Topic: Hhampuz using his position on forum to vindicate scams - page 4. (Read 1343 times)

His feedback is still valid, and I do not see any misuse of his position here. He had been dealing with them for over two years and might risk losing money, but they paid him. In this case, you cannot say he misused the position he has. If someone has a single valid negative, ten positives won't be able to cover that valid negative.

The problem is you never know if the accuser is telling the whole story. But, I believe the platform has other things to say than saying, "The player is in profit". This cannot be a reason to seize funds and freeze the account.

You are probably using the alt account for the same reason (Hhampuz will not take you into any campaigns in the future). There is no point in blaming others while you are doing the same thing.

Hamphuz said so based on his experience with the casino in terms of rendering a service for Rollbit from 2021 till date or do you want him to say something that isn't true no. If you look out Hamphuz is one of the for users with the highest trust and this has given me the right to drop a positive tag on any issue of scam and people will consider his actions because of his reputation in the forum. If the issue has been resolved then we can know if the person was telling the whole story of the incident or he was just saying things against Rollbit to favour his judgement. Nobody here in the forum will cover up scammers because it is against the forum.

The user who created the flags has taken his complaint to their license provider a week ago and the thread where they made these accusations has not been updated yet so I can only assume the case has not been resolved. Until there is a resolution, there isn't enough evidence for me to say whether the user was scammed or not. Their campaign manager's feedback is based on their own personal experience so it is just as valid as feedback which is based on negative experience.

This is the feedback where Hhampuz left to Rollbit Razer's account, it's really valid because Rollbit's team isn't scamming him until now as the signature campaign is always paying the manager and the participants, which part is wrong for you? leaving feedback isn't always used for someone's experience, if you have a good experience and they didn't scam you, what's wrong for leaving a positive feedback?


As you have pointed out the accusations toward Rollbit, I will give the accusations that has been resolved during at the moment:
1. Resolved
2. I cant withdraw my funds (1200$) on Rollbit.com
3. Rollbit Holding $4k Withdrawal | Been 7 days+

If Rollbit is scam casino, they must not resolve and respond to any complaint or accusation in this forum.

How is that feedback vindicating a scam? I actually spoke with Hhampuz about this issue a while back because sometimes it feels like casinos use certain violations as a way to confiscate money, but a very good point was brought up. They cannot share some information to all of the forum. All they would be doing is making the scammers smarter by doing so. Users with a complain can ask the casino to agree to a outside ruling from casinoguru or askgamblers and some sites agree with that.

You gotta realize that most of the time the accuser usually isn't sharing the whole story. They're sharing the part that makes them look like they were scammed. In most cases at least. Every now and then someone actually is telling the truth and usuaully the casino will fix the issue. I at 1 point felt like the guy got scammed but I don't know the whole story and gave the casino the benefit of doubt.

I don't think Hhampuz leaving a positive trust for a casino he has had no issues with is vindicating a scam though.

Why are you using a new account?

Because I don't want to be targeted by others.


What happened?

Rollbit seizes $10k from a user. When asked why the funds were seized, they didn't give a clear answer but mentioned "The player is in profit", which sounds like a horrendous reason to seize funds.

There are other similar cases too.

BitcoinGirl.club summed up very nicely (highly appreciated) - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62338319

Date of incident: 19th of April, 2023.


What follows next?

Bitcoingirl.club leaves negative feedback following the incident, explaining why they did so.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3261248

Date of (-ve) feedback: 1st June, 2023

Hhampuz manages Rollbit's signature campaign since 2021 but never left feedback for Rollbit.

Following Bitcoingirl.club's feedback, 17 days later, on 18th June,  Hhampuz counters the feedback by stating "I have worked with Rollbit for well over 2 years now and have never had any issues. Great people behind the scenes and an innovative casino where I've played lots without problems."

Date of (+ve) feedback: 18th June, 2023

Also important to note that the feedback was left to the profile where negative feedback was given. Although the casino's main profile is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3067300

I think this is a clear case of Hhampuz misusing his position to counter a valid feedback. Neither he provides any reason or insight as to why the funds were seized although he claims to know the great people behind the scenes at Rollbit.

A casino paying a promoter/manager and paying their players are 2 very different things. 1xbet, a known scam, pays their promoters but not players.

Any casino would pay DT a sum of money to cover their shady practices such as seizing funds and don't have to give any explanation.
2 flags were created against Rollbit and everyone supported the flag and provided reasons while Hhmpuz opposed the flag and didn't care to reason it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3178

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3194

I know signature campaign guys won't care to step up because Hhampuz will not take them into any campaigns in future. But I expect LoyceV and other reputed members to at least reply.