I get it you don't take time to answer any replies that contain facts?
So what? He had a large profit margin and may have borrowed on that while equipment was delivered. As long as he pay on his bonds what he promised. There was never anything hidden about the price of IPO and how much mhash you were getting, nor was it guaranteed that He would keep enough hardware around at any time for sold hashing. Just that the bond would pay the equivalent of 5 mhash/s.
I hardly see how something could be wrong when people willingly bought into something that was clear from the start. Why insist on something being bad when people agreed to it? Anyone who bought those bonds were buying a promise to be paid the EQUIVALENT of 5 mhash/s. They can invest without reading or make assumptions, that does not give them any claim.
As far as I'm concerned, Gigamining acted honestly throughout his operation.
The terms were there, black on white, and were respected thus far.
The thing that has to be put under the microscope is if people take the time to read what they're buying before making a purchase.
Their is a term for them type of contracts in particular the "Total failure of consideration".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unjust_enrichment
Well thought about it some more and I have idea not that I think it will have hope in hell of getting done mind you. But here it is giga pays for the upgrade to four of the th/s boxes. Now once these come online the 40000 5mh/s shares now become 100mh/s. Don't get them all the way to being equally treated as it still leaves ~$100k of their money still in his pocket as profit that has already been taken in but it is some of the way there. Well giga how about it can you man up on that one or are you just going to screw these people proving me right? Oh and don't forget the massive windfall of btc once them th/s boxes go online their entitled to some of that too. Anyways that is all I have to say, good luck to the investors in this venture you will need it.
Edit: I would add for the critically thinking challenged around here. My proposal asks nothing of him that he is not already obligated to do except give the massively increased hash power bonus to those who's money he has already in keeping with the sprit of the contract, ie. you give me btc I give you what that hashing power produced by that btc got me, as he is obligated by the last round of funding to spend $60k on four rig boxes. It makes no sense to do that at this point in time as the upgrade path is the preferred option now. So 20x hash power from that money/btc taken in 20x given back to who's money/btc it was.