Too bad none of the other cloud miners took up Garza on that 100 BTC bet for profitability. That would have been easy money.
Well, I made a direct and personal challenge worth up to $1.01M to Mr. Garza before I was thankfully shown the HT door Last Sept/Oct that would have been more valuable on multiple levels than 100BTC. Needless to say, it was never acknowledged or accepted...
Regardless, I have said it before and will say it again:
No amount of factually inexperienced and unproven self-proclaimed Presidents, Chairmen, CEO's, COO's, ITO's, etc. who couldn't write, follow, or even understand a business case, charter, or plan while popping up every other day under a new dorm-room derived business name in order to "rebuild", "restructure", "save", or otherwise "progress" Paycoin/XPY will ever change the singular fact that the venture was ill-conceived as a SCAM and will NEVER be anything other than a poorly executed SCAM. Do the research, generate the appropriate analyses, and consider the constraints/risks. There is no other outcome keeping this waste of computational bandwidth alive via one or twenty blockchain forks under the direction of multiple wannabe foundations than throwing more
good ill-gotten money/crypto after bad.
The end result is and will always be a NET ZERO.
Scott-
(6 months later and STILL waiting for Garza to sue me in a court of law...)=============
Here is an interesting read from back before the Kool-Aid starting kicking 100% on HT. This author ran the numbers and warned people in November what could happen.
http://gawgate.com/pdf/TheMathsBehindWhyHashcoinMight%20FailPart%201.pdf=============