Topic: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More - page 5. (Read 17362 times)

You don't understand how interweb works.  The trail of slime you left behind you can't be deleted.  You have done this once too many times, and now both you and your scamming brother are getting fed to the lions for the amusement of all.

Just like REAL Christians.


Lol, like clockwork!  Teh Twins are coverin' their tracks
A bit too late, but it's the thought that counts, amiright?



...But Teh Tiem Machine Nevar 4gits!! 
https://web.archive.org/web/20110828180209/http://20yearbillionaire.com/who-is-the-worlds-richest-man-i-am/

To Gleb Gamow / NotLambChop / IPOMagic / RiverBoatBTC:

I am not allowing further discussion on this offering by these accounts, or any alts that I can find. You have your own thread in which you can post whatever you like. I will continue to delete any and all posts you make here, as its very obvious what you are trying to do. If you don't like what I am doing, do not invest. If you believe I am scamming people, post in in your own thread to compile whatever ideas you like. I will continue to allow anyone else to post here.

Hash Buy is an additional LLC I created if we ever needed a subsidiary to hold anything, such as the facility we're working on purchasing. Although I've paid for it, it has no EIN associated with it, and has not been used for anything as of yet.

Coin Services LLC owns the "BuyAHash" trademark, not BTCI.

https://www.havelockinvestments.com/fund.php?symbol=HASH


So BIG TRENDS CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED owns and operates the trademark "BuyAHash"?

Let me note that Benny already registered a company with the name "HASH BUY LLC":

http://www2.sos.state.oh.us/pls/bsqry/f?p=100:7:0::NO:7:P7_CHARTER_NUM:2298945


It is becoming confusing to determine who owns what...

Same quote applies here with BTCI and Benny.

Ok, you can stop illustrating my point now... I guess my line of reasoning is that if any of these posts had relevant information then you wouldn't need to resort to threats and insults to make them.

I really wish the "USB-Crayons" input device had never been invented now.

In all honesty, do you really think that making the documents publicly available would stop these guys from continuing to use Google to "research" and invent more distractions from the actual topic?... I would agree with you if we were dealing with rational human beings. However, it's quite evident that we are not.  It's amazing how much complete rubbish they have posted which has buried any loosely relevant points they may have had, while removing any credibility by their use of infantile rants and insults.

Had they stuck to any specific point or line of reasoning, their posts may have had merit. But if you notice, there seems to be a pattern that the people with genuine inquiries that may be considering the offer are on topic and have posts that are respectfully worded. While the posts speaking out against this offer are quite rude, disrespectful and insulting.

It's funny that the FUD spreaders very presence and amount of effort spent seems to indicate how truly threatened they are that this offering has the potential to be quite successful.  

That depends what Benny wants. I could examine the documents and report back without share with anyone. However I recommend Benny share this documents with the general public. This would certainly result in a great deal of trust to him. If everything is all right, there is nothing to fear from public scrutiny.

This fuckin' sucks! I just received an email offering up proof, of sorts, that it's possible that Brothers Schlick may be behind another Havelock IPO that consists of...wait for it...gambling. S/He's proof looks pretty damning, thus now I may need to vector my research over there. I also had a hunch, and did see some of the links presented, but now have to revisit them and see how the dots connect. To think all this exposure was due to Danny Brewster.

I wonder if Benny cloaks some his of domain names to keep his ID secret from the prying eyes of his God: https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&es_sm=122&q=%22Creation+Date%3A+2013-12-13+12%3A12%3A00Z%22&oq=%22Creation+Date%3A+2013-12-13+12%3A12%3A00Z%22&gs_l=serp.3...2211.2211.0.2522.1.1.0.0.0.0.101.101.0j1.1.0.chm_loc%2Chmss2%3Dfalse%2Chms2min%3D10%2Chms2max%3D10%2Chmtb%3D120%2Chmta%3D1440%2Chmrde%3D0-0%2Chmde%3D1-0%2Chmmpp1%3D0-5%2Chmmpp2%3D0-3%2Chmth%3D4%2Chmffs%3D10000...0...1.1.49.serp..1.0.0.2DP6e2rBT2M

You know what would be so fuckin' funny? What if... remember, this is ONLY a what-if thingie... what if Brandon and Benjamin Schlichter ministered to children at their church. Their only  saving grace (no pun intended) would be if parents of said children (if such were the case, for I'm not saying such is true) didn't have internet connections.

Augusto, if you were shown the documents would you share them with everybody else or would you only examine them for authenticity and then report back here?

True, I am not native English speaker. However I know Bruno for enough time to know that his is being sarcastic. I really wished Benny had sent the documents to me. I would vouch for him after examine the authenticity of such important documents. Instead he decided to send to people already biased in his favour. I think I did everything I could to clarify what was necessary. Now is up to Benny comply with what he promised. I will not insist on this matter further and I wish all the best for all parties involved.

Benny said he controls the BIG TREND CAPITAL INVESTMENT via power of attorney. We all know this is granted by a written and signed document. We all know as well that such document is very sensitive since it proves that a legal entity is authorized to represent another legal entity. Benny just admitted he was preparing a signed copy to send to neutral parties appointed by himself. This was stated at 02:01:49 PM (GMT). Anyone familiar with validation of documents knows that it takes more than few hours to authenticate sensitive documents. So after Benny statement, at 06:02:31 PM (GMT), CanaryInTheMine made his first statement confirming he had the documents sent by Benny. When I confronted CanaryInTheMine that he had just digitalized copies, he insisted he was in physical possession of the documents. So we are lead to believe that Benny got a copy of two important documents verified and signed, then sent to CanaryInTheMine and MrWDunne in 4 hours frame time? I am starting to think CanaryInTheMine refusal to publish the documents is due the fact that there is no power of attorney. CanaryInTheMine insistence to not reveal his name reinforces my suspicion.Assuming that Benny sent the verified and signed document copies via mail, it is quite easy to him produce evidence that he did this. All Benny have to do is present the receipt or the tracking number of the mail sent to CanaryInTheMine and MrWDunne.

It is also worth to note that both CanaryInTheMine and MrWDunne are not providing the necessary details about the documents. None admitted they had received a verified and signed copy of a power of attorney. CanaryInTheMine addressed the document as  "executed agreement with mentioned HK Corp." and MrWDunne as "contract between the HK company and Coin Services LLC".