Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. - page 259. (Read 2032248 times)

ftfy

what's your skype address?

having invested before them must mean something.

Did you see the point of the sig? If one were to follow,

"I could not agree more that developers should not be in charge of the
network rules.
Which is why - in my opinion - hard forks cannot be controversial things. A
controversial change to the software, forced to be adopted by the public
because the only alternative is a permanent chain fork, is a use of power
that developers (or anyone) should not have, and an incredibly dangerous
precedent for other changes that only a subset of participants would want."

one might find that,

"A decentralized payment system must not depend on a single person's decisions, even if this person is a core developer. Hard constants and magic numbers in the code deter the system's evolution and therefore should be eliminated (or at least be cut down to the minimum). Every crucial limit (like max block size or min fee amount) should be re-calculated based on the system's previous state. Therefore, it always changes adaptively and independently, allowing the network to develop on it's own.
CryptoNote has the following parameters which adjust automatically for each new block:
1) Difficulty. The general idea of our algorithm is to sum all the work that nodes have performed during the last 720 blocks and divide it by the time they have spent to accomplish it. The measure of the work is the corresponding difficulty value for each of the blocks. The time is calculated as follows: sort all the 720 timestamps and cut-off 20% of the outliers. The range of the rest 600 values is the time which was spent for 80% of the corresponding blocks.
2) Max block size. Let MN be the median value of the last N blocks sizes. Then the "hard-limit" for the size of accepting blocks is 2*MN. It averts blockchain bloating but still allows the limit to slowly grow with the time if necessary. Transaction size does not need to be limited explicitly. It is bounded by the size of the block."

the devs i respect are the one's who understand the implications of the position they assume such as core dev for a revolutionary new form of money that has a chance to become a reserve currency and a public good.  i respect those devs who then choose to be paid or funded by a foundation or a research center where they can't be accused of having a financial conflict except by the most extremists who will never be satisfied with anything and see evil everywhere they look.

Yes we see clearly the pattern of your delusion and disrespect for the programmers who make this entire technology happen.

I am ROTFLMAO that you think you have won any debate with me.

Btw, I think perhaps MOA was the guy who spanked me on some Bitcoin 101 issue when I first arrived in this forum in 2013. I've learned much since then.

only a nutjob would expect to be able to get away with saying things like that.

it's not "with me".  it's with Gavin.  yes, i trust Gavin way more than the other financially conflicted Blockstream devs.  

i'm not the one who came up with the block size increase idea.  it's a recommendation from the only guy who could have got us here since Satoshi turned over the reins to him.  guys like gmax and luke were causing trouble long before this issue became a debate.

TPTB dev goes down with a whimper and right on time, MOA dev shows up throwing hand grenades.

anyone see the pattern i've already pointed out?  but it's ok, there are plenty of excellent devs with the right vision.

No, to this day, reading his blog makes me cringe. 

i did file a response and declaration.  you should read that too.

you're still wrong.  both as a programmer stuck on "start" and with your economic assessment.

An offering to communicate is a two-way street. It is not your right King Cypherdoc to determine that you only want to see me for a few seconds on cam and not talk to me. I want to probe your brain. I want to find out more about your personality. Etc..

I did not install Skype here on my development machine and location because Skype is arguably spyware. I only have one computer currently at this new location. I am building two more computers and my new 24" Acer monitors just arrived. Just haven't completed that task yet.

My livein 25 year old boobastic gf is pissed off that I was over at the other location the past two nights and I promised her not to go over there again until maybe tomorrow. Last night she was pissed off that I was still on the computer until 5am. So this has to stop!

Have you ever tried to keep up with a 25 year old woman at our age who wants sex 10 times per day?


I read the filing by the plaintiff. I observe your personality here in this forum. I am a very good judge of people. I am a late June Cancer. We see right through everything. And those Cancers on the leading edge of the start of the Cancer dates are also movers and shakers.

Just return the BTC as long as the manufacturer can commit to dispersing it to the victims you harmed with your endorsement. Do the right thing. Live to profit another day.

Perhaps you can't return it if you've squandered it.

File a counter affidavit for the public record to make your side of the case known.

By entering that endorsement game without anonymity, you implicitly subscribed to this trial.

Why did you risk a profitable medical practice and a timely investment in BTC by doing such risky endorsements? Why put yourself in such a predicament if you are as wealthy as you boastfully claim?

An offering to communicate is a two-way street. It is not your right King Cypherdoc to determine that you only want to see me for a few seconds on cam and not talk to me. I want to probe your brain. I want to find out more about your personality. Etc..


I read the filing by the plaintiff. I observe your personality here in this forum. I am a very good judge of people. I am a late June Cancer. We see right through everything. And those Cancers on the leading edge of the start of the Cancer dates are also movers and shakers.

i won't capture anything.  i just want to see if you're Armstrong.  you're the one who offered.

you have no details of the case so don't jump to any conclusions.  but of course, that's not your objective is it?  to be fair.

Come on cypherdoc do you realize how silly you sound?

The main reason that TPTB's writings often resemble MA's is that he quotes and slightly paraphrases MA a lot.

can you even construct a proper sentence?  and i said most miners have most tx's in their mempool which is why Gavin thinks it is likely to work.  i'm sure there is some work to be done along with testing but the concepts are the same.

do you even have a clue?  the Chinese miners are claiming their bandwidth connections are crap and have given pretty poor connectivity rates.  the miner making the claim was BTCGuild the #3 largest miner in the world.  he was making the claim that all Chinese miners have the same problem.  that includes the #1 and #2 miners Discus Fish and Antpool, both Chinese.  therefore, all 3 of the largest miners in the world cannot conduct the large miner, large block against small miner attack the Blockstream devs have been FUD'ing.  get it or are you retarded?

He won't publish my "21 Inc" revelation. I emailed him 3 times.

I want to talk with you. I want to see you on cam also. I want to try to explain to you why you need to stop your Dunning Kruger presumptions.

But you don't want to talk. You just want to capture my image from the web cam.

You know why we programmers don't make 3000 BTC on defrauding our fellow community? Because we are enjoying too much the challenge of doing. And we see through such simpleton thought processes that you use to lure in naive investors to your trap. Thus we don't have the conscience to do what you do. I suppose your ignorance helps you manage your conscience.

Fuck man I told you 100 pages upthread that big blocks favor large centralized mining because of the equation that determines orphan rate says the orphan rate increases with the propagation delay. Then you retorted that IBLT resolves that, and I said yes but IBLT requires all miners to see all transactions and agree thus is centralization of the network bandwidth requirements.

Then you go over to Reddit and reargue the same nonsense that I had already explained to you is illogical. Then you write here that programmers use too much logic and not enough double-blind surveys.

Fuck man get off our lawn already!

that's possible altho from what i recall those grammatical problems were confined to the time when he was in prison.  remember, he was beat up, probably malnourished, mentally ill, and who knows, maybe faking mistakes to make his condition appear worse for when he appealed.