Topic: HASHNEST Discussion and Support Thread - page 77. (Read 660097 times)
I noticed that Antpool now decided to distribute transaction fees. Since all hashnest hashes run on PPLNS before, are we entitled to PPLNS+ now? It makes sense to me.
I have two contracts in your site,one is s7 and other is s9.Now have question ,this s7 will be avalible or you disable it with s9 is more efficienty?
My withdrawal was confirmed without any acceleration. It was included into a blocked mined by AntPool, I don't know if this was a coincidence, it was not the first block mined by AntPool after the withdrawal (it was 4th).
It was probably a coincidence. The bitcoin mempool is slightly less congested today than yesterday. But it is still pretty bad.
My withdrawal was confirmed without any acceleration. It was included into a blocked mined by AntPool, I don't know if this was a coincidence, it was not the first block mined by AntPool after the withdrawal (it was 4th).
It was probably a coincidence. The bitcoin mempool is slightly less congested today than yesterday. But it is still pretty bad.
My withdrawal was confirmed without any acceleration. It was included into a blocked mined by AntPool, I don't know if this was a coincidence, it was not the first block mined by AntPool after the withdrawal (it was 4th).
But hey, BTC did reach ATH today.
Well, the number of unconfirmed Tx's has broken an all time high as well
It's way past due time for the Bitcoin world to wake up, and resolve this seemingly endless issue regarding block sizes and stuff
Transaction fees of 20-30k won't help much either with current kind of 'traffic jams'
And I actually would classify it as a critical thing; for instance, because there are also services out there (like, Bitcoin mixers) that work with addresses that expire after a certain amount of time and are then being deleted afterwards. Off course Bitcoin addresses don't really expire, but you don't know how (the retention of) the private keys of those temporary addresses are being handled, and thus having potential ending transactions up in limbo forever...
I believe the Bitcoin is a very neat system; yet until the scaling problem isn't resolved, it is failing as a payment-system in my eyes...
Try submit your Tx to pools that offer transaction accelerator. It should help as long as you are paying more than 0.0001/kB
Thank you. Finally was able to get it to work. Was finally able to add my transaction to VIABTC transaction accelerator.
https://blockchain.info/tx/8be251716c17d3c5f67e4ed0a78170489ece1370234d9c91d285140dff44105c
It's my secret trick for long time
glad it helped. Try submit your Tx to pools that offer transaction accelerator. It should help as long as you are paying more than 0.0001/kB
Thank you. Finally was able to get it to work. Was finally able to add my transaction to VIABTC transaction accelerator.
https://blockchain.info/tx/8be251716c17d3c5f67e4ed0a78170489ece1370234d9c91d285140dff44105c
...
My problem is that I was trying to move some funds from my "wallet" at Hashnest to somewhere else. I have no control over how much transaction fee their wallet assigns to my withdraw transaction. Hashnest definitely profited a little from the fee they charged me to withdraw. Although it was only a little over 15K sats.
Well, hopefully this does attract their attention, the fees included in bitcoin withdrawals has been a problem in more than 1 exchange as I have seen so far. But well, it is though if you can't choose your own amount of fee My problem is that I was trying to move some funds from my "wallet" at Hashnest to somewhere else. I have no control over how much transaction fee their wallet assigns to my withdraw transaction. Hashnest definitely profited a little from the fee they charged me to withdraw. Although it was only a little over 15K sats.
But hey, BTC did reach ATH today.
Well, the number of unconfirmed Tx's has broken an all time high as well
It's way past due time for the Bitcoin world to wake up, and resolve this seemingly endless issue regarding block sizes and stuff
My problem is that I was trying to move some funds from my "wallet" at Hashnest to somewhere else. I have no control over how much transaction fee their wallet assigns to my withdraw transaction. Hashnest definitely profited a little from the fee they charged me to withdraw. Although it was only a little over 15K sats.
But hey, BTC did reach ATH today.
Well, the number of unconfirmed Tx's has broken an all time high as well
It's way past due time for the Bitcoin world to wake up, and resolve this seemingly endless issue regarding block sizes and stuff
Just tried to via ViaBTC.
By the way, as for ViaBTC. I've just found out that they offer better conditions to some extent for cloud mining except for the miner price. ViaBTC takes 6% management fee and likely 2% pool fee, but this is effectively neglected by the fact that ViaBTC shares transaction fees among miners and AntPool does not. And electricity cost at ViaBTC is about 0.12 USD per THs whereas Hashnest takes 0.19 USD per THs. But the real problem at ViaBTC is THs cost. It is 0.16 BTC per THs whereas Hashnest currently sells THs just as low as 0.11 BTC. Another problem is that you cannot sell hashpower at ViaBTC.
But hey, BTC did reach ATH today.
Well, the number of unconfirmed Tx's has broken an all time high as well
It's way past due time for the Bitcoin world to wake up, and resolve this seemingly endless issue regarding block sizes and stuff
You know, I spent 200k sat for a withdrawal fee and hashnest only applied 4502 sats in fee to the transaction which includes someone else's output too. Screw hashnest! Now I get to wait many hours, probably days, while my transaction languishes in the mempool!! Not pleased at all. 
It was 20k satoshi, hovewer indeed real transaction fee was 4.5k satoshi (which is exactly 20k satoshi per kilobyte - not that bad though). I'm wondering why it happens, it's not good because it looks like we give up 15.5k satoshi to hashnest in this case.
Yes, I was wrong. I was only charged 20K sats. However, my transaction is still unconfirmed. 20K sat per kilobyte isn't going to cut it right now.
Just tried to via ViaBTC. They are past their limit right now. Not surprising since the mempool size is over 58 megs at the moment.What a bad way to spend my birthday. 1st had to go to DMV to renew my license. Now I have to hurry up and wait for my BTC transaction to go through. But hey, BTC did reach ATH today.
You know, I spent 200k sat for a withdrawal fee and hashnest only applied 4502 sats in fee to the transaction which includes someone else's output too. Screw hashnest! Now I get to wait many hours, probably days, while my transaction languishes in the mempool!! Not pleased at all.
It was 20k satoshi, hovewer indeed real transaction fee was 4.5k satoshi (which is exactly 20k satoshi per kilobyte - not that bad though). I'm wondering why it happens, it's not good because it looks like we give up 15.5k satoshi to hashnest in this case.
Yes, I was wrong. I was only charged 20K sats. However, my transaction is still unconfirmed. 20K sat per kilobyte isn't going to cut it right now.
You know, I spent 200k sat for a withdrawal fee and hashnest only applied 4502 sats in fee to the transaction which includes someone else's output too. Screw hashnest! Now I get to wait many hours, probably days, while my transaction languishes in the mempool!! Not pleased at all.
It was 20k satoshi, hovewer indeed real transaction fee was 4.5k satoshi (which is exactly 20k satoshi per kilobyte - not that bad though). I'm wondering why it happens, it's not good because it looks like we give up 15.5k satoshi to hashnest in this case.
Yes, I was wrong. I was only charged 20K sats. However, my transaction is still unconfirmed. 20K sat per kilobyte isn't going to cut it right now.
You know, I spent 200k sat for a withdrawal fee and hashnest only applied 4502 sats in fee to the transaction which includes someone else's output too. Screw hashnest! Now I get to wait many hours, probably days, while my transaction languishes in the mempool!! Not pleased at all.
It was 20k satoshi, hovewer indeed real transaction fee was 4.5k satoshi (which is exactly 20k satoshi per kilobyte - not that bad though). I'm wondering why it happens, it's not good because it looks like we give up 15.5k satoshi to hashnest in this case.
You know, I spent 200k sat for a withdrawal fee and hashnest only applied 4502 sats in fee to the transaction which includes someone else's output too. Screw hashnest! Now I get to wait many hours, probably days, while my transaction languishes in the mempool!! Not pleased at all.
hey guys beaware for hackers that want to hack your account, i'm receiving a log in attempt to make account and it's not authorized by me, the ip is from russia country, i see also that when i try to access to hashnest the page become red with google chrome, are they attacking it with malware or what? i feel they need to make this more secure, because it's not the first tiem this is happening to me
Please never apply same passwords on different sites.
Always keep 2FA enabled on Hashnest.
hey guys beaware for hackers that want to hack your account, i'm receiving a log in attempt to make account and it's not authorized by me, the ip is from russia country, i see also that when i try to access to hashnest the page become red with google chrome, are they attacking it with malware or what? i feel they need to make this more secure, because it's not the first tiem this is happening to me
Thank you for sharing. Can you please provide some screenshot for us to see how it looks like? Personally, I never experience that scenario. It's always been secure in my end and I'm not receiving any log in attempt email. Since you've mentioned that it's not your first time to encounter this, I think you need to do some check or changes in your PC or Chrome, maybe the problem is just in your end. Try browsing hashnest site in different browser (IE. Mozilla Firefox) and check if the problem still occur, if it's fine, maybe your Chrome was the only one infected, while if the same, you need to scan your PC. Jump to: