Yeah - saw that and wondered...
Topic: GPUMAX | The Bitcoin Mining Marketplace - page 48. (Read 215554 times)
Like 0.024% low
Yeah - saw that and wondered...
Yeah - saw that and wondered...
Is it just me or is anyone else noticing that the rejects are absurdly low? As much as I'd like stats, I can't complain.
still waiting for an account 
, any news on when will gpumax get more ppl in ?
, any news on when will gpumax get more ppl in ? back in business. Thanks pirate !I'm still out...
But glad to know that GPUMax is back!
Pleeeese... Give me an account too Mr. Pirate!! LOL
Cheers,
Thiago
i made a Test Purchase @ 2012-04-11 19:38:07 UTC
a few Hours later my Payment was confirmed but nothing happened since this time.
I pointed the Shares to deepbit (only for testing).
Payment-address: 1CgUC6xo6LcV5z7sBYDFb8fYK5j7t75Bbf
anybody wanna help?
nyana
a few Hours later my Payment was confirmed but nothing happened since this time.
I pointed the Shares to deepbit (only for testing).
Payment-address: 1CgUC6xo6LcV5z7sBYDFb8fYK5j7t75Bbf
anybody wanna help?
nyana
Help how ?
i made a Test Purchase @ 2012-04-11 19:38:07 UTC
a few Hours later my Payment was confirmed but nothing happened since this time.
I pointed the Shares to deepbit (only for testing).
Payment-address: 1CgUC6xo6LcV5z7sBYDFb8fYK5j7t75Bbf
anybody wanna help?
nyana
a few Hours later my Payment was confirmed but nothing happened since this time.
I pointed the Shares to deepbit (only for testing).
Payment-address: 1CgUC6xo6LcV5z7sBYDFb8fYK5j7t75Bbf
anybody wanna help?
nyana
Dropping names now, are we?
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure it's not the right name.
Dropping names now, are we?
Let's hope so. Much like yochdog and xkrikl, gpumax is only reporting only about 1/4 to 1/5 of my submitted shares it should be. None of the shares are going to my backup pools so gpumax is obviously sucking them all up ... but it is only displaying/acknowledging a small fraction.
zux0r has stated that they removed stats calculations from the submission process to be able to handle the load all of the users currently invited. Stats calculations are now in another separate process and they are not quite right yet so he'll be working on the tonight.
If anything goes awry with payment calculations, you can be sure pirateat40 will make it right.
I have no doubt about this.
I wouldn't worry about the stats much, it's not the first time there are problems with updating, even though shares are accounted for behind the scenes.
Let's hope so. Much like yochdog and xkrikl, gpumax is only reporting only about 1/4 to 1/5 of my submitted shares it should be. None of the shares are going to my backup pools so gpumax is obviously sucking them all up ... but it is only displaying/acknowledging a small fraction. 
My rigs are suddenly happy again
Thanks Pirate and Zux0r
Thanks Pirate and Zux0r
back in business. Thanks pirate ! 
It is strange. I use the same pool as my backup pool in cgminer as my private pool in GPUMax.
Right now this backup pool is showing all my miners connected to it, but only doing 20MH/s. So either something is horribly wrong with the pass through feature or my miners are jumping between public and private work. I just can't tell because GPUMax stats are not updating.
Right now this backup pool is showing all my miners connected to it, but only doing 20MH/s. So either something is horribly wrong with the pass through feature or my miners are jumping between public and private work. I just can't tell because GPUMax stats are not updating.
GPUMAX is leasing work now. You are probably seeing bleed over because cgminer is leaking shares whenever a long pool happens.
This is a good thing because cgminer is making sure your miners are not idle.
Yeah normally, it would say my miners are disconnected for a period of time on the backup pool. I haven't seen it sustained quite like this.
I can just wait to see what shakes out.
It is strange. I use the same pool as my backup pool in cgminer as my private pool in GPUMax.
Right now this backup pool is showing all my miners connected to it, but only doing 20MH/s. So either something is horribly wrong with the pass through feature or my miners are jumping between public and private work. I just can't tell because GPUMax stats are not updating.
Right now this backup pool is showing all my miners connected to it, but only doing 20MH/s. So either something is horribly wrong with the pass through feature or my miners are jumping between public and private work. I just can't tell because GPUMax stats are not updating.
GPUMAX is leasing work now. You are probably seeing bleed over because cgminer is leaking shares whenever a long pool happens.
This is a good thing because cgminer is making sure your miners are not idle.
It is strange. I use the same pool as my backup pool in cgminer as my private pool in GPUMax.
Right now this backup pool is showing all my miners connected to it, but only doing 20MH/s. So either something is horribly wrong with the pass through feature or my miners are jumping between public and private work. I just can't tell because GPUMax stats are not updating.
Right now this backup pool is showing all my miners connected to it, but only doing 20MH/s. So either something is horribly wrong with the pass through feature or my miners are jumping between public and private work. I just can't tell because GPUMax stats are not updating.
I was told on IRC, that even though the displayed usernames have changed for some reason, you can still use the old one and it will work. That's bound to cause a lot of confusion, anyway.
I wouldn't worry about the stats much, it's not the first time there are problems with updating, even though shares are accounted for behind the scenes.
I wouldn't worry about the stats much, it's not the first time there are problems with updating, even though shares are accounted for behind the scenes.
Situation here is even worse ...
I found that my workers went back to GPUMAX as well but without single share being credited as leased or forwarded to my offline pool.
I also noticed that the username on the details tab for my workers has changed - so I tried the new one as well as the old one - and the result is the same - GPUMAX accepts the shares but they aren't counted in the stats.
I found that my workers went back to GPUMAX as well but without single share being credited as leased or forwarded to my offline pool.
I also noticed that the username on the details tab for my workers has changed - so I tried the new one as well as the old one - and the result is the same - GPUMAX accepts the shares but they aren't counted in the stats.
Very similar to what I am seeing.....might have to bail out of this experiment soon.
Situation here is even worse ...
I found that my workers went back to GPUMAX as well but without single share being credited as leased or forwarded to my offline pool.
I also noticed that the username on the details tab for my workers has changed - so I tried the new one as well as the old one - and the result is the same - GPUMAX accepts the shares but they aren't counted in the stats.
I found that my workers went back to GPUMAX as well but without single share being credited as leased or forwarded to my offline pool.
I also noticed that the username on the details tab for my workers has changed - so I tried the new one as well as the old one - and the result is the same - GPUMAX accepts the shares but they aren't counted in the stats.
I woke up today and found that CGminer had switched all of my miners back over to GPUmax. Initially pleased, I have now noticed that despite running full bore, GPUmax in only giving me credit for about 1/20th of the actual shares my miners are submitting.
Very alarmed.
Very alarmed.
Jump to: