I don't feel bad at all for Garza for whatever personal information is exposed.
What does suck about it though, is that he uses to paint himself as a victim.
But on the other hand, anyone who still thinks he is a victim probably deserves what is coming to them.
So yeah, I support keeping the personal shit out of it, but at the same time, can't manage to muster up that much outrage.
The main thing to remember folks, is that when people post pictures of Ms. Garza or their children, or sexting, etc. it gives GarBozo a means to deflect and detract from the damning mountain of evidence against him.
It appears that Ms. Garza, and likely the accountant, had at least some knowledge that everything was not all legitimate in the HashKingdom and they at the very least ignored a lot of things they shouldn't have ignored. So as you say, I have no sympathy for them either.
BUT, I do object to giving GarBozo a way to detract from the coming storm that is directed right at him. Lets not make it easy for him to erect a smoke screen... focus on evidence of fraud, charitable donations that weren't made, fractional reserve mining, fictional mining, $20 floor that even GarBozo thought would not work, etc. etc. etc. THAT is what will damn him. Posting sexts and pictures of kids .. will give him exactly the smokescreen he needs to deflect for long enough that he might escape justice.
Also, I think we should not ignore Ms. Garza or the accountant insofar as evidence of THEIR culpability is concerned. Just please thinking about keeping the sex stuff out unless it is clearly evidence of quid pro quo for a cover up.
what pictures are you reffering to i dont recall seeing no pictures that would be considered bad, all the pictures i seen seem to be of the staff and trips they have taken and so forth
LMFAO! 
