Author

Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 152. (Read 880461 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Does the HashFast design work?  That is, are there a significant number of working machines?
It works, but the customers are not receiving them. They have kilos of ASICs, see the last joke from garret (garret paying for a production line for HF, making 300 boards per day starting april 4th)... They are gonna get everything out of the company and then close it.

http://hashfast.com/live/
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #mmrpxSDwspQYQwmO
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 513
It works with some issues. Icedrill is running sierras.

I'd be able to tell you a whole lot more if I had the sierra I paid for last frickin september.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1002
Does the HashFast design work?  That is, are there a significant number of working machines?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Its about time hashfast gets slammed by the law.
Once that we see them in jail we can call this closed. That court order doesn't really mean a lot.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #kRgDFCxhxU6uCPoS
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 513
amen to that brother. I don't even care if I get nothing at this point, as long as those crooks get some come-upins.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
http://digitaljournal.com/pr/1819167

Deans & Lyons Lawyers Obtain a TRO against HashFast Technologies, "Freezing" its Bitcoin Wallets
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #EiSnJ07GtWCWlpdE

Great news!

Its about time hashfast gets slammed by the law.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
"Consequently, the Court finds that a temporary restraining order is necessary because it appears to the Court that Defendants are presently engaged in, or will imminently engage in, unlawful activities..."
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
http://digitaljournal.com/pr/1819167

Deans & Lyons Lawyers Obtain a TRO against HashFast Technologies, "Freezing" its Bitcoin Wallets
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #EiSnJ07GtWCWlpdE
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
They sold out their second batch of EVOs Cheesy
http://hashfast.com/shop/sierraevo/
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #XTWCCNj0PNvkgFYL

I guess De Castro's mom gave him his allowance and, with that, the second batch was closed at two orders.  (Simon's dad paid for the other.  In Bitcoin mining, time is everything.)
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
They sold out their second batch of EVOs Cheesy
http://hashfast.com/shop/sierraevo/
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #XTWCCNj0PNvkgFYL
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
I guess you must be the type of client Gallo wants to represent?
Gallo aims at a BTC refund, he probably signed that refund and release agreement and agreed to a USD refund. Also, what gallo is not quoting is that such customers must have requested a refund before the 15th of January, as per tos...
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #KDhoAriXMBjEYm7j
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
raskul  You  got a response about your refund? When was the first time u ask for your refund. I am already ask them since end january. And they will only request in the order they receive... I am now waiting nearly 3 months... and they still havent send my refund.

I guess you must be the type of client Gallo wants to represent?

I tried to apply (their website is retarded up to a point, can't fill in a European phone number due to US syntax checking) but I got my Batch #1 ones (no MPP though

Quote
Thanks for your answers.  Unfortunately, based on them, we cannot currently agree to represent you.  Currently, we are only representing Batch1 customers who purchased by September 5, 2013, paid in bitcoin, did not recieve a bitcoin refund, and did not cash a check for a dollar refund.  We will contact you if that changes and we believe you have claims that can be economically arbitrated.  In the meantime, remember that every claim is subject to a statute of limitations. In  California, a claim for breach of contract must be brought within four years of the date of the breach, and a claim for fraud must be brought within three years of the date of the breach.  So, do not wait too long to pursue your claims if you wish to do s o.

hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
raskul  You  got a response about your refund? When was the first time u ask for your refund. I am already ask them since end january. And they will only request in the order they receive... I am now waiting nearly 3 months... and they still havent send my refund.
I mail , call them 1000 times and they ingore.. trust me, they also dont have clear answers.. they cant tell specefic datums or name up a week when they send u the refund.

First of all, even if they react, it dont mean nothing, they lie and they have excuses to delay everything, thats why they cant name up a datum. They are to scare to answer that kind of e-mails, because they know they want to hold as long as they can your money.

I heard from people that already ask their refund in december and still havent receive it, so the thing is, they dont request in the order they receive, they tried to delay everything up, because they have lawsuits and they are developing,  that is their priority.. the support and paying customers are not their priority, they can stuck.. that is what Hashfast thinking.

For people that ask or request now for their refund can wait another 3-4 months minimal before they send u a refund. trust my words. Hashfast is worser then Butterfly, they should go on CNN for amazing fraud.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
will this be extended to batch 2,3 and 4 after 31st March?

I'm not in a position to say. You'd have to ask de Gallo. I speculate that it might, if enough batch 2, 3, and 4 customers got on board.

got a response back about my refund, so i'm going with that. to hell with waiting another 3 months for a rig that isn't going to break even.
i'd be better of putting it into my 5 year cloudhashing account. i see that as less of a gamble!
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 513
Also, how are you supposed to cool 675 GH/s ~ 740W board ?

Those parts will have to be in direct contact with hillary clinton's...
full member
Activity: 130
Merit: 100
I would like to point out that per following page
http://hashfast.com/shop/chipsales/
Quote
Hashing Output: Up to 800 GH/s (overclocked)
Hashing Output: 400 GH/s (nominal)
those are the same chips that will go into Yoli Evo boards that are advertized as
Quote
Typical Bitcoin Mining Performance:  675 GH/s +/- 20% [540-810 GH/s]
That above 400 GH/s performance is from already overclocking the equipment. Since MPP supposed to be based on nominal hashing rate of 400 GH/s and not on overclocked rate and be 4x not 2-3x of overclocked board.

Also, how are you supposed to cool 675 GH/s ~ 740W board ?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
Excuse my ignorance but what happened to the super manufacturing facility Ciara?  Not trolling, but weren't they supposed to crank out all if the preorders in days.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
Quote
Hashfast's latest e-mails seem to indicate that teen 'wunderkid' Garrett's assembly line is what Hashfast is depending upon to fill the MPP and EVO orders/upgrades.

And when those deliveries fail, HF will say it's Garrett's fault.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
In addition, HashFast will likely lose resulting in insolvency. New and existing customers will receive nothing.
And Garret will be recycling $1M per day for HF, to get everything out of the company before this happens.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #8VM1j283MNjU8zXe

Hashfast's latest e-mails seem to indicate that teen 'wunderkid' Garrett's assembly line is what Hashfast is depending upon to fill the MPP and EVO orders/upgrades. 

As somebody else said, what could possibly go wrong?  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
I guess now we know why it was important that the Yoli Evo boards are advertised as "Up To 800GH/s" even though they haven't been demonstrated to hit that. There's a big difference between shipping two boards and shipping three for the MPP.
Jump to: