it would be really nice to have failover for pools in pools.txt file
In GMiner v1.08 we will add support of configuration file, you will be able specify pools and options in INI file. 
Topic: GMiner v3.24 Ergo+KASPA+ZIL/KAWPOW/Equihash/Cortex - page 131. (Read 306469 times)
it would be really nice to have failover for pools in pools.txt file
Пoчeмy пpи cкaчивaнии Windows нaxoдит виpyc?
I got it working, seems each pool the bats can drastically change.
Hi, getting a low hash with this miner, around 25 sol/s per card (1080ti 11Gb) is this right?
Thanks
Hi, normal hashrate for 1080 Ti is 80+ sols.Thanks
Your OS is windows 10?
Does this support --pers auto? I keep getting subscription failed when trying to use the it.
Yes, "--pers auto" supported. Please provide more details, specially pool/algorithm, I'll check. GMiner v1.07 support added for MinerMonitoring.com (https://github.com/JamesSmith2/EthControl/releases/tag/1028)
I been using your ethmonitor side for months now, when I use this it mines for a few shares then says to many processes and restarts, any idea how to fix it? Hi, getting a low hash with this miner, around 25 sol/s per card (1080ti 11Gb) is this right?
Thanks
Thanks
hmmm, which algo? that seems way to low if it is 144_5. I tested Gminer 1.07 on a 1070ti and got 60 Sol/s in ZhashOS with it.
I set:
Power: 120 watts
cc: 240
mc: 1292
I think a 1080ti likes around 170 watts though.
Does this support --pers auto? I keep getting subscription failed when trying to use the it.
Hi, getting a low hash with this miner, around 25 sol/s per card (1080ti 11Gb) is this right?
Thanks
Thanks
Hi, Just stopping by to say thanks for your work in the asic resistant equihash algorithm arena.
We have decided to add your miner to our ZhashOS Release 3.
FYI, ZhashOS is a Power $aving Pendrive OS that also allows users to keep their Win10/7 intact.
More info and download link in 1st post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.40261859
We have decided to add your miner to our ZhashOS Release 3.
FYI, ZhashOS is a Power $aving Pendrive OS that also allows users to keep their Win10/7 intact.
More info and download link in 1st post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.40261859
GMiner v1.07 support added for MinerMonitoring.com (https://github.com/JamesSmith2/EthControl/releases/tag/1028)
Thx, great job guys!
GMiner v1.07 support added for MinerMonitoring.com (https://github.com/JamesSmith2/EthControl/releases/tag/1028)
What PL for 1070 (asus strix) is the best fot 1.07 version of miner ? Tnx
I can't mine with my RTX 2080 
FTW: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:12,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:12,0,440 -setPowerTarget:12,51
SC: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:2,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,420 -setPowerTarget:2,64
1.06 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.1 Sol/s
89.6 watts
SC @ 100,420,64
43.2 Sol/s
92.7 watts
1.07 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.9 Sol/s
90.2 watts
FTW @ 100,440,51
46.2 Sol/s
91.7 watts
SC @ 100,420,67
44.3 Sol/s
98.5 watts
I tied 1.07 with the original OC settings on the SC cards but power draw went up and sols went down so i tried other settings of higher power to see what happens. efficiency just went down. i also tried lower power settings, eff still decreased. I decided to use 1.06 on the SC cards and 1.07 on FTW cards.
Unfortunately I'm unable to achieve 5-10% performance increase as stated in 1.07 notes. from 1.06 at 50% power to 1.07 at 51% power sol's went up little under 3% but power also went up little over 2%. 1.07 on the FTW cards at 51% PL is about the same efficiency as 1.06 at 50% PL
still need to do more comparisons at higher pl
Could you take a screenshot ?! I just can not get the card to work under such conditions as you write? Your FTW has a base frequency of 1067MHz! + 100=1700MHz, at such a frequency and a minimum PL, the card works at least 780Mv, and it can not be 90W . SC: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:2,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,420 -setPowerTarget:2,64
1.06 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.1 Sol/s
89.6 watts
SC @ 100,420,64
43.2 Sol/s
92.7 watts
1.07 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.9 Sol/s
90.2 watts
FTW @ 100,440,51
46.2 Sol/s
91.7 watts
SC @ 100,420,67
44.3 Sol/s
98.5 watts
I tied 1.07 with the original OC settings on the SC cards but power draw went up and sols went down so i tried other settings of higher power to see what happens. efficiency just went down. i also tried lower power settings, eff still decreased. I decided to use 1.06 on the SC cards and 1.07 on FTW cards.
Unfortunately I'm unable to achieve 5-10% performance increase as stated in 1.07 notes. from 1.06 at 50% power to 1.07 at 51% power sol's went up little under 3% but power also went up little over 2%. 1.07 on the FTW cards at 51% PL is about the same efficiency as 1.06 at 50% PL
still need to do more comparisons at higher pl
FTW: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:12,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:12,0,440 -setPowerTarget:12,51
SC: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:2,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,420 -setPowerTarget:2,64
1.06 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.1 Sol/s
89.6 watts
SC @ 100,420,64
43.2 Sol/s
92.7 watts
1.07 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.9 Sol/s
90.2 watts
FTW @ 100,440,51
46.2 Sol/s
91.7 watts
SC @ 100,420,67
44.3 Sol/s
98.5 watts
I tied 1.07 with the original OC settings on the SC cards but power draw went up and sols went down so i tried other settings of higher power to see what happens. efficiency just went down. i also tried lower power settings, eff still decreased. I decided to use 1.06 on the SC cards and 1.07 on FTW cards.
Unfortunately I'm unable to achieve 5-10% performance increase as stated in 1.07 notes. from 1.06 at 50% power to 1.07 at 51% power sol's went up little under 3% but power also went up little over 2%. 1.07 on the FTW cards at 51% PL is about the same efficiency as 1.06 at 50% PL
still need to do more comparisons at higher pl
SC: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:2,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,420 -setPowerTarget:2,64
1.06 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.1 Sol/s
89.6 watts
SC @ 100,420,64
43.2 Sol/s
92.7 watts
1.07 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.9 Sol/s
90.2 watts
FTW @ 100,440,51
46.2 Sol/s
91.7 watts
SC @ 100,420,67
44.3 Sol/s
98.5 watts
I tied 1.07 with the original OC settings on the SC cards but power draw went up and sols went down so i tried other settings of higher power to see what happens. efficiency just went down. i also tried lower power settings, eff still decreased. I decided to use 1.06 on the SC cards and 1.07 on FTW cards.
Unfortunately I'm unable to achieve 5-10% performance increase as stated in 1.07 notes. from 1.06 at 50% power to 1.07 at 51% power sol's went up little under 3% but power also went up little over 2%. 1.07 on the FTW cards at 51% PL is about the same efficiency as 1.06 at 50% PL
still need to do more comparisons at higher pl
Zminer777
Version 1.06 more productive Sol/W ..
Version 1.06 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 230Sol ~ 530W ~ 0.43Sol/W
Version 1.07 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 240Sol ~ 600W ~ 0.38Sol/W
Is it possible to make a special version with new features, but with the old performance?
whats your OC settings? your efficiency should not be so low. which make/model of your 1070s?Version 1.06 more productive Sol/W ..
Version 1.06 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 230Sol ~ 530W ~ 0.43Sol/W
Version 1.07 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 240Sol ~ 600W ~ 0.38Sol/W
Is it possible to make a special version with new features, but with the old performance?
I run my EVGA 1070 FTW at little over .50sol/w and the EVGA SC at about .465 sol/w which I have found is max efficiency for both cards using my most stable oc settings of 100/440 for the FTW cards and 100/420 for the SC cards. especially at high difficulty efficiency becomes more important.
It matters to me how my cards work! My 1070 consume ~ 105W and give ~46Sol/s (5x46 = 230)! they heat at the same time 52-54C(38% RPM)!
EVGA FTW are 45 sol/s @ 89.57w
EVGA SC are 43.2 sol/s @ 92.75w
Haven't used 1.07 yet
Dear, Zminer777, I really look forward to the function of the failover pool in pools.txt file!
6x1060 6 GB
185 core
200 memory
71% power limit
WINDOWS
1.07 More stable sols 190-199, 560W
Vs
1.06 184-199 sols, 575W
185 core
200 memory
71% power limit
WINDOWS
1.07 More stable sols 190-199, 560W
Vs
1.06 184-199 sols, 575W
Thank you for responsiveness!
The main advantage of Awesome Miner is the ability to change the parameters of the pool (and mining software) on the fly without going into each rig.
Yes, you added compatibility but only through an external miner. Command line remained ewbf like (exept api key), but -api part became Bminer.
Can you add bminer command line compatiblity together with bminer api compatibility?
EWBF's API is absurd, it's very hard to comply with it.The main advantage of Awesome Miner is the ability to change the parameters of the pool (and mining software) on the fly without going into each rig.
Yes, you added compatibility but only through an external miner. Command line remained ewbf like (exept api key), but -api part became Bminer.
Can you add bminer command line compatiblity together with bminer api compatibility?
Thus we decided implement "BTMiner NebuTech compatible", because it's JSON based HTTP protocol.
We will try to support Awesome Miner better in future updates, currently we can only support it through external miner.
Jump to: