Gone are the days where projects team ask for opinions from investors - page 3.

Bttzed03

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1150

https://bitcoincleanup.com/

One thing I try to avoid when expressing my opinion is to assume that I'm certain of what I'm talking about.

Quote

~ once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Quote

~ Now new project teams always think they are the wisest

How sure are you? Do you have any statistical data to back up those claims?
Don't get me wrong, I understand what you are trying to point out but don't assume that it applies to all just because 10 out of 1000 does it.

Quote

~ the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions.

This sounds good on paper until you hear the audience starts asking for "when new exchange?" or "when Binance?".

From my experience hanging out with different project on their telegram, many teams do listen to their community but we have to accept the fact that not everything we say will be viable for the team. When it comes to listing on exchanges, most of them would choose small/medium with cheaper listing fees and "decent volume". I'm not sure if they even consider the exchange reputation.

memed97

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 101

Quote from: Winscosinally on February 14, 2020, 04:49:11 AM

The only project I can side till date on this OP point is Apollo, they never did any ICO or IEO, the CEO and team spend money on the project themselves and they still ask investors for opinions, this is rare in crypto space

Yes, the concept of the Apollo project rarely happens in crypto space, but that does not mean it is much better than projects that have done ICO, IEO, because we can't get a little profit through the launch of the Apollo project, unless we choose Apollo to trade in exchange.

Winscosinally

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 16

The only project I can side till date on this OP point is Apollo, they never did any ICO or IEO, the CEO and team spend money on the project themselves and they still ask investors for opinions, this is rare in crypto space

knuckey

sr. member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 251

When the goal has been achieved, in this case the funds have been held, then all regulations and policies must be subject or obey as they wish. Often they change the agreement or do not comply with their initial bid and it is certain that all parties involved will incur losses.

Therefore we must be thorough and wise to invest or trade, because there are many opportunities that they can take advantage of in each of our investment funds.

Balladtony77

member

Activity: 378

Merit: 15

Here is my own little point, If they make you all feel at home providing every thing investors asked for what do you think will happen? you will definitely want to invest more, they are trying to build somekind of tight relationship between investors and team just to make more money, I find these type of teams to be the most dangerous

minairia3

sr. member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 326

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: Furryball on February 14, 2020, 02:06:15 AM

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..

If you would noticed eversince IEO started the voices of investors are put through action. No need for team members to listen to them as most investors only concern about the listing and the profits they are ripping off on this new projects.

Quote from: fuer44 on February 14, 2020, 02:27:11 AM

I think the team should start listening to the bounty hunter when they are going to register the token, so that the token does not happen which ultimately has no value.

Its not that they dont listen plus what benefits they can get on suggestion of the hunters? They would not pay the exchange listing so why bother? Most projects just using hunters as a tool for their marketing purposes nothing more. That's a fact in cryptoindustry.

fuer44

sr. member

Activity: 1652

Merit: 262

I understand that friend, often the team decides itself where the token will launch. bounty hunters who should know more about exchangers (because bounty hunters almost all exchangers are explored for bounty campaign reasons) must have understood, which exchangers will make the token liquidity increase, and which do not. I think the team should start listening to the bounty hunter when they are going to register the token, so that the token does not happen which ultimately has no value.

Furryball

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 19

Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..

Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..

Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .

Topic: Gone are the days where projects team ask for opinions from investors - page 3. (Read 489 times)