Topic: Gone are the days where projects team ask for opinions from investors - page 2. (Read 489 times)
February 14, 2020, 12:10:14 PM
yes im familiar with that . i remember i see many projects on thier telegram channel ask if what exchange their coin will be listed . they follow based on the poll . thats the reason why most of them succeeded because they end up on good exchanges but now , i rarely see them doing some kind of polls . they are only deciding for them selves and end up listed on crappy exchanges that arent even popular or have a good trading volume .i think this is the reason why most of them are going down . on any business , its normal that owners listen to thier costumers feedback because that is the only way for thier succees .
February 14, 2020, 11:59:09 AM
I believe you would LOVE Blocknet in this regard. Not only do they listen to their investors, (communicate pretty nicely on Discord and other socials), but the vast majority of their project is voted in by investors through "super blocks". Enough "yes" versus "no", and the proposal is funded. That's the beauty of a well established masternode coin.
Do some research, and I'm sure you'd love what you find. Creators of the first DEX on the market, working on a decentralized oracle network and much much more.
Do some research, and I'm sure you'd love what you find. Creators of the first DEX on the market, working on a decentralized oracle network and much much more.
February 14, 2020, 11:53:53 AM
Teams today shall present themselves as knowledgeable for people to think they knew it all. This is why it ends the be very embarrassing for them when things began to fail they just scam and run away instead of seeking more help from the community they built.
P2Pb2b exchange were already caught to have fake team member profile but continues to operate though. Its gotta to be seize since its a scam waiting to happen.
February 14, 2020, 11:24:14 AM
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
Nowadays its rare to see a project team asking their investors for their suggestions or opinions to execute a better outcome. Its really different now, if you dont ask a question to them then you cant get a concrete answer on hows the progress of their project or something related.The only project I can side till date on this OP point is Apollo, they never did any ICO or IEO, the CEO and team spend money on the project themselves and they still ask investors for opinions, this is rare in crypto space
Taking opinions from investors are good step, im seeing this kind of team as an indication for the project to succeed because they are willing to hear the opinions of investors that can contribute for the betterment of the project. 
February 14, 2020, 11:10:10 AM
I have never seen any IEO conducted on P2pb2p that performs very well in the market. Once a project chooses Dobi, P2Pb2p, Latoken and the likes for IEO, I stay clear and still encourage who cares to just put their money where it's safe. Useless exchanges with fake IEO team screwing investors.
It's a scam exchange and surely the IEO project there is also scam. I have not seen any successful IEO projects there, all of them ended and prices dropped hundreds of times after being listed. Stay away from P2PB2P exchange as far as possible February 14, 2020, 10:07:01 AM
When project has nothing seriously to offer and are after money, the agenda is not fair fetched. to join team with a scam exchange to scam investors, sell tokens at a high price, then got listed, open trading for 5 to six months. the next day, they dissappear and the next is the exchange delisting the token. who suffered most in this scams are novices that are yet to understand how the scam deal whats and bounty hunters that spend their time marketing for such project and finally not getting paid.
February 14, 2020, 09:56:12 AM
There are still some that asks questions to investors and the community but the real thing here is that people already share their opinions both on telegram/discord whatever chat they are using but also on bitcointalk as well.
So, what a coin creator all has to do is listen to people and not ask questions anymore. Sure, some of them do not even listen to them but that is a whole another topic. Unfortunately some people realized they could create any coin they want, print all the money in the world all by themselves, give themselves the whole printed coin and then give other people a bit for investing or doing something, that is a much much bigger problem.
Coin creators create 100 million token which is the total supply and give it to themselves and then share 50 million with others and ask them to make them richer both by buying that 50 million and also keep selling the 50 million they have themselves.
So, what a coin creator all has to do is listen to people and not ask questions anymore. Sure, some of them do not even listen to them but that is a whole another topic. Unfortunately some people realized they could create any coin they want, print all the money in the world all by themselves, give themselves the whole printed coin and then give other people a bit for investing or doing something, that is a much much bigger problem.
Coin creators create 100 million token which is the total supply and give it to themselves and then share 50 million with others and ask them to make them richer both by buying that 50 million and also keep selling the 50 million they have themselves.
February 14, 2020, 09:23:33 AM
I have never seen any IEO conducted on P2pb2p that performs very well in the market. Once a project chooses Dobi, P2Pb2p, Latoken and the likes for IEO, I stay clear and still encourage who cares to just put their money where it's safe. Useless exchanges with fake IEO team screwing investors.
I've seen good projects that ends up on p2pb2b exchange but luckily they getaway from the wrath because few weeks later they listed on bitforex, okex, and coineal which brings better volume for the token if not would have been the end for the project, I don't know why new project team are sometimes so stubborn to listen to advice February 14, 2020, 09:05:29 AM
I have never seen any IEO conducted on P2pb2p that performs very well in the market. Once a project chooses Dobi, P2Pb2p, Latoken and the likes for IEO, I stay clear and still encourage who cares to just put their money where it's safe. Useless exchanges with fake IEO team screwing investors.
February 14, 2020, 09:00:32 AM
I think that the only aspect of the crypto industry mostly responsible for that, is the ICO market and the boom ethereum created for it. Many newbies came in to invest, and along with them many of the project managers knew nothing about the sense of community cryptocurrency projects used to have. ICOs were seeking funding in any way possible, they focused on marketing more than anything else, and secondly, quick profits. They were fast-paced unlicensed securities, of course they weren't going to listen to the community. Now they've set a precedent after this model, sadly.
February 14, 2020, 08:56:04 AM
I agree with you. Most new program developers do not understand how a crypto can develop and make them number one in a market such as Bitcoin. the main purpose and target of coin users that they will make is very important, in my opinion this is the beginning of a big goal to become the most valuable coin and become number one like Bitcoin.
February 14, 2020, 08:54:42 AM
Well I haven't seen such team before, crypto space is full of team who will never listen to people's opinion because they always feel that they are doing exactly the right things
February 14, 2020, 08:51:20 AM
Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..
Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
With my time with blockchain and crypto currency, it is rare for any project team not to have an idea of what crypto currency means or its exchange.
In your instance above, don't you think it is a situation where there is no team ? and the project are only interested in picking up profits from potential ieo or open trade investors ?
Or another angle, most succesful projects don't have their top team members discussing on telegram, they delegate such role to community moderator, and handle their sphere with short views, reviews on twitter.
NB: Think am and i will like to see more views.
February 14, 2020, 08:24:14 AM
Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..
Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
Indeed true, that was the true state of the most projects today, I think they all do that for a couple of reason, they don't want things more complicated on their side thats why they picked it for their convenience while disregarding the feeling and warning of its investors and community members thats why the results were not good in the end since then crypto projects are fast evolving but not all are destined to be succeed. Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
February 14, 2020, 08:15:35 AM
Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..
Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
In reality team doesn't enter suddenly so they have some investors in projects and long term efforts never died in the future so team and Investors are plan the mutual decision in crypto projects. Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
nowadays number of project enter in the market but few only occupy the top region so potential and innovation is important for all the new projects then only investors will enter in the new project.
I think before to launch the project some private investors are available in all the projects because they also suggest some changes and needs of the projects, May be after the launching some secret discuss will happen on team and investors so once launched successfully mostly they trying to update the further days.
February 14, 2020, 08:01:20 AM
Sometimes team really knows better that they should do with project
February 14, 2020, 07:57:51 AM
- snip -
More of the coins listed in p2pb2b is just manipulated coins ( in volume) .Accepting suggestions from investors is what is really needed if you want your project to be successfull. they are doing what they think is is good to the project but not listning to other and investors. More off them ( Crowd fund) is just want to raise money thats why they dont wanna hear any suggestions from others even from investors . They only do what they think is good for them and they dont look for what will be the consequences to the project they are making if they failed.
February 14, 2020, 07:21:48 AM
Who doesn't like projects that asked the audience/members about what they are feeling, what and what are missing that they want to it to get fixed, once upon a time few projects does this, they love hearing out from their investors but gone are those days..
Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
I really love also if this kind of scenario will continue to the team behind the project will be aware about the voices of the investors like what are their problems and how the team can help to solve it. Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
Some times teams can know all, there are things that crypto traders and investors are aware of that's still shady to some new project teams, the wise ones are the ones that ask the audience for opinions .
As what I saw also, even in their social channels there are no active supports that are willing to lessen to the problems or opinions of their users,customers and investors. Thinking that they are wise because they were able to successfully launch their project and reach their goal is not a good thinking at all as it will bring them to disaster someday, I am pretty sure of it.
February 14, 2020, 07:03:10 AM
This doesn't clear the fact that once the team Gained the trust of investors they won't end up scamming the investors because its another form of traps for newbies and new crypto investors
February 14, 2020, 07:01:55 AM
Now new project teams always think they are the wisest, and the fact is some team are just claiming the name 'TEAM' for nothing sake, they know nothing about crypto exchanges like we do because we use this exchanges to trade time to trade, imagine warning projects about crap exchanges like p2pb2b but they failed to listen just because Coinmarketcap listed and ranked p2pb2b as top exchange they neglect advice and later they regret..
I think the team should start listening to the bounty hunter when they are going to register the token, so that the token does not happen which ultimately has no value.
Its not that they dont listen plus what benefits they can get on suggestion of the hunters? They would not pay the exchange listing so why bother? Most projects just using hunters as a tool for their marketing purposes nothing more. That's a fact in cryptoindustry. I believe that there’re two kinds of project in the market one that analyses what investors want and they take some basic feedback from them, and the other one is like how you have described out here they basically ignore investors feedback and these ones are mostly unsuccessful in the long run.
@minairia3 it’s a wrong mentality if the team decides there’s no need for investors feedback after all they’re only being able to execute their plans because of the investors money, hence I feel that they should at least listen to their investors feedback and implement it wherever possible.
Jump to: