Pages:
Author

Topic: GridSeed 5-chip USB miner voltage mod - page 84. (Read 156991 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
March 18, 2014, 02:54:53 PM
#47
Personally modded all of my miners, none of them reported HW errors so far (cpuminer).

Cool!
What are your current average hash rates given at your mining pool?
What is the average temp of each miner?
I forget, are you running them without cooling fans?
So, you are absolutely sure, no red nonce errors whatsoever?
Tanks!
Wolfey2014
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 18, 2014, 02:27:26 PM
#46
Personally modded all of my miners, none of them reported HW errors so far (cpuminer).

Sandor just making sure that I am supposed to place a shunt across the two yellow lines to gain the boost. Thanks

Yes
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
March 18, 2014, 02:24:24 PM
#45
Personally modded all of my miners, none of them reported HW errors so far (cpuminer).

Sandor just making sure that I am supposed to place a shunt across the two yellow lines to gain the boost. Thanks
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 18, 2014, 02:16:13 PM
#44
Personally modded all of my miners, none of them reported HW errors so far (cpuminer).
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
March 18, 2014, 02:13:37 PM
#43
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
March 18, 2014, 01:57:03 PM
#42
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 18, 2014, 01:46:41 PM
#41
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
March 18, 2014, 01:45:03 PM
#40
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
March 18, 2014, 01:32:37 PM
#39


Yes, up to 950 MHz would be stable, I am using cpuminer.

Hey sandor, i am wondering whats the diff doing the hardware mod vs the software mod you are coming out with?

both are able to be overclocked to 950 stable. Does the software update somehow increase voltage? Just curious to see if i should perform the hardware mod
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
March 18, 2014, 01:26:33 PM
#38
If I perform the mod, then I want to go back to mining at 600-850mhz again for some reason, that still works? (but still using 2W more?)

Of course, the power consumption is directly related to core voltage, so frequency does not matter much in that regard.

If you want to hard mod the voltage to 1.25v, and use different miner software:



This allows you to have a stable overclock without the special version of CGminer and voltage=1???

Yes, up to 950 MHz would be stable, I am using cpuminer.

Excellent! I knew there had to be a further hardware mod 'jumper' to get stable operation at 1.25V without converting over to a different mining program. I'm using cpuminer and am quite satisfied with it since I have a very small farm anyway.
One thing that still bugs me though is having to reset the USB ports every 24+/- hours.
Anyway, I can make the jumper mods easily as I own a professional Weller soldering station with adjustable temp, very fine tip assortment, de-soldering etc. So no problems making the mods.

I wonder though, have either of you chaps tried seeing if any of the existing header's pins correspond to either of those two jumper points? Or is that header simply a serial port connection. I haven't studied the schematic yet so I realize this may be a stupid question.  Cheesy

Anyway, I'm very interested in this mod for my own miners. Having done years of laboratory level R&D in electronics, this stuff is a piece of cake!

Have the two jumpers stabilized the GS units well enough to overclock above 950 yet?
Man, if we can get these little buggers running at 500KH/s, that would be fantastic!
But, 400KH/s ain't nothin to laugh at either Wink

I have all my units fanless now. If necessary, I can simply use 1 or 2 fans to blow air on the fins indirectly which will of course keep them running cooler.

I might be interested in making this mod for others too if the money is right.
They'd be responsible for all shipping costs and insurance etc. etc.
I'll figure out what is a fair price to charge per mod later if anyone shows interest.

Thanks for coming up with this mod. Sure saved me some time and hassle. Wink
Wolfey2014
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
March 18, 2014, 01:16:21 PM
#37
If I perform the mod, then I want to go back to mining at 600-850mhz again for some reason, that still works? (but still using 2W more?)

Of course, the power consumption is directly related to core voltage, so frequency does not matter much in that regard.

If you want to hard mod the voltage to 1.25v, and use different miner software:



This allows you to have a stable overclock without the special version of CGminer and voltage=1???

Yes, up to 950 MHz would be stable, I am using cpuminer.

Okay so place a shunt across the 2 spots marked in yellow and I should be able to pull 950 with no errors. Is this correct. Thanks in advance
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 18, 2014, 12:14:31 PM
#36
Anyone tried messing with PLL voltage (1.1v)? I'm thinking lowering it could help a lot with stability
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 18, 2014, 11:52:45 AM
#35
If I perform the mod, then I want to go back to mining at 600-850mhz again for some reason, that still works? (but still using 2W more?)

Of course, the power consumption is directly related to core voltage, so frequency does not matter much in that regard.

If you want to hard mod the voltage to 1.25v, and use different miner software:



This allows you to have a stable overclock without the special version of CGminer and voltage=1???

Yes, up to 950 MHz would be stable, I am using cpuminer.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
March 18, 2014, 11:43:57 AM
#34
If I perform the mod, then I want to go back to mining at 600-850mhz again for some reason, that still works? (but still using 2W more?)

Of course, the power consumption is directly related to core voltage, so frequency does not matter much in that regard.

If you want to hard mod the voltage to 1.25v, and use different miner software:



This allows you to have a stable overclock without the special version of CGminer and voltage=1???
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
March 18, 2014, 11:31:18 AM
#33
If I perform the mod, then I want to go back to mining at 600-850mhz again for some reason, that still works? (but still using 2W more?)

Of course, the power consumption is directly related to core voltage, so frequency does not matter much in that regard.

If you want to hard mod the voltage to 1.25v, and use different miner software:


member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
March 18, 2014, 05:28:53 AM
#32
If I perform the mod, then I want to go back to mining at 600-850mhz again for some reason, that still works? (but still using 2W more?)
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 14
March 18, 2014, 03:48:41 AM
#31
Here's what my cgminer looks like after about 10 hours:

Code:
GSD  0: 8D9155794849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:177152 R:   0 HW: 1 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  1: 8D9111984849  850 MHz | 360.6K/360.7Kh/s | A:194048 R:   0 HW:14 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  2: 8D71428E5654  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200704 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  3: 8D8D36B04849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:196096 R: 512 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  4: 8D98148C4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:195072 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  5: 8D833F674849  950 MHz | 403.1K/403.1Kh/s | A:221696 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  6: 8D7328515654  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200192 R: 512 HW: 1 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  7: 8D8E556D4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:182784 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  8: 8D9916694849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200192 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  9: 8D9255784849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:182272 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD 10: 8D89188D4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:202240 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD 11: 8D86367B4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:186880 R: 512 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m

Have you tried 1000mhz yet?

Yes, it generates hardware errors.
sr. member
Activity: 282
Merit: 250
March 18, 2014, 01:45:25 AM
#30
Here's what my cgminer looks like after about 10 hours:

Code:
GSD  0: 8D9155794849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:177152 R:   0 HW: 1 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  1: 8D9111984849  850 MHz | 360.6K/360.7Kh/s | A:194048 R:   0 HW:14 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  2: 8D71428E5654  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200704 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  3: 8D8D36B04849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:196096 R: 512 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  4: 8D98148C4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:195072 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  5: 8D833F674849  950 MHz | 403.1K/403.1Kh/s | A:221696 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  6: 8D7328515654  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200192 R: 512 HW: 1 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  7: 8D8E556D4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:182784 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  8: 8D9916694849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200192 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  9: 8D9255784849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:182272 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD 10: 8D89188D4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:202240 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD 11: 8D86367B4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:186880 R: 512 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m

Have you tried 1000mhz yet?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 14
March 17, 2014, 10:14:49 PM
#29
Here's what my cgminer looks like after about 10 hours:

Code:
GSD  0: 8D9155794849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:177152 R:   0 HW: 1 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  1: 8D9111984849  850 MHz | 360.6K/360.7Kh/s | A:194048 R:   0 HW:14 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  2: 8D71428E5654  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200704 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  3: 8D8D36B04849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:196096 R: 512 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  4: 8D98148C4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:195072 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  5: 8D833F674849  950 MHz | 403.1K/403.1Kh/s | A:221696 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  6: 8D7328515654  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200192 R: 512 HW: 1 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  7: 8D8E556D4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:182784 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD  8: 8D9916694849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:200192 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD  9: 8D9255784849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:182272 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
GSD 10: 8D89188D4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:202240 R:   0 HW: 0 WU:   0.7/m
GSD 11: 8D86367B4849  850 MHz | 360.7K/360.7Kh/s | A:186880 R: 512 HW: 0 WU:   0.6/m
Pages:
Jump to: