Author

Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 2327. (Read 3377922 times)

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
Neither  Cheesy

It hurts your case that you're only going after GAW. there are several(if not dozens) of other mining DC's in the US, and going after just one shows you're mad at that company, and just want revenge.

Well all the HT kiddos seem to think this means nothing, so be on your way shill Smiley

If this is all truly nonsense that will lead to nothing, none of you need to worry your pretty little heads. Just stay focused on renting more magic wallets that promise you %400 APY on a coin that doesn't exist yet.

If somebody should be on your way is you. Take your pills and go to bed.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060

Is the point of this to force GAW to disclose details of their operations? The "likely transmitting stray radio emissions" thing is kind of strange otherwise.

I can see it if it's a way to impose transparency, but I don't see your standing. Did you find someone who lives next to the "data center" and can't get a cell signal?

Yea I'm not sure I see the point in that.

I say just wait for GAW to be investigated for securities fraud. It's only a matter of time.

Foot in the door technique, when the fcc investigates and there's no miners, boom.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Neither  Cheesy

It hurts your case that you're only going after GAW. there are several(if not dozens) of other mining DC's in the US, and going after just one shows you're mad at that company, and just want revenge.

Well all the HT kiddos seem to think this means nothing, so be on your way shill Smiley

If this is all truly nonsense that will lead to nothing, none of you need to worry your pretty little heads. Just stay focused on renting more magic wallets that promise you %400 APY on a coin that doesn't exist yet.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
As far as the signal jamming goes, You do realize that you're shooting yourself in the foot? If somehow you do manage to succeed in the lawsuit, I fully expect you do be the full focus of a counter-suit for the exact same reason.

This statement makes zero sense.  Are you implying that after SGB raises non-conforming HW concerns that somehow GAW is going to sue SGB for non-conforming HW?

Quote
Amazon- ever heard of an NDA?
Cheesy  Yeah, because NDA's cause secondary entities to outright DENY involvement and threaten legal action if the primary party continues to imply there is.

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509

Is the point of this to force GAW to disclose details of their operations? The "likely transmitting stray radio emissions" thing is kind of strange otherwise.

I can see it if it's a way to impose transparency, but I don't see your standing. Did you find someone who lives next to the "data center" and can't get a cell signal?

Yea I'm not sure I see the point in that.

I say just wait for GAW to be investigated for securities fraud. It's only a matter of time.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Neither  Cheesy

It hurts your case that you're only going after GAW. there are several(if not dozens) of other mining DC's in the US, and going after just one shows you're mad at that company, and just want revenge.

Fine close all cloud miners, they're all scams. Cryptsy is about to launch their own scam. Now fuck off shill.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Neither  Cheesy

It hurts your case that you're only going after GAW. there are several(if not dozens) of other mining DC's in the US, and going after just one shows you're mad at that company, and just want revenge.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060

Is the point of this to force GAW to disclose details of their operations? The "likely transmitting stray radio emissions" thing is kind of strange otherwise.

I can see it if it's a way to impose transparency, but I don't see your standing. Did you find someone who lives next to the "data center" and can't get a cell signal?

It's affecting his ham radio
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
https://hashtalk.org/topic/21150/and-so-it-begins

Still sucking each other off, wondering who'll be the first to lose their money
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500

Is the point of this to force GAW to disclose details of their operations? The "likely transmitting stray radio emissions" thing is kind of strange otherwise.

I can see it if it's a way to impose transparency, but I don't see your standing. Did you find someone who lives next to the "data center" and can't get a cell signal?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060

So you're trying to get GAW on a possible technicality. Damn, someone's getting desperate.

As far as the signal jamming goes, You do realize that you're shooting yourself in the foot? If somehow you do manage to succeed in the lawsuit, I fully expect you do be the full focus of a counter-suit for the exact same reason.

Amazon- ever heard of an NDA?

Ok duffy or are you rootdude?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0

So you're trying to get GAW on a possible technicality. Damn, someone's getting desperate.

As far as the signal jamming goes, You do realize that you're shooting yourself in the foot? If somehow you do manage to succeed in the lawsuit, I fully expect you do be the full focus of a counter-suit for the exact same reason.

Amazon- ever heard of an NDA?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
So what you're saying is that if I create a payment processor I am allowed to claim partnerships with any and every company that accepts fiat?

I was talking about ways the entire system could fail. I put the Amazon thing there because it speaks to legitimacy, but it's not necessarily fatal. There was nothing implied about what entities are allowed to make whatever claims.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Hahaha one of the biggest GAW shills (Daffy) has already posted the PDF on Hashtalk.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
I was under the impression that Amazon denied having anything to do with paycoin, and threatened to sue if Josh even implied that they did.

Actually, the Amazon thing is the least problematic of the "what ifs". If there's some sort of debit card proxy that works with existing payment systems and allows instantaneous conversion, it doesn't matter that much if Amazon takes it directly.

So what you're saying is that if I create a payment processor I am allowed to claim partnerships with any and every company that accepts fiat?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
I was under the impression that Amazon denied having anything to do with paycoin, and threatened to sue if Josh even implied that they did.

Actually, the Amazon thing is the least problematic of the "what ifs". If there's some sort of debit card proxy that works with existing payment systems and allows instantaneous conversion, it doesn't matter that much if Amazon takes it directly.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
is the Q & A happening in a few hours?
Jump to: