Topic: Havelock Investments - Exchange feedback/comments - page 5. (Read 248097 times)

Quote from: explorer on July 01, 2014, 07:14:27 PM

Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.

Or just for cancellations. Or after a limit. Abuser pay, as it were.

Trying to recall think there was an option like that on BTCT or maybe not if so then it would be a nice feature to add to havelock

IIRC they had higher trade fees for non-2FA accounts? I don't recall any order or cancellation fees. Of course, that was before breakfast this morning, and therefore somewhat fuzzy Grin

Ah right that was it to promote more secure authentication only the 2FA sometimes timed out on you more often than not

So your right guess it hasn't occurred yet fees for using the bots rapidly since some trades should be allowed at no fee just a lot of them at one time etc.

Or an API fee. If you are using it to good effect, perhaps you'd like to pay for it's upgrading before it brings the house down Cheesy

Swordsoffreedom

legendary

Activity: 2884

Merit: 1115

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Swordsoffreedom on July 01, 2014, 06:22:01 PM

Quote from: Swordsoffreedom on July 01, 2014, 06:22:01 PM

Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.

Or just for cancellations. Or after a limit. Abuser pay, as it were.

Trying to recall think there was an option like that on BTCT or maybe not if so then it would be a nice feature to add to havelock

IIRC they had higher trade fees for non-2FA accounts? I don't recall any order or cancellation fees. Of course, that was before breakfast this morning, and therefore somewhat fuzzy Grin

Ah right that was it to promote more secure authentication only the 2FA sometimes timed out on you more often than not

So your right guess it hasn't occurred yet fees for using the bots rapidly since some trades should be allowed at no fee just a lot of them at one time etc.

explorer

legendary

Activity: 2016

Merit: 1259

Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.

Or just for cancellations. Or after a limit. Abuser pay, as it were.

Trying to recall think there was an option like that on BTCT or maybe not if so then it would be a nice feature to add to havelock

IIRC they had higher trade fees for non-2FA accounts? I don't recall any order or cancellation fees. Of course, that was before breakfast this morning, and therefore somewhat fuzzy Grin

Swordsoffreedom

legendary

Activity: 2884

Merit: 1115

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.

Or just for cancellations. Or after a limit. Abuser pay, as it were.

Trying to recall think there was an option like that on BTCT or maybe not if so then it would be a nice feature to add to havelock

explorer

legendary

Activity: 2016

Merit: 1259

Quote from: dyask on July 01, 2014, 06:37:47 AM

Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.

Or just for cancellations. Or after a limit. Abuser pay, as it were.

Lohoris

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

Bitgoblin

Actually the real solution would be to charge a low fee for every order placed, whether it is fulfilled or not or canceled.

jjdub7

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 502

Quote from: jjdub7 on July 01, 2014, 06:22:47 AM

Quote from: dyask on July 01, 2014, 06:09:03 AM

Quote from: jjdub7 on July 01, 2014, 06:22:47 AM

The 600 call per minute limit for the API needs to be lowered. This is enough, honestly. Enough geniuses on here know how to program in php with the parameters to beat bid/ask by 1 or 10 satoshis that its now made the site completely unusable every time a live user tries to put in an order.

Cut it in half and see where that gets us.

600 calls per minute?!!!! That is way too high. It should be lowered to about 60 a minute. I agree the site is now a pain in the butt to use.

300 per 10 minutes*

Burning the old midnight oil a little too long there lol

Okay I vote for your 300 per 10 minute limit. Something needs to be done.

Nope, that's the current limit, and its still causing problems with the site. Either the server needs upgraded or we'd need to dial down the bots a bit. The problem is that user-initiated orders set of a chain reaction across the entire orderbook (and if you try trading BDD at all, especially EXCH...it just shits the bed).

dyask

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 510

Quote from: dyask on July 01, 2014, 06:09:03 AM

Quote from: dyask on July 01, 2014, 06:09:03 AM

The 600 call per minute limit for the API needs to be lowered. This is enough, honestly. Enough geniuses on here know how to program in php with the parameters to beat bid/ask by 1 or 10 satoshis that its now made the site completely unusable every time a live user tries to put in an order.

Cut it in half and see where that gets us.

600 calls per minute?!!!! That is way too high. It should be lowered to about 60 a minute. I agree the site is now a pain in the butt to use.

300 per 10 minutes*

Burning the old midnight oil a little too long there lol

Okay I vote for your 300 per 10 minute limit. Something needs to be done.

jjdub7

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 502

The 600 call per minute limit for the API needs to be lowered. This is enough, honestly. Enough geniuses on here know how to program in php with the parameters to beat bid/ask by 1 or 10 satoshis that its now made the site completely unusable every time a live user tries to put in an order.

Cut it in half and see where that gets us.

600 calls per minute?!!!! That is way too high. It should be lowered to about 60 a minute. I agree the site is now a pain in the butt to use.

300 per 10 minutes*

Burning the old midnight oil a little too long there lol

dyask

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 510