Pages:
Author

Topic: [GUIDE] BitFury Miner Support/Tuning - page 39. (Read 148049 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 265
September 12, 2013, 04:21:13 PM
#73
Added info about the CGMiner ... for BitFury

- CGMiner for BitFury
Quote
compile with --enable-bitfury
con is not going to make support for our hardware because it only runs on linux, pi and needs root access
so this is as far as cgminer support will go from our side Sad
[13.9.2013 0:17:44] Antti Lehto: --bitfury-board-type Bitfury board type, 0=i2c, 1=mboardv1, 2=mboardv2 (default: 0)
--bitfury-options Set bitfury chip options chip:speed,chip.. eg. 0:55,1:56... default: ALL:54
oops
./cgminer --help
--bitfury-board-type Bitfury board type, 0=i2c, 1=mboardv1, 2=mboardv2 (default: 0)
--bitfury-options Set bitfury chip options chip:speed,chip.. eg. 0:55,1:56... default: ALL:54
old M-board probably doesn't work because no-one has tested it
so use --bitfury-board-type 2
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 500
..yeah
September 12, 2013, 03:49:33 PM
#72
can anyone interpret what this means?

Quote
22 148069 140517 140494 0 163196 2326 2326 [1]http://127.0.0.1:8333/          (btcguild)
22 148332 141428 141405 [2]http://127.0.0.1:8334/  (eligius acc2)

I saw my hashrate drop slightly, I am hashing on 3 workers (two different pools). I know it reads "Queue length   Getworks  Nonces found   Nonces submitted   Server". Does btcguild have so little nonces comapred to eligius because difficulty setting is much higher? (it was 64 but i only hashed with ~25gh, oops  Cheesy). It seems I have problems with spi/msi errors? Is this bad? Or can I ignore that, as it is only a tiny percentage?
What if the queue length switches between >0 and <100? Is this bad? I sometimes see the hashrate on the pool (eligius) drop drastically. This seems not to happen on btcguild, but I'm no fan of hashing on the biggest pool out there. I want to support smaller pools. Please enlighten me you guys!  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 265
September 12, 2013, 05:26:10 AM
#71
what is the danger of the pencil trick ....? what if it gets under 1.1K Ohm the r02f ? ... anyone that can do some light in the dark?
I don't know how serious the danger is. The voltage regulator has a current and temperature limit, so it should protect itself. From what I've seen, it just turns itself off when it's not happy anymore. The card will stop mining, but a quick power cycle will fix it. Of course, if this happens when you're not watching, you could lose a lot of hashes, so I wouldn't get it too close.

Of course, increased heat will decrease lifetime of the chips, but how important is that given the increasing difficulty ? A few months at 120% rated capacity may return more than a few years at 100%.

+1 thanx a lot ...
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
September 12, 2013, 05:17:59 AM
#70
4:      888     28.891  32.903  2018    256     0       2

r02 @ 1.199k with 6b pencil


Nice but it seems that the mod introduced Miso errors that could contaminate other boards (in case more are in the same m-board).


sadly it had those before
It has one duff chip thats forced back online at 48 that give the odd miso

ill keep an eye on it, I avg about 5-10 miso errors over the 2 boards without the mod over 24hrs
sr. member
Activity: 408
Merit: 250
September 12, 2013, 05:11:12 AM
#69
4:      888     28.891  32.903  2018    256     0       2

r02 @ 1.199k with 6b pencil

Nice but it seems that the mod introduced Miso errors that could contaminate other boards (in case more are in the same m-board).
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
September 12, 2013, 05:03:53 AM
#68
4:      888     28.891  32.903  2018    256     0       2

r02 @ 1.199k with 6b pencil
sr. member
Activity: 251
Merit: 250
September 12, 2013, 04:55:02 AM
#67
what is the danger of the pencil trick ....? what if it gets under 1.1K Ohm the r02f ? ... anyone that can do some light in the dark?
I don't know how serious the danger is. The voltage regulator has a current and temperature limit, so it should protect itself. From what I've seen, it just turns itself off when it's not happy anymore. The card will stop mining, but a quick power cycle will fix it. Of course, if this happens when you're not watching, you could lose a lot of hashes, so I wouldn't get it too close.

Of course, increased heat will decrease lifetime of the chips, but how important is that given the increasing difficulty ? A few months at 120% rated capacity may return more than a few years at 100%.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 265
September 12, 2013, 04:44:16 AM
#66
Ive just used the pencil trick on my boards, for ref a 6b pencil allows for finer tuning of the value on the r02 resistor.
Ive gained about 5ghs/board Cheesy



yep, some reported that they did the trick up to 5-6 times ... until they got the cards up to 28GH ^^ ... i would suggest having the chips working at 2.0 - 2.1 GH is a good number ... ^^ im unsure if going higher then ... 2.2 per chip ... is viable ... but maybee some of the experts can comment ...

what is the danger of the pencil trick ....? what if it gets under 1.1K Ohm the r02f ? ... anyone that can do some light in the dark?

Code:
1 aIfDSo 55 2.606 2.019 182 0
2 aIfDSo 55 1.790 2.029 125 0
3 aIfDSo 55 2.205 2.124 154 4
4 aIfDSo 55 1.861 1.998 130 7
5 aIfDSo 55 0.515 1.955 36 50
6 aIfDSo 55 2.176 2.019 152 1
7 aIfDSo 55 2.434 2.103 170 0
8 aIfDSo 55 1.632 1.712 114 1
9 aIfDSo 54 2.004 1.977 140 0
10 aIfDSo 55 2.047 2.082 143 1
11 aifdso 0 0.000 0.000 0 0
12 aIfDSo 55 1.961 1.924 137 8
13 aIfDSo 55 2.319 1.945 162 2
14 aIfDSo 56 1.875 2.167 131 7
15 aIfDSo 55 2.462 2.019 172 0
16 aIfDSo 55 2.147 2.135 150 1
17 aifdso 0 0.000 0.000 0 0
18 aIfDSo 55 1.861 1.860 130 0
19 aIfDSo 55 1.718 1.945 120 0
20 aIfDSo 55 1.561 1.659 109 5
21 aIfDSo 56 1.847 2.051 129 6
22 aIfDSo 55 1.632 1.839 114 0
23 aIfDSo 55 1.818 1.966 127 1
24 aIfDSo 55 1.732 1.892 121 0
25 aIfDSo 55 1.833 1.871 128 7
26 aIfDSo 55 2.047 1.892 143 0
27 aIfDSo 55 1.904 1.860 133 2
28 aIfDSo 55 2.047 1.871 143 4
29 aIfDSo 55 2.019 1.818 141 0
30 aIfDSo 56 2.248 2.072 157 7
31 aIfDSo 55 2.233 2.008 156 0
32 aIfDSo 55 1.990 1.934 139 0

speed:1652
noncerate[GH/s]:58.526 (1.829/chip)
hashrate[GH/s]:58.746
good:4088
errors:114
spi-errors:1
miso-errors:0
jobs:295 (record[GH/s]:58.082)
0: 825 30.036 30.208 2098 82 1 0
4: 827 28.490 28.538 1990 32 0 0
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
September 12, 2013, 04:25:10 AM
#65
Ive just used the pencil trick on my boards, for ref a 6b pencil allows for finer tuning of the value on the r02 resistor.
Ive gained about 5ghs/board Cheesy

member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
September 11, 2013, 09:07:48 AM
#64
Starter kit with two H-boards. Both H-boards produce over 20 GH/s in bus B or C, but bus A produces only about 12 GH/s regardless of which h-board is in the A1 slot. I heard another on irc having similar situation. Is this a hardware problem on the M-board?

Yours still running at 20 GH/s in  bus B and C?
I still get some chips turning off and drop in hashrate along with it. Stopping and restarting temporarily fixes the problem. I hand tuned chip speeds and turned off autotune. Seems like a software problem. If the user can restart non-producing chips by clicking stop and restart, mining software should be able to do it automatically, or even avoid the problem alltogether.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 12:59:21 PM
#63
Did you put the boards in slots A1 and B1 ?

Try using another slot.

It's a US version.1, so I cant move it to any other slots.
legendary
Activity: 892
Merit: 1002
1 BTC =1 BTC
September 10, 2013, 12:45:39 PM
#62
Did you put the boards in slots A1 and B1 ?

Try using another slot.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 12:23:42 PM
#61
Try setting '25 aIfDSo 0' then the chips 25-32 will hash too.


24      AIfDSo  55      1.288   1.328   48      0       0       0       67      [1:7]   710     3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25      aIfDSo  0       0.000   0.277   0       0       0       0       14      [1:8]   756     0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1320 noncerate[GH/s]:25.152 (1.006/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:28.459 good:937 errors:72 spi-err:0 miso-err:1 jobs:140 cores:5% good:25 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Tue Sep 10 17:22:37 2013
0:      880     15.650  17.499  583     54      0       1       16      0       0       (0.978/chip)    5%
1:      440     9.503   10.959  354     18      0       0       9       0       0       (1.056/chip)    5%


Doesn't look like it wants to go further. Sad
legendary
Activity: 892
Merit: 1002
1 BTC =1 BTC
September 10, 2013, 12:14:38 PM
#60
Try setting '25 aIfDSo 0' then the chips 25-32 will hash too.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 10:34:22 AM
#59
Could somebody give me a hand figuring this out?
I disabled #25 (I think), but how do I go about bypassing it? I am a n00b at this, so....
Boards are US version.

1       AIfDSo  55      1.532   1.585   107     13      0       0       150     [0:0]   317     8 8 7 5 6 6 6 7 5 6 7 8 7 6 8 7         0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 2 0 1
2       AIfDSo  55      1.503   1.522   105     8       0       0       144     [0:1]   328     7 7 6 7 7 6 5 6 7 5 7 6 7 7 8 7         0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
3       AIfDSo  55      0.787   1.554   55      22      0       0       147     [0:2]   470     3 3 5 3 3 5 4 1 2 3 4 3 5 3 4 4         2 2 0 2 2 0 1 4 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 1
4       AIfDSo  55      1.546   1.564   108     3       0       0       148     [0:3]   312     6 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 7 7         1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
5       AIfDSo  55      1.403   1.522   98      4       0       0       144     [0:4]   321     5 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6         1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6       AIfDSo  55      1.217   1.543   85      3       0       0       146     [0:5]   321     5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5         1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
7       AIfDSo  55      1.546   1.585   108     10      0       0       150     [0:6]   345     7 7 7 7 7 6 8 8 8 7 5 5 7 7 6 6         0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1
8       AIfDSo  55      1.374   1.511   96      6       0       0       143     [0:7]   327     6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 7 7 6 6 6 6 5 6         0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
9       AIfDSo  55      1.518   1.659   106     6       0       0       157     [0:8]   287     7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 5 6 6 7 7         0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0
10      AIfDSo  55      1.331   1.628   93      7       0       0       154     [0:9]   315     6 6 6 6 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 5 6         0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
11      AIfDSo  55      1.503   1.596   105     8       0       0       151     [0:A]   313     6 5 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 7 7 6 7 6 7 7         1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
12      AIfDSo  55      1.389   1.533   97      5       0       0       145     [0:B]   326     7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 6 5 5 6 6 6 7 7         0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
13      AIfDSo  55      1.646   1.543   115     3       0       0       146     [0:C]   316     7 7 7 7 6 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 6 7 7         0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
14      AIfDSo  55      1.561   1.596   109     5       0       0       151     [0:D]   316     7 6 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7         0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
15      AIfDSo  55      1.561   1.585   109     4       0       0       150     [0:E]   337     7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 6 7 7 7 7         0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
16      AIfDSo  55      1.331   1.575   93      10      0       0       149     [0:F]   307     4 7 5 7 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 4         2 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
17      AIfDSo  55      1.918   1.924   134     5       0       0       182     [1:0]   248     8 8 8 9 9 7 9 9 9 8 8 9 9 9 7 8         0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
18      AIfDSo  55      1.875   2.103   131     3       0       0       199     [1:1]   247     9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 7 9 9         0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
19      AIfDSo  55      1.847   1.860   129     5       0       0       176     [1:2]   252     7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 8         1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0
20      AIfDSo  55      1.933   1.934   135     3       0       0       183     [1:3]   263     8 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 8         1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
21      AIfDSo  55      1.847   1.955   129     9       0       0       185     [1:4]   281     9 7 8 8 8 7 8 8 7 8 9 9 9 9 7 8         0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
22      AIfDSo  55      1.417   1.649   99      12      0       0       156     [1:5]   307     7 6 5 6 7 7 7 5 6 6 7 5 5 6 7 7         0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 0
23      AIfDSo  55      1.704   1.924   119     5       0       0       182     [1:6]   293     8 7 7 7 7 7 8 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8         0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24      AIfDSo  55      1.833   1.913   128     9       0       0       181     [1:7]   262     8 8 8 9 8 8 7 8 9 8 8 9 8 8 6 8         0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0
25      aifdso  55      0.000   0.000   0       0       0       0       0       [1:8]   756     0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1320 noncerate[GH/s]:37.123 (1.485/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:40.365 good:2593 errors:168 spi-err:0 miso-err:0 jobs:375 cores:57% good:24 bad:0 off:1 (best[GH/s]:37.781) Tue Sep 10 15:29:41 2013
0:      880     22.749  25.103  1589    117     0       0       16      0       0       (1.422/chip)    57%
1:      440     14.374  15.263  1004    51      0       0       8       0       1       (1.597/chip)    57%
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
September 10, 2013, 04:37:58 AM
#58
Starter kit with two H-boards. Both H-boards produce over 20 GH/s in bus B or C, but bus A produces only about 12 GH/s regardless of which h-board is in the A1 slot. I heard another on irc having similar situation. Is this a hardware problem on the M-board?

Yours still running at 20 GH/s in  bus B and C?
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1006
Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
September 10, 2013, 01:06:26 AM
#57
can anyone help me trough team viewer ?
i just got the starter kit and i got very bad results ... 7 GH with both H cards ... Huh

Can you post your /run/shm/.stat.log file?
sr. member
Activity: 408
Merit: 250
September 09, 2013, 05:29:09 AM
#56
Is there any guide/manual to make chainminer display more values?? I was hoping it displayed a full set of values: accepted, rejected, difficulty, etc, etc, just like cgminer or bfgminer but chainminer is extremely shy and doesn't provide nearly the same feedback when running manually.

Similary, is there any guide on how to set up/optimize stratum? I heard someone changed the real target parameter or something like that to achieve better results.


you can check difficulty by
>sudo su
>screen -ls
>screen -r
It should show the difficulty reported by stratum proxy

Thanks. I was able to take a snapshot of the stratum log and this is a sequence that repeats all the time. (None of the lines below seems to be displayed more often than the others, pretty much even distribution)


2013-09-09 03:21:02,852 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'worker1' asks for new work
2013-09-09 03:21:03,148 INFO proxy jobs.submit # Submitting XXXXX
2013-09-09 03:21:03,152 DEBUG proxy jobs.submit # Share is below expected target
2013-09-09 03:21:03,158 WARNING proxy getwork_listener._on_submit # [0ms] Share from 'worker1' accepted, diff 318
2013-09-09 03:21:03,186 INFO proxy jobs.submit # Submitting XXXXX
2013-09-09 03:21:03,191 DEBUG proxy jobs.submit # Share is below expected target
2013-09-09 03:21:03,198 WARNING proxy getwork_listener._on_submit # [0ms] Share from 'worker1' accepted, diff 318
2013-09-09 03:21:02,620 DEBUG protocol protocol.writeJsonRequest # < {"params": ["worker1", " XXX", "XXX", "XXX", "XXX"], "id": 423, "method": "mining.submit"}

Anything that seems suspicious/wrong??

Looks to me like too many warnings but would love to learn what each of those line means...
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1003
September 09, 2013, 04:50:04 AM
#55
both my H cards have soldering errors ...
legendary
Activity: 892
Merit: 1002
1 BTC =1 BTC
September 09, 2013, 04:41:42 AM
#54
Does overvolting/clocking make sense due to total error rate (is it rising a lot)?

I pencil modded 3 fury boards and gained quite some speed.

Blue line is Avalon overclocked @350 = 82GH
Green is Bitfury starterkit with 3 boards ...

Pages:
Jump to: