[HAVELOCK] [XBOND] - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

cesmak

legendary

Activity: 1057

Merit: 1009

Quote from: ThickAsThieves on November 10, 2013, 08:46:39 AM

Quote from: cesmak on November 10, 2013, 08:44:49 AM

Hello

why no daily dividend on yesterday 9 october and today (10 october) ?

There appears to be some technical error in Havelock's dividend system. They will likely address it tomorrow.

Thank You !

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: cesmak on November 10, 2013, 08:44:49 AM

Hello

why no daily dividend on yesterday 9 october and today (10 october) ?

There appears to be some technical error in Havelock's dividend system. They will likely address it tomorrow.

cesmak

legendary

Activity: 1057

Merit: 1009

Hello

why no daily dividend on yesterday 9 october and today (10 october) ?

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: lightbox on November 01, 2013, 05:00:31 PM

https://www.havelockinvestments.com/20131101-announcement.php

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 1, 2013 - Havelock Investments (HavelockInvestments.com), a leading Bitcoin Denominated Investment Fund, announced today that it has executed a definitive agreement to be acquired by The Panama Fund, S.A, a fully licensed and registered Panamanian Investment Company.

The acquisitions creates the world's first, fully licensed, Bitcoin Denominated Fund Exchange, where companies from around the world will be able to raise capital directly, through the exclusive use of Bitcoins.

With this acquisition HavelockInvestments.com will be able to maintain its current Funds, as well as expand its operations, while attracting new opportunities in the rapidly expanding Bitcoin Marketplace.

The original HavelockInvestments.com team will remain in place and will play a key role in the future growth of the company.

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: mgio on September 17, 2013, 12:19:38 PM

Will the exchanged bonds be sold back on the exchange or will they simply be removed from circulation?

This has not been decided yet. We'll announce any updates beforehand.

mgio

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Will the exchanged bonds be sold back on the exchange or will they simply be removed from circulation?

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

An updated, more detailed prospectus for NEOBEE is now available:
http://lmb-holdings.com/LMB_Holdings_Prospectus.pdf

NOTE: The Pre-IPVO round for XBOND holders begins at the top of the hour!

GreekGeek

hero member

Activity: 577

Merit: 500

Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist

Oh! I get it
Thanx and sorry for being stupid

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

- The Xfer link offers an option to push the bonds to the issuer, that is what you should choose tomorrow after the Pre-IPVO starts.

The issuer is TAT Investments the issuer of XBOND. Do not push shares to an email address. Use the feature noted above.

GreekGeek

hero member

Activity: 577

Merit: 500

Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist

isimme

member

Activity: 78

Merit: 10

Quote from: ThickAsThieves on September 16, 2013, 12:28:28 PM

2. Even if you are okay with the above point, and just want to lock in shares early, please realize that the Pre-IPVO round is limited to 500,000 shares and may sell out also.

6. The Pre-IPVO BitFunder shares will not be delivered until September 23, 2013 - three days after the IPVO round begins.

Will Pre-IPVO investors have confirmation of successful buys before the IPVO rounds begins,
so if in the event our Pre-IPVO's bids are unsuccessful(do to selling out) we can still buy the shares we want in the IPVO?
And as well if our Pre-IPVO bids are unsuccessful are we then left with XBONDS with which we will have to either hold or sell on the market?

Thanks!

ColdHardMetal

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

What determines priority in the 500,000 pre-IVPO share distribution? Time bonds are transferred, time email is received, which ever happens first/last?

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: Deprived on September 16, 2013, 01:05:47 PM

Quote from: ThickAsThieves on September 16, 2013, 01:02:52 PM

Quote from: Deprived on September 16, 2013, 12:50:38 PM

Something that may be worth clarifying now - to potentially avoid butt-hurt later - is what the procedure would be if there was oversubscription prior to release. i.e. if total bids at/above list price on the three exchanges added up to more than available shares. Would you:

a) Fill bids on all exchanges above list price then split rest in proportion to orders on each book.
b) Fill one (or more) exchange before others - specifically would you fill orders on the 'main' exchange before filling orders on the pass-throughs.

What the plan is has obvious implications for those with the ability to place orders on multiple exchanges (though only if it looks likely that bids will exceed supply of course).

Certainly, I addressed this earlier today in the main thread, but it is closest to a).

Here is what we decided:

Quote

In the case of oversubscription, shares will be sold proportionally according to total bid amounts, in bitcoins, on each exchange at the start of the IPVO.

For example: If there are 20000btc on BTCT, 10000btc on Havelock, and 5000btc on Bitfunder, each exchange would be sold approximately 57.1%, 28.6%, 14.3%, respectively.

This cannot be exact due to bids changing at any moment, but we'll do our best to keep it fair (proportional) in such a case.

Please do not confuse this with a Dutch style auction (like Labcoin). The price per share would not change in this case, other than if bidders choose to raise their own bids.

Original comment is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3166320

Ah thanks - missed that.

One minor clarification you should probably make to it is that you'd only consider bids at/above the list price when evaluating total bids on each exchange. i.e. I couldn't, for example, sling up a huge bid at below official price to ensure maximum allocation to the exchange of my choice (something which I'd quite happily do IF I was bidding and there was oversubscription to ensure my order got filled).

Nice catch, I will concur that your recommendation is correct and it to my other comment.

Deprived

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: ThickAsThieves on September 16, 2013, 01:02:52 PM

Quote from: Deprived on September 16, 2013, 12:50:38 PM

Something that may be worth clarifying now - to potentially avoid butt-hurt later - is what the procedure would be if there was oversubscription prior to release. i.e. if total bids at/above list price on the three exchanges added up to more than available shares. Would you:

a) Fill bids on all exchanges above list price then split rest in proportion to orders on each book.
b) Fill one (or more) exchange before others - specifically would you fill orders on the 'main' exchange before filling orders on the pass-throughs.

What the plan is has obvious implications for those with the ability to place orders on multiple exchanges (though only if it looks likely that bids will exceed supply of course).

Certainly, I addressed this earlier today in the main thread, but it is closest to a).

Here is what we decided:

Quote

In the case of oversubscription, shares will be sold proportionally according to total bid amounts, in bitcoins, on each exchange at the start of the IPVO.

For example: If there are 20000btc on BTCT, 10000btc on Havelock, and 5000btc on Bitfunder, each exchange would be sold approximately 57.1%, 28.6%, 14.3%, respectively.

This cannot be exact due to bids changing at any moment, but we'll do our best to keep it fair (proportional) in such a case.

Please do not confuse this with a Dutch style auction (like Labcoin). The price per share would not change in this case, other than if bidders choose to raise their own bids.

Original comment is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3166320

Ah thanks - missed that.

One minor clarification you should probably make to it is that you'd only consider bids at/above the list price when evaluating total bids on each exchange. i.e. I couldn't, for example, sling up a huge bid at below official price to ensure maximum allocation to the exchange of my choice (something which I'd quite happily do IF I was bidding and there was oversubscription to ensure my order got filled) - which could actually leave you with unsold shares on one exchange and unfilled orders on the others.

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: Deprived on September 16, 2013, 12:50:38 PM

Something that may be worth clarifying now - to potentially avoid butt-hurt later - is what the procedure would be if there was oversubscription prior to release. i.e. if total bids at/above list price on the three exchanges added up to more than available shares. Would you:

a) Fill bids on all exchanges above list price then split rest in proportion to orders on each book.
b) Fill one (or more) exchange before others - specifically would you fill orders on the 'main' exchange before filling orders on the pass-throughs.

What the plan is has obvious implications for those with the ability to place orders on multiple exchanges (though only if it looks likely that bids will exceed supply of course).

Certainly, I addressed this earlier today in the main thread, but it is closest to a).

Here is what we decided:

Quote

In the case of oversubscription, shares will be sold proportionally according to total bid amounts, in bitcoins, on each exchange at the start of the IPVO.

For example: If there are 20000btc on BTCT, 10000btc on Havelock, and 5000btc on Bitfunder, each exchange would be sold approximately 57.1%, 28.6%, 14.3%, respectively.

This cannot be exact due to bids changing at any moment, but we'll do our best to keep it fair (proportional) in such a case.

Please do not confuse this with a Dutch style auction (like Labcoin). The price per share would not change in this case, other than if bidders choose to raise their own bids.

Original comment is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3166320

Deprived

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Something that may be worth clarifying now - to potentially avoid butt-hurt later - is what the procedure would be if there was oversubscription prior to release. i.e. if total bids at/above list price on the three exchanges added up to more than available shares. Would you:

a) Fill bids on all exchanges above list price then split rest in proportion to orders on each book.
b) Fill one (or more) exchange before others - specifically would you fill orders on the 'main' exchange before filling orders on the pass-throughs.

What the plan is has obvious implications for those with the ability to place orders on multiple exchanges (though only if it looks likely that bids will exceed supply of course).

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

I'm getting repeated questions of the same nature, so I'd like to remind people of a few points:

1. If you pay more than .0012 for XBONDs in order to participate in the Pre-IPVO round, you are effectively paying more than the initial ask price of the actual IPVO.

2. Even if you are okay with the above point, and just want to lock in shares early, please realize that the Pre-IPVO round is limited to 500,000 shares and may sell out also.

3. The Pre-IPVO round will get you BITFUNDER shares, not other types. If you want to convert them to another exchange after the fact, you will need to instigate our transfer services.

4. Do not send XBOND confirmation emails, nor push XBOND units to the issuer UNTIL 1PM EDT / 5PM UTC TOMORROW.

5. You must include your BitFunder account name in your Pre-IPVO confirmation email. The email sending adddress must match your Havelock registration address.

6. The Pre-IPVO BitFunder shares will not be delivered until September 23, 2013 - three days after the IPVO round begins.

7. Your math must be accurate when figuring how many XBOND units needed to exchange for NEOBEE units. It is a 5:2 ratio.

ThickAsThieves

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

GreekGeek

hero member

Activity: 577

Merit: 500

Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist

Hello

I am sorry if this has been answered before on this thread
but I am really busy with my real work to go through all the posts

Q: I have a few XBonds and I would like to participate in the Neo&Bee Pre-IPVO but I don't get the instructions given

"Pre-IPVO Redemption Rules & Instructions (for Neo&Bee):
To instigate a redemption exchange for Pre-IPVO this offering, simply transfer your bonds to the the XBOND issuer account within HavelockInvestments.com, Also, please send a corresponding email to [email protected] confirming your desired Pre-IPVO purchase quantity desired, and your account name on the destination exchange."

when I look at my portfolio on HavelockInvestments.com there is an xrf link
this links to a page where you can
1. transfer the xbonds to the issuer
is that HavelockInvestments.com (the xbond issuer) or [email protected] (the stock issuer)
2. transfer the xbonds to an email address of a user of HavelockInvestments.com ([email protected] ? )

I also found under the "Public Offerings" tab on xbond's (main) page
an (I)PO which probably is for Neo&Bee shares (same date same time)
which states
3. A 'Buy Now' link will appear to the right of the offering once the public offering begins. You will need to refresh this page to see it!

which is the proper way to exchange my xbonds for the Neo&Bee pre-IPVO 1 (probably not) , 2 or 3?

Thank you for your time

P.S.
if the answer is No2
How can I be sure that [email protected] is a user of HavelockInvestments.com?

Draino

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I wasn't talking about anything from the original XBOND contract (er, indentured text), but now I realize I misinterpreted instructions for transferring shares with redeeming them.

Thanks for clarifying, anyway.

Topic: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] - page 2. (Read 21733 times)