Topic: Hhampuz using his position on forum to vindicate scams (Read 1343 times)

This is why you will never be a moderator here on forum

You see blood while people are having fun


Goddamn sorry LoyceV, I woke you up from deep sleep.


Are you ok bro? I hope someone didn't mention you just to cause you trouble because with the alarms notification setting you have, you must have a sleep disorder already 

What peculiar conduct from yourself. You seem somewhat deranged but this forum does have a tendency to bring out all sorts of weird characters. Does Don't talk the talk, if you can't walk the walk ring any bells? 

The moment I left neutral feedback on your account stating your reason for creating the "JCLadisav" account was false (as you were now deviating from the purpose the account was created) as you were now posting in unrelated threads, you did not like it.

If you are a genuine member in this community you have every right to question the alleged wrong-doing of any fellow member but in your case there was nothing except nefarious intent. This is my last post in this thread. I already reported it asking for it to be locked, I hope it will be soon.

Agreed

Now OP, lock this please

I didn't really chime in on the subject of this thread until OP's last comment, because it was then that it became obvious he just created this account to stir shit. Its the reason why 99% of such accounts exist. Its not that they have anything interesting to say that is worthy of debate, because if they did, they would have done it from their main account. If anyone negative tags people for bringing up valid concerns - which arguably OP's concern initially was - then I will exclude them from my trust list, and other DT should as well. But that's not what OP actually wanted to do with this account.

Hhampuz is a really nice guy and is accepting of criticism. He's also allowed people to participate in his campaigns who have made crazy false allegations about him before.

I don't see what the problem is with the OP using an alt to make this case, I'm with DireWolfM14 on this. What I also don't see much point in continuing the thread, because what the title says is false to begin with, and from the time the OP created the thread until now, what that statement has done is even lose more strength. Continuing the thread is only going to further piss off the OP, as you can see, and others. So my advice is also to lock it.

And now we see the real reason why OP exists:


Its already been established there's no evidence to suggest Hhampuz's feedback was left as a counter, and it was left on the personal account of a staff, not rollbitdotcom, where Hhampuz hasn't left a feedback. The negative has already been deleted from Rollbit Razer thus negating the premise of your thread, so you should absolutely lock it, unless you have more shit slinging that must be done.


I suggest you consider following your own advice:

I was going to close it but now watching you die slowly motivates me to keep this thread up lol

It hurt when someone you worship is being asked questions publicly. I started the thread to ask Hhampuz a question publicly but now I will keep it open because I want to see you come here everyday and die slowly lmao


@DireWolfM14 We're alts? I will take that as a compliment and move on xD


It's ironic people are questioning me "why" I am using a throwaway account while proving the reason at the same time. It's so that you morons cannot attack my main account, gotcha?

@GxSTxV The question isn't about who supports who, instead opposing anything posted against a casino he works for, without even knowing the case details, as admitted by Hhampuz.

Oh and by the way, @JollyGood, I never said my other account is established kid

But well, I am used to of your incorrect feedbacks to other members so I'll let it be

Im sorry if my previous statement "old known drama" wasn't clear for you. What I meant is that on Bitcointalk we see both new or known casinos often face accusations from newbies almost everyday . And most of these claims are due to breaking rules like creating multiple accounts or losing money while gambling so they start crying here until the casino team clarify things and explain why that user couldn’t withdraw or was banned.
Im certain that those who provide evidence to support their claims regardless of their position newbie to legendary. This is how things have been working on here for a while and everyone gets his right

You, missing the obvious?  Shocking. 

He's suggesting it's me.  Are you happy?

I could be missing the blatantly obvious therefore can you elaborate?

You are right, it is not worthwhile though there could be odd exceptions.

I had a look at some of the topics in the Bitcoin Discussion and noted at the end of several OPs were questions such as "what do you think?" and "what should I do?". Many of those are the sort of topics that been started for purposes other than genuine discussion.

From my little knowledge over here and research I don't think Hhampuz in any way connected to this project owner or in hand to what happened to anyone if the casino refuses to pay their players, I won't categorically say that he is using his rank to oppose flag or opposed any scam accusations but what you should know is that, you don't expect everyone to reason like you or even act like you because you noticed something isn't right all other people should act accordingly to how you viewed. Yes off course, no one would see scam and fully support it but what I noticed is that after he might reason and examine his own point of view and if he noticed no sign or atom of scam to what you see as scam he has the Will power to oppose it.

Btw Hhampuz is partially in direct contact to project he is managing and he might help to chat with those projects if such case is brought to his notice and he looked into it he might decide to directly contact the project owner and if they refused he might decide to pause the campaign in other to abstain himself from a scamming project.

So your own case analysis may or may not be the same as others only if they stands for the truth, and from bpip.org it shows that he is the most trusted manager and I can't in anyway See's Hhampuz to acts according to your wishes.

What old known drama?  I wasn't aware of any issues with Rollbit until I read this thread.  If this is old news, it obviously wasn't known to all of us.

As I've clearly stated in this thread, I have no issues with Hhampuz's review, but I do have issues with all those focusing on the least important aspect of this thread; the status of the OP's account.  Even if the OP lacks confidence in his assertion, I would rather have him create a sockpuppet and bring up a non-issue than to have a potentially damaging issue go unaddressed due to fear of retaliation.

Look at all the members attacking the OP as it is.  Imagine if this were some up-and-coming Sr. Member with good potential.  Do you think these "Legendary" members would leave him alone, or would they continue to harass him for calling out one of our favorite CMs?

It's very easy for a person to create a topic that's got 100 characters about things like:

- "Should I keep buying more bitcoin or hold?"

- "Bitcoin will reach $100,000 by end of the year, analyst says"

- "Microstrategy buys more Bitcoin"

- Topics like these

- And even using AI to generate the OP, which I've seen a few people get away with on the main boards!

So is it worthwhile? No, because the amount of effort being put to create a new topic compared to a new reply is, for most people, negligent.

That's not a problem with the Trust system, it's a user-problem. The only way to "fix" this from within the Trust system would be by removing the Trust score altogether.

I asked why he would use an alt-account to post about this rather than use his real account and he said he did not want to be targeted. Theoretically he is right, of-course he could feel he might be targeted including the (unlikely) risk of being excluded from future campaigns as revenge. That however should be aside from the core complaint.

We do not know which other accounts the OP controls but he is complaining because he sees Hhampuz as being biased towards the projects he promotes. He based that view on the examples he cited. Hhampuz posted in this thread to refute the allegation. Before and subsequently the OP did not receive any support therefore members do not agree with the allegation Hhampuz using his position on forum to vindicate scams

The OP should keep that in mind and maybe lock the thread.

So you don't want to be targeted by others, but you want to target other members aka Hhampuz  
I never liked when members don't have enough balls to use their main account for saying what they want, and any accusations coming from alt accounts chicken is losing any integrity.
I am sure accused manager was not asked to defend any of his clients, but he has full right on his own opinion and he can say whatever he wants.
If I was in manager's place I would never blindly defend any of my clients, but that is just me.

That probably includes you as well, right?
Maybe that is one more reason for using chicken alt account.

There are many meaningless and incorrect details in your accusation. You're accusing a casino of being a scam without any solid evidence yet, and the case you're referring to is still ongoing which means you're making baseless claims and mixing two things in one by pointing everything to Hhampuz I believe you have a personal issue with him.
 If you were confident in your statements you wouldn't use a new account to create the old known drama in this section. Accusations should be based on the complete story and all details to avoid false accusations against casinos or people due newbies stories that been started because of losing some deposits or after account lock due rule violations.

It looks like all the relevant trust ratings have been removed from the casino’s forum account trust page, so I think the issue is closed.

From what I can tell, hhampuz left a trust rating that reflected an actual transaction (actually a series of transactions), that had a real economic benefit to both parties outside of leaving the trust rating. There isn’t any reason why he shouldn’t be able to leave a rating under these circumstances.

I think the situation highlights a problem with the trust system. Too many people are focused on raw trust scores and are ignoring the references and the words behind the ratings. Hhampuz left a rating for an advertising campaign. Anyone considering entrusting the casino with their money should give more weight to ratings regarding the casino honoring withdrawals and paying out appropriately. If, in the future, someone else is considering to run an advertising campaign for the casino, the feedback by hhampuz would be valuable to them.

The owner did commit fraud, but it was related to using stolen identities for the purpose of paying for servers. It is true that they did not cheat their customers, however, got to give credit where its due.


Well not exactly. The operator said they wiped all logs after 7 days. The feds were able to confiscate the BTC in several chips that had already been paid out to purchasers, some of the cashouts were months or even years old...


I would assume the private keys to chips would be included in data to be wiped, but technically it was never clarified.

Anyway, sorry for the OT.

ChipMixer didn't commit fraud nor did they cheat their customers. It was a mixing service that got shutdown and taken offline by the FBI and Interpol. Their service worked exactly as advertised. It allowed anyone to mix their coins: you, me, or hardcore fraudsters. It's partially because it was used to wipe the history from the coins that came from malicious activities that it was taken down. The bigger reason is that no government in the world want you to be private or free.