm being a hypocrite for "not seeing before commenting", whatever the hell that even means. I'm all ears and waiting with bated breath. And again, they get no respect and no trust from me as long as CHRISTIAN is in their name. I can go elsewhere to get my news and never have to read another single article from them and never be any less informed. Yes my atheism is that strong.
Jump to: