Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 162. (Read 880461 times)

The saddest thing is that HasfFart_CL is apparently pretty senior in the company.

Has Hashfast ever confirmed that HashFast_CL speaks on their behalf? I can't believe that any company would let someone like her represent them. Would somebody with a known Hashfast account please confirm that she speaks for your company? Thank you.

I posted the above question twice on the self moderated thread and twice it was deleted.

I don't know what they smoke at HashLast, but it aint something good.
They like to fuck their customers and each others.
Some customers still haven't receive their gear.
I have receive a BJ that is a bit mentally retarded same as HashLast_Tubal_Dick_Liaison

I'll have a look for a link to the relevant threads.  

Edit: here is the link https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/garr255werner-auction-shilling-238474

Multiple accounts are absolutely allowed.  My understanding of the reasoning is because they can't effectively stop them they just warn people they exist and then let them exist.  Unless they changed the policy and I missed it (quite possible) it is even ok to buy and sell accounts.

Link? So multiple accounts are allowed on this forum? Maybe i will make some too.

No, looks like they just made that up.

[/quote]


There basically looking for address and bank info.
[/quote]

Just give them your BTC address to send the money to.

Interesting, was that the right order #?

Isn't that the kid that Inaba caught using a sock puppet and then it was subsequently found out that he was shill bidding his own companies auctions on this forum?

There basically looking for address and bank info.

http://cognitivemining.com/NDA.pdf

^^ don't sign that, it's not an NDA, it's a we-own-your-ass-please-sign-with-your-blood agreement.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #yZVaMWKD6vDTEk00

Update. This is an e-mail chain with dozens of recipients, I'm pretty sure including others here... who are probably reading their e-mail and palming their face right now.  

MacDonald seems to confirm the person's question.  Basically, since Hashfast isn't delivering many units, current customers will be screwed because "this will not in any way change the rate at which existing HashFast customers receive their units".

Cognitive meanwhile makes "a few thousand" and sells them, while Hashfast continues to ship a board or two every once in a while.

You legally focused folks, I think your lawyers might want to take note of this one.




On 19/03/2014 17:49, Garrett MacDonald wrote:>

> [Person's Name]:
>
> I apologize for the vagueness, I cannot reveal the exact numbers. The
> main thing to note is that this will not in any way change the rate at
> which existing HashFast customers receive their units, until after our
> agreement is fulfilled, then it will expedite the rate at which existing
> customers receive units. This is a win-win all over.
>
> Best,
> Garrett
>
> On 3/19/14, 4:35 PM, [Person] wrote:
>> Mr. MacDonald:
>>
>> If I understand you correctly, you are saying that you have entered into
>> an agreement with Hashfast that will result in production and sale by
>> Cognitive of a "few thousand" Hashfast boards before Hashfast's
>> outstanding orders are filled?
>>
>> [Person]
>>

Oh dear.  Thanks for sharing.

"Win-Win" unless you are already a Hashfast customer, in which case you are reamed up the ass by those "few thousand" boards, whose buyers paid less and will receive their hardware before or at the same time as you.


From Garrett MacDonald - [email protected]...

---

On 03/19/2014 05:30 PM, Garrett MacDonald wrote:
> The situation right now is: HashFast is short on money, I am paying
> for a new, separate production line to begin and will be recieving the
> profits from it an it's first few thousand boards. Beyond this,
> HashFast will take control of the line producing Evo boards and will
> be able to serve customers much faster than before.
>
> The hashfast directors, myself and my partner, and both of our lawyers
> have talked it over and it is a go from everyone legally.
>
> Cheap hashpower for all, and the ramp-up of a new production line for
> HashFast customers. This is a total win-win situation.
>
> Best,
> Garrett
>
>
>>>>> On 19/03/2014 15:18, Garrett MacDonald wrote:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> As of today, the 19th of March, Cognitive has entered a
>>>>> partnership with
>>>>> HashFast to open a parallel production line and resell HashFast
>>>>> chips.
>>>>> We will be selling Cognitive branded Hashfast "Evo" boards
>>>>> (http://hashfast.com/shop/sierraevo/) for April delivery or your
>>>>> money
>>>>> back. Starting on the 4th of April, 2014 we will be producing and
>>>>> shipping 300 boards per day achieving an average (+/- 10%) of
>>>>> 750Gh/s each.
>>>>>
>>>>> The boards are available for purchase at
>>>>> http://cognitivehardware.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> today.
>>>>>
>>>>> If desired, I can provide you a private link that displays the
>>>>> realtime
>>>>> hashing output (cgminer feed + eligius address) of a single Evo
>>>>> board.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Garrett MacDonald
>>>>> CEO, Cognitive
>>>>> 1.424.253.4278
>>>>>
>>>>>

http://cognitivehardware.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=33&product_id=50

Link?

A person representing a concern named Cognitive Mining is making some very interesting claims about his company entering into an agreement with Hashfast.

latest deleted post from that other thread....  i chimed in with:


Quote:
why are you guys trying to shame a sociopath?
 they feed off honest people and feel it is their right to fuck over anyone they can

if you want to communicate with them, go find them and hit them with a 2x4 and forget about this thread

Just out of curiosity, care to share it? Were they looking for your personal details?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #sQhoupBLPQenIJ8A

I vaguely remember that. I have a feeling this is something new though. I emailed them just a couple days ago requesting a email which is the first time I've even bothered with it. Now I get this fake refund form. Hell of a coincidence if it was from that leak.