I just can't get my head around this.
This could mean two things:
1, he could be trying to create doubt as to if he is really posting what is being said by the account in order to muddy the legal waters.
2, he could actually need the money as a result of his legal bills and potentially a judgement against him. As I previously mentioned, he may not be in a position to repay a loan (even though many would likely be lining up to lend to him). If he really needed the money, he may have chosen to sell his account to someone who understood what he was buying instead of entering into a transaction without the intention of holding up his end of the deal in order to get the $600
First off, thanks QS for verify me.
Secondly, I'm in no legal trouble whatsoever across the board, unless you consider having an SR22 for a traffic related issue that has nothing to do with being under the influence, for I don't partake, or, perhaps, Josh Zerlan still having a restraining order on my scammy ass because he fears for his life after I posted a pic of his master bath gleaned from the Net, uploaded years prior to him purchasing the infamous BTC-House.
Yes, I was contracted by the police to stop posting about Leroy Fodor and Bruce Peterson (BFL) but fuck them, given that enough time has passed since.
Again, it's ironic that the ONLY person sentenced for a crime related to BFL was me.
Bruno
EDIT: Anybody wanna buy QS' phone number. (ONLY KIDDING)
That made me laugh, I like that you can keep your sense of humor about this.
Can you shed any light on the PM that was produced about selling the account?
Maybe you don't care and are just going to keep doin you; either way inquiring minds and what not.
Yes I can shed some light on the matter. At one time it was for sale but no longer after finding out that such wasn't permitted in spite of believe such was, even posting such as proof. I was mistaken. I in no way wanted to get my cred in jeopardy while serving the community along with advancing my ICO.