When, new faster version for BEAM ? Tnx
When ready :p 
Topic: GMiner v3.24 Ergo+KASPA+ZIL/KAWPOW/Equihash/Cortex - page 121. (Read 306482 times)
When, new faster version for BEAM ? Tnx
Any plans on 1060 3gb support for 150,5?
This algo use 4300mb on GPU. Its imbossible.thats not entirely true, lollidieb (the developer of the official miner) released an openCL version, that is capable of mining with 3GB memory. saw it somewhere in the discord channel some days ago and tried it with some of my HD7970/280x not much hashrate (2,5-5 sol/s), but it works and some people confirmed running it with nvidia cards.
Edit:
found it
Quote
Lolliedieb
@felblob : look current commit - added a switch ^^
but only for all GPUs in system atm ... if some should still run 4G kernel (which is faster if it works) then must run two miners in two cmd windows
@caex:
Maybe try the new build right now created and force 3G kernel use with --force3G ... if you run your monitor on the 4G mining card the 4G kernel may be too much bit 3G could work
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/win/opencl-miner-1.0.62.zip (windows)
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/linux/opencl-miner-1.0.62.tar.gz (linux)
Versions with --force3G switch
@felblob : look current commit - added a switch ^^
but only for all GPUs in system atm ... if some should still run 4G kernel (which is faster if it works) then must run two miners in two cmd windows
@caex:
Maybe try the new build right now created and force 3G kernel use with --force3G ... if you run your monitor on the 4G mining card the 4G kernel may be too much bit 3G could work
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/win/opencl-miner-1.0.62.zip (windows)
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/linux/opencl-miner-1.0.62.tar.gz (linux)
Versions with --force3G switch
help, how to run 1063 on that miner? (not found opencl devices)
Confirmed to be working flawlessly mining BEAM 150,5 with GTX 1070 @ 12-13sol/s 
For reference, I was getting 8.5-9sol/s with the official BEAM miner v9.0
Overclock settings with MSI Afterburner for the GTX 1070:
Power Limit: 75
Temp Limit: 72
Core Clock: +75
Memory: +500
Fan: 70%
Proof: https://imgur.com/2XC2C91
Thank you for your work, keep it up!
For reference, I was getting 8.5-9sol/s with the official BEAM miner v9.0
Overclock settings with MSI Afterburner for the GTX 1070:
Power Limit: 75
Temp Limit: 72
Core Clock: +75
Memory: +500
Fan: 70%
Proof: https://imgur.com/2XC2C91
Thank you for your work, keep it up!
75% is too much power
asus 1070ti here power 50% core +240 memory +700
What is your sol/s with those overclock settings mining BEAM? I've noticed that if I push the 1070 past ~600-650 memory clock AND/OR core clock of 140+, it won't be stable and it'll constantly crash....
C:\Users\User\Desktop\gminer_1_14_windows64>miner.exe --algo 192_7 --pers ZERO_P
oW --server zer-eu.forgetop.com --port 2052 --user t1d1YLkZ94UhUE1G6nJLHA2Qf3HPD
5JqgwQ.rig0 --pass x
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| GMiner Equihash Miner v1.14 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
Algorithm: Equihash 192,7 "ZERO_PoW"
Stratum server:
host: stratum://zer-eu.forgetop.com:2052
user: t1d1YLkZ94UhUE1G6nJLHA2Qf3HPD5JqgwQ.rig0
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: off
Selected devices: GPU0 GPU1
Temperature limits: 90C 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
15:56:25 Anti-hacking system detected modification of the miner memory. If you u
sing an antivirus, add miner to antivirus exceptions
15:56:25 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds
fix it please!!!
I tried to undervolt to 635, but it does not seem to do anything if i go under 650, at least on 1060s, power consumption wise, maybe hashrate is little lower, but within what i expect for the same kind of rig i'm testing it on.
You also need to reduce memoery to -600 (this is the level where power consummed by memory drop considerably (next step being -800 but at that level the hashrate drops like a brick)
Running gminer with 1080 and 1060 rigs. Have near 10% delay shares on sparkpool. Any suggestions how to reduce this percentage?
That was report for the creator of this miner, I will try to find better place to post it.
I have windows 7
windows 1809 drivers do not contain nvidia-smi and your miner expects, i guess, nvidia management library, in the nvidia-smi directory in program files
so it does not start mining on windows 1809
so it does not start mining on windows 1809
Can someone help me with this weird thing? When I run gminer I get notification 'Anti-hacking system detected modification of the miner memory. If you using an antivirus, add miner to antivirus exceptions'
I added miner to Avira antivirus exceptions, but it didn't help. Then I uninstalled Avira and still got the same error. I disabled Comodo firewall and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, but still got the same error. I have no other anti-whatewer protection on my system, yet the miner doesn't work.
https://imgur.com/ZbDMtB1
I added miner to Avira antivirus exceptions, but it didn't help. Then I uninstalled Avira and still got the same error. I disabled Comodo firewall and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, but still got the same error. I have no other anti-whatewer protection on my system, yet the miner doesn't work.
https://imgur.com/ZbDMtB1
I tried to undervolt to 635, but it does not seem to do anything if i go under 650, at least on 1060s, power consumption wise, maybe hashrate is little lower, but within what i expect for the same kind of rig i'm testing it on.
Any plans on 1060 3gb support for 150,5?
This algo use 4300mb on GPU. Its imbossible.thats not entirely true, lollidieb (the developer of the official miner) released an openCL version, that is capable of mining with 3GB memory. saw it somewhere in the discord channel some days ago and tried it with some of my HD7970/280x not much hashrate (2,5-5 sol/s), but it works and some people confirmed running it with nvidia cards.
Edit:
found it
Quote
Lolliedieb
@felblob : look current commit - added a switch ^^
but only for all GPUs in system atm ... if some should still run 4G kernel (which is faster if it works) then must run two miners in two cmd windows
@caex:
Maybe try the new build right now created and force 3G kernel use with --force3G ... if you run your monitor on the 4G mining card the 4G kernel may be too much bit 3G could work
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/win/opencl-miner-1.0.62.zip (windows)
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/linux/opencl-miner-1.0.62.tar.gz (linux)
Versions with --force3G switch
@felblob : look current commit - added a switch ^^
but only for all GPUs in system atm ... if some should still run 4G kernel (which is faster if it works) then must run two miners in two cmd windows
@caex:
Maybe try the new build right now created and force 3G kernel use with --force3G ... if you run your monitor on the 4G mining card the 4G kernel may be too much bit 3G could work
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/win/opencl-miner-1.0.62.zip (windows)
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/linux/opencl-miner-1.0.62.tar.gz (linux)
Versions with --force3G switch
Nvidia 1060 3G - 5 sol so with gminer i think we can get 6-8 sol on beam
Any plans on 1060 3gb support for 150,5?
This algo use 4300mb on GPU. Its imbossible.thats not entirely true, lollidieb (the developer of the official miner) released an openCL version, that is capable of mining with 3GB memory. saw it somewhere in the discord channel some days ago and tried it with some of my HD7970/280x not much hashrate (2,5-5 sol/s), but it works and some people confirmed running it with nvidia cards.
Edit:
found it
Quote
Lolliedieb
@felblob : look current commit - added a switch ^^
but only for all GPUs in system atm ... if some should still run 4G kernel (which is faster if it works) then must run two miners in two cmd windows
@caex:
Maybe try the new build right now created and force 3G kernel use with --force3G ... if you run your monitor on the 4G mining card the 4G kernel may be too much bit 3G could work
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/win/opencl-miner-1.0.62.zip (windows)
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/linux/opencl-miner-1.0.62.tar.gz (linux)
Versions with --force3G switch
@felblob : look current commit - added a switch ^^
but only for all GPUs in system atm ... if some should still run 4G kernel (which is faster if it works) then must run two miners in two cmd windows
@caex:
Maybe try the new build right now created and force 3G kernel use with --force3G ... if you run your monitor on the 4G mining card the 4G kernel may be too much bit 3G could work
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/win/opencl-miner-1.0.62.zip (windows)
http://builds.beam-mw.com/files/master/2019.01.06/Release/linux/opencl-miner-1.0.62.tar.gz (linux)
Versions with --force3G switch
Tried running this on my 980Ti. Getting between 1-2 Sols/s on 150_5. limitation on the algo or just needs some work?
Current Equihash 150,5 implementation is base, we will release much more optimized version within few days, please be patient. Interesting, I thought you can't go under 650mV
Requesting the info with always give you a minimum of 650mV but the voltage can go as low as 450mV but with settings lower than 630mV, the performance w/s doesn't increase with any algorithm I have tested so far (and you have to overclock the CPU so much, it become the limiting factor because of instability)Those are the voltagepoint for a 1070ti (probably the same for other 10* serie) but for some reason you can still use in between values
nvidiaInspector.exe "-setVoltagePoints:0,450000;400000|462500;400000|475000;400000|481250;400000|493750;400000|500000;400000|512500;400000|525000;400000|531250;400000|543750;
400000|550000;400000|562500;400000|575000;400000|581250;400000|593750;400000|600000;400000|612500;400000|625000;400000|631250;400000|643750;400000|650000;400000|662500;
400000|675000;400000|681250;400000|693750;400000|700000;400000|712500;400000|725000;400000|731250;400000|743750;400000|750000;400000|762500;400000|775000;400000|781250;
400000|793750;400000|800000;400000|812500;400000|825000;400000|831250;400000|843750;400000|850000;400000|862500;400000|875000;400000|881250;400000|893750;400000|900000;
400000|912500;400000|925000;400000|931250;400000|943750;400000|950000;400000|962500;400000|975000;400000|981250;400000|993750;400000|1000000;400000|1012500;400000|1025000;
400000|1031250;400000|1043750;400000|1050000;400000|1062500;400000|1075000;400000|1081250;400000|1093750;400000|1100000;400000|1112500;400000|1125000;400000|1131250;
400000|1143750;400000|1150000;400000|1162500;400000|1175000;400000|1181250;400000|1193750;400000|1200000;400000|1212500;400000|1225000;400000|1231250;400000|1243750;400000|"
Tried running this on my 980Ti. Getting between 1-2 Sols/s on 150_5. limitation on the algo or just needs some work?
Confirmed to be working flawlessly mining BEAM 150,5 with GTX 1070 @ 12-13sol/s
For reference, I was getting 8.5-9sol/s with the official BEAM miner v9.0
Overclock settings with MSI Afterburner for the GTX 1070:
Power Limit: 75
Temp Limit: 72
Core Clock: +75
Memory: +500
Fan: 70%
Proof:
Thank you for your work, keep it up!
For reference, I was getting 8.5-9sol/s with the official BEAM miner v9.0
Overclock settings with MSI Afterburner for the GTX 1070:
Power Limit: 75
Temp Limit: 72
Core Clock: +75
Memory: +500
Fan: 70%
Proof:
Thank you for your work, keep it up!
75% is too much power
asus 1070ti here power 50% core +240 memory +700
beam-cuda-miner-1.0.0.82 9-10sols/
Gminer 13sol/s but 2% go to dev and is not open source so can be more than 2%
Code:
15:03:25 Share Accepted
15:03:47 Temperature: GPU0 47C
15:03:47 Speed: GPU0 13 Sol/s
15:03:47 Power: GPU0 88W 0.15 Sol/W
15:03:47 Total Speed: 13 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 24 Rejected: 0 Power: 88W 0.15 Sol/W
15:03:47 Uptime: 0d 00:03:00 Electricity: 0.004kWh
15:04:01 Share Accepted
15:04:02 Share Accepted
15:04:05 Share Accepted
15:04:17 Temperature: GPU0 47C
15:04:17 Speed: GPU0 14 Sol/s
15:04:17 Power: GPU0 88W 0.16 Sol/W
15:04:17 Total Speed: 14 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 27 Rejected: 0 Power: 88W 0.16 Sol/W
15:04:17 Uptime: 0d 00:03:30 Electricity: 0.005kWh
15:04:21 Share Accepted
15:04:28 Share Accepted
15:04:29 Share Accepted
15:04:30 Share Accepted
15:04:32 New Job: 6
15:04:39 Share Accepted
15:04:40 New Job: 7
15:04:44 Share Accepted
15:04:47 Temperature: GPU0 47C
15:04:47 Speed: GPU0 13 Sol/s
15:04:47 Power: GPU0 88W 0.15 Sol/W
15:04:47 Total Speed: 13 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 33 Rejected: 0 Power: 88W 0.15 Sol/W
15:04:47 Uptime: 0d 00:04:00 Electricity: 0.006kWh
15:04:48 Share Accepted
15:04:49 Share Accepted
15:05:03 Share Accepted
15:05:05 New Job: 8
15:05:08 Share Accepted
15:05:08 Share Accepted
15:05:10 New Job: 9
15:05:17 Temperature: GPU0 47C
15:05:17 Speed: GPU0 13 Sol/s
15:05:17 Power: GPU0 88W 0.15 Sol/W
15:05:17 Total Speed: 13 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 38 Rejected: 0 Power: 88W 0.15 Sol/W
15:05:17 Uptime: 0d 00:04:30 Electricity: 0.007kWh
Interesting, I thought you can't go under 650mV
Requesting the info will always give you a minimum of 650mV but the voltage can go as low as 450mV but with settings lower than 630mV, the performance w/s doesn't increase with any algorithm I have tested so far (and you have to overclock the CPU so much, it become the limiting factor because of instability)Those are the voltagepoint for a 1070ti (probably the same for other 10* serie) but for some reason you can still use in between values
nvidiaInspector.exe "-setVoltagePoints:0,450000;400000|462500;400000|475000;400000|481250;400000|493750;400000|500000;400000|512500;400000|525000;400000|531250;400000|543750;
400000|550000;400000|562500;400000|575000;400000|581250;400000|593750;400000|600000;400000|612500;400000|625000;400000|631250;400000|643750;400000|650000;400000|662500;
400000|675000;400000|681250;400000|693750;400000|700000;400000|712500;400000|725000;400000|731250;400000|743750;400000|750000;400000|762500;400000|775000;400000|781250;
400000|793750;400000|800000;400000|812500;400000|825000;400000|831250;400000|843750;400000|850000;400000|862500;400000|875000;400000|881250;400000|893750;400000|900000;
400000|912500;400000|925000;400000|931250;400000|943750;400000|950000;400000|962500;400000|975000;400000|981250;400000|993750;400000|1000000;400000|1012500;400000|1025000;
400000|1031250;400000|1043750;400000|1050000;400000|1062500;400000|1075000;400000|1081250;400000|1093750;400000|1100000;400000|1112500;400000|1125000;400000|1131250;
400000|1143750;400000|1150000;400000|1162500;400000|1175000;400000|1181250;400000|1193750;400000|1200000;400000|1212500;400000|1225000;400000|1231250;400000|1243750;400000|"
I can get this miner working directly to a pool. however, MiningRigRentals will not connect.
Any ideas as to why?
this in the consol:
""02:21:47 Connected to us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333
02:21:47 Subscribed to Stratum Server
02:21:47 Set Nonce: f800002e
02:21:47 Authorized on Stratum Server
02:21:47 Connection Error: End of file
02:21:52 Connected to us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333
02:21:52 Subscribed to Stratum Server
02:21:52 Set Nonce: f800002e
02:21:52 Authorized on Stratum Server
02:21:52 Connection Error: End of file
02:21:52 All user mining pools are unavailable
02:21:53 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds""
Having the same issue but I am trying to connect directly to pools, I had the same issue with Bminer. Any ideas as to why?
this in the consol:
""02:21:47 Connected to us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333
02:21:47 Subscribed to Stratum Server
02:21:47 Set Nonce: f800002e
02:21:47 Authorized on Stratum Server
02:21:47 Connection Error: End of file
02:21:52 Connected to us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333
02:21:52 Subscribed to Stratum Server
02:21:52 Set Nonce: f800002e
02:21:52 Authorized on Stratum Server
02:21:52 Connection Error: End of file
02:21:52 All user mining pools are unavailable
02:21:53 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds""
Jump to: