Topic: [HAVELOCK] PETAMINE - 1,150 TH/S HASH RATE (1GH/S per Unit) - page 207. (Read 565837 times)
February 28, 2014, 12:23:02 PM
I has a sad. No dividends yet.
February 28, 2014, 11:35:09 AM
3:10 PM GMT. No dividends.
I'd prefer to get all the new hardware hashing over getting the first tiny dividend at a specific time.
The thing is not what we prefer, the important thing is what Cryptx said.
I'd prefer getting what we prefer over what was promised. For example, 700 TH/s over 220 TH/s.
That's true and we trust in Cryptx. But it would be nice to know the dividend process is working properly.
Totally agreed. Why it is not happening?
Also, by number of owned shares, dividend may not be just "dust" (but for example allow more shares to be purchased).
February 28, 2014, 11:02:21 AM
3:10 PM GMT. No dividends.
I'd prefer to get all the new hardware hashing over getting the first tiny dividend at a specific time.
The thing is not what we prefer, the important thing is what Cryptx said.
I'd prefer getting what we prefer over what was promised. For example, 700 TH/s over 220 TH/s.
That's true and we trust in Cryptx. But it would be nice to know the dividend process is working properly.
February 28, 2014, 10:52:56 AM
They are probably busy setting new miners.
10 new miners already set up Today
10 new miners already set up Today
February 28, 2014, 10:49:59 AM
3:10 PM GMT. No dividends.
I'd prefer to get all the new hardware hashing over getting the first tiny dividend at a specific time.
The thing is not what we prefer, the important thing is what Cryptx said.
I'd prefer getting what we prefer over what was promised. For example, 700 TH/s over 220 TH/s.
February 28, 2014, 10:45:05 AM
3:10 PM GMT. No dividends.
I'd prefer to get all the new hardware hashing over getting the first tiny dividend at a specific time.
The thing is not what we prefer, the important thing is what Cryptx said.
February 28, 2014, 10:44:00 AM
3:10 PM GMT. No dividends.
I'd prefer to get all the new hardware hashing over getting the first tiny dividend at a specific time.
February 28, 2014, 10:20:00 AM
3:10 PM GMT. No dividends.
You're my dividend, crino.
Congratulations, you got a new activity...
February 28, 2014, 10:15:12 AM
3:10 PM GMT. No dividends.
You're my dividend, crino.
February 28, 2014, 10:09:29 AM
3:10 PM GMT. No dividends.
February 28, 2014, 08:25:59 AM
New miners coming online 
Nice.But such a strange numbering scheme for workers. Hard to keep count of what's new.
February 28, 2014, 08:16:45 AM
New miners coming online
February 27, 2014, 07:21:02 PM
If we don't get some more hardware hashing soon, the tension is likely to trigger an outbreak of math. Complete with vicious drive-by definitions and wanton use of unregistered equations.
I have to admit, I am continuously amazed by shareholder ability to become addicted to updates. We've been spoiled lately, the flood of good news has been intoxicating.
Let us not anger the barman with drinks in hand.
February 27, 2014, 06:51:38 PM
If we don't get some more hardware hashing soon, the tension is likely to trigger an outbreak of math. Complete with vicious drive-by definitions and wanton use of unregistered equations.
February 27, 2014, 06:18:18 PM
A tiny mischievous monkey sneaks into chip mining labs and inserts tiny very limited range EM pulse generators into all chips but those destined for PETA. The timer is set for May 1. On May 1 all of a sudden PETA is mining at 4800 BTC at day
, and others have expensive space heaters. 
February 27, 2014, 06:17:51 PM
This is my main. The username i use on most forums was already taken. I have no more than one account on bitcointalk. (nor anywhere else).
February 27, 2014, 06:01:19 PM
Does it bother anyone else when people post under the guize of a new account?
Your message would carry more weight if you were to post your thoughts on your main. (Darkstone2)
Your message would carry more weight if you were to post your thoughts on your main. (Darkstone2)
February 27, 2014, 05:36:44 PM
Let me put it another way, a stagnation of the network hashrate growth is mutually exclusive to the continued exponential growth of the bitcoin price.
Yes, it's true - but never seen someone claiming the opposite (at least on this thread
)And, please, stop cherry picking phrases (no fragments of phrases!) in the way that suggests different sens of someones statements.
February 27, 2014, 05:23:49 PM
I think that both of you do not understand the impact of that statment. The network hashrate is directly linked to the bitcoin price. As long as the bitcoin price keeps rising the way it is, the network hashrate growth will not slow down in the long run.
Let me put it another way, a stagnation of the network hashrate growth is mutually exclusive to the continued exponential growth of the bitcoin price. Only one of these two things can happen.
February 27, 2014, 05:02:10 PM
I think that both of you do not understand the impact of that statment. The network hashrate is directly linked to the bitcoin price. As long as the bitcoin price keeps rising the way it is, the network hashrate growth will not slow down in the long run.
Btc/usd exchange rate is just one more factor in the puzzle which could 'give up' - as any other like for example speed at which new more efficient chips are introduced.
What's more a lot depends on how you define 'long run'.
Surely, before writing 'you do not understand' try to read carefully what others say.
Jump to: