Topic: Health and Religion - page 52. (Read 210983 times)
According to 218 studies on the effects of loneliness and social isolation, researchers found that having poor social connections and intimate relationships is nearly twice as deadly as just being fat.
These stats are flawed because it's only true in the USA. I have an IQ of 153, and I'm heavily religious and a true far-right believer. Also, they're not really actualised.
Nothing is better than humans except God, because we're His most perfect creation.
Also, if there ever is a greater-than-human A.I. it will likely detest religion thoroughly, because to do so is quite logical:
https://youtu.be/VrCTGfeJvxM
https://youtu.be/VrCTGfeJvxM
Nothing is better than humans except God, because we're His most perfect creation.
Health is the state of being well in the mind and body where as Religion is the act and the way of worshiping the supreme being
Not all religions claim a supreme being.
Health is the state of being well in the mind and body where as Religion is the act and the way of worshiping the supreme being
Jesus loves you more than could ever imagine..hes more willing and concerned for your happines,peace, and joy, than you could ever be for yourself.he knows all the gifts that you want for your self,snd desires even more for you.serve him with all your heart.trust him with all your life.not only does he know everything about you he knows everything about your future without him ., theres no future for you.
And this is why a Jesus-based religion will be more healthful for you. Jesus is doing it through the power of God. We don't understand the process at all. But events over time have proven this to be the fact.
Jesus loves you more than could ever imagine..hes more willing and concerned for your happines,peace, and joy, than you could ever be for yourself.he knows all the gifts that you want for your self,snd desires even more for you.serve him with all your heart.trust him with all your life.not only does he know everything about you he knows everything about your future without him ., theres no future for you.
if you have a religion of the heart will feel calm and peaceful. because, your soul closer to the Almighty god. this is causing yourself to be healthy both physically and mentally. thank you...
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 101
EMMARES – Email as you know it, will never be the
I was never any good at sports. Wny not? Because I always felt sorry for the opposite team when they were losing. And, of course, since I didn't want my team to lose, I decided not to be in sports.
You guys go fight with Astargath. I feel too sorry for him because he is losing all the time, and much of the time doesn't even realize it.
You guys go fight with Astargath. I feel too sorry for him because he is losing all the time, and much of the time doesn't even realize it.
''
Because Christianity is a religion of faith, many Bible scholars say we should avoid proving any of it.
By entering the movements of the stars and planets into a computer, NASA has found that the lost day of Joshua in Joshua 10:13, and the shorter period of time in 2 Kings 20:9–11 that were supposed to be discrepancies in the movements of the stars and planets.
One site is https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/arguments-to-avoid/nasa-found-joshuas-missing-day/.
Science is starting to prove that the Bible is accurate.''
Yea badecker, we can all see how you are winning by posting a link that says ''arguments to avoid'' which is exactly the argument you are using, I don't even need to prove you wrong, you prove yourself wrong hahaha.
You don't even get it, do you? One time I play your game, and you jump right on it in attack. Keep it up, Dufus. You attack yourself way more than you could ever think to attack me. And you don't even realize it.
Ye ye, just admit that you fucked up badly and move on, you are only making yourself look even more pathetic. I will still post the link whenever you say something about science to show everyone how you do your ''research''
Actually, because my faith in God isn't perfect in this life, I DO have a touch of atheism. In similar ways you have much faith in God, even though you try to deny it. It is inherent in both of us.
Turn, now, while you have the chance, to strengthen the little faith in God that you DO have... so that you can be saved in the resurrection
Turn, now, while you have the chance, to strengthen the little faith in God that you DO have... so that you can be saved in the resurrection
Just like participating in a religion might make one's faith grow, not participating in one make it weaker. That's my experience at least.
I didn't have much faith to begin with, but when I stopped attending church entirely, it just vanished. And I don't miss it one bit.
I was never any good at sports. Wny not? Because I always felt sorry for the opposite team when they were losing. And, of course, since I didn't want my team to lose, I decided not to be in sports.
You guys go fight with Astargath. I feel too sorry for him because he is losing all the time, and much of the time doesn't even realize it.
You guys go fight with Astargath. I feel too sorry for him because he is losing all the time, and much of the time doesn't even realize it.
''
Because Christianity is a religion of faith, many Bible scholars say we should avoid proving any of it.
By entering the movements of the stars and planets into a computer, NASA has found that the lost day of Joshua in Joshua 10:13, and the shorter period of time in 2 Kings 20:9–11 that were supposed to be discrepancies in the movements of the stars and planets.
One site is https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/arguments-to-avoid/nasa-found-joshuas-missing-day/.
Science is starting to prove that the Bible is accurate.''
Yea badecker, we can all see how you are winning by posting a link that says ''arguments to avoid'' which is exactly the argument you are using, I don't even need to prove you wrong, you prove yourself wrong hahaha.
You don't even get it, do you? One time I play your game, and you jump right on it in attack. Keep it up, Dufus. You attack yourself way more than you could ever think to attack me. And you don't even realize it.
Actually, because my faith in God isn't perfect in this life, I DO have a touch of atheism. In similar ways you have much faith in God, even though you try to deny it. It is inherent in both of us.
Turn, now, while you have the chance, to strengthen the little faith in God that you DO have... so that you can be saved in the resurrection
Turn, now, while you have the chance, to strengthen the little faith in God that you DO have... so that you can be saved in the resurrection
Just like participating in a religion might make one's faith grow, not participating in one make it weaker. That's my experience at least.
I didn't have much faith to begin with, but when I stopped attending church entirely, it just vanished. And I don't miss it one bit.
I was never any good at sports. Wny not? Because I always felt sorry for the opposite team when they were losing. And, of course, since I didn't want my team to lose, I decided not to be in sports.
You guys go fight with Astargath. I feel too sorry for him because he is losing all the time, and much of the time doesn't even realize it.
You guys go fight with Astargath. I feel too sorry for him because he is losing all the time, and much of the time doesn't even realize it.
''
Because Christianity is a religion of faith, many Bible scholars say we should avoid proving any of it.
By entering the movements of the stars and planets into a computer, NASA has found that the lost day of Joshua in Joshua 10:13, and the shorter period of time in 2 Kings 20:9–11 that were supposed to be discrepancies in the movements of the stars and planets.
One site is https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/arguments-to-avoid/nasa-found-joshuas-missing-day/.
Science is starting to prove that the Bible is accurate.''
Yea badecker, we can all see how you are winning by posting a link that says ''arguments to avoid'' which is exactly the argument you are using, I don't even need to prove you wrong, you prove yourself wrong hahaha.
Yes, I believe there is a religion of health, if you are very deeply convinced to be healthy, you will end up being healthy. Faith in being healthy helps being healty.
I was never any good at sports. Wny not? Because I always felt sorry for the opposite team when they were losing. And, of course, since I didn't want my team to lose, I decided not to be in sports.
You guys go fight with Astargath. I feel too sorry for him because he is losing all the time, and much of the time doesn't even realize it.
You guys go fight with Astargath. I feel too sorry for him because he is losing all the time, and much of the time doesn't even realize it.
You always talk about research and you never do it. Google is there for you, you just need to type: Deepak chopra fraud or Ian Stevenson fraud.
Yes I think we know how you find your "answers" to religious questions Astargath. You might run into problems, however, if your source of wisdom ever fails to deliver.
What will you do when you can't find a ready prepackaged response? Oh wait we already know.
obviously since no one else said anything about what he says because no one cares since he is wrong, why don't you just admit that he is wrong?
*clap clap* A system that provides a ready answer to every conceivable question.
The Astargath method.
Or ignoring arguments like you did with mine about your retarded book. You are not different than badecker, just another blind follower of your cult. Go worship your stupid book.
You always talk about research and you never do it. Google is there for you, you just need to type: Deepak chopra fraud or Ian Stevenson fraud.
Yes I think we know how you find your "answers" to religious questions Astargath. You might run into problems, however, if your source of wisdom ever fails to deliver.
What will you do when you can't find a ready prepackaged response? Oh wait we already know.
obviously since no one else said anything about what he says because no one cares since he is wrong, why don't you just admit that he is wrong?
*clap clap* A system that provides a ready answer to every conceivable question.
The Astargath method.
health depends on it heredity and immunity. From the way of life also depends. But the fact that it depends on religion, personally I have serious doubts
For instance, if everyone who ever died and was brought back to life in a hospital told the exact same story about what they saw, it would be considered strong evidence about the nature of the afterlife, heaven and hell, and they could tell the same story about meeting Jesus or the devil too. But instead they tell stories based upon what they already believe.
Hasty generalization fallacy: this author has failed to consider the full body of evidence, and falsely suggests that the experience of being near-death has no consistency across cultures and is therefore merely a "story". Also, Dr. Ian Stevenson studied reincarnation cases of children across many cultures and concluded that "culture and belief" alone is inadequate, i.e. low explanatory power. Is this author prepared to address the full body of evidence with an open mind? Or is he committed to his "story" explanation regardless of the evidence? Children’s Experiences.
The NDEs of children, including very young children who are too young to have developed concepts of death, religion, or NDEs, are essentially identical to those of older children and adults. This refutes the possibility that the content of NDEs is produced by preexisting beliefs or cultural conditioning.
Worldwide Consistency.
NDEs appear remarkably consistent around the world, and across many different religions and cultures. NDEs from non-Western countries are incredibly similar to those occurring in people in Western countries.
Carl Becker examined four ways in which NDEs may be considered objective:
1. Paranormal knowledge that is later verified
2. The similarity of deathbed events in different cultures
3. Differences between religious expectations and visionary experiences
4. Third-party observations of visionary figures, indicating that they were not merely subjective hallucinations.
https://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html#a07
Chopra presents answers to such questions as: who you meet in the afterlife and how your experience there reflect your present beliefs, expectations, and level of awareness. In the here and now you can shape what happens after you die. Chopra opens up immense new areas of insights where ultimately there is no division between life and death - there is only one continuous creative project.
Oh yea Dr Ian Stevenson LUL. Do you have any source that is not a complete fraud?
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ian_Stevenson
http://skepdic.com/stevenson.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/pjdg3/ian_stevensons_reincarnation_research/
Give me a break. With Chopra do you mean Deepak Chopra?? https://www.quora.com/I-have-heard-that-physicists-call-Deepak-Chopra%E2%80%99s-claims-%E2%80%9Cwoo-woo%E2%80%9D-What-do-physicists-think-of-Deepak-Chopra-Does-Deepak-really-understand-quantum-physics
He is a total nut job, there is an interview of him debating richard dawkins, you should watch that and have a good laugh.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
Also, Chopra wrote papers with Hameroff, a briiant QM researcher, so if all.you have is cherry picking and old videos then your argument is totally incomplete.
''The fact is that NDE and reincarnation cases have similar features across cultures'' Thats a fact? ROFL. ''my author'' I posted several sources, I don't know what you mean by my author. Ian Stevenson is a known fraud. Somehow you believe what he says after I presented evidence that he is a fraud, gets to show who is the guy who has an agenda here. You never research against your own, small, small sources. I can find hundreds of different sources pointing out that Ian Stevenson is a fraud and didn't perform the experiments how he should have, yet you will still believe him because that's what you do, you believe these nut jobs for some reason.
You always talk about research and you never do it. Google is there for you, you just need to type: Deepak chopra fraud or Ian Stevenson fraud.
For instance, if everyone who ever died and was brought back to life in a hospital told the exact same story about what they saw, it would be considered strong evidence about the nature of the afterlife, heaven and hell, and they could tell the same story about meeting Jesus or the devil too. But instead they tell stories based upon what they already believe.
Hasty generalization fallacy: this author has failed to consider the full body of evidence, and falsely suggests that the experience of being near-death has no consistency across cultures and is therefore merely a "story". Also, Dr. Ian Stevenson studied reincarnation cases of children across many cultures and concluded that "culture and belief" alone is inadequate, i.e. low explanatory power. Is this author prepared to address the full body of evidence with an open mind? Or is he committed to his "story" explanation regardless of the evidence? Children’s Experiences.
The NDEs of children, including very young children who are too young to have developed concepts of death, religion, or NDEs, are essentially identical to those of older children and adults. This refutes the possibility that the content of NDEs is produced by preexisting beliefs or cultural conditioning.
Worldwide Consistency.
NDEs appear remarkably consistent around the world, and across many different religions and cultures. NDEs from non-Western countries are incredibly similar to those occurring in people in Western countries.
Carl Becker examined four ways in which NDEs may be considered objective:
1. Paranormal knowledge that is later verified
2. The similarity of deathbed events in different cultures
3. Differences between religious expectations and visionary experiences
4. Third-party observations of visionary figures, indicating that they were not merely subjective hallucinations.
https://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html#a07
Chopra presents answers to such questions as: who you meet in the afterlife and how your experience there reflect your present beliefs, expectations, and level of awareness. In the here and now you can shape what happens after you die. Chopra opens up immense new areas of insights where ultimately there is no division between life and death - there is only one continuous creative project.
Oh yea Dr Ian Stevenson LUL. Do you have any source that is not a complete fraud?
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ian_Stevenson
http://skepdic.com/stevenson.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/pjdg3/ian_stevensons_reincarnation_research/
Give me a break. With Chopra do you mean Deepak Chopra?? https://www.quora.com/I-have-heard-that-physicists-call-Deepak-Chopra%E2%80%99s-claims-%E2%80%9Cwoo-woo%E2%80%9D-What-do-physicists-think-of-Deepak-Chopra-Does-Deepak-really-understand-quantum-physics
He is a total nut job, there is an interview of him debating richard dawkins, you should watch that and have a good laugh.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
Also, Chopra wrote papers with Hameroff, a briiant QM researcher, so if all.you have is cherry picking and old videos then your argument is totally incomplete.
Jump to: