Topic: Government & Bitcoin - page 4. (Read 70855 times)

but the government must adapt to bitcoin, though is little by little. because bitcoin is a digital asset that have potential in future. and its good for government and for us if we implement some system or something like that.
bitcoin can be hold by government. great if they ise it than they against it

In that case, the government must now start learning and studying the uprising trends of the modern technology that offer a lot more innovation that will have a great impact to its people and the same thing will be applied in the economy. They must now adapt fast to be able to go with the flow of events that involve with the rise of the economic progress. Though it was hard for their part to do such thing, it is a must need to do to be able have a intimate relationship between government and the uprising technology which involves Bitcoin as a digital and virtual currency.

The sharing economy is just going to continue to grow, and governments will be challenged to understand and manage its implications while embracing its benefits. However, governments will be at a significant disadvantage if they wait too long and newer technologies and markets will have already been developed that do not follow traditional models. Think of the following: Uber is the world’s largest taxi service and owns no cars. Airbnb provides lodging yet does not own real estate.

How will local governments adapt to these new ways of doing business that are disrupting traditional business models? All we know now is that governments are a long way from even contemplating and accepting this new reality.

I am wondering if bitcoin can be stopped by any government a new came today which made some people dumped their coin. This is a blockchain technology it is been developed on daily basis and research are been carried out so it can't be stopped.

The sharing economy is just going to continue to grow, and governments will be challenged to understand and manage its implications while embracing its benefits. However, governments will be at a significant disadvantage if they wait too long and newer technologies and markets will have already been developed that do not follow traditional models. Think of the following: Uber is the world’s largest taxi service and owns no cars. Airbnb provides lodging yet does not own real estate.

How will local governments adapt to these new ways of doing business that are disrupting traditional business models? All we know now is that governments are a long way from even contemplating and accepting this new reality.

The sharing economy is just going to continue to grow, and governments will be challenged to understand and manage its implications while embracing its benefits. However, governments will be at a significant disadvantage if they wait too long and newer technologies and markets will have already been developed that do not follow traditional models. Think of the following: Uber is the world’s largest taxi service and owns no cars. Airbnb provides lodging yet does not own real estate.

How will local governments adapt to these new ways of doing business that are disrupting traditional business models? All we know now is that governments are a long way from even contemplating and accepting this new reality.

But is better to adapt so that we have a unity in the currency and money. And its better to have a mainstream in the bitcoin so that the valued of it will increased.

For me, some government sectors and banks are now conducting studies and some experiments about cryptocurrency. Yes, there is some state are now accepting bitcoin and another cryptocurrency because they notice that this cryptocurrency is helpful for there economy. But some nation also bans bitcoin and some cryptocurrency for some reasons. So, I’m just hoping that someday or in the future that bitcoin and some cryptocurrency become legal and acceptable in any form of establishments. 

The sharing economy is just going to continue to grow, and governments will be challenged to understand and manage its implications while embracing its benefits. However, governments will be at a significant disadvantage if they wait too long and newer technologies and markets will have already been developed that do not follow traditional models. Think of the following: Uber is the world’s largest taxi service and owns no cars. Airbnb provides lodging yet does not own real estate.

How will local governments adapt to these new ways of doing business that are disrupting traditional business models? All we know now is that governments are a long way from even contemplating and accepting this new reality.

The sharing economy is just going to continue to grow, and governments will be challenged to understand and manage its implications while embracing its benefits. However, governments will be at a significant disadvantage if they wait too long and newer technologies and markets will have already been developed that do not follow traditional models. Think of the following: Uber is the world’s largest taxi service and owns no cars. Airbnb provides lodging yet does not own real estate.

How will local governments adapt to these new ways of doing business that are disrupting traditional business models? All we know now is that governments are a long way from even contemplating and accepting this new reality.

The sharing economy is just going to continue to grow, and governments will be challenged to understand and manage its implications while embracing its benefits. However, governments will be at a significant disadvantage if they wait too long and newer technologies and markets will have already been developed that do not follow traditional models. Think of the following: Uber is the world’s largest taxi service and owns no cars. Airbnb provides lodging yet does not own real estate.

How will local governments adapt to these new ways of doing business that are disrupting traditional business models? All we know now is that governments are a long way from even contemplating and accepting this new reality.

I don't think that the government has a lot of question about bitcoin because they are not dumb to not research about it because there is a lot of branches under the leadership of the government. 

The sharing economy is just going to continue to grow, and governments will be challenged to understand and manage its implications while embracing its benefits. However, governments will be at a significant disadvantage if they wait too long and newer technologies and markets will have already been developed that do not follow traditional models. Think of the following: Uber is the world’s largest taxi service and owns no cars. Airbnb provides lodging yet does not own real estate.

How will local governments adapt to these new ways of doing business that are disrupting traditional business models? All we know now is that governments are a long way from even contemplating and accepting this new reality.

Since the invention of bitcoin, it has been claimed that bitcoin will be suppressed by governments and even outlawed in the future. The argument is that the further development of bitcoin will threaten the interests of traditional currencies, while rulers will not cede power to a p2p currency. Once governments declare it illegal, the price of bitcoin will fluctuate wildly in the short term and could collapse. At the same time, the government's ban will lead to the closure of the bitcoin trading platform. After the closing of the trading platform, bitcoin can only be realized in private, and its ability to cash will be greatly affected.

The theoretical basis of the government's crackdown on this view is that the currency is an effective tool for the government to control power, so the government will firmly hold the currency issue right in its own hands. And we think, however, many countries in the world, including the United States, will allow private money, so from the source, not governments around the world have natural power to suppress private money. To say the least, even if there is some governments, distribution rights to control their own currency, it is forbidden for any private monetary circulation in the country, they will find, to clamp down on COINS from the technology is almost impossible task.