Topic: Homosexuality is caused by being molested - page 16. (Read 13104 times)

YOU GANG OF STUPID THICK CUNTS..
21ST CENTURY and you all talk shit..
people are gay because they are GET OVER IT..
Some people think being gay means your weak ..well take a good look at history and present day.
lots of people who were gay have made your life so much better and contributed to the human race..

 Alexander the Great, Emperor Hadrian, Sappho, King Richard the Lionhearted, Julius and Augustus Caesar, Aristotle, Socrates, Erasmus, Christina of Sweden, Virginia Woolf, Eleanor Roosevelt, Queen Anne, Marie Antoinette, Margaret Fuller, and more modern names like Dag Hammerskjold (UN Secretary), Josephine Baker, Isadora Duncan, Frida Cahlo, Ellen Degeneres, Sir Ian McKellan, Gene Robinson, Mary Glasspool.   We have actors who defined masculinity for several generations of movie viewers: Rock Hudson, Cary Grant, Raymond Burr, Rudolf Valentino, Montgomery Clift, Tab Hunter.  In sports, John Amaechi (NY Knicks), Gareth Thomas (out rugby player), Esera Tuaolo, David Kopay, Roy Simmons (all football players), Sheryl Swoopes, Billy Jean King, Martina Navratilova.

This is just a few but to say that some these people got molested is a FUCKIN JOKE.

GROW UP ITS THE 21ST CENTURY
AND FUCK ALL YOUR RELIGIONS YOU GANG OFF DUMB FUCKS
YOUR LIKE CHILDREN
When someone does no harm to you or anybody else and its 2 consenting adults what the fuck as it got to do with you ..
even if 2 people are straight i hope as an adult your child will still be a virgin at 18 if your a responsible adult you don.t need your kids to grow up to fast..

some really sad comments made but free speech your well within your rights to say what you will
so here is my right

YOU GANG OF HOMOPHOBIC STUPID THICK DUMB FUCKS FUCK YOU AND YOUR BACKWARD THOUGHTS DICK BRAIN CUNTS

BRING IT ON BABY

" Everyone in this thread is partly gay, example.... think of all the times you have appreciated another mans insights on life, in that moment you are enjoying the concept of man you gay bastard. " Huh??? That's ridiculous and way beyond reaching, in what way does that make anyone "gay"...?

How brainwashed you can be?

According to them, it is not "erotic" enough. Now HIV is a manageable medical condition, thanks to the newer versions of the anti-retroviral drugs. 99% of the treatment cost is borne by the government, and therefore these guys don't have to worry about anything. Being HIV +ve is something like a status symbol among the gays. 

I wonder why they won't inject some infected blood. This seems to be much simpler than infecting through ass.

There are places where saying that could get you arrested for hate speech.

You're supposed to say that gays are born unable to enjoy the feeling of a vagina around their penis.  They can enjoy a man's mouth but not a woman's mouth. 

Even if a man married a woman, promised to stay with her until death, and ejaculated inside her for 20 years and got her pregnant 3 times - you're supposed to say he's a hero for abandoning his family and getting blowjobs from teenaged boys in alleys.  Because he was born that way, end of discussion.

+1

The connections of logic in some of the posts is very interesting indeed.

Everyone is a mixture of gay/straight. Nobody is truly gay or straight.  Even if the straightest of straight guys decided to have gay sex as a test and found out he did not like it he still isn't 100% straight beause life does not work like this. We dont have all nice neat social boxes/catergories we live in from birth to death.

Everyone in this thread is partly gay, example.... think of all the times you have appreciated another mans insights on life, in that moment you are enjoying the concept of man you gay bastard.   Example, the circle jerk that happened when Andreas Antonopoulus spoke at the canadian senate - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUNGFZDO8mM  That circle jerk over him and his presenation was perhaps warranted, his insights were excellent, is it partly gay to rave about him though?..... emmmmm yeah it is.  Dont go saying its not partly gay because you only wanted his brain and not his cock.

Sry, but I think you wrong...

I was having a few experience with gays and also I used to have a gay friend. We was friends for a couple of years. I didn't noticed that, but I have heard rumors about him and honestly I didn't want to believe until one day... We was watching a movie and he lied on the bed near to me. In that moment I have realize that the rumors were true and I leave immediately!

After that I start to analyse the situation and have realize that the gay are actually confused persons. They are influenced by the TV, Internet and most of all the GMO in our daily products. I was arguing with one guy who study chemistry and even he admitted that GMO can cause some problems with our hormones. By the law of the nature we are born as a male and female, it is simple!

There is even a phenomenon called bug-catching. Young gay males undergo recipient sex with gays who are HIV positive, in order to get themselves infected. Some of the mentally retarded homosexuals consider this the ultimate homo-erotic feeling. There are even websites and forums, which give a step-by-step instruction for younger homosexuals, in order to get themselves the HIV.

If they were fat as children, does that mean they were born fat and that being fat is just as good as being fit?

I can't agree with this. I have gay friends and they were not molested  and were obviously gay during our childhood days.

Sure, I respect you words, but let me ask you something: If we have virus is it logical that there is antivirus, right?

Here is the last study that I have read about AIDS:

Bees could hold the key to preventing HIV transmission. Researchers have discovered that bee venom kills the virus while leaving body cells unharmed, which could lead to an anti-HIV vaginal gel and other treatments.

Scientists at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis found that melittin, a toxin found in bee venom, physically destroys the HIV virus, a breakthrough that could potentially lead to drugs that are immune to HIV resistance. The study was published Thursday in the journal Antiviral Therapy.

"Our hope is that in places where HIV is running rampant, people could use this as a preventative measure to stop the initial infection," Joshua Hood, one of the authors of the study, said in a statement.

So tell me, if already have the anti-virus here on planet Earth, then is it normal they know how to develop the virus?

i think its 50% by molester an 50% by himself

This is true. I think you should ask to some socialists how they see that, this should make you laugh, and then you'll understand why they keep it secret. That's because on their Holy Human Rights, that's stated that no one can be discriminated. Also, when a huge proportion of people in medias are gay, that doesn't help .

I've heard a lot of similar stories. 

How many adult gay men still live with their mothers?  How many of them sleep in the same bed with their mothers?

The answers you get will be different from people who actually know a lot of gay men. 

In our age of single mothers, women are used to being abandoned.  But there is sometimes one man she can depend on never to leave her - her son, as long as he doesn't meet a woman and get married. 

A lot of gay men couldn't be with a woman because they would feel like they were cheating on their own mom.



A famous example would be Anderson Cooper talking about which of his mom's boyfriends was better at licking his mother's vagina.

Another famous example would be Walt Whitman, whose poetry seems to draw a close connection between his mother and masturbation.

Another famous example would be Alexander McQueen, the fashion designer who killed himself the day before his mother's funeral.

Another famous example would be Barney Bubbles, the fashion designer who killed himself on his late mother's wedding anniversary.


For anyone who wasn't aware, there is plenty of reading.  Sometimes they admit that there is a positive correlation between a man being gay and having an unusually close relationship with his mother, but sometimes they pretend the causality is the other way around. 

I don't think the average person that adds a rainbow filter to their facebook profile has any idea what kind of things these people do behind closed doors or in the company of other homosexuals. A close family member was part owner of a hair salon when I was growing up and had many gay friends, after years of being around them she sold her part in the business. The stories of what she witnessed at parties or was told in confidence by her friends over the years was mind-blowing, beyond warped...and from what she said, most of these people would tell her they weren't happy being gay and wished they were straight. I really could care less what people do behind closed doors and the whole lgbt population is in reality very small, but now that there is this push to "normalize" it and spread it to the masses - especially children - that pisses me off.

Back to the topic:  multiple studies have found that gay men "have their first sexual experience" much younger than the average straight person.  And gays are more likely to have that first experience with an older partner.  

So if a boy is 9 years old, or 11 years old, and is anally penetrated by a 13-year-old, or a 15-year-old, or a 50-year-old, they are calling that a beautiful first love experience.  But of course it has nothing to do with love.



The truth is that being gay is similar to being fat.  There can be many contributing factors.  It's not healthy, it's disgusting to most people (even themselves), and most people agree that "nobody would choose to be that way".  Most fat people didn't decide to be fat, but they still choose the behaviors and habits every day that keep them fat.  

They feel that it's impossible for them to change their behaviors, because they have mental and emotional dysfunctions.

They use a biological function - eating (or sex) - as an emotional coping mechanism, which involves them abusing the natural biological function of their bodies.  

So yes, "if they just stopped eating so much, they would stop being fat."  Just like "if they stopped having gay sex, they would stop being gay."  But unless they learn healthy coping mechanisms, they would remain dysfunctional.

Of course, being fat doesn't strictly prevent people from reproducing within a monogamous relationship.  Being gay does prevent people from reproducing within a monogamous relationship, making a normal marriage and family impossible;  it's like being infertile.  But being fat does go a long way toward the same result, for many people.  

Like gay people, fat people don't want to follow the rules that everyone else follows.  They free themselves from certain responsibilities and step outside social norms.  Like most freedoms, this freedom from the burden of social duty is not often relinquished willingly.  Being fat isn't "just like being skinny, but fatter."  It usually means you don't care about being neat, clean, organized, and an entire list of things that go with it.  Fat people often give up on fitting in, and that has an effect on every area of their mentality.  They are outsiders, apart from mainstream society, and unwilling to take any steps towards joining.  



So that's how I see it, and now people will disagree using emotion instead of logic.  

If you want to show that I'm wrong, all you have to do is simply come up with some thoughts about homosexuality that don't apply to obesity:



"I've known him since he was 5 years old, and I could already tell he would be fat."

"He was born fat because he says so."

"Even as a child, he loved his mother's sausages and would eat 3 pounds a day.  Of course she encouraged him because she knew he was born fat and she loves him for who he is."

"The only reason fat people aren't happy is because you won't accept them."

"Being fat is an orientation.  Even if you lose weight, you're still fat in your mind if you were born fat."

"It's not about how much you actually eat and exercise.  It's about how much you prefer to eat and exercise.  That's why being fat can never be defined scientifically, or proven by studying someone.  It's only based on what people say about their own thoughts."

"He pretended to be skinny for a long time, but he finally admitted that he was born fat.  Then he got skinny again, so it turns out he wasn't born fat."

"If you don't like fat people, you're secretly fat yourself."

"Being fat isn't a choice.  Can't you see how different their bodies are?  That proves it's genetic."

"If being morbidly obese makes them happy, who are you to tell your children it's undesirable?"

"There's nothing wrong with weighing so much you can't get out of bed.  Only backwards inbred racist religious fools disagree."

"When they shove so much food down their orifice that it makes them puke, that is love.  It's just as noble and beautiful as your grandparents starting a family and being together every day for 60 years."

Not necessary.

1) There were several waves of plague in europe.
2) Most of HIV strains are CCR5-tropic strains.

CCR5-D32 mutation increased the probability of survival for those who had this mutation. As the result of natural selection, share of CCR5-D32 in european gene pool has been increased. The same is correct for other "good" mutations, there are many varians of CCR5 gene.

Fortunately for europeans, these mutations are also making it more difficult for HIV to merge with cell. For example, if you have one copy of CCR5-D32 gene then HIV infection is developing much slower than with regular genome, and it can take ~20-30 years to show any symptoms of immunodeficiency. If you're lucky to have two copies of D32 variation of gene (~1% of white population), then you're nearly 100% resistant to infection by CCR5-tropic strains of HIV.

Nothing like these european epidemies of plague happened in Africa or America. As the result, gene pool of native population wasn't affected by natural selection, leaving them more vulnerable to CCR5-tropic strains of HIV.

No mystics, pure science.

It's not a matter of opinion, or something for scientists to argue.  If more black people in Africa have AIDS, it's probably because the majority of the African population is black.

But one major problem with the AIDS statistics for Africa is that they weren't doing AIDS tests.  They just wrote down "AIDS" for anyone with a runny nose or the flu, and then reported that 1 in 4 Africans has AIDS.  It's not true.

So the good news is that AIDS isn't being used to exterminate Africans.  Because Africans don't have as much AIDS as we've been told.






I've read that AIDS was originally called GRID, Gay-Related Immune Disease.  It was first associated with the openly-gay culture in places with significant groups of openly gay men, such as New York.  The majority of openly gay men at the time were white, probably in part because white people were the majority population in the U.S.

I think you are also aware that the majority of black men in the U.S. who have sexual relations with other men do not openly admit it.  So when medical researchers first went to the gay communities to find out about AIDS, they found a disproportionate number of white gays.





Before AIDS was discovered by doctors and scientists, people were dying from it and the cause of death would be listed as pneumonia or another illness.  Doctors didn't notice 50% of all Asian patients coming in with pneumonia, or 50% of all their Indian patients coming in with pneumonia.  If they had, they would have searched for some reason within the Asian or Indian communities which could have been causing it.  But it was gays that were noticed to have a new illness among their group, so they investigated gay people.  There were probably other people who had AIDS, but they weren't openly gay, so those people continued to die "of pneumonia" because there was nothing else to identify their illness as AIDS until the virus was isolated.





There was no blood test for AIDS.  It was, and still is, a primarily gay disease.  Lesbians do not typically transmit AIDS to each other, and women typically do not transmit AIDS to men.  Because when a man has sex with a woman, her blood or bodily fluid usually does not get into the man's bloodstream.

So if a woman gets AIDS, she will probably die without passing it on to anyone else.  But when a gay man gets AIDS, he is more likely to pass it on to multiple other gay men, and each of them are very likely to pass it on to others.  That's why it spread among gays instead of among straight people.

Most women who get AIDS were infected by bisexual men.  Transmission is more likely with anal sex, because there is damage and bleeding which allows the semen into the bloodstream.

There are places in Africa where "dry sex" is considered the cultural norm among some groups, and women will put herbs or toothpaste into their vaginas to dry themselves out.  Then the sex has more friction, but also results in more tearing of the vaginal tissue and a greater chance of AIDS transmission.  





Some of those cases certainly involved AIDS-infected blood transfusions.





I don't know what you mean, but there are at least 3 major strains of HIV.  One is more prevalent in the U.S., one is more prevalent in Africa, and one is more prevalent in Asia.  There is nothing unusual about that.  






No one has forced gay men to infect each other with AIDS.  They have known about AIDS for 30 years, and it's still being transmitted to new patients every day.  

No one has forced straight people to act differently to prevent themselves from getting AIDS.  If straight people acted like gay people, they would have just as much AIDS.  But it would spread more slowly, since men give it to women more than women give it to men.

Is it 100 times more likely for a gay person to get AIDS?  Or is it more than that?

It's not a conspiracy, it's just physics.  A torn anus lets the AIDS virus into the bloodstream more easily than a penis, and the vagina doesn't let it in easily unless the vagina is torn.  

And then the average gay person has over 10 times more sexual partners than the average straight person, compounding their already-increased risk.

How is the government responsible for that?