Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 183. (Read 880461 times)
How long does Hashfast thinks to going to work like this. Only care about their own time,make thousand of bitcoins daily and cant even hire a callcenter to answer all the orders and reply emails??
no!! 
Has any one gotten their Upgrade order yet?
Tupac still legend.
It's not that they don't care about us..
They don't give a fuck about us..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ01yReWwsI&t=0m23s
They don't give a fuck about us..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ01yReWwsI&t=0m23s
It's not that they don't care about us..
They don't give a fuck about us..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ01yReWwsI&t=0m23s
They don't give a fuck about us..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ01yReWwsI&t=0m23s
Everday is a lost day, and they make ten thousand of bitcoins daily. And we still wait.
They dont care about us.
And there goes our 35th day or so without updates.
They dont care about us.
anyone got news about MPP?
And there goes our 35th day or so without updates.
anyone got news about MPP?
And there goes our 35th day or so without updates.
unfortunaly, you're right, dear...
anyone got news about MPP 
Thanx.
Thanx.
That old joke. Gets me everytime!sigh ..
anyone got news about MPP?
And there goes our 35th day or so without updates.
You are forgetting bitmain.
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX
These guys have been pretty much confirmed to be a bitmain mine.
There is also bitfury who controls his own production and still has the most efficient chip out there. I seem to recall one of the bitfury folks saying, when they got their first wafers, that they would be able to easily pump out the petahash without issue (I assume the case would be the same for HF).
I agree with the commenter in the other thread that we are approaching the endgame where only the chip manufacturers will be left in the mining game due to the poor ratio of btc price in to btc price out for consumers.
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX
These guys have been pretty much confirmed to be a bitmain mine.
There is also bitfury who controls his own production and still has the most efficient chip out there. I seem to recall one of the bitfury folks saying, when they got their first wafers, that they would be able to easily pump out the petahash without issue (I assume the case would be the same for HF).
I agree with the commenter in the other thread that we are approaching the endgame where only the chip manufacturers will be left in the mining game due to the poor ratio of btc price in to btc price out for consumers.
And electric utilities.
anyone got news about MPP
Thanx.
Thanx.
That old joke. Gets me everytime!
anyone got news about MPP
Thanx.
Thanx.
You are forgetting bitmain.
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX
These guys have been pretty much confirmed to be a bitmain mine.
There is also bitfury who controls his own production and still has the most efficient chip out there. I seem to recall one of the bitfury folks saying, when they got their first wafers, that they would be able to easily pump out the petahash without issue (I assume the case would be the same for HF).
I agree with the commenter in the other thread that we are approaching the endgame where only the chip manufacturers will be left in the mining game due to the poor ratio of btc price in to btc price out for consumers.
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX
These guys have been pretty much confirmed to be a bitmain mine.
There is also bitfury who controls his own production and still has the most efficient chip out there. I seem to recall one of the bitfury folks saying, when they got their first wafers, that they would be able to easily pump out the petahash without issue (I assume the case would be the same for HF).
I agree with the commenter in the other thread that we are approaching the endgame where only the chip manufacturers will be left in the mining game due to the poor ratio of btc price in to btc price out for consumers.
So, CT and HF are shipping peanuts. KNC is busy building datacenters. Everyone else is shipping overpriced old gen hardware, hopefully in low quantities.
BUT, the network hashrate increased 10PH during the last month. That's something like 40 times HF batch 1.
I guess that no one see anything strange with it.
BUT, the network hashrate increased 10PH during the last month. That's something like 40 times HF batch 1.
I guess that no one see anything strange with it.
I already have receive 2 times a email from Hashfast that my request is receive. 1st time is aaround mid january, and last time they react was today, the only thing they said was:
.........,
We have received your request.
Thanks,
HashFast Sales
[email protected]
Still dont know what this mean??? They react not personal but like really stupid machines
.........,
We have received your request.
Thanks,
HashFast Sales
[email protected]
Still dont know what this mean??? They react not personal but like really stupid machines
Here are all the addresses I have from HashFast:
Not everything is a conspiracy. This is one is easily explained.
Yea it is called Lousy Photoshoping of an Image
Here are all the addresses I have from HashFast:
Not everything is a conspiracy. This is one is easily explained.
I want to make a collection of all the fake addresses OR all the addresses with "bad" information. (such as the previous one with a wrong zip code.)
Here are all the addresses I have from HashFast:
HF address on my Aug 8 invoice:
Quote
HashFast Technologies LLC
1060 Gilman
San Francisco, CA 94124
United States
1060 Gilman
San Francisco, CA 94124
United States
HF legally registered address /w incorrect zip:
Quote
HashFast Technologies LLC
649 Mission St. 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 90291
United States
649 Mission St. 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 90291
United States
HF while @ Uniquify:
Quote
HashFast Technologies LLC
2030 Fortune Dr.
San Jose, CA 95131-1835
United States
2030 Fortune Dr.
San Jose, CA 95131-1835
United States
HF while @ NextSpace San Jose:
Quote
HashFast Technologies LLC
97 South Second Street #175
San Jose, CA 95113
United States
97 South Second Street #175
San Jose, CA 95113
United States
HF while @ NextSpace San Francisco:
Quote
HashFast Technologies LLC
365 Vermont Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
United States
365 Vermont Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
United States
HF current location:
Quote
HashFast Technologies LLC
100 Bush Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
United States
100 Bush Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
United States
Also according to the court documents, they knew that their mailing address was wrong in early December which is why they weren't receiving notices when they were getting sued by that other guy in small claims court back in November.
Related but unrelated, my lawyer's proxy tried to serve the documents to the address on the HashFast invoice yesterday, and failed. The number (175) simply doesn't exist.I want to make a collection of all the fake addresses OR all the addresses with "bad" information. (such as the previous one with a wrong zip code.)
Jump to: