Namecoin isn't a monetary coin.
LMAO for non-monetary
coins.
namecoin is useful as it allows a decentralized censorship resistant DNS .bit domains
its a cool alt coin thats been out for a long time.
I wouldn't speculate on namecoin, but i can see myself possibly buying a few to get a .bit domain
actually namecoin is interesting from a theoretical perspective. [...] The fact the gold-bugs are not jumping on NMC in hoardes tells me the whole "intrinsic value" argument is flawed.
Distributed TLD/DNS database:
yesDatabase that can't have values removed:
noUsing coin mining as an incentive for the problem that Namecoin is trying to solve doesn't work IMO. There's just no reason to have a separate cryptocoin for every implementation of a decentralised network that uses cryptographic proofs to operate.
In bitcoin, the justification is there, as every data unit (the coins) must originate from a mining block reward to ensure the validity of transaction inputs. The database for TLD/DNS serving doesn't need to store the original instantiation of the domain name or it's DNS resolution mapping, that information is no longer relevant the moment it changes (and there can exist the need for it to change frequently in either case). The wasteful bloat would probably kill a working Namecoin system before it became really useful. It still does a good job of popularising the idea.
I think the uncensorable web domains issue will be solved by some overlay protocol to MAIDsafe or MetaDisk (or perhaps a new rival decentralised storage system)