GUI mining - updated Dec 3 with 7970 bugfix, also supports Stratum! - page 12.

Graet

vip

Activity: 980

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Graet on July 14, 2011, 12:42:11 AM

Thanks for guiminer I have used it for most of my mining life

Could I ask that http://ozco.in be added to to your drop down pool list please

will drop a donation in the box on the way out
Thanks again

^^ any chance?
If this miner is still being supported of course

Smoovious

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Scattering my bits around the net since 1980

Quote from: Gladiator on March 12, 2012, 08:21:10 PM

Quote from: Smoovious on March 07, 2012, 05:22:12 PM

The bad, when solo mining when BTCG is down, I'm only getting ~400khash/s when I typically get the same 85-90Mhash/s per card for both BTCG mining and solo mining, with the old version.

Did something get changed with solo mining, where it is ignoring my card choice, and is CPU mining instead?

I had the same problem. If I uncheck one of cores from cpu affinity on solo mining hashrate drops about 30% with -f 1 and goes into khashes/second with -f 60.
And poclbm.exe eats up about 60-70% of the CPU either way.

Well, before I updated, all 4 miners would eat up 100% cpu full time, but I also was using an older OpenCL driver with my vid card too... but each miner would use the full ~80Mhash/s of each card when tested individually, so they were all set to 1 core and left that way.

Now tho, since updating GUIMiner, and updating my ATI/OpenCL drivers, now they're doing what they're doing now, and it just seems so odd why my BTCGuild miners would behave, while my solo miners won't.

You'd think they would be doing the same thing, but no... >shrugs<

Gladiator

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Smoovious on March 07, 2012, 05:22:12 PM

The bad, when solo mining when BTCG is down, I'm only getting ~400khash/s when I typically get the same 85-90Mhash/s per card for both BTCG mining and solo mining, with the old version.

Did something get changed with solo mining, where it is ignoring my card choice, and is CPU mining instead?

I had the same problem. If I uncheck one of cores from cpu affinity on solo mining hashrate drops about 30% with -f 1 and goes into khashes/second with -f 60.
And poclbm.exe eats up about 60-70% of the CPU either way.

Bitcoin_Silver_Supply

sr. member

Activity: 258

Merit: 250

There are always lots of requests in this thread but not a lot of people following up with donations to encourage him to continue; myself included -- until today. Just flipped a donation for fixing the poclbm issue, which is useful beyond words for those of us who mine without the slightest ability to code.

Thanks for the service Kiv and if you choose to continue updating this program I will continue to send donations.

Smoovious

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Scattering my bits around the net since 1980

Ok, got the new GUIMiner installed, with both good and bad results...

The good, my shares on BTC Guild are being accepted again...

The bad, when solo mining when BTCG is down, I'm only getting ~400khash/s when I typically get the same 85-90Mhash/s per card for both BTCG mining and solo mining, with the old version.

Did something get changed with solo mining, where it is ignoring my card choice, and is CPU mining instead?

It would certainly explain why my BTCG miners on core #3 are processor friendly, while my Solo miners on core #4, are perpetually at 100% still...

-- Smoov

disclaimer201

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1001

I have just donated 0.5 BTC. I am really thankful, too!

I'd still love to know what was the problem with guiminer out of a sudden so none of the pools would accept shares anymore, and why so only recently? It worked all of 2011.

Best of all with SDK2.6 the CPU bug is gone, my shares are accepted again, my cpu isn't grilled all of the time. Now we just need to get back full performance (while <5% CPU usage) and I couldn't be happier.

I am specially thankful b/c I never really figured out CGMiner, call me what you will, and once I tried I got a worse performance than with gui. Also, since I am already running on a windows machine, I don't see why running useful programs in a is something to look down on, btw.

Cheers!

rTech

sr. member

Activity: 305

Merit: 250

Trust but confirm!

Yeah keep up good work Kiv. Donating also something small.

Haku

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Thanks Kiv!

malevolent

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 1724

Quote from: Kiv on February 19, 2012, 11:43:19 AM

Thanks, fixed the link.

Welcome back.
Can you tell if the newest version properly counts shares and stales?

ssateneth

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1004

HOLY FUCKING SHIT! KIV IS BAAAAAAAAAAACK.

Kiv, will you support new phoenix 2 beta please?

bradminer

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

It works great. Thanks Kiv... jsut sent a donation to you for your great work.

Roland68

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

Thanks Kiv!

Kiv

full member

Activity: 162

Merit: 100

Thanks, fixed the link.

dishwara

legendary

Activity: 1855

Merit: 1016

Quote from: Kiv on February 19, 2012, 10:31:37 AM

Hi everyone, long time no see. I've released an update that includes the poclbm code fix:

guiminer-20120219.exe (self-extracting archive)

There are also a few updates to translations, pools, etc from contributors on GitHub. See the commit history there for details, but thanks to everyone who submitted pull requests even though it took a long time to get it into the release

The link downloads guiminer-20110823.exe..................?

EDIT:Thanks allinvain for correct link.

allinvain

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1083

I think you may have forgotten to properly name the file because the download link points to guiminer-20110823.exe not guiminer-20120219.exe .

Edit: Actually I see now that you just linked to the wrong one. Here is the correct link:

https://github.com/downloads/Kiv/poclbm/guiminer-20120219.exe

Kiv

full member

Activity: 162

Merit: 100

Hi everyone, long time no see. I've released an update that includes the poclbm code fix:

guiminer-20120219.exe (self-extracting archive)

There are also a few updates to translations, pools, etc from contributors on GitHub. See the commit history there for details, but thanks to everyone who submitted pull requests even though it took a long time to get it into the release

deepceleron

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1036

Quote from: jarsumarsu on February 18, 2012, 03:27:17 PM

Maybe it is a false alarm? Or not...?
https://www.virustotal.com/file/97f99b046a17272b174534094ae705686c2deb89caf53edc9f0c64d6760ad0ec/analysis/1329594828/

As I stated above in my analysis, the "Application.BitCoinMiner.G" and "Riskware.RiskTool.Win32.BitCoinMiner!IK" type warnings are being set off by the ufasoft miner binary included with this, which is not included in the newest guiminer. The ufasoft.exe is identical to that which was included in guiminer 6-14-2011. Ufasoft was also used by some botnet ops, so antivirus flagging it at least alerts the user if they didn't authorize mining software install.

Vyper

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Tried another malware program , don't know if it's good.. Spyhunter.
No detection at all once again!?

It must be a false alarm, and if you can see suspicious files in that file please report here!

Thanks.
Kind regards Vyper

Vyper

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

I've ran three different virus scanners on that PC and Malwarebytes which usually has been good to detect other sort of malware too.
None of the programs can simply find any kind of infected files whatsoever..
I understand if you don't want to risk it but i'm running with the added files and so for i haven't got robbed

You made quite nervous there but i simply think it's a false alarm really.
I'm not forcing anyone to download my "merge" of guiminer, just wanted to share with the world if someone like me is lazy enough to run guiminer.

Take care people.
Kind regards Vyper

jarsumarsu

donator

Activity: 134

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vyper on February 18, 2012, 11:45:43 AM

Quote from: Roland68 on February 18, 2012, 06:03:04 AM

It's a virus !!!!

What the hell?!

This was NOT my intention at all. Which file/files in the package is infected?!
Of course i'm a "noob" at bitcoin mining but not IT wise. BUT! If some of my files has got infected this is truly very awkward and embarasing.
I have a virus scanner on my computer which hasn't made a alarm or anything.
Will try to download my own file and scan this with different softwares on multiple computers.
Stay tuned for more results.

Kind regards Vyper
P.S I'm legit and have been running seti@home for more than twelve years. D.S

Maybe it is a false alarm? Or not...?
https://www.virustotal.com/file/97f99b046a17272b174534094ae705686c2deb89caf53edc9f0c64d6760ad0ec/analysis/1329594828/

Topic: GUI mining - updated Dec 3 with 7970 bugfix, also supports Stratum! - page 12. (Read 3232240 times)