Topic: Gleb Gamow account was sold Proof - page 6. (Read 2853 times)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.40211050

Already on it, bud. I'm now Mick Fleetwood.  (with sigs removed)

Bruno

Can you post a picture? 

No, seriously, don't.

If you happen to see YuTü.Co.in please tell him to check his messages. Thx.

Apologies for it being strange as fuck in trying to earn a couple bucks with the sig below after 100% declining ALL tips throughout the years offered to me in looking out for the community. As for the paid personal message on the side, dude, that's my entity. Fuck me! Is it okay for me to pay myself by endorsing my entity on the side or in the sig - which BTW I've done in the past - on this forum?

Let's say for sake of argument I'm between a rock and hard place. If so, is there any way possible you guys can kick me in my balls harder?

Dude, although we haven't crossed paths much, I will say that I've crossed your path enough to think that it's strange as fuck to see your posts with a paid signature underneath them and a paid personal message to the side... Just sayin'

That image with me holding my cell phone depicting its phone number was uploaded quickly, thus no time to edit such even if I knew how to accomplish said feat on a phone. The following is the extent of my Photoshoping skills via the Inspect thingy ...

Seriously, dude, there's no real buyer. Please don't make me call Trump for a pardon. 

@Gleb, please don't kill yourself man, world doesn't end here and now, I'm sure that we all could find a way to forgive you if you just honestly tell us the truth about the actual buyer. just tell us please and I will do whatever in my power to help you out.

It was. But in the other thread (which messed up everything).

I haven't really paid any attention or crossed many paths with Gleb Gamow, but given the recent debacle related to his account, I developed a theory that was touched upon by @hilariousetc: that as part of the sale of this account, Gleb Gamow would provide proof anytime the validity of the account was questioned.

After reading this thread, however, this theory is starting to make less and less sense, unless the new owner of the account specifically asked Gleb to log in to clarify and address any doubts or suspicions.

As someone who knows how to use Photoshop and the "Inspect Element" tool in mozilla-based browsers, my first instinct to the screenshot that was provided by OP was that the text on-screen was customized (via inspector) before the screenshot was taken. If this is not the case, how come the message still hasn't been reported to a moderator so it could be verified?

Either way, I find this whole scenario highly amusing, so thanks for the entertainment. I honestly can't wait to see what outcome there is, if there even will be at all  

EDIT: nvm about the verification by hilariousandco, I just discovered the other thread.

Here's the pic as promised above ...

I could do the screenshot again with the same phone depicting its phone number - 702-981-5600. Give me a sec, bud. ; seriously, I'm not versed in PS, with the ONLY time I've altered a post was falsely depicting BitConnect's 24hr vol. via the Inspec thingy when you right click the moose thingy>

I'm not going to go down the route of claiming it's QS, and I'll be honest I was hoping that this was a fake screenshot right from the beginning. However, you've got to consider how this looks on the outside. If you were relatively new to the forum, and tried selling your account a few years ago when it wasn't so documented that it was a pretty unacceptable thing then I don't think it would be an issue.

But, your account holds a certain respect. It's pretty well known by the majority of the members here, and I just don't think the original owner would not know it's unacceptable to sell an account after being part of the forum for all these years.

I don't want to believe your protecting the buyer, and I don't want to believe it's been sold. But, the fact that you sent that message, and  then there are multiple password changes in among all of this just doesn't seem right.

Yeah, and it's why I'm so conflicted about the issue. All we do know is the PM was sent, and there were password changes. I tend to steer away from pure speculation, but this kind of hits a nerve with me for what ever reason. I remember liking Bruno quite a bit.

Alright, it seems that Bruno has attempted to sell an account before (PG) back when it was an accepted thing to do. Maybe, it's not totally unbelievable that he wasn't aware it's not really accepted anymore.

Whoever is posted with the account right now definitely sounds like Bruno, and matches up with his previous posts. I find it hard to believe that someone who has bought the account would be nailing his language down to a T.

You look and sound like good ol' Bruno, which is good enough for me.


If Bruno and the hypothetical buyer are in cahoots then it's impossible to verify the ownership of the account in any conceivable way. Same applies to any account. So we are basically trying to come up with probabilities. I know I brought up the QS conspiracy theory but I think the probability of that one is quite low.

Jesus fuckin Chris, bud, this is getting crazy now. QS only confirmed that I am who I say I am by calling me, but now we have him as the possible owner of the Gleb account.

Please refrain from stickin' it my ass by being straightforward with you.


I give. We could spend hours on this issue. Please let me know who I'm protecting. AND IT'S NOT QS.

If this was the case wouldn't you have tried selling the account as this account, and not some throw away?

Calling him is useless. It literally proves nothing other than he's willing to potentially protect the person who bought it by claiming he's still in control.

I have no plans whatsoever in participating in any form of shady shit, bud ... unless it's with goat shit under a giant elm tree (read: in the shade).

I like this theory. Most of them in this thread were all boring but this is fired up crack( I DON'T TAKE DRUGS,FYI).  Can someone else call Gleb to verify if this theory is true or false?

I'll just leave this here:


Still doesn't explain this either:



The account has almost certainly changed hands regardless of any pictorial or telephonic proof gleb wants to post.


1) You've been here long enough to know how things work around here.
2) If that was the case, why did you use a throwaway account to sell it?


It wouldn't surprise me at all if QS was the one that bought it.

Sold it and then reclaimed? Thus multiple password changes.

Sold it to Quicksy with some sort of revenue sharing deal? Thus Quicksy so eager with proof.

Many possibilities but unless Gleb starts engaging in shady shit beyond sig campaigns I think I'll hold my judgement.