still same error at startup: ava0 reset failed! not an avalon? (0:08 00 00 00)
then it just cycles through:
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 16 miners
every time it does this the case fans spin up hard so know the new psus are working.
i have 4 capacitors that have come completely off, but some chips should function without these?
Topic: [GROUP BUY WORLDWIDE]BTMine v1 Miner 200GH/s BTC 2.4 - page 21. (Read 97041 times)
i get an error "invalid avalon options for frequency, must be 256 <= 1024" im confused which value is the frequency?
Try this
--avalon-options 115200:16:10:D:1400:55
Yes 16 miners not 24 my mistake.
16 is miner count
10 is asic count per miner
i get an error "invalid avalon options for frequency, must be 256 <= 1024" im confused which value is the frequency?
Try this
--avalon-options 115200:16:10:D:1400:55
Wow 70 Pages... this thread is getting crazy!
So mine came all beat up also. One module was "loose" and almost cut the ribbon cable - PICS:
At least I just was able to tape it and move on... ends up I have all good chips except for 5 disabled ones (one of the 16 miner counts shows half the hashes). Better than a zero! This thing pulls right at 900W at the wall with two Corsair TX650 supplies - over 2X an ANT! But I still get ~215 GH or so...
My ribbon was the same, replaced it with an ATA33 IDE cable. So mine came all beat up also. One module was "loose" and almost cut the ribbon cable - PICS:
At least I just was able to tape it and move on... ends up I have all good chips except for 5 disabled ones (one of the 16 miner counts shows half the hashes). Better than a zero! This thing pulls right at 900W at the wall with two Corsair TX650 supplies - over 2X an ANT! But I still get ~215 GH or so...
ive managed to conenct it to usb and cgminer appears to recognise it, however it just cycles through the following:
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
did you start cgmine with --avalon-options 115200:24:10:D:1400:55
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Avalon
i get an error "invalid avalon options for frequency, must be 256 <= 1024" im confused which value is the frequency?
1400 is the frequency, and it is correct. I'm guessing you're using a very old version of cgminer - check the version and make sure you're at least 3.4.3 or higher (I think that's correct). The current version is 3.10.0.
using 3.9 so not sure why it says that.
i started it with 1024 but still nothing. on start i get the error ava0 reset failed! not an avalon c0:08 00 00 00
it starts saying 24 miners, fans spin up like its about to start but then just
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
ive managed to conenct it to usb and cgminer appears to recognise it, however it just cycles through the following:
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
did you start cgmine with --avalon-options 115200:24:10:D:1400:55
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Avalon
i get an error "invalid avalon options for frequency, must be 256 <= 1024" im confused which value is the frequency?
1400 is the frequency, and it is correct. I'm guessing you're using a very old version of cgminer - check the version and make sure you're at least 3.4.3 or higher (I think that's correct). The current version is 3.10.0.
ive managed to conenct it to usb and cgminer appears to recognise it, however it just cycles through the following:
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
did you start cgmine with --avalon-options 115200:24:10:D:1400:55
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Avalon
i get an error "invalid avalon options for frequency, must be 256 <= 1024" im confused which value is the frequency?
Wow 70 Pages... this thread is getting crazy!
So mine came all beat up also. One module was "loose" and almost cut the ribbon cable - PICS:
At least I just was able to tape it and move on... ends up I have all good chips except for 5 disabled ones (one of the 16 miner counts shows half the hashes). Better than a zero! This thing pulls right at 900W at the wall with two Corsair TX650 supplies - over 2X an ANT! But I still get ~215 GH or so...
So mine came all beat up also. One module was "loose" and almost cut the ribbon cable - PICS:
At least I just was able to tape it and move on... ends up I have all good chips except for 5 disabled ones (one of the 16 miner counts shows half the hashes). Better than a zero! This thing pulls right at 900W at the wall with two Corsair TX650 supplies - over 2X an ANT! But I still get ~215 GH or so...
ive managed to conenct it to usb and cgminer appears to recognise it, however it just cycles through the following:
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
did you start cgmine with --avalon-options 115200:24:10:D:1400:55
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Avalon
ive managed to conenct it to usb and cgminer appears to recognise it, however it just cycles through the following:
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
result return rate low, resetting
reset sequence sent
ava0: idling 32 miners
im open to suggestions as for what to try next....
So after hashing fine for a while my hashrate slowed a bit and the api shows this.
After opening the rig this is what I found on one of the modules. I'm pretty sure the component is making contact with one of the power pins. I am no smd guy and I do not even know for sure if this is the module getting 0. Any suggestions?
Code:
[match_work_count1] => 4009
[match_work_count2] => 3864
[match_work_count3] => 0
[match_work_count4] => 3953
[match_work_count5] => 4079
[match_work_count6] => 3772
[match_work_count7] => 3937
[match_work_count8] => 3801
[match_work_count9] => 4013
[match_work_count10] => 3882
[match_work_count11] => 4063
[match_work_count12] => 3896
[match_work_count13] => 3784
[match_work_count14] => 3875
[match_work_count15] => 3977
[match_work_count16] => 3886
Avalon worker unit with that smd is eather one of these. It's hashing fine
better not touch it haha.[match_work_count1] => 4009
or
[match_work_count9] => 4013
Pictures you supplied are not the worker that is not hashing. Dont resolder it i think that is just ground. Doesnt matter it touching. I had same pin that component is touching twisted and did resoldering and measured it to be ground...
Picture you provided is 1st worker of one of the blades, that would be worker 1 or worker 9 in cgminer apilog
Anyways you have worker 3 cold. That would be 3rd Avalon unit on one of the blades. You have taken picture of Avalon unit 1 on a Blade.
Short the fuses with by soldering or anything like aluminium tape lol see if it gets the unit hashing
I would say this is what you have cold. Easy way to find what is cold is to let it run for 2 minutes and use your finger to touch the Avalon chips. Depending your pain management level youll fid it easy which one is cold. You wont burn your finger
Recap here are the Fuses
So after hashing fine for a while my hashrate slowed a bit and the api shows this.
After opening the rig this is what I found on one of the modules. I'm pretty sure the component is making contact with one of the power pins. I am no smd guy and I do not even know for sure if this is the module getting 0. Any suggestions?
Code:
[match_work_count1] => 4009
[match_work_count2] => 3864
[match_work_count3] => 0
[match_work_count4] => 3953
[match_work_count5] => 4079
[match_work_count6] => 3772
[match_work_count7] => 3937
[match_work_count8] => 3801
[match_work_count9] => 4013
[match_work_count10] => 3882
[match_work_count11] => 4063
[match_work_count12] => 3896
[match_work_count13] => 3784
[match_work_count14] => 3875
[match_work_count15] => 3977
[match_work_count16] => 3886
i would try heating it up and removing it. have noticed plenty of bad solder jobs that make contact with other points they shouldnt be.
Hello all,
for the ones who just received their tracking number, could you please provide feedback and give status here?
I already received my tracking number yesterday but the status is still :
Wednesday, January 22, 2014 Location Time
1 Shipment information received HONG KONG - HONG KONG 09:15
for the ones who just received their tracking number, could you please provide feedback and give status here?
I already received my tracking number yesterday but the status is still :
Wednesday, January 22, 2014 Location Time
1 Shipment information received HONG KONG - HONG KONG 09:15
So any news about the status of your tracking?
Mine is still in "shipment information received"...
I'm getting boring.... so many days to have it and when I see the quality and all the problems of the people who received it, I don't know if I really want it....
If they dont send then open a dispute on PP (if you used PP to buy this box).
Thanks
So after hashing fine for a while my hashrate slowed a bit and the api shows this.
After opening the rig this is what I found on one of the modules. I'm pretty sure the component is making contact with one of the power pins. I am no smd guy and I do not even know for sure if this is the module getting 0. Any suggestions?
Code:
[match_work_count1] => 4009
[match_work_count2] => 3864
[match_work_count3] => 0
[match_work_count4] => 3953
[match_work_count5] => 4079
[match_work_count6] => 3772
[match_work_count7] => 3937
[match_work_count8] => 3801
[match_work_count9] => 4013
[match_work_count10] => 3882
[match_work_count11] => 4063
[match_work_count12] => 3896
[match_work_count13] => 3784
[match_work_count14] => 3875
[match_work_count15] => 3977
[match_work_count16] => 3886
I am a retired engineer and as you I enjoy the tweaking and perfecting, but I think many should read our posts and realize these Chinese machines are not a fit for everyone!
We know that bitcoin mining takes a broad range of computer, code and hardware knowledge. I do not believe everyone who tries to get into mining understands or know these pertinent details.
I am so eager for my units to arrive to start fine tuning and modifying them to be what I desire them to be! I enjoy the process as you do!
mtnminer
FWIW, I have 7 cubes and they all worked flawlessly, and I only run them at high clock. I bought them over time, from different vendors even. That said, they are very finicky with what's on your network - I guess you could consider that a problem with them, but once I solved that it was smooth sailing.
I just got my first 2 Antminer S1s in today. I set them up and had to downgrade the firmware to avoid the constant beeping/rebooting, but after that, no worries, and now they're running at 205-ish GH/s each. Nice addition to my btmine unit (that's also hashing perfectly now at 230-ish GH/s, OC'd to 1500).
*shrug* I think most of these take some tweaking, but since I'm an inveterate optimizer, it's all fun for me.
We know that bitcoin mining takes a broad range of computer, code and hardware knowledge. I do not believe everyone who tries to get into mining understands or know these pertinent details.
I am so eager for my units to arrive to start fine tuning and modifying them to be what I desire them to be! I enjoy the process as you do!
mtnminer
I am not trying to excuse BTmine, but I have noticed looking at this forum and others that have Chinese eruptor cubes for sale used, there is a fairly high rate of module failure out of the box new is common!
So, that leaves us the consumers with facts to consider, Butterfly Labs is slower than molasses flowing up hill in winter, but the units I own from the have worked flawlessly. So if we want Chinese delivery speed, we will have to deal with Chinese quality issues.
I wish we could have both quality and speed of delivery, but these do not seem to coexist often in the ASIC's world. As a former RF Engineer I will take the speed of delivery, the best quality I can buy and do some fine tuning and tweaking of the units I purchase. I will still be ahead of waiting for a January order with a March delivery date if I am lucky.
Mtnminer
So, that leaves us the consumers with facts to consider, Butterfly Labs is slower than molasses flowing up hill in winter, but the units I own from the have worked flawlessly. So if we want Chinese delivery speed, we will have to deal with Chinese quality issues.
I wish we could have both quality and speed of delivery, but these do not seem to coexist often in the ASIC's world. As a former RF Engineer I will take the speed of delivery, the best quality I can buy and do some fine tuning and tweaking of the units I purchase. I will still be ahead of waiting for a January order with a March delivery date if I am lucky.
Mtnminer
FWIW, I have 7 cubes and they all worked flawlessly, and I only run them at high clock. I bought them over time, from different vendors even. That said, they are very finicky with what's on your network - I guess you could consider that a problem with them, but once I solved that it was smooth sailing.
I just got my first 2 Antminer S1s in today. I set them up and had to downgrade the firmware to avoid the constant beeping/rebooting, but after that, no worries, and now they're running at 205-ish GH/s each. Nice addition to my btmine unit (that's also hashing perfectly now at 230-ish GH/s, OC'd to 1500).
*shrug* I think most of these take some tweaking, but since I'm an inveterate optimizer, it's all fun for me.
btw, are people form btmine answering on skype - i asked about my dead modules a couple of days ago and no answer since then.
I am not trying to excuse BTmine, but I have noticed looking at this forum and others that have Chinese eruptor cubes for sale used, there is a fairly high rate of module failure out of the box new is common!
So, that leaves us the consumers with facts to consider, Butterfly Labs is slower than molasses flowing up hill in winter, but the units I own from the have worked flawlessly. So if we want Chinese delivery speed, we will have to deal with Chinese quality issues.
I wish we could have both quality and speed of delivery, but these do not seem to coexist often in the ASIC's world. As a former RF Engineer I will take the speed of delivery, the best quality I can buy and do some fine tuning and tweaking of the units I purchase. I will still be ahead of waiting for a January order with a March delivery date if I am lucky.
Mtnminer
So, that leaves us the consumers with facts to consider, Butterfly Labs is slower than molasses flowing up hill in winter, but the units I own from the have worked flawlessly. So if we want Chinese delivery speed, we will have to deal with Chinese quality issues.
I wish we could have both quality and speed of delivery, but these do not seem to coexist often in the ASIC's world. As a former RF Engineer I will take the speed of delivery, the best quality I can buy and do some fine tuning and tweaking of the units I purchase. I will still be ahead of waiting for a January order with a March delivery date if I am lucky.
Mtnminer
FWIW, I have 7 cubes and they all worked flawlessly, and I only run them at high clock. I bought them over time, from different vendors even. That said, they are very finicky with what's on your network - I guess you could consider that a problem with them, but once I solved that it was smooth sailing.
I just got my first 2 Antminer S1s in today. I set them up and had to downgrade the firmware to avoid the constant beeping/rebooting, but after that, no worries, and now they're running at 205-ish GH/s each. Nice addition to my btmine unit (that's also hashing perfectly now at 230-ish GH/s, OC'd to 1500).
*shrug* I think most of these take some tweaking, but since I'm an inveterate optimizer, it's all fun for me.
I used corsair tx850 PSU's, I had some 650's but they only put out 52amps so I didn't even try them. Been waiting on the tx850 PSU's, they just came in tonight, have to say the setup on this was super easy, 10 minutes after plugging it in I was mining. Just keeping my fingers crossed now.
are you going to OC?
Finally everything is running and I can stress less...
No, dont plan on over clocking. Not after all the problems people have posted about on here. My PSU's are prob big enough to over clock, I just dont want to risk burning anything up, not yet at least. Fans do make a faint high pitch whistle like noise. I haven't turned my fans down, cause I'd rather keep the blades as cool as possible. I haven't put the side cover back on yet either, does anyone know if it effects the temp of the miner if you leave the side cover off?
I used corsair tx850 PSU's, I had some 650's but they only put out 52amps so I didn't even try them. Been waiting on the tx850 PSU's, they just came in tonight, have to say the setup on this was super easy, 10 minutes after plugging it in I was mining. Just keeping my fingers crossed now.
are you going to OC?
Finally everything is running and I can stress less...
http://i1029.photobucket.com/albums/y358/balkx2/Bitcoin%20Mining/finally_mining.jpg
No, dont plan on over clocking. Not after all the problems people have posted about on here. My PSU's are prob big enough to over clock, I just dont want to risk burning anything up, not yet at least. Fans do make a faint high pitch whistle like noise. I haven't turned my fans down, cause I'd rather keep the blades as cool as possible. I haven't put the side cover back on yet either, does anyone know if it effects the temp of the miner if you leave the side cover off?
I really don't get this machine. All I did was keep reconnecting the lan interface until finally the pings came back under .0xxxx. Is it that the network card they used is a cheap piece of crap? Can I change this part out to a better one? If so, any recommendations? Also, can anyone verify that the cat3 cable I installed by mistake will not work? The rig connects to my network on it and I can connect to it. After moving my rig back on a known working cat5e line it still had high latency issues when ping openwrt, until eventually working after reconnect to lan several times.
Edit: According to google cat3 is good for 10Mbps. I only have 6Mbps on this crappy att dsl. So theoretically the cat3 I have should work for this application just fine? Maybe if I would've just kept hitting reconnect it would've worked on that line as well?
Edit: According to google cat3 is good for 10Mbps. I only have 6Mbps on this crappy att dsl. So theoretically the cat3 I have should work for this application just fine? Maybe if I would've just kept hitting reconnect it would've worked on that line as well?
have you tried a laptop or pi on the end of the cat 3 and pinged ur router to compare. that should give a hint to what is going on.
I just moved rentals and brought some tplink powerline adapters
I am having similar problems with my pi's , waiting for network cable to be delivered now..DO NOT use powerline adapters for mining. They work fine for weeks then go screwy at
I didn't ping from it, but yes I connected a laptop to it and it accessed the the internet fine. Tomorrow I'm going to try and reconnect the rig to it and keep reconnecting the lan interface and see if it works.
Jump to: