Hate a DT1 member? Or two? All of them? Post your grievances here. UNMODERATED - page 3.

TheNewAnon135246

legendary

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1989

฿uy ฿itcoin

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 11:35:08 PM

Quote from: TheNewAnon135246 on February 06, 2019, 11:25:49 PM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on February 06, 2019, 10:28:27 PM

I wouldn't say I hate OgNasty but I do believe he shouldn't be in DT so I'm glad to see him with -1 again:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview

Not sure who excluded him (or removed an inclusion perhaps) but it feels like balance has been restored to the Universe. However I'd like to encourage other DT1 members to review OgNasty's trust list and include any DT2 members that you consider worthy.

I trust 0gNasty unlike some others on the DT list. 0gNasy had a good trade reputation which is what the DT was meant for. I would trust him with $$ unlike MANY many of the DT list users that are on that list with ZERO trade rep. Fuck you if you don't like that answer.

I agree but he has been acting very childish lately. No idea what happened but his current behaviour doesn't suit DT1 imo.

So maybe you should RED tag him? is that what your saying? He Doesn't meet your expectations so lets Red tag him? Remove him from DT? what are you saying?

I would never leave negative trust simply for disagreeing with him, neither would I disrecommend anyone to use him as escrow.

H8bussesNbicycles

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

▄▀ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT

Quote from: bones261 on February 07, 2019, 12:33:01 AM

it will keep you safe

fuck safety

Quote from: mikeywith on February 07, 2019, 12:35:58 AM

the are probably alts of some old members, look at their profile, most of them are newbies who don't even have 10 merit, why would a newbie care this much about DT bullshit?

no shit Sherlock
possibly you should take heed in our warnings

we fight to be free from tyrants
petty scammers are the least of our worries compared to tyrannical dictators

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 07, 2019, 12:15:22 AM

OgNasty has done a lot of good trades but he has freaked over a few guys escrows.

I think that’s a bit of a misconception. I’ve actually helped quite a few escrow agents here. I’ve directed users looking for escrow to minerjones, Blazed, krogomanhattan, and you philipma. If you think my warnings about scam escrows are freaking out, I urge you to invest in the next ICO Lauda escrows for. Wink

You’ll be a great addition to the DefaultTrust network. I have no doubt.

H8bussesNbicycles

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

▄▀ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 07, 2019, 12:25:07 AM

Quote from: bones261 on February 07, 2019, 12:17:20 AM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 07, 2019, 12:07:57 AM

It's about being right or wrong... Don't be a pussy your trust is outstanding. Stand up for whats right. would you trust Ognasty with a $ knowing he has a great full history of trades or would you trust Lauda with your $ knowing she has never made a trade deal in her entire history with BCT? Lauda has a higher Rating than Ognasty LOL

Lauda has never done a deal via Bitcointalk? Cheesy

Lauda offers escrow services among other things. Roll Eyes

Perhaps you should do a bit more research before typing nonsense. You do realize that P2P trades aren't the only economic activity going on within this forum. Correct?

I wouldn't trust Lauda with a single $ of my money. but yet she is stiill on my trusted list why?

because ""scambusters""

""busting"" petty scams is more trustworthy than the political direction of cryptocurrency
they are throwing away the main goal of satoshi in favor of the temporary safety of idiots at the expence of essential liberty for all

laudas thousands of ratings are only copies of others anyway
hundreds a day to catch up and be the top red trust sender (must i produce a quote ?)

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

Quote from: bones261 on February 07, 2019, 12:33:01 AM

I am pretty sure they know these things already, the are probably alts of some old members, look at their profile, most of them are newbies who don't even have 10 merit, why would a newbie care this much about DT bullshit?

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 07, 2019, 12:25:07 AM

Quote from: bones261 on February 07, 2019, 12:17:20 AM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 07, 2019, 12:07:57 AM

It's about being right or wrong... Don't be a pussy your trust is outstanding. Stand up for whats right. would you trust Ognasty with a $ knowing he has a great full history of trades or would you trust Lauda with your $ knowing she has never made a trade deal in her entire history with BCT? Lauda has a higher Rating than Ognasty LOL

Lauda has never done a deal via Bitcointalk? Cheesy

Lauda offers escrow services among other things. Roll Eyes

Perhaps you should do a bit more research before typing nonsense. You do realize that P2P trades aren't the only economic activity going on within this forum. Correct?

I wouldn't trust Lauda with a single $ of my money. but yet she is stiill on my trusted list why?

There is a remedy for that. Go into your trust settings and type the following;

Code:

~Lauda

You can distrust anyone else you think doesn't have valuable input either. Also, you can add whoever you like by just typing in their username. Very simple. If you are confident enough in your list and feel it will keep you safe, then remove DefaultTrust from your list.

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

Quote from: H8bussesNbicycles on February 07, 2019, 12:18:27 AM

most of you you 3rd world fucks dont understand the concepts of freedom

fuck off please with your non-sense.

otrkid1970

member

Activity: 270

Merit: 17

Quote from: bones261 on February 07, 2019, 12:17:20 AM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 07, 2019, 12:07:57 AM

It's about being right or wrong... Don't be a pussy your trust is outstanding. Stand up for whats right. would you trust Ognasty with a $ knowing he has a great full history of trades or would you trust Lauda with your $ knowing she has never made a trade deal in her entire history with BCT? Lauda has a higher Rating than Ognasty LOL

Lauda has never done a deal via Bitcointalk? Cheesy

Lauda offers escrow services among other things. Roll Eyes

Perhaps you should do a bit more research before typing nonsense. You do realize that P2P trades aren't the only economic activity going on within this forum. Correct?

I wouldn't trust Lauda with a single $ of my money. but yet she is stiill on my trusted list why?

otrkid1970

member

Activity: 270

Merit: 17

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 07, 2019, 12:15:22 AM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 07, 2019, 12:07:57 AM

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 06, 2019, 11:57:29 PM

I simply never understood why all of you fight one another.

I excluded almost everyone from my list due to being attacked for jacking my score up and have been off DT1 list for a while.

I don't like getting dragged into these arguements.

Over time I have exchanged many pm's with

Lauda
suchmoon
OgNasty

and I actually get along with the three of you fairly well.

But you guys or girls or cats fight hard against each other.

I don't know much about thepharmicist, but he seems to have a fan club and a hate club.

And here I am writing on a thread that is bound to get me going again.

oh I added

OgNasty
suchmoon
sidehack
frodocooper
Lauda

to my list the last few days

of course I now jump back up to 671 trust number vs 221

but I am moody so why not

I can always pull them off.

lets see how long before I get screwed with.

It's about being right or wrong... Don't be a pussy your trust is outstanding. Stand up for whats right. would you trust Ognasty with a $ knowing he has a great full history of trades or would you trust Lauda with your $ knowing she has never made a trade deal in her entire history with BCT? Lauda has a higher Rating than Ognasty LOL

Hey I like pussy but that is not the point. I have been given a lot of grief over trust.

Lauda used to bust a lot of assholes and scammers.

OgNasty has done a lot of good trades but he has freaked over a few guys escrows.

Suchmoon has been really solid support to me when I was threatened by GAW-zen miners Josh G years ago.

So all three people have helped me.

now I have a mailing contact to OgNasty
I don't for Lauda.
I don't for Suchmoon.

One of the reasons I dropped almost everyone off my list was I don't know:

real names phone number and addresses

makes it harder to trust if I can't get to them.

most people on the list I had I good contact for real.

Maybe trust should have real name KYC or not be there at all.

Kind of why I don't like writing on these threads.

sorry Phillip im in Ma. too North Adams near the VT. line. i just don't agree with you.

H8bussesNbicycles

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

▄▀ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT

Quote from: mikeywith on February 06, 2019, 11:52:55 PM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM

I trust 0gNasty unlike some others on the DT list. 0gNasy had a good trade reputation which is what the DT was meant for. I would trust him with $$ unlike MANY many of the DT list users that are on that list with ZERO trade rep. Fuck you if you don't like that answer.

I doubt that there is any DT member who don't trust Og with their funds , i am almost certain that by now almost everybody knows that he is a very-very trustworthy person, no-doubt , i personally know this without having to hear it from anybody else.

just because other members exclude him, it does not mean they don't trust him. they just have a problem with his feedbacks and/or they have some personal shit going on , same thing goes to those that he exudes.

i still want to see him on DT to be honest, while his rating are not 100% accurate,and many are based on non-trust related matters ( just like many other DT members) i think he has tagged a good amount of scammers and there are chances that those are not tagged by others - therefore, they now have clean profiles again. ( not aware of any specific members, but the possibility is there)

removing anyone from DT in many cases bring more harm than good based on the previous theory , i still believe the best thing to sort this shit out is by keeping the trust system emotionless and focusing only on protecting the forum from scammers rather than expressing personal views.

ognastys ratings are 100% accurate

stop making this about scammers
scammers are stupid and so is everyone stupid enough to be fooled by stupid scammers

this is about the future of bitcointalk
is this a free society to speak as we please or is this a society that throws away all freedoms to protect fools from petty scammers ?

most of you you 3rd world fucks dont understand the concepts of freedom and liberty but guess what
bitcoin is made by satoshi for freedom and liberty as its main purpose

anyone that values security from petty scams over the freedom and liberty of the people of this earth are the tyrant trash bitcoin was given to us to overthrow

1000 account sellers are not worth a single censored user
all the money in this world is not worth the oppression of dictators

dt of this forum has lost touch with the goal of cryptocurrency and its far past time to do something about it

whose side are you on ?
are you on the righteous free people of this earths ability to decide their own fate or the side of authoritarian controllers to decide their fate for them ?

if you are some sort of socialist looking out for all the stupid people against petty scams at the expense of the freedom of all individuals go fuck a goat

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 07, 2019, 12:07:57 AM

It's about being right or wrong... Don't be a pussy your trust is outstanding. Stand up for whats right. would you trust Ognasty with a $ knowing he has a great full history of trades or would you trust Lauda with your $ knowing she has never made a trade deal in her entire history with BCT? Lauda has a higher Rating than Ognasty LOL

Lauda has never done a deal via Bitcointalk? Cheesy

Lauda offers escrow services among other things. Roll Eyes

Perhaps you should do a bit more research before typing nonsense. You do realize that P2P trades aren't the only economic activity going on within this forum. Correct?

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 07, 2019, 12:07:57 AM

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 06, 2019, 11:57:29 PM

I simply never understood why all of you fight one another.

I excluded almost everyone from my list due to being attacked for jacking my score up and have been off DT1 list for a while.

I don't like getting dragged into these arguements.

Over time I have exchanged many pm's with

Lauda
suchmoon
OgNasty

and I actually get along with the three of you fairly well.

But you guys or girls or cats fight hard against each other.

I don't know much about thepharmicist, but he seems to have a fan club and a hate club.

And here I am writing on a thread that is bound to get me going again.

oh I added

OgNasty
suchmoon
sidehack
frodocooper
Lauda

to my list the last few days

of course I now jump back up to 671 trust number vs 221

but I am moody so why not

I can always pull them off.

lets see how long before I get screwed with.

It's about being right or wrong... Don't be a pussy your trust is outstanding. Stand up for whats right. would you trust Ognasty with a $ knowing he has a great full history of trades or would you trust Lauda with your $ knowing she has never made a trade deal in her entire history with BCT? Lauda has a higher Rating than Ognasty LOL

Hey I like pussy but that is not the point. I have been given a lot of grief over trust.

Lauda used to bust a lot of assholes and scammers.

OgNasty has done a lot of good trades but he has freaked over a few guys escrows.

Suchmoon has been really solid support to me when I was threatened by GAW-zen miners Josh G years ago.

So all three people have helped me.

now I have a mailing contact to OgNasty
I don't for Lauda.
I don't for Suchmoon.

One of the reasons I dropped almost everyone off my list was I don't know:

real names phone number and addresses

makes it harder to trust if I can't get to them.

most people on the list I had I good contact for real.

Maybe trust should have real name KYC or not be there at all.

Kind of why I don't like writing on these threads.

otrkid1970

member

Activity: 270

Merit: 17

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 06, 2019, 11:57:29 PM

I simply never understood why all of you fight one another.

I excluded almost everyone from my list due to being attacked for jacking my score up and have been off DT1 list for a while.

I don't like getting dragged into these arguements.

Over time I have exchanged many pm's with

Lauda
suchmoon
OgNasty

and I actually get along with the three of you fairly well.

But you guys or girls or cats fight hard against each other.

I don't know much about thepharmicist, but he seems to have a fan club and a hate club.

And here I am writing on a thread that is bound to get me going again.

oh I added

OgNasty
suchmoon
sidehack
frodocooper
Lauda

to my list the last few days

of course I now jump back up to 671 trust number vs 221

but I am moody so why not

I can always pull them off.

lets see how long before I get screwed with.

It's about being right or wrong... Don't be a pussy your trust is outstanding. Stand up for whats right. would you trust Ognasty with a $ knowing he has a great full history of trades or would you trust Lauda with your $ knowing she has never made a trade deal in her entire history with BCT? Lauda has a higher Rating than Ognasty LOL

otrkid1970

member

Activity: 270

Merit: 17

Quote from: mikeywith on February 06, 2019, 11:52:55 PM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM

I trust 0gNasty unlike some others on the DT list. 0gNasy had a good trade reputation which is what the DT was meant for. I would trust him with $$ unlike MANY many of the DT list users that are on that list with ZERO trade rep. Fuck you if you don't like that answer.

I doubt that there is any DT member who don't trust Og with their funds , i am almost certain that by now almost everybody knows that he is a very-very trustworthy person, no-doubt , i personally know this without having to hear it from anybody else.

just because other members exclude him, it does not mean they don't trust him. they just have a problem with his feedbacks and/or they have some personal shit going on , same thing goes to those that he exudes.

i still want to see him on DT to be honest, while his rating are not 100% accurate,and many are based on non-trust related matters ( just like many other DT members) i think he has tagged a good amount of scammers and there are chances that those are not tagged by others - therefore, they now have clean profiles again. ( not aware of any specific members, but the possibility is there)

removing anyone from DT in many cases bring more harm than good based on the previous theory , i still believe the best thing to sort this shit out is by keeping the trust system emotionless and focusing only on protecting the forum from scammers rather than expressing personal views.

People who "Trust" him would not remove him from their trust based on "Feelings"

Base his trust on FACTS
He is genuinely trusted by any person exchanging $ that is what trust is all about.....I don't give a fuck if he is having a bad day and says some shit on a post.....If i buy or sell something from/to him him do i have to be worried about getting robbed? NOPE....Thats trust

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

I simply never understood why all of you fight one another.

I excluded almost everyone from my list due to being attacked for jacking my score up and have been off DT1 list for a while.

I don't like getting dragged into these arguements.

Over time I have exchanged many pm's with

Lauda
suchmoon
OgNasty

and I actually get along with the three of you fairly well.

But you guys or girls or cats fight hard against each other.

I don't know much about thepharmicist, but he seems to have a fan club and a hate club.

And here I am writing on a thread that is bound to get me going again.

oh I added

OgNasty
suchmoon
sidehack
frodocooper
Lauda

to my list the last few days

of course I now jump back up to 671 trust number vs 221

but I am moody so why not

I can always pull them off.

lets see how long before I get screwed with.

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM

I trust 0gNasty unlike some others on the DT list. 0gNasy had a good trade reputation which is what the DT was meant for. I would trust him with $$ unlike MANY many of the DT list users that are on that list with ZERO trade rep. Fuck you if you don't like that answer.

I doubt that there is any DT member who don't trust Og with their funds , i am almost certain that by now almost everybody knows that he is a very-very trustworthy person, no-doubt , i personally know this without having to hear it from anybody else.

just because other members exclude him, it does not mean they don't trust him. they just have a problem with his feedbacks and/or they have some personal shit going on , same thing goes to those that he exudes.

i still want to see him on DT to be honest, while his rating are not 100% accurate,and many are based on non-trust related matters ( just like many other DT members) i think he has tagged a good amount of scammers and there are chances that those are not tagged by others - therefore, they now have clean profiles again. ( not aware of any specific members, but the possibility is there)

removing anyone from DT in many cases bring more harm than good based on the previous theory , i still believe the best thing to sort this shit out is by keeping the trust system emotionless and focusing only on protecting the forum from scammers rather than expressing personal views.

otrkid1970

member

Activity: 270

Merit: 17

Quote from: OgNasty on February 06, 2019, 11:42:51 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on February 06, 2019, 11:04:07 PM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM

I trust 0gNasty unlike some others on the DT list. 0gNasy had a good trade reputation which is what the DT was meant for. I would trust him with $$ unlike MANY many of the DT list users that are on that list with ZERO trade rep. Fuck you if you don't like that answer.

OgNasty's exclusion doesn't prevent him from trading. It excludes his ratings from the default score and moves them down on on person's trust page, which is appropriate seeing how worthless many of his ratings are due to his extremely fragile ego.

My ratings aren’t worthless nor is my ego fragile. Your continued attempts to control the narrative with nonsense is noticed. People can review my trust ratings themselves and see they are of value. Don’t pretend that my exclusion is about anything other than retaliation for prior exclusions while I was tasked with being one of only a few DT members willing to risk being publicly unpopular for the accuracy of the trust network. In fact, I’m now being crucified by those whom I excluded for not being able to accurately judge the value of trust ratings. Had I cared about my ego, I would have put myself before the forum and acted in a way that wouldn’t have made unstable users want to enact revenge, as they are doing now.

You can say I’m an idiot for donating so much of my time and money to a community project. You can say I’m a fool for risking my reputation as the most trusted user here in order to maintain a reasonably honest DT network and not empower known extortionists. You saying my ratings aren’t valuable though? That is nonsense. More likely you are blinded by politics and acting irrationally out of emotion.

I trust you 100% more than 99.9% of these pukes on the DT list

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: suchmoon on February 06, 2019, 11:04:07 PM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM

I trust 0gNasty unlike some others on the DT list. 0gNasy had a good trade reputation which is what the DT was meant for. I would trust him with $$ unlike MANY many of the DT list users that are on that list with ZERO trade rep. Fuck you if you don't like that answer.

OgNasty's exclusion doesn't prevent him from trading. It excludes his ratings from the default score and moves them down on on person's trust page, which is appropriate seeing how worthless many of his ratings are due to his extremely fragile ego.

My ratings aren’t worthless nor is my ego fragile. Your continued attempts to control the narrative with nonsense is noticed. People can review my trust ratings themselves and see they are of value. Don’t pretend that my exclusion is about anything other than retaliation for prior exclusions while I was tasked with being one of only a few DT members willing to risk being publicly unpopular for the accuracy of the trust network. In fact, I’m now being crucified by those whom I excluded for not being able to accurately judge the value of trust ratings. Had I cared about my ego, I would have put myself before the forum and acted in a way that wouldn’t have made unstable users want to enact revenge, as they are doing now.

You can say I’m an idiot for donating so much of my time and money to a community project. You can say I’m a fool for risking my reputation as the most trusted user here in order to maintain a reasonably honest DT network and not empower known extortionists. You saying my ratings aren’t valuable though? That is nonsense. More likely you are blinded by politics and acting irrationally out of emotion.

otrkid1970

member

Activity: 270

Merit: 17

Quote from: DarkStar_ on February 06, 2019, 11:37:51 PM

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM

I trust 0gNasty unlike some others on the DT list. 0gNasy had a good trade reputation which is what the DT was meant for. I would trust him with $$ unlike MANY many of the DT list users that are on that list with ZERO trade rep. Fuck you if you don't like that answer.

Go attack theymos then:

Quote from: theymos on November 11, 2013, 11:44:07 PM

No. That's not how the Trust system works. There's a reason why trust lists and trust ratings are separate. You can trust that someone is not a scammer but not trust them to have a good trust list, and vice-versa. Listing someone in your trust list indicates only that you like their ratings and/or trust list in some way (defined by you). With the default trust system, my goal is to maximize the number of default-trusted ratings while minimizing the number of incorrect ratings (especially negative ones). There haven't been any major failures in this area.

There actually isn't a way to vouch for someone in the trust system if you use it properly. There are only trust events which are interpreted by users, and trust list relationships which are mostly unrelated to real trust. This is why I kept my positive trust rating of TF even though my overall trust in him has diminished. My personal history with TF has not changed. My trust in him has diminished, but only because of how I am interpreting other trust events. My own history/rating is still relevant to the full picture of TF's trustworthiness in my mind, and it may still be relevant to others.

Your misunderstanding of how the trust system works is one reason why you are not in DefaultTrust.

theymos is a spineless coward. His only goal is to rape the forum for $$.....And yes just like now i have attacked him before.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: otrkid1970 on February 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM

I trust 0gNasty unlike some others on the DT list. 0gNasy had a good trade reputation which is what the DT was meant for. I would trust him with $$ unlike MANY many of the DT list users that are on that list with ZERO trade rep. Fuck you if you don't like that answer.

Go attack theymos then:

Quote from: theymos on November 11, 2013, 11:44:07 PM

No. That's not how the Trust system works. There's a reason why trust lists and trust ratings are separate. You can trust that someone is not a scammer but not trust them to have a good trust list, and vice-versa. Listing someone in your trust list indicates only that you like their ratings and/or trust list in some way (defined by you). With the default trust system, my goal is to maximize the number of default-trusted ratings while minimizing the number of incorrect ratings (especially negative ones). There haven't been any major failures in this area.

There actually isn't a way to vouch for someone in the trust system if you use it properly. There are only trust events which are interpreted by users, and trust list relationships which are mostly unrelated to real trust. This is why I kept my positive trust rating of TF even though my overall trust in him has diminished. My personal history with TF has not changed. My trust in him has diminished, but only because of how I am interpreting other trust events. My own history/rating is still relevant to the full picture of TF's trustworthiness in my mind, and it may still be relevant to others.

Your misunderstanding of how the trust system works is one reason why you are not in DefaultTrust.

Topic: Hate a DT1 member? Or two? All of them? Post your grievances here. UNMODERATED - page 3. (Read 2011 times)