Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 653. (Read 3377974 times)
May 04, 2015, 12:47:06 PM
Thank you, kind sir.
May 04, 2015, 12:42:54 PM
Cmilian, I know you read this, which is why you knew that I busted your lying scamdog ass using the Hyperstake keys.
Your post was found by Team XPY members who got on a video call to discuss the rogue keys. A member discovered a deposit going to BTCLend which swept to a matching address in your post. After verifying the information Carmello was brought into the call to discuss the issue.
Which is to say, Carmello likely is not reading this forum.
May 04, 2015, 12:41:29 PM
I don't have an account on GH. Could someone be so kind as to quote my last post where I mentioned that the 4,000 "accidentally staked" XPY would be acceptable as a token of appreciation for my diligence that saved BTClend over there for me?
looks like miaviator just did it for you...the response should be comical...
May 04, 2015, 12:39:14 PM
I don't have an account on GH. Could someone be so kind as to quote my last post where I mentioned that the 4,000 "accidentally staked" XPY would be acceptable as a token of appreciation for my diligence that saved BTClend over there for me?
May 04, 2015, 12:31:01 PM
I don't have an account on GH. Could someone be so kind as to quote my last post where I mentioned that the 4,000 "accidentally staked" XPY would be acceptable as a token of appreciation for my diligence that saved BTClend over there for me?
Here is the screen where I discovered the 600,000+ XPY block Hyperstaking:
Here is where I noted the three 125k Adresses that were compound Hyperstaking.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11254325
Here is the screen where I discovered the 600,000+ XPY block Hyperstaking:
Here is where I noted the three 125k Adresses that were compound Hyperstaking.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11254325
Another thing worthy of note on the Paycoin Blockchain: At least 3 PC addresses are not playing along with the pretend rule that PC's must scrape stake to avoid (much) compounding. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/#!rich
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?319632.htm #11
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?320305.htm #12
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?320307.htm #13
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?319632.htm #11
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?320305.htm #12
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?320307.htm #13
May 04, 2015, 12:27:06 PM
The scamdog Cmilian lying directly to the chumps that trust him with their coins:
I like how he completely ignored the hot/cold wallet question. Wasn't really cold apparently if someone could just move the coins around for a few days until they got caught.
What this idiot Cmilian, and apparently his
So Cmilian: If this insane story about a "rogue" developer in your organization is true, then I personally saved your ass. I think it is time for you to publicly thank me. My time is valuable, so the small 2 BTC token of your appreciation would be a nice gesture for my hard work in securing your customer's coins, since you were obviously not able to do so yourself.
he's on GetHashing right now...go give him hell!!
https://forum.gethashing.com/t/xpy-paycoin-discussion/1559/3403
May 04, 2015, 12:26:21 PM
The scamdog Cmilian lying directly to the chumps that trust him with their coins:
I like how he completely ignored the hot/cold wallet question. Wasn't really cold apparently if someone could just move the coins around for a few days until they got caught.
What this idiot Cmilian, and apparently his
So Cmilian: If this insane story about a "rogue" developer in your organization is true, then I personally saved your ass. I think it is time for you to publicly thank me. My time is valuable, so the small 2 BTC token of your appreciation would be a nice gesture for my hard work in securing your customer's coins, since you were obviously not able to do so yourself.
wait, I hope no one is surprised by this. I mean we all knew that those super secure online wallets are just paper thin secured. I lold hard at his sorry excuses.
Coincidentally, the ~4,000 XPY that was Hyperstaked with the leaked keys that Cmilian says he does not know what to do with are worth right around 2 BTC.
So, Cmilian, in the spirit of helping the Paycoin community and keeping you from having to cash out XPY to get the 2 BTC token for my efforts, I will accept these nefariously staked coins as a token of gratitude for alerting you that your wallets had been breached and some "rogue developer" was staking extra XPY for you. Your problem of what to do with those coins is solved, and you get to do the right thing and reward my efforts that saved BTClend from ruin. Let me know which way you would like to reward me for saving BTClend, I will get you an address for whatever coin you would like to send me.
May 04, 2015, 12:20:23 PM
This reminds me of an interview on Sky News in the UK last Christmas with one of the hackers who took down both the playstation and Xbox gaming networks.
The reporter was laying into him about how disgraceful it was to prevent kids playing on their consoles at Christmas and the hacker said "Well heaven forbid they may have to spend some time with their families instead!"
Bitch-slapped is the correct term I think
May 04, 2015, 12:13:38 PM
There is nothing wrong with the Bitcoinist article. Clear disclaimer at the top, and if the company in question wants to pay for it, there is nothing wrong with that.
Deepak did a good job of keeping things objective in my opinion.
People need to do their own research and go after the people that are actually to blame here, aka the Garza clan (or however you want to describe it).
Deepak did a good job of keeping things objective in my opinion.
People need to do their own research and go after the people that are actually to blame here, aka the Garza clan (or however you want to describe it).
CPIG IS THE GARZA CLAN YOU EFFING MORON.
May 04, 2015, 11:52:08 AM
The scamdog Cmilian lying directly to the chumps that trust him with their coins:
I like how he completely ignored the hot/cold wallet question. Wasn't really cold apparently if someone could just move the coins around for a few days until they got caught.
What this idiot Cmilian, and apparently his
So Cmilian: If this insane story about a "rogue" developer in your organization is true, then I personally saved your ass. I think it is time for you to publicly thank me. My time is valuable, so the small 2 BTC token of your appreciation would be a nice gesture for my hard work in securing your customer's coins, since you were obviously not able to do so yourself.
wait, I hope no one is surprised by this. I mean we all knew that those super secure online wallets are just paper thin secured. I lold hard at his sorry excuses.
May 04, 2015, 11:40:12 AM
The scamdog Cmilian lying directly to the chumps that trust him with their coins:
I like how he completely ignored the hot/cold wallet question. Wasn't really cold apparently if someone could just move the coins around for a few days until they got caught.
What this idiot Cmilian, and apparently his
So Cmilian: If this insane story about a "rogue" developer in your organization is true, then I personally saved your ass. I think it is time for you to publicly thank me. My time is valuable, so the small 2 BTC token of your appreciation would be a nice gesture for my hard work in securing your customer's coins, since you were obviously not able to do so yourself.
May 04, 2015, 11:32:26 AM
The scamdog Cmilian lying directly to the chumps that trust him with their coins:
I like how he completely ignored the hot/cold wallet question. Wasn't really cold apparently if someone could just move the coins around for a few days until they got caught.
May 04, 2015, 11:18:39 AM
The scamdog Cmilian lying directly to the chumps that trust him with their coins:
Ya, "someone" removed 600,000+ XPY OUT of the BTClend wallet and staked them with the leaked Hyperstaking keys for 7 hours in one chunk (1,100+XPY) and then split them into three 125,000 XPY wallets and proceeded to let them stake and compound for a couple days, until I personally discovered this and with the help of some other members here positively traced it back to BTClend.
So which is it? Are you a complete and total fucking liar when you say the coins in BTClend are secure, or are you a total fucking liar when you say someone else moved those coins and did you a favor by going through all the trouble of inserting one of the leaked Hyperstake keys into some wallets and letting them run until you were caught? Common sense says it is the latter, that you personally moved those coins and are making up a pathetically unbelievable lie to cover your scammer ass. Cmilian, I know you read this, which is why you knew that I busted your lying scamdog ass using the Hyperstake keys. Message to Cmilian : You are a complete and total lying asshat and a sorry excuse for anything that could be considered trustwaorthy. I will make it my personal hobby to expose what a lying asshole you and your scamdog partner Homero are.
https://hashtalk.ch/topic/37316/btclend-caught-using-leaked-prime-controller-key-to-stake-funds-they-hold/14
Archive: https://archive.is/OwS3T
P.S: Cmilian: I will accept a small token of appreciation for the time I spent uncovering that "someone" in your organization made off with over 600,000 XPY from the BTClend wallets. I think 2 BTC is fair for saving your entire business, since you are not capable of securing your customer's coins yourself.
Ya, "someone" removed 600,000+ XPY OUT of the BTClend wallet and staked them with the leaked Hyperstaking keys for 7 hours in one chunk (1,100+XPY) and then split them into three 125,000 XPY wallets and proceeded to let them stake and compound for a couple days, until I personally discovered this and with the help of some other members here positively traced it back to BTClend.
So which is it? Are you a complete and total fucking liar when you say the coins in BTClend are secure, or are you a total fucking liar when you say someone else moved those coins and did you a favor by going through all the trouble of inserting one of the leaked Hyperstake keys into some wallets and letting them run until you were caught? Common sense says it is the latter, that you personally moved those coins and are making up a pathetically unbelievable lie to cover your scammer ass. Cmilian, I know you read this, which is why you knew that I busted your lying scamdog ass using the Hyperstake keys. Message to Cmilian : You are a complete and total lying asshat and a sorry excuse for anything that could be considered trustwaorthy. I will make it my personal hobby to expose what a lying asshole you and your scamdog partner Homero are.
https://hashtalk.ch/topic/37316/btclend-caught-using-leaked-prime-controller-key-to-stake-funds-they-hold/14
Archive: https://archive.is/OwS3T
P.S: Cmilian: I will accept a small token of appreciation for the time I spent uncovering that "someone" in your organization made off with over 600,000 XPY from the BTClend wallets. I think 2 BTC is fair for saving your entire business, since you are not capable of securing your customer's coins yourself.
May 04, 2015, 10:52:57 AM
https://hashtalk.ch/topic/37329/i-need-a-woman-like-hashtalk-ch
https://hashtalk.ch/api/topic/37329/i-need-a-woman-like-hashtalk-ch
https://archive.is/DfYdW
https://archive.is/sE6Qh
https://hashtalk.ch/api/topic/37329/i-need-a-woman-like-hashtalk-ch
https://archive.is/DfYdW
https://archive.is/sE6Qh
I lol'd
More like a women who goes down on you all day long and every time taking a chunk out of your cock. Eventually you are just left with a pussy.
May 04, 2015, 10:51:06 AM
We should start a poll. "Which Josh is going to be incarcerated first ?" Josh Zipkin, Josh Zerlan, or Josh Garza.
Interesting idea, would love to see such a poll
May 04, 2015, 10:44:00 AM
May 04, 2015, 10:19:14 AM
Quote
A customer is a trust, shell company, or Private Investment Company that is reluctant to provide information on controlling parties and underlying beneficiaries. Beneficial owners may hire nominee incorporation services to establish shell companies and open bank accounts for those shell companies while shielding the owner’s identity.
Crypto Private Investors Group
GAW Miners
May 04, 2015, 10:09:17 AM
Someone asked me today
"How does one end up on these banking watch lists"?
Entities that receive an MSB are subject to SAR reports and other materials. A specific person at a company is typically in charge of taking care of these sort of things. At a bank a compliance officer is typically tasked with this.
When an exchange or bank or other MSB sees these types of things they are expected to fill out the appropriate paperwork and report it.
The answer can be found here: http://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/OLM_106.htm
Anything look familiar? If you were checking boxes for Mr. Garza how many would you check? Here is a random sampling from that manual page...
Which things would set your red flags off in this situation?
"How does one end up on these banking watch lists"?
Entities that receive an MSB are subject to SAR reports and other materials. A specific person at a company is typically in charge of taking care of these sort of things. At a bank a compliance officer is typically tasked with this.
Quote
The following are examples of potentially suspicious activities, or "red flags" for both money laundering and terrorist financing. Although these lists are not all-inclusive, they may help banks and examiners recognize possible money laundering and terrorist financing schemes. FinCEN issues advisories containing examples of "red flags" to inform and assist banks in reporting instances of suspected money laundering, terrorist financing, and fraud. In order to assist law enforcement in its efforts to target these activities, FinCEN requests that banks check the appropriate box(es) in the Suspicious Activity Information section and include certain key terms in the narrative section of the SAR.
When an exchange or bank or other MSB sees these types of things they are expected to fill out the appropriate paperwork and report it.
The answer can be found here: http://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/OLM_106.htm
Anything look familiar? If you were checking boxes for Mr. Garza how many would you check? Here is a random sampling from that manual page...
Quote
A customer is a trust, shell company, or Private Investment Company that is reluctant to provide information on controlling parties and underlying beneficiaries. Beneficial owners may hire nominee incorporation services to establish shell companies and open bank accounts for those shell companies while shielding the owner’s identity.
Quote
Funds transfer activity occurs to or from a financial secrecy haven, or to or from a higher-risk geographic location without an apparent business reason or when the activity is inconsistent with the customer’s business or history.
Quote
Funds transfer activity occurs to or from a financial institution located in a higher risk jurisdiction distant from the customer's operations.
Quote
Large, incoming funds transfers are received on behalf of a foreign client, with little or no explicit reason
Quote
Payments or receipts with no apparent links to legitimate contracts, goods, or services are received.
Quote
Funds transfers contain limited content and lack related party information.
Quote
Large-value, automated clearing house (ACH) transactions are frequently initiated through third-party service providers (TPSP) by originators that are not bank customers and for which the bank has no or insufficient due diligence.
Quote
The currency transaction patterns of a business show a sudden change inconsistent with normal activities.
Quote
A large volume of cashier’s checks, money orders, or funds transfers is deposited into, or purchased through, an account when the nature of the accountholder’s business would not appear to justify such activity.
Quote
Unusual transfers of funds occur among related accounts or among accounts that involve the same or related principals.
Quote
Payments for goods or services are made by checks, money orders, or bank drafts not drawn from the account of the entity that made the purchase.
Quote
Loans secured by pledged assets held by third parties unrelated to the borrower.
Quote
Loans are made for, or are paid on behalf of, a third party with no reasonable explanation.
Quote
Loans that lack a legitimate business purpose, provide the bank with significant fees for assuming little or no risk, or tend to obscure the movement of funds (e.g., loans made to a borrower and immediately sold to an entity related to the borrower).
Quote
Multiple wire transfers initiated by foreign nonbank financial institutions that direct U.S. banks to remit funds to other jurisdictions that bear no apparent business relationship with that foreign nonbank financial institution. Recipients may include individuals, businesses, and other entities in free trade zones and other locations.
Quote
Customers conducting business in higher-risk jurisdictions.
Quote
Payments to or from the company have no stated purpose, do not reference goods or services, or identify only a contract or invoice number.
Quote
Transacting businesses share the same address, provide only a registered agent’s address, or have other address inconsistencies.
Quote
Multiple high-value payments or transfers between shell companies with no apparent legitimate business purpose.
Quote
Employee exhibits a lavish lifestyle that cannot be supported by his or her salary.
Quote
Suspicious movements of funds occur from one bank to another, and then funds are moved back to the first bank.
Quote
Funds are generated by a business owned by persons of the same origin or by a business that involves persons of the same origin from higher-risk countries (e.g., countries designated by national authorities and FATF as noncooperative countries and territories).
Quote
A large number of incoming or outgoing funds transfers take place through a business account, and there appears to be no logical business or other economic purpose for the transfers, particularly when this activity involves higher-risk locations.
Quote
Multiple accounts are used to collect and funnel funds to a small number of foreign beneficiaries, both persons and businesses, particularly in higher-risk locations.
Quote
Funds are sent or received via international transfers from or to higher-risk locations.
Which things would set your red flags off in this situation?
Jump to: