Pages:
Author

Topic: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More - page 2. (Read 17362 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...So if this price holds, we'll be looking at giving them an extra 3.25 shares for each share purchased during the IPO.

Don't you mean an extra 9 shares?  The highest bid is .0022, so each share must be augmented with a minimum of 9 more shares to bring it up to I*cough*PO price.
Check ur math.
sr. member
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
Anyone have a summary of what exactly happened with this IPO? I tried reading this thread but ended up with a headache.

I can see a semi-decent amount of shares sold in the end. Now the price has crashed. People bought then dumped..?

645 shares were sold on Havelock during the offering (BTC14.19). Once the Havelock IPO ended, I believe all previous shares (from their first offering on LitecoinTalk) were converted over, though someone correct me if I'm wrong.

This is correct.

Additionally, I messaged all IPO buyers about this prior to the IPO closing. Since we've had a large number of shares that were unsold, we are giving them additional shares to compensate for the price dropping. So if this price holds, we'll be looking at giving them an extra 3.25 shares for each share purchased during the IPO.

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
@CoinsForTech:

A shade over 1% (one percent) of the shares sold.

The price [understandably] tanked as soon as trading has started, with current highest bid being 50/50    @ ฿0.00220000 (exactly one tenths the Havelock IPO price).

The unsold shares were put up for sale, and can be seen at the bottom of the asks, here:


There wasn't much dumping, simply because there were never any bids.  The highest non-trivial (over 0.11BTC) current bid is


  ~Happy Investing!


P.S: If it's not obvious, offerings like this create DISASTROUS PR for Bitcoin, and are [at least partially] responsible for the floundering exchange rate.
Case in point:  The same people who black-mouthed and raged against me for calling out Active Mining are now posting this:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8564894 <==don't click if you anger easily

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
Anyone have a summary of what exactly happened with this IPO? I tried reading this thread but ended up with a headache.

I can see a semi-decent amount of shares sold in the end. Now the price has crashed. People bought then dumped..?

645 shares were sold on Havelock during the offering (BTC14.19). Once the Havelock IPO ended, I believe all previous shares (from their first offering on LitecoinTalk) were converted over, though someone correct me if I'm wrong.
hero member
Activity: 698
Merit: 500
5% Bitcoin Discount - All Orders
Anyone have a summary of what exactly happened with this IPO? I tried reading this thread but ended up with a headache.

I can see a semi-decent amount of shares sold in the end. Now the price has crashed. People bought then dumped..?
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
No reason to panic, finance enthusiasts!   

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254




Edit: It gets better...

sr. member
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
9 More days till the death of hash? Or are they going to extend the offering?

Given that we're going to import shares for previous shareholders, I don't think the offering is going to "Die". However, extension of the IPO remains to be seen. I believe Havelock typically allows those shares to float on the market @ IPO price.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
There are some 10-50k usd unpaid dividends which would probably be used to setup the next group buy or reseller order. I'm sure Benny will find a place to make that coin work.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
9 More days till the death of hash? Or are they going to extend the offering?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
Breaking news:

After merely two weeks of brisk sales, Big Trends Capital Investment, a Hong Kong financial concern, has sold over 500 shares of its spectacular Havelock offering to eager Bitcoin finance enthusiasts.

This marks the 1% point of the firm's total projected sales.

On the other side of the globe, somewhere in rural Ohio, visionary financiers Benny and Branny jubilantly commemorated the momentous milestone.

sr. member
Activity: 391
Merit: 250
HashWithUs is slated to be our investor portal, with PR/News, along with dividend information, and company info where needed.

Re: Cloud mining, its something we're looking into, as we do have a few people interested in that. But the primary focus has been, and continues to be to build a world-class hardware resales facility, while building infrastructure for mining (and eventually leveraging for cloud contracts when we broker a few agreements).
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Havelock frontpage is showing a Youtube-video about HASH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8gicpVv7m4

That video is advertising a website
http://hashwithus.com/

Is BAH entering into Cloud-hashing market? The website says we'll get more info next week.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
Another deletion spree. 


Lol, like clockwork!  Teh Twins are coverin' their tracks Roll Eyes
A bit too late, but it's the thought that counts, amiright? Cheesy



...But Teh Tiem Machine Nevar 4gits!! 
https://web.archive.org/web/20110828180209/http://20yearbillionaire.com/who-is-the-worlds-richest-man-i-am/

...
I dono but maybe I read the news to much, but every company I have ever seen go public has never hide a key player unless something is a foul. This should be interesting if they can produce a Mr. John K Freeman, maybe they will do like tocobell and find all the Ronald McDonalds bwhaha.

Pretty sure if it was Ok'd with the SEC all parties in the IPO would be listed... like directors. So can we see what you sent the SEC?

Mr. Freeman is not only a key player, he is the asset issuer.  What's more, there are many "John K. Freeman[ s]," but the issuer is not "K," but rather "Kenton," limiting us to a much narrower set Smiley



https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQY05JZm1MSVNFaEk/edit

@RiverBoatBTC:  will post the fraudulent SEC filing in a sec.

Here:
 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1598311/000159831114000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml


[/quote]
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
You left out the other idiots name, NotLambchop.

btw, all 3 sock accounts are the same person.

Gleb Gamow and RiverBoatBTC,

I have to assume that you both have an ulterior motive here. I mean you've been posting constantly about HASH for well over a week now and I've made one post...and I'm an investor! Seriously, you either have absolutely no life or have a financial interest in seeing HASH disappear. Either way, you both are pathetic.

Haze

Btw, your wrong.... 
*You're*

Please learn how to spell before you start giving your "advice" on the legitimacy of HASH. Thanks and goodbye.

If I recall, their was a quasi-truce in place until somebody came along and starting hazing.

TBC, I'm not affiliated with any other account that has posted on RENT or HASH's threads.

Peace.
legendary
Activity: 1123
Merit: 1000
SaluS - (SLS)
You left out the other idiots name, NotLambchop.

btw, all 3 sock accounts are the same person.

Gleb Gamow and RiverBoatBTC,

I have to assume that you both have an ulterior motive here. I mean you've been posting constantly about HASH for well over a week now and I've made one post...and I'm an investor! Seriously, you either have absolutely no life or have a financial interest in seeing HASH disappear. Either way, you both are pathetic.

Haze
full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 100
Gleb Gamow and RiverBoatBTC,

I have to assume that you both have an ulterior motive here. I mean you've been posting constantly about HASH for well over a week now and I've made one post...and I'm an investor! Seriously, you either have absolutely no life or have a financial interest in seeing HASH disappear. Either way, you both are pathetic.

Haze
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
Ironically, this truce has lasted longer than any of the ones involving the Gaza Strip of late.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
Hey, guys. Can we call a truce on busting the balls of HASH and RENT?

I've read their entire Litecoin Forum thread, and the best I can come up with is a tiny handful of missteps that may, or may not be concerning, of which it's those that we've collectively beat with buggy whips.

To date, I don't believe there's been one disgruntle customer or investor of theirs.

I've come to this conclusion on my own accord sans speaking personally with no one, thus don't want be judge by fellow bitcoiners-in-arms, and the pleasure of your participation was all mine.

I'm sure if we hunt hard enough on this forum  Roll Eyes we should have no problem finding bigger fish to deep fry.

~Bruno Kucinskas

PS: If at all possible, please show us something pertaining to John Kenton Freeman.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
Pages:
Jump to: