Ok, explain to potential investors why you need a proxy company in Honk Kong to raise funds for a legally registered company in Ohio?
By the way, who is the appointed director of BIG TREND CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED?
While our US LLC can offer investment direct to investors (and will to US investors to comply with SEC rules), due to the nature of bitcoin and the fact that many of our previous investors were foreign, it was decided to have the investment done into a foreign entity (in this case HK) to lessen the requirements foreign investors would need to handle investing into a US company. This also allows us to keep our onshore and offshore investment clearly separated and in compliance with the various registration exemptions. As others have mentioned, we have a history of handling mining bonds denominated in LTC.
^Lol, OK. You will be the one unique and special snowflake that proves profitable.
There are many profitable, industrial-scale mines out there. The issue is that few (or any, that I know of), are public and use crypto as a vehicle of investment. This has to do with the nature of an entity denominating their listing in Bitcoin, purchasing devices that may, or may not, ROI, while offering a percentage of mining profits, which almost insures that the entity will never be crypto-positive, since miners are a depreciating asset.
This is why we want to utilize large-scale distribution first, then leverage it for cheaper mining products that have a higher likelihood of ROI. Additionally, when we get to that point, we would rather look into sellable hashing contracts to the public (e.g. cloudhashing.net) so that investors do no have to pay for machines that will ROI, but rather invest in infrastructure, with a nominal number of miners that are very cheap since we'd be buying hundreds or thousands at a time.