Topic: Greetings from the new 🌟🌟MoneyPot🌟🌟 staff - page 8. (Read 11024 times)

Im not gonna lie i was semi excited about the possibility of a 3k bankroll for players to bet against. Oh well hopefully you guys still take this site in the correct direction

Thanks for your support. Even on our end, the team has been beyond amazing in both ideas for moving forward and bringing about the best MP we possibly can. I think you all are going to be fairly surprised once we really hit the ground running, . We're very anxious for the takeover!

Great team. I think it's one that we can trust...

Good luck with your work, and hopefully we can see a better and improved version of MoneyPot in the near future.

Here's an idea - how about you guys input a sort of loyalty system. In the source code, maybe you can make a section where you can make multiple house edges. So maybe you start with 0.5% house edge, and each consecutive day you bet 100+ bits, the house edge decreased by 0.05, until it caps at 0.01%.

Any explanation as to what happened with this partnership? Im sure everyone would like to know

In response to multiple meetings regarding MoneyPot, its current state, and its future, the team behind MoneyPot and Dean, of BetKing, have felt it in the best interest of both companies -- as well as current and future players and investors on both platforms -- to sever their partnership and move in different directions.

This should never have been any kind of secret. I was under the understanding that it was generally well known that if a casino owner was going to cheat their investors they would more likely gamble knowing the server seed rather then simply run away with investor funds, as this gives them somewhat of the ability to deny they actually stole from their investors.

If you were not even aware of this risk, then you probably should not be investing in casino bankrolls

In other words we cant have a perfect solution to this and it is not a secret anymore that the holder of the server secret will have access to the "funds" in other words he can win since he knows the upcoming roll , doesnt really matter whoever holding the funds

What would that give them? As you can see that most of those altcoins are dropping in value. Besides those coins don't provide a decent amount of players

You should consider adding Florincoin - FLO, Vericoin - VRC Hyperstacke - HYP and Fluttercoin - FLT

Hi JPR, this is the group account for us. Naming trolls etc is not the purpose of this thread, this thread is intended for providing updates about our service and to answer genuine questions/concerns. We will be creating a group chat on Skype for app owners over the next couple days, please send us a PM containing your Skype ID.

That isn't true. I don't dislike him. The issues I had with him weren't personal at all.

I understand that you have made your decision to get into business with Dean and give him control of all your (future) investors' coins. But that doesn't mean you need to rewrite history and pretend that there have never been any issues with him other than "people not liking him". To do so seems disingenuous to me.

could you please tell us who you are? I am sorry if I missed it

could you please name those trolls because I did not see any but it could well be that I don't know who a troll is

I agree that we should have a place to talk to you guys = the new team/buyer at another place but this place should IMO be established by you like Ryan did it with inviting us to slack group.

and I disagree that each app owner will message you guys and discuss matters that are interesting for all app owners. that is exactly when I mentioned that no app owner should get a preferred treatment. yes I understand if there are private or internal questions regarding an app that would not be for all ears.

regards

No one is disputing that Just-Dice ran the largest site accepting a public bankroll, but ever since Just-Dice decided to switch to clams (which is not for legal purposes, in the eyes of the law BTC is the same as CLAM), Bet King (PRC) has been the largest site accepting user investments. As to the questions about Dean, it is important for people to note that the only "issues" regarding him are that certain people in the community (mainly other casino owners) do not like him.

As Ranlo said earlier, this thread is not intended to be a place for FUD/trolling. If you have any questions/concerns please send us a message and we will be glad to assist.

As to the questions about Dean, it is important for people to note that the only "issues" regarding him are that certain people in the community (mainly other casino owners) do not like him.

OK. When you said:


it sounded like you were moving your current investors coins over to moneypot without asking them. I don't see how else you can justify making that claim.


If you're measuring trustworthiness by number of Bitcoins held, biggest bets, volume, profit, or any other similar measure (and that does appear to be what you're doing) then I don't think betking's stats come anywhere near to Just-Dice's.


I'm not saying there's no solution, but as far as I know nobody has implemented a solution. Currently Ryan is in the position of being able to win on your MP app whenever he wants to. He knows the server seed, so knows the outcome of each bet before it happens. This is something investors need to take into account when deciding which bankroll to invest in.

(As for possible solutions, you can imagine a system where three different people ran servers, each of which had their own server seed, and each bet had to pass through all three servers to generate the roll. That way the only way to cheat investors would be if all three people colluded.)


Only if they knew about the switchover. There are quite a few people who still didn't withdraw their BTC from the JD bankroll, 18 months after the site shut down. Some investors just like to "invest and forget". But it turns out that Dean isn't moving the 3000 BTC over from BK to MP after all - he's going to have the investors withdraw from BK and deposit to MP, so the point is moot.


I wasn't meaning to cast any aspersions. I've had run-ins with Dean in the past, but he seems trustworthy enough. I don't know how much of a team player he is, but I'm in no position to criticize on that score either.