Gone are the days where projects team ask for opinions from investors

DU18

sr. member

Activity: 1694

Merit: 268

Binance #SWGT dan CERTIK Audited

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 03:06:15 AM

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

I am also surprised how Coinmarketcap can register several exchanges that are indeed indicated to be a scam in their top list, even though we all know that many developers and investors make Coinmarketcap as a reference before they make Ieo and investments, but it seems that now Coinmarketcap provides an assessment of an exchange without strict consideration, and it is time for developers to select more exchanges before make ieo, so that they are not disappointed in the end.

princerepon

full member

Activity: 980

Merit: 101

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 03:06:15 AM

[snip]

I agree with you mate. I saw some projects whom take this kinda unprofessional step and regret later. Sometimes still i saw couple of good projects are going to listed their coin in P2PB2B or Coinsbit. I wish project team beware before they listed those kinda scam exchange. Here is a good scam details about them which given by JollyGood.

Interesting thing is if you told them about they are going to listed their coin in scam exchange they'll just say they have no idea about it. Sometimes i thought those project is a scam also other wise why they support scam exchange. A good quality project always listen (at least respect) to their community/investors. After all their audience is the main source for their project.

aemma

copper member

Activity: 966

Merit: 14

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 03:06:15 AM

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

They stopped asking and started making unnecessary mistakes which always leads to the downfall of the platform, in this case when they list on bad exchanges. This is true because, a good exchange will help a project as well as a bad exchange will also kill a project. To prove this, I haven't seen a project that did IEO on P2PB2B or even list on P2PB2B that is still standing till now, they always ends up with low volume thus lack of interest from investors and of course the downfall of the project. Project team should endeavour to ask questions because most of their investors and members are traders and therefore knows more about most exchanges.

bearexin

full member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 168

Hey OP, I understand your pain man, and I also feel the same. Lots of projects these days don’t ask of their investors opinion, they just prefer to do how it pleases them, forgetting that their investors are the main reason their project is still active, because if those investors should lose interest and stop making use and investing in their project, they are going to fail for sure.

So, the most important thing they should do is to be asking of opinions from their investors, so they wouldn’t end up offering services that wouldn’t interest their users. But despite that, most of them don’t care these days and it’s really not good.

coinfinger

sr. member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 278

I don't think it will be a good idea to listen to the suggestions from common people/end-users but they must listen to the complaints of such group of people and for developments and enhancement they must have specialized team so that they could find good progress with their project. I mean to say community members are for finding bugs and missing things whereas you must have separate team for your all other things.

At the same time every project must interact with end-users or their dedicated community so that they could have all type of feedback and they must work on that so that they could have continuous progress which is more important for sustaining market value.

Ashong Salonga

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 260

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 03:06:15 AM

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

Well, upon engaging into any sort of project, building communication and good relationship between the project team and the investors is in need to make things work the right way because this will build better understanding on how things should be going and to avoid such confusion into any of the party. Well, based on my experience way back 2017, project managers as well as the team behind it seems to be really active and approachable into the different platforms to answer inquiries as well as accept suggestions from the participants to be able to make things work out and be favorable for the both. It is indeed that nowadays the existing projects are not like those projects before and I really do not know why because supposedly the relationship between the two parties should remain in tacked and keep the bonding to be able to make the project successful and will benefit both two parties in the end.

Gheka

hero member

Activity: 1344

Merit: 501

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: rdewilde on March 03, 2020, 09:21:25 AM

This is true they now think they know all and ends up making mistakes. And this is why most people will support a project to an extent and then stop and it will look like they don't like the project anymore whereas it is due to bad decisions the team makes. How can a project aiming to grow list on an exchange known for low volume, low user base and so on. I have seen many people support a project but once IEO is announced and it is on Latoken or P2PB2B, they will all take their leave because the team won't listen to them and seek for a better exchange and its of no use investing in something that won't benefit you in any way. There are good exchanges to launch IEO on, mustn't be top exchanges.

In this era, we can't complain too much about project teams when they don't listen to us because listening to opinions from investors can only improve at some point, project groups cannot adjust completely, project teams sometimes want to be listed on good and reputable exchanges but this time is too difficult. Good exchanges can only list a few eligible projects, projects listed below are forced to list on bad exchanges to maintain hope for the future, listening to the investors' wishes is possible but completing it is a challenging process

BayAngelo

member

Activity: 882

Merit: 17

What matters to them is Money. not what the community said. they are only interested in how much they made and the worth of their product should in case of any suitable investor interested in buying the project. Most projects these days never update their roadmap to suit the current trends in cryptocurrency. some are quiet aware of the damages most of these exchanges cause yet they go ahead and list on them.

Crypto_lion

member

Activity: 630

Merit: 11

NEW MEDICINE:Faster, Safer, Smarter

First of all not all projects that start the ico are with knowledgeable and equipped personal with ideas. There are some projects who come with up a poor idea and try to make a quick buck out of it with ico. On the other hand there are people who are knowledgeable on the specific segment but have little idea about crypto industry and exchanges

rdewilde

full member

Activity: 925

Merit: 100

This is true they now think they know all and ends up making mistakes. And this is why most people will support a project to an extent and then stop and it will look like they don't like the project anymore whereas it is due to bad decisions the team makes. How can a project aiming to grow list on an exchange known for low volume, low user base and so on. I have seen many people support a project but once IEO is announced and it is on Latoken or P2PB2B, they will all take their leave because the team won't listen to them and seek for a better exchange and its of no use investing in something that won't benefit you in any way. There are good exchanges to launch IEO on, mustn't be top exchanges.

kindbtc

member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 12

SAPG Pre-Sale Live on Uniswap!

You are right but the problem is that bigger or established exchanges do not list new coins or tokens easily so new projects have to find some place to list their tokens and as p2pb2b and other exchanges are new themselve and they want to grow their community and volume that is why they welcome new projects to list their coins and as a result attract new members.

thesmallgod

full member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 129

Not seeking an opinion from the community members is one of the reasons why many projects will lead to destruction. Apart from opinion about the listing, contribution from the community about features and functions they want in a project really help. The problem with dev team is that they always feel they have adequate knowledge about anything about crypto and blockchain which is not through because the technology is very evolving. I have once warned a dev team not to list a coin on Latoken and p2p2b but they refused citing reasons because CMC indicates they have a high daily volume. Today the project is in shambles

Winscosinally

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 16

Lol many new projects developers always think they are smarter, honestly speaking there are some hidden parts in crypto space that only investors will be well aware of, developers aren't the types that seek for knowledge, they claim to be the real knowledge of which they are always wrong

DDante

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 19

Many developers are not doing proper research about crypto exchanges that's why they become a victim of scam exchanges like idax and vindax, even if they can't find clue I expect them to ask from old crypto members like from this project

Shallow

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 255

SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 03:06:15 AM

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

That's quite true, before the team do ask their community their opinions on several things, not that they are clueless but to understand or hear from the community so as to serve them better. And back in the days, although there were still scam projects, but the few that listened to their community members felt the positive impact. Also, what you said about P2PB2B is true, any project which lists on that exchange have a bad motive, because I can't understand why everyone will be against an exchange and a team which have little or no experience about exchanges will still go ahead then later will look for an excuse to cover up their mistakes. I also, understand most times the community members can try to impose their ideas, but yet it pays to hear from them so as to make good decisions.

jacafbiz

hero member

Activity: 2072

Merit: 529

Sugars.zone | DatingFi - Earn for Posting

Quote from: oxgroth on February 14, 2020, 09:01:20 AM

Sometimes team really knows better that they should do with project

Yes this is true sometimes the team know better but not every time. I could remember Davcoin, this project raise more than $20 million in their ICO, I can't really remember the actual amount and they went on to list on IDAX, exchange were all they do there was to wash trade, no liquidity and not surprise how the exchange scam people of their funds. All what some of these developers cared about is to list on exchange and some don't want to pay the listing fee on big exchange that would help the price and give it exposure

canovan25

member

Activity: 546

Merit: 30

Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on February 14, 2020, 04:39:04 PM

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 03:06:15 AM

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do ***

Well I'm not against your opinion as it's more beneficial when everyone is been carried along especially when the projects is at its early stage and need all the contribution that can bring about success to the project. Although from a personal experience, I think the reason teams aren't interested in the opinion of the community is because, most patronizers aren't interested in the progress of the project on a long-term but only concerned how to make quick bucks.

Asking for opinions from customers who're only interested in their selfish gains is deadly to the progress of a project as their suggestion will only involves the price movement of the project and not the development of the project on a general note.

You are incredibly right. I support your every word, I think there is nothing to add here.

CryptopreneurBrainboss

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 4133

eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 03:06:15 AM

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do ***

Well I'm not against your opinion as it's more beneficial when everyone is been carried along especially when the projects is at its early stage and need all the contribution that can bring about success to the project. Although from a personal experience, I think the reason teams aren't interested in the opinion of the community is because, most patronizers aren't interested in the progress of the project on a long-term but only concerned how to make quick bucks.

Asking for opinions from customers who're only interested in their selfish gains is deadly to the progress of a project as their suggestion will only involves the price movement of the project and not the development of the project on a general note.

canovan25

member

Activity: 546

Merit: 30

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 03:06:15 AM

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

This is actually a very difficult question. Of course, this is not good to hear, but not all members of the community adequately assess the situation. I came here from the Russian local section, there are very few adequate people who really understand how exchange trading, banks and the economy as a whole work. I feel Spanish shame when I read posts from there. Therefore, I believe that it is better to let the teams order expert advice from lawyers / economists and publish it in the public domain.

Bonwin

member

Activity: 798

Merit: 38

I once witnessed similar thing from some projects too, most especially when it comes to exchanging listing.
They might decide to ask them to vote. Even if they do not have the fund at that moment, they will try every means possible to get it done, perhaps after they might have done their review.
Also, they never can tell, there are some investors who have meaningful contributions. Some of them might be well connected and could lead the project team on the right path and the easiest way to achieve some things.

Topic: Gone are the days where projects team ask for opinions from investors (Read 426 times)