Pages:
Author

Topic: Health and Religion - page 16. (Read 210823 times)

legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1468
July 26, 2019, 11:57:56 AM

And we are back to more outlandish conjectures...You are seriously deluded.

Using your logic you will always be wrong about everything in your life.  You will make shit up as you go and explain to yourself that you are correct, lol.

Yes this last bit is conjecture. Can't you read.

Up until now (several pages of) answers and replies to you have been simple logic and deduction essentially IF -> THEN statements. However, I am not wise enough to answer these last questions in the same definitive manner. The best I can do is share my opinions on these issues. Perhaps that will be helpful.

On the question of Adam and Eve...

Conjecture can be useful at times. It helps us explore and tests ideas. You asked for my thoughts on the question of Adam and Eve. You are clearly riled up by them but that is nothing new.

I freely admit that I could be entirely wrong in my thoughts on Adam and Eve. My opinion on the issue is certainly not a proof of any kind. It is as you said conjecture.

I would argue, however, that this particular conjecture is in harmony with both with our scientific understanding of how mankind came to be and with the Biblical account of our creation. Thus I present it as an interesting possibility.

You have been indoctrinated into your religious cult and are unable to free yourself from it.

You desperately cling onto this Bronze Age myth despite all the evidence that it is a man-made fiction.

If you truly believe in it, you might be a borderline schizophrenic.  No amount of evidence will change your mind because you live in a carefully constructed bubble and will protect it at all costs.

Talking to you feels like talking to notbatman.  At times you seem lucid, but then you revert into this comatose pseudoscientific state and you keep babbling about nonsense, proving nonsense with other nonsense.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
July 25, 2019, 08:23:51 PM

And we are back to more outlandish conjectures...You are seriously deluded.

Using your logic you will always be wrong about everything in your life.  You will make shit up as you go and explain to yourself that you are correct, lol.

Yes this last bit is conjecture. Can't you read.

Up until now (several pages of) answers and replies to you have been simple logic and deduction essentially IF -> THEN statements. However, I am not wise enough to answer these last questions in the same definitive manner. The best I can do is share my opinions on these issues. Perhaps that will be helpful.

On the question of Adam and Eve...

Conjecture can be useful at times. It helps us explore and tests ideas. You asked for my thoughts on the question of Adam and Eve. You are clearly riled up by them but that is nothing new.

I freely admit that I could be entirely wrong in my thoughts on Adam and Eve. My opinion on the issue is certainly not a proof of any kind. It is as you said conjecture.

I would argue, however, that this particular conjecture is in harmony with both with our scientific understanding of how mankind came to be and with the Biblical account of our creation. Thus I present it as an interesting possibility.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1468
July 25, 2019, 08:09:54 PM

Where these prehumans came from?  If they were not humans, breeding with Adam’s sons would not work.lol

Didn’t your God create Adam to be the first man, wait for it, from fucking dirt?

You are a hapless chap. You cling to your Christian cult no matter the obvious holes in its dogma.

Just admit that you will believe in your God no matter the evidence to the contrary.  Don’t pretend you are a rational person when you are clearly way in the Christian la-la land.

God created life from dirt.

Was the Bible RIGHT about the origins of life? Scientists believe that we may have had our beginnings in CLAY
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2488467/Scientists-believe-beginnings-CLAY.html

God created man from life over time. So yes God created Adam from dirt. It probably took a long time for that dirt to go through various shapes and forms until it became Adam.

You should read up on how new species are thought to form. They probably initially exists as subsets within a larger population before branching off so yes the very first of what we would call human beings would presumably have existed among a larger planet wide population of prehumans they could breed with. Read the article on speciation I linked upthread.

At some point prehumans who did not have knowledge of good and evil obtained it and became the fallen creatures we refer to today as humans. The first two prehumans to "eat from the tree of knowledge" and the beginnings of our species are referred to as Adam and Eve.

Anyways that's my opinion on the matter. Other interpretations are out there and people should think about the issue for themselves.

There cannot be evidence against God. That is impossible as I highlighted above. One can make the case that there is evidence against the Bible. Its a very weak case. The more one dives into that text the more depth and complexity one finds. Like layers of an onion,



And we are back to more outlandish conjectures...You are seriously deluded.

Using your logic you will always be wrong about everything in your life.  You will make shit up as you go and explain to yourself that you are correct, lol.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
July 25, 2019, 07:45:51 PM

Where these prehumans came from?  If they were not humans, breeding with Adam’s sons would not work.lol

Didn’t your God create Adam to be the first man, wait for it, from fucking dirt?

You are a hapless chap. You cling to your Christian cult no matter the obvious holes in its dogma.

Just admit that you will believe in your God no matter the evidence to the contrary.  Don’t pretend you are a rational person when you are clearly way in the Christian la-la land.

God created life from dirt.

Was the Bible RIGHT about the origins of life? Scientists believe that we may have had our beginnings in CLAY
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2488467/Scientists-believe-beginnings-CLAY.html

God created man from life over time. So yes God created Adam from dirt. It probably took a long time for that dirt to go through various shapes and forms until it became Adam.

You should read up on how new species are thought to form. They probably initially exists as subsets within a larger population before branching off so yes the very first of what we would call human beings would presumably have existed among a larger planet wide population of prehumans they could breed with. Read the article on speciation I linked upthread.

At some point prehumans who did not have knowledge of good and evil obtained it and became the fallen creatures we refer to today as humans. The first two prehumans to "eat from the tree of knowledge" and the beginnings of our species are referred to as Adam and Eve.

Anyways that's my opinion on the matter. Other interpretations are out there and people should think about the issue for themselves.

There cannot be evidence against God. That is impossible as I highlighted above. One can make the case that there is evidence against the Bible. Its a very weak case. The more one dives into that text the more depth and complexity one finds. Like layers of an onion,

full member
Activity: 853
Merit: 144
July 25, 2019, 07:23:34 PM
I dont wish to speak my honest opinion, but thanks for the great comments of conversation
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1468
July 25, 2019, 06:58:10 PM
Why don’t you get off your high horse and tell me who did the sons of Adam and Eve marry?

I have discussed this earlier.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25115058

I don't include it in my list of arguments above, however, because I don't have enough information. The best I can offer is my opinion.

Up until now (several pages of) answers and replies to you have been simple logic and deduction essentially IF -> THEN statements. However, I am not wise enough to answer these last questions in the same definitive manner. The best I can do is share my opinions on these issues. Perhaps that will be helpful.

On the question of Adam and Eve I believe the Bible/Torah is best understood as a functional document. It's intent and purpose is to redeem and rectify humanity.

For this to occur biblical wisdom must be conveyed in a manner that is both simplified enough to be understandable by primitive man while simultaneously accurately reflecting a truth which can be better understood as our wisdom grows. The best way to meet these two needs is via parable and metaphor.

(The reasoning below represents my opinions and speculations on these issues. I make no claims beyond that)

Adam and Eve in the garden can be looked at literally as a man and a woman walking through a garden and considering the fruit of various trees.

Or Adam and Eve can be looked at as a metaphor for our biological species progenitors. All choices were potentially open to our remotest ancestors but a singular choice namely the development of an intellect capable of understanding good and evil was "forbidden" as that choice is probably incompatible with long term sustained biological existence.

Many "punishments" outlined in the Bible are not necessarily outside intervention at all but simple cause and effect the inevitable consequences we bring upon ourselves from sin.

Let's look at the "punishment" women received as a result of eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge.

Genesis 3:16
"Unto the woman He said: 'I will greatly multiply thy pain and thy travail; in pain thou shalt bring forth children"

Why is childbearing in humans so painful? A religious man would have told you 1000 years ago that it was because Eve ate from the tree of knowledge. It has taken science a very long time to catch up to this very simplified but according to our current theories essentially accurate description.

Current science theory states that the reason human birth and labor is so painful and dangerous is due to the physiological consequences of our large brains specifically some combination of the physical limitations of pelvic size when walking upright and the extreme metabolic demands a large infant brain places on a mother.

See:
Why Is Human Childbirth So Painful?
https://www.americanscientist.org/article/why-is-human-childbirth-so-painful

For the most part God doesn't punish us we punish ourselves with our choices. Sometimes these "choices" were made long before our time but the consequences nevertheless impact us.

Now unlike my prior posts which were simple logical deduction the arguments in this reply are opinion. They are one possible interpretation. I have not proven this opinion is fact and am not in a position to do so currently. I share them as a potential answer to your questions but the question is a spiritual ones and must ultimately be answered on a personal and individual level.

As for who the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve married I suspect it was other prehumans nearby. With their pairing they passed on the cultural and genetic mix that pushed us over the edge allowing them and later us to have knowledge of good and evil.

See: Speciation: The Origin of New Species
https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/speciation-the-origin-of-new-species-26230527


Where these prehumans came from?  If they were not humans, breeding with Adam’s sons would not work.lol

Didn’t your God create Adam to be the first man, wait for it, from the fucking dirt?

You are a hapless chap. You cling to your Christian cult no matter the obvious holes in its dogma.

Just admit that you will believe in your God no matter the evidence to the contrary.  Don’t pretend you are a rational person when you are clearly way in the Christian la-la land.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
July 25, 2019, 04:16:14 PM
Why don’t you get off your high horse and tell me who did the sons of Adam and Eve marry?

I have discussed this earlier.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25115058

I don't include it in my list of arguments above, however, because I don't have enough information. The best I can offer is my opinion.

Up until now (several pages of) answers and replies to you have been simple logic and deduction essentially IF -> THEN statements. However, I am not wise enough to answer these last questions in the same definitive manner. The best I can do is share my opinions on these issues. Perhaps that will be helpful.

On the question of Adam and Eve I believe the Bible/Torah is best understood as a functional document. It's intent and purpose is to redeem and rectify humanity.

For this to occur biblical wisdom must be conveyed in a manner that is both simplified enough to be understandable by primitive man while simultaneously accurately reflecting a truth which can be better understood as our wisdom grows. The best way to meet these two needs is via parable and metaphor.

(The reasoning below represents my opinions and speculations on these issues. I make no claims beyond that)

Adam and Eve in the garden can be looked at literally as a man and a woman walking through a garden and considering the fruit of various trees.

Or Adam and Eve can be looked at as a metaphor for our biological species progenitors. All choices were potentially open to our remotest ancestors but a singular choice namely the development of an intellect capable of understanding good and evil was "forbidden" as that choice is probably incompatible with long term sustained biological existence.

Many "punishments" outlined in the Bible are not necessarily outside intervention at all but simple cause and effect the inevitable consequences we bring upon ourselves from sin.

Let's look at the "punishment" women received as a result of eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge.

Genesis 3:16
"Unto the woman He said: 'I will greatly multiply thy pain and thy travail; in pain thou shalt bring forth children"

Why is childbearing in humans so painful? A religious man would have told you 1000 years ago that it was because Eve ate from the tree of knowledge. It has taken science a very long time to catch up to this very simplified but according to our current theories essentially accurate description.

Current science theory states that the reason human birth and labor is so painful and dangerous is due to the physiological consequences of our large brains specifically some combination of the physical limitations of pelvic size when walking upright and the extreme metabolic demands a large infant brain places on a mother.

See:
Why Is Human Childbirth So Painful?
https://www.americanscientist.org/article/why-is-human-childbirth-so-painful

For the most part God doesn't punish us we punish ourselves with our choices. Sometimes these "choices" were made long before our time but the consequences nevertheless impact us.

Now unlike my prior posts which were simple logical deduction the arguments in this reply are opinion. They are one possible interpretation. I have not proven this opinion is fact and am not in a position to do so currently. I share them as a potential answer to your questions but the question is a spiritual ones and must ultimately be answered on a personal and individual level.

As for who the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve married I suspect it was other prehumans nearby. With their pairing they passed on the cultural and genetic mix that pushed us over the edge allowing them and later us to have knowledge of good and evil.

See: Speciation: The Origin of New Species
https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/speciation-the-origin-of-new-species-26230527
jr. member
Activity: 186
Merit: 2
July 25, 2019, 03:44:32 PM
That is why there's so many jewish on wolfstreet
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1468
July 25, 2019, 03:36:45 PM

You have not presented any rational arguments. First define God, then make your argument.


I have presented many rational arguments in this thread. Here are a small selection of them.

I have highlighted how we can mathematically deduce The incompleteness of the universe and logically conclude that whatever is outside the universe must be boundless, immaterial, indivisible and an uncaused cause.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23796852

I have also highlighted how religious thought specifically monotheism conceptualizes God and how this conceptualization is consistent with what we can mathematically deduce.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24187846

I have demonstrated how traditional Biblical writings on the timeline of creation and origins of mankind can in fact be reconciled with modern scientific thought.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24374030

I have discussed the importance of truly drilling down to the foundations of ones metaphysical assumptions and how failure to do so was ceding control of ones actions, beliefs and thoughts to external forces.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24418501

I have argued that maximizing cooperation is the greatest challenge that must be overcome to maximize progress.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16982834

I have highlighted how superrationality breaks people free of prisoner's dilemmas allowing the achievement of optimal cooperative outcomes despite a Nash equilibrium of defection and betrayal and thus maximizes cooperation.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21680790

I have argued that the laws needed to extend superrationality across the cosmos must lead to the creation of a universe wide not human specific morality and basic acceptance of superrational reality. These requirements manifest logically if we choose to love God with all our heart and with all our soul and with all our mind and love our neighbors as ourselves.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51893391

Finally I tied much of this together in a single post in my argument for God.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.36246134



Fucking evil fairy tale dressed up as a religion designed to extract people’s wealth and molest their children.


This seem to be your real problem. You have arbitrarily and illogically defined the worship of God as evil based on human corruption and abuse that has infiltrated some houses of worship. This seems to have led to a progressive inability to process rational arguments that indicate you are incorrect and that the worship of God is the very opposite of evil.

Human corruption is endemic and everywhere omnipresent in all institutions. God is necessary to limit and eventually overcome that corruption.  

Why don’t you get off your high horse and tell me who did the sons of Adam and Eve marry?
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
July 25, 2019, 02:28:56 PM

You have not presented any rational arguments. First define God, then make your argument.


I have presented many rational arguments in this thread. Here are a small selection of them.

I have highlighted how we can mathematically deduce The incompleteness of the universe and logically conclude that whatever is outside the universe must be boundless, immaterial, indivisible and an uncaused cause.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23796852

I have also highlighted how religious thought specifically monotheism conceptualizes God and how this conceptualization is consistent with what we can mathematically deduce.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24187846

I have demonstrated how traditional Biblical writings on the timeline of creation and origins of mankind can in fact be reconciled with modern scientific thought.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24374030

I have discussed the importance of truly drilling down to the foundations of ones metaphysical assumptions and how failure to do so was ceding control of ones actions, beliefs and thoughts to external forces.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24418501

I have argued that maximizing cooperation is the greatest challenge that must be overcome to maximize progress.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16982834

I have highlighted how superrationality breaks people free of prisoner's dilemmas allowing the achievement of optimal cooperative outcomes despite a Nash equilibrium of defection and betrayal and thus maximizes cooperation.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21680790

I have argued that the laws needed to extend superrationality across the cosmos must lead to the creation of a universe wide not human specific morality and basic acceptance of superrational reality. These requirements manifest logically if we choose to love God with all our heart and with all our soul and with all our mind and love our neighbors as ourselves.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51893391

Finally I tied much of this together in a single post in my argument for God.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.36246134



Fucking evil fairy tale dressed up as a religion designed to extract people’s wealth and molest their children.


This seem to be your real problem. You have arbitrarily and illogically defined the worship of God as evil based on human corruption and abuse that has infiltrated some houses of worship. This seems to have led to a progressive inability to process rational arguments that indicate you are incorrect and that the worship of God is the very opposite of evil.

Human corruption is endemic and everywhere omnipresent in all institutions. God is necessary to limit and eventually overcome that corruption.  
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
July 25, 2019, 01:29:22 PM

You have not presented any rational arguments.  First define God, then make your argument.

If you cannot define God, then the only rational position is to stop and say well, I don’t know, not jump to conjectures upon conjectures.

Christianity is a cult.  Human diversity we see today is not the result of incest in Noah’s family, 4000 years ago.  Who did sons of Adam and Eve marry? Angels, unicorns, dragons?

Fucking evil fairy tale dressed up as a religion designed to extract people’s wealth and molest their children.

It is our duty as intelligent human beings to expose the bullshit all religions sell.  Utter nonsense.  All of them, no exceptions.

All you are doing is suggesting, and essentially proving, that God exists. How are you doing this? Simple. You are suggesting something that you can't possibly know... when you suggest that God doesn't exist. In the light of the machine nature of the universe, and the fact that all our machines that WE make come from the machine nature of the universe, God is being shouted throughout the universe as its Maker... all machines have makers.

Since you set yourself up as the authority that says that God doesn't exist, and you really don't have enough knowledge to know that He doesn't exist, and nature says that He does exist, you are setting yourself up as god above God. So, you are not an atheist after all, even if you are too ignorant to realize it.

This proves that you are a hypocrite, and that your atheism is simply a religion for you, and that this atheism religion of yours is approximately the stupidest religion around. Or can you prove that you are god above God, showing that you don't exist?

Cool

Where in that post did I say that God does not exist? Jesus fucking Christ, learn how to read before you post nonsense.

You are just a less convoluted, more emotional version of CoinCube, but you are carved from the same block of wood.

LOL! You simply can't answer, so you act like you are all heated up about something irrelevant.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1468
July 25, 2019, 01:17:54 PM

You have not presented any rational arguments.  First define God, then make your argument.

If you cannot define God, then the only rational position is to stop and say well, I don’t know, not jump to conjectures upon conjectures.

Christianity is a cult.  Human diversity we see today is not the result of incest in Noah’s family, 4000 years ago.  Who did sons of Adam and Eve marry? Angels, unicorns, dragons?

Fucking evil fairy tale dressed up as a religion designed to extract people’s wealth and molest their children.

It is our duty as intelligent human beings to expose the bullshit all religions sell.  Utter nonsense.  All of them, no exceptions.

All you are doing is suggesting, and essentially proving, that God exists. How are you doing this? Simple. You are suggesting something that you can't possibly know... when you suggest that God doesn't exist. In the light of the machine nature of the universe, and the fact that all our machines that WE make come from the machine nature of the universe, God is being shouted throughout the universe as its Maker... all machines have makers.

Since you set yourself up as the authority that says that God doesn't exist, and you really don't have enough knowledge to know that He doesn't exist, and nature says that He does exist, you are setting yourself up as god above God. So, you are not an atheist after all, even if you are too ignorant to realize it.

This proves that you are a hypocrite, and that your atheism is simply a religion for you, and that this atheism religion of yours is approximately the stupidest religion around. Or can you prove that you are god above God, showing that you don't exist?

Cool

Where in that post did I say that God does not exist? Jesus fucking Christ, learn how to read before you post nonsense.

You are just a less convoluted, more emotional version of CoinCube, but you are carved from the same block of wood.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
July 25, 2019, 12:51:01 PM

You have not presented any rational arguments.  First define God, then make your argument.

If you cannot define God, then the only rational position is to stop and say well, I don’t know, not jump to conjectures upon conjectures.

Christianity is a cult.  Human diversity we see today is not the result of incest in Noah’s family, 4000 years ago.  Who did sons of Adam and Eve marry? Angels, unicorns, dragons?

Fucking evil fairy tale dressed up as a religion designed to extract people’s wealth and molest their children.

It is our duty as intelligent human beings to expose the bullshit all religions sell.  Utter nonsense.  All of them, no exceptions.

All you are doing is suggesting, and essentially proving, that God exists. How are you doing this? Simple. You are suggesting something that you can't possibly know... when you suggest that God doesn't exist. In the light of the machine nature of the universe, and the fact that all our machines that WE make come from the machine nature of the universe, God is being shouted throughout the universe as its Maker... all machines have makers.

Since you set yourself up as the authority that says that God doesn't exist, and you really don't have enough knowledge to know that He doesn't exist, and nature says that He does exist, you are setting yourself up as god above God. So, you are not an atheist after all, even if you are too ignorant to realize it.

This proves that you are a hypocrite, and that your atheism is simply a religion for you, and that this atheism religion of yours is approximately the stupidest religion around. Or can you prove that you are god above God, showing that you don't exist?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1468
July 25, 2019, 02:06:49 AM

Are you sure you understand the “big” words?  Maybe you should stick with comic books and other fairy tales you are so fond of.

Your constant blabbing about nothing is nauseating.


So reason and rational argumentation nauseate you? This sounds more like an emotional response then a logical one.
Perhaps it is related to your view of religion as a cult?

You realize that the majority of Atheists in North America come from your cult, don't you?

Indoctrinating children into your cult is child abuse.

I saw this article today. Figured you would approve.

China: Schoolchildren taught to 'hate God,' Christianity an 'evil cult'
https://www.christianpost.com/news/china-schoolchildren-taught-to-hate-god-christianity-an-evil-cult.html
Quote from: Leah MarieAnn Klett
Christian parents in China have shared how their schoolchildren are being taught that Christianity is an “evil cult” and encouraged to “hate God” as the officially atheist country continues to tighten its grip on religion.

According to Chinese persecution watchdog Bitter Winter, since the Regulations on Religious Affairs legislation was implemented last year, schools around China have adopted “unprecedented measures” to keep students away from Christianity. Schools in China are government-controlled, and therefore Communist in ideology.

The policy has resulted in difficult situations for families as children are encouraged to question the beliefs of family members and report those closest to them to authorities.

Several Christian parents shared their stories with Bitter Winter, revealing the magnitude of China’s animosity toward Christianity.

“My teacher says that Christianity is an evil cult,” one boy explained to his mother. “[That] if you believe in it, you will leave home and not take care of me. You might set yourself on fire, too.”

Another mother shared how, after discovering an anti-Christian school textbook in her son’s backpack, she hid many of the items that identified her as a believer to help her son with his anxiety.

A month later, when her son found another religious leaflet in his mother’s bag by chance, he “angrily took a fruit knife from the kitchen and fiercely poked several holes in it,” according to the outlet.

He then threatened his mother to give up her faith because “Christianity is an evil cult” and she “mustn’t believe in it.”

“Before starting school, I told my child about God’s creation, and he believed it,” the woman explained. “But after being taught at school, my child is like a different person. In atheistic China, these pure and innocent children have been taught to hate God.”

Kindergarten and primary schools are also teaching children how to oppose religion. In late April, a primary school in Xinzheng city in the central province of Henan encouraged young children to refrain from believing in any deity.

“If your mom goes to church and believes in God, she doesn’t want you as her child anymore,” one teacher said.

Another school screened a propaganda video in which Jesus followers were depicted as big scary monsters. After the presentation was complete, a teacher warned that Christian relatives might “cast spells” on the youngsters.

One of the parents at the school said that as a result, her son actively opposed her reading religious books in the family home. Another student was terrified that his mom was going to be led away by police.

Others students were advised to “supervise” their parents to ensure that they don’t practice their faith.

“It leads to a dead-end,” one young student said of his father's Christian faith. “If you attend gatherings, you will be arrested.”

China introduced revised regulations on religion in February, which included banning under-18s from attending church or receiving any religious education.

The new regulations have also forced primary schools in Henan to warn parents that they are not allowed to breach the country's laws on the practice of religion.

"No one may use religions to disrupt social order, harm citizens or impede the national education system," read a letter by the Ninth Primary School of Linzhou city of Anyang and the First Primary School of Chengguan town of Xingyang city of Chengzhou.

"It is an offense for any organizations or individuals to guide, support, permit and condone minors to believe in religions or participate in religious activities," it warned.

Officials have also reportedly claimed schools are places "for the state to foster students to build up socialist society," with parents told they have an obligation "to nurture children in accordance with national laws and social requirements."

China ranks as the 27th worst nation in the world when it comes to Christian persecution, according to Open Doors USA’s World Watch List. Open Doors has expressed concern that the religious affairs in China now “lies with the Communist Party.”
You have not presented any rational arguments.  First define God, then make your argument.

If you cannot define God, then the only rational position is to stop and say well, I don’t know, not jump to conjectures upon conjectures.

Christianity is a cult.  Human diversity we see today is not the result of incest in Noah’s family, 4000 years ago.  Who did sons of Adam and Eve marry? Angels, unicorns, dragons?

Fucking evil fairy tale dressed up as a religion designed to extract people’s wealth and molest their children.

It is our duty as intelligent human beings to expose the bullshit all religions sell.  Utter nonsense.  All of them, no exceptions.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
July 25, 2019, 01:53:14 AM

Are you sure you understand the “big” words?  Maybe you should stick with comic books and other fairy tales you are so fond of.

Your constant blabbing about nothing is nauseating.


So reason and rational argumentation nauseate you? This sounds more like an emotional response then a logical one.
Perhaps it is related to your view of religion as a cult?

You realize that the majority of Atheists in North America come from your cult, don't you?

Indoctrinating children into your cult is child abuse.

I saw this article today. Figured you would approve.

China: Schoolchildren taught to 'hate God,' Christianity an 'evil cult'
https://www.christianpost.com/news/china-schoolchildren-taught-to-hate-god-christianity-an-evil-cult.html
Quote from: Leah MarieAnn Klett
Christian parents in China have shared how their schoolchildren are being taught that Christianity is an “evil cult” and encouraged to “hate God” as the officially atheist country continues to tighten its grip on religion.

According to Chinese persecution watchdog Bitter Winter, since the Regulations on Religious Affairs legislation was implemented last year, schools around China have adopted “unprecedented measures” to keep students away from Christianity. Schools in China are government-controlled, and therefore Communist in ideology.

The policy has resulted in difficult situations for families as children are encouraged to question the beliefs of family members and report those closest to them to authorities.

Several Christian parents shared their stories with Bitter Winter, revealing the magnitude of China’s animosity toward Christianity.

“My teacher says that Christianity is an evil cult,” one boy explained to his mother. “[That] if you believe in it, you will leave home and not take care of me. You might set yourself on fire, too.”

Another mother shared how, after discovering an anti-Christian school textbook in her son’s backpack, she hid many of the items that identified her as a believer to help her son with his anxiety.

A month later, when her son found another religious leaflet in his mother’s bag by chance, he “angrily took a fruit knife from the kitchen and fiercely poked several holes in it,” according to the outlet.

He then threatened his mother to give up her faith because “Christianity is an evil cult” and she “mustn’t believe in it.”

“Before starting school, I told my child about God’s creation, and he believed it,” the woman explained. “But after being taught at school, my child is like a different person. In atheistic China, these pure and innocent children have been taught to hate God.”

Kindergarten and primary schools are also teaching children how to oppose religion. In late April, a primary school in Xinzheng city in the central province of Henan encouraged young children to refrain from believing in any deity.

“If your mom goes to church and believes in God, she doesn’t want you as her child anymore,” one teacher said.

Another school screened a propaganda video in which Jesus followers were depicted as big scary monsters. After the presentation was complete, a teacher warned that Christian relatives might “cast spells” on the youngsters.

One of the parents at the school said that as a result, her son actively opposed her reading religious books in the family home. Another student was terrified that his mom was going to be led away by police.

Others students were advised to “supervise” their parents to ensure that they don’t practice their faith.

“It leads to a dead-end,” one young student said of his father's Christian faith. “If you attend gatherings, you will be arrested.”

China introduced revised regulations on religion in February, which included banning under-18s from attending church or receiving any religious education.

The new regulations have also forced primary schools in Henan to warn parents that they are not allowed to breach the country's laws on the practice of religion.

"No one may use religions to disrupt social order, harm citizens or impede the national education system," read a letter by the Ninth Primary School of Linzhou city of Anyang and the First Primary School of Chengguan town of Xingyang city of Chengzhou.

"It is an offense for any organizations or individuals to guide, support, permit and condone minors to believe in religions or participate in religious activities," it warned.

Officials have also reportedly claimed schools are places "for the state to foster students to build up socialist society," with parents told they have an obligation "to nurture children in accordance with national laws and social requirements."

China ranks as the 27th worst nation in the world when it comes to Christian persecution, according to Open Doors USA’s World Watch List. Open Doors has expressed concern that the religious affairs in China now “lies with the Communist Party.”


What you don't understand is that rejection of God does not free you from religion. It just drives you into an ideology and to borrow the words of Jordan Peterson ideology is corrupt; it's just a parasite on religious structures.

Jordan Peterson: The Collapse of Belief Systems, Nihilism and The Way Out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8UTMl3BK80
 
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
July 24, 2019, 10:06:14 AM
I'm a christian and I don't hate atheists. I can't actually remember when was the last time I felt hate, probably back when I was still an atheist and slave to my emotions like Moloch is today

Did you seriously just say you don't hate Atheists, then in the next sentence slander me?

The hypocrisy is getting thick, and we're still on the first page... slow down hoss

maybe he converted in becoming a christian.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1468
July 23, 2019, 11:41:25 PM

Faith is not a reliable method to discover the truth. The scientific method is.

The only thing you showed is how faith indoctrination can lead to delusions.

You don’t understand epistemology.

You effectively worship a technique as capable of supplying answers it cannot and will never give. Like the cult of pythagoras you have found something that provides some answers and assume in error that it will provide all answers.

Science is just a technique. It is the observation that if I do X in a controlled manner then Y happens predictably. That is useful information certainty but it does not address nor is it capable of answering the important questions in life.

Are you sure you understand the “big” words?  Maybe you should stick with comic books and other fairy tales you are so fond of.

Your constant blabbing about nothing is nauseating.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
July 23, 2019, 10:44:13 PM

Faith is not a reliable method to discover the truth. The scientific method is.

The only thing you showed is how faith indoctrination can lead to delusions.

^^^ Strong, faith-based, religious-types, like af_newbie, have great faith in the scientific method.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
July 23, 2019, 09:17:00 PM

Faith is not a reliable method to discover the truth. The scientific method is.

The only thing you showed is how faith indoctrination can lead to delusions.

You don’t understand epistemology.

You effectively worship a technique as capable of supplying answers it cannot and will never give. Like the cult of pythagoras you have found something that provides some answers and assume in error that it will provide all answers.

Science is just a technique. It is the observation that if I do X in a controlled manner then Y happens predictably. That is useful information certainty but it does not address nor is it capable of answering the important questions in life.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1468
July 23, 2019, 08:53:11 PM
I'm not assuming anything, you are. Your arguments show humans cannot determine whether something is true or not. It's also really easy to prove that using the scientific method works far better than simply using your reasoning and logic. For example:

Let's say you don't know much about anything. An apple falls on your head, you start to think about it, why does that happen? Will you ever be able to determine it's gravity only using your logic without performing any experiment or gathering evidence? Of course not. In fact logically, the earth could simply be accelerating upwards, that would make sense logically and would explain the apple falling.

You are correct that my arguments do highlight the difficulty humans indeed any consciousness must face when determining whether something is true. Indeed there are only two possibilities. You can become a epistemological nihilist and decide you can never know anything at all ever or you can assume some basic foundation to ground yourself upon and build your knowledge upon it.

Once you really understand this you understand that faith is unavoidable. Ultimately we choose to have a faith in our core beliefs and build everything we are upon that faith. Even the nihilist have faith in their nihilism they certainly cannot prove nihilism is true. Most people don't understand their own assumptions. They adopt a whole host of them but don't actually ever analyze them to any degree or even know what they are.
 
The scientific method is an extremely useful tool for answering questions but it is just a tool. It is an error to elevate that tool to a stature that it does not warrant and pretend it will answer questions it never can. One of the assumptions you must make if you believe scientific facts exist is that the universe is rational (results from today will predict reality tomorrow) and that knowledge exists. Science ultimately is just disciplined observation, testing, and recording of results very useful but limited in what it can answer.

What I have endeavored to show in this thread is that faith in God is superior then faith in alternatives like nihilism and definitely superior to lying to oneself and pretend denying you have faith. To some degree I have succeeded and to some degree I have failed. That depends on the reader.  

Faith is not a reliable method to discover the truth. The scientific method is.

The only thing you showed is how faith indoctrination can lead to delusions.
Pages:
Jump to: