Cowards who use sockpuppets because they aren't willing to pay a reputational cost for their claims.
That form of debate is the proof of stake of public discourse.
They get to claim pure motives for hiding their identities and if they lose the debate, or if their predictions are shown to be false, of if they decide to employ dishonest and underhanded tactics to achieve their goals, then their public identities don't have to suffer.
Fuck them for wanting to have their cake and eat it too.
Yes, how dare anyone take care to insulate debates from ad hom fallacies and protect their families/careers from internet whackjobs?
Fuck Satoshi Nakamoto for being an anonymous coward! Nobody ever said disrupting gold, central banks, and fintech settlement would be safe or easy! Man up and make sacrifices! The revolution needs martyrs!
And fuck Publius for writing all those mean things about how the King of England treats his American Colonies. Such a gutless terror-symp, am I right?
PS Still waiting for your concern over lack of an objective, precise definition for Bitcoin network "overcapacity" to result in some amazing new concepts and dimensionless numbers.
After all the hand wringing you performed over our unforgivably sloppy use of "decentralized" I'm sure such research is your top priority.
