this is pretty cool
http://bitcoincore.org/~gavin/btc_dev_viz.mp4
Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. - page 668. (Read 2032265 times)
Adrian-x, how much are your losses ?
"there is no there there" there are no losses
there is no spoon,
I do not know if it is 1) not worth my time to talk with you.
it really isn't. 2) you're the one who started the mud slinging.
3) no one said they're smarter. i'm just expressing my view.
1) I'm sorry, I'm not natural speaker.
2) really ?
3) the opposite is true -> they're smarter
I do not know if it is not worth my time to talk with you.
it really isn't. you're the one who started the mud slinging.
no one said they're smarter. i'm just expressing my view.
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.
what are you talking about? better stop smokin that stuff...
I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality.
the problem with you is that you think just b/c something is technically possible you automatically think its economically possible or viable. that's not true, esp with Bitcoin. you're throwing all caution to the wind.
the mere fact that you'll throw out all sorts of these allegations show how desperate you are to capitalize on SC's.
ok, I can take it.
but the problem with you is that you think
a) you are smarter than Satoshi and all devs together (only you have no proof)
b) you invested into Bitcoin and w/o your investment/brain-washing it is the end of universe (only I'm not sure if you invested at least 1/2 of what I did)
I do not know if it is not worth my time to talk with you.
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.
what are you talking about? better stop smokin that stuff...
I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality.
the problem with you is that you think just b/c something is technically possible you automatically think its economically possible or viable. that's not true, esp with Bitcoin. you're throwing all caution to the wind.
the mere fact that you'll throw out all sorts of these made up allegations show how desperate you are to capitalize on SC's.
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.
what are you talking about? better stop smokin that stuff...
I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality.
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.
what are you talking about? better stop smokin that stuff...
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.
It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased.
but so are holders holdings. net effect, zero.
"net effect, zero." =>
a) cypherdoc managed to scam $100,000 USD
b) some newbies lost $100,000 USD
=> $0 USD
WTF is wrong with you? accusing me of scamming? making stuff up now?
you're a dick.
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.
It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased.
but so are holders holdings. net effect, zero.
"net effect, zero." =>
a) cypherdoc managed to scam $100,000 USD
b) some newbies lost $100,000 USD
=> $0 USD
WTF is wrong with you? accusing me of scamming? making stuff up now?
you're a dick.
Edit:
and your scamming business will be evaporating soon. => good for bitcoin
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.
It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased.
but so are holders holdings. net effect, zero.
"net effect, zero." =>
a) cypherdoc managed to scam $100,000 USD
b) some newbies lost $100,000 USD
=> $0 USD
WTF is wrong with you? accusing me of scamming? making stuff up now?
you're a dick.
Adrian-x, how much are your losses ?
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.
It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased.
but so are holders holdings. net effect, zero.
"net effect, zero." =>
a) cypherdoc managed to scam $100,000 USD
b) some newbies lost $100,000 USD
=> $0 USD
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.
It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased.
it seems to me if you make a spin-off that expanded the moneyless 2x with no innovation it'll be deleted in minus and the money supply will balance out at 1x. 2 seconds later.
if it survives, its market cap will be the values the free market gives the innovation. the two market caps combined create a greater whole.
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.
It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased.
but so are holders holdings. net effect, zero.
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
this is too good.
the only thing too much here is your desperation to character assassinate.
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.
It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased.
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat
- "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
- "spin-offs" inflates money.
this is too good.
Jump to: