Pages:
Author

Topic: homosexuality is unnatural nonsense from america - page 2. (Read 1189 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1150
Merit: 260
☆Gaget-Pack☆
I really don't think Homosexuality started or originated in America. I think that this has been a constant throughout worldwide history, it is a given, it's been here since the dawn of man and it isn't going anywhere anytime soon. America takes a different approach to these matters and the politicians and lobbyists fight hard within congress to make sure that regardless of whatever sexual identity, religious belief, code or creed you live by, you're treated equally as a citizen.
  Sweden has taken the initiative to progressively move ahead leading the forefront for LBGQT equal rights. It seems more of a scientific and political matter more than a religious one these days (no offense to the religious), but to each his/her/it's own, I think the bigger picture may be finding equality among all the confusion.
 Just my two cents.Q
sr. member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 279
Can't really blame America for this, it's pretty much existed for most of history, with various cultures having their own way of responding to it, from the indifference of the Greeks to the outright violent response of Islam.

I would however blame America for the toxic femininity the world is experiencing right now. Basically this, but on a planet-wide level: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMucmRlPZK0
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
Sorry, you really can't apply human or even mammalian concepts of sexuality to insects.

nature involves everything in nature,

there are also mamals than run states, naked mole rats create feminist states https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_mole-rat

and if you look back into pre christian history, you will find even more, gay romans, indians, chinese, africans, and also matriachic ruled india.

human body cells also create a state the cells are gender neutral.

regards

Just a clarification. You can defend sexual behaviors all you want, and there are many valid defenses. But justification by comparison with insects is just plain ridiculous. This is also true for a comparison with different mammalian species.

the universe is a big place, there could be huge insectoid species, that live like insects,

besides there are feminists and feminist kinder gardens, there are also people that research artificial womb,

that are signs for a societial organisation similar like the one of a insect state,

not to mention muslim harems, where in a city more than 50% of the women where basically property of a single man.

you call yourself smart using a computer, then at least be smart, and open.

the universe is big, complex and diverse, if you don't like it become a farmer again.

regards
Yes, but wasn't your position (paraphrasing...) homosexuality is okay because (A) (B) (C) reasons...

An ethical or moral justification can't be made by comparison with insects. Sexuality in mammals varies widely. Some have been studied a lot, some species hardly at all.

As an example of a valid justification, suppose a king in the Middle Ages wanted to maximize male baby production so he could have the biggest armies. He might well set social incentives for baby production both through marriage and out of marriage sex, and set negative social incentives for gay behavior.

That's totally rational - in that context.

i dont mind homosexuality if its not toxic for a society homosexual behavior can be balancing and beneficial for a society,

bee swarms wouldn't work as they work harmonically if they wouldn't be homosexual/gender neutral.

issues are about sustainability etc.
sr. member
Activity: 791
Merit: 271
This is personal
Quote
all the roman soldiers where basically either gay or gender neutral, few of them married

Yeah, I'm gonna need a citation for that.

Do you know what else is natural?

Murder.
Ripping your opponents apart and throwing their limbs around (apes).
Throwing poop at other members of your group.
Eating your offspring.
Rape.
Dolphins often bite a fish in half and then fuck it's corpse. (I'm not even sarcastic)
full member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 146

As an example of a valid justification, suppose a king in the Middle Ages wanted to maximize male baby production so he could have the biggest armies. He might well set social incentives for baby production both through marriage and out of marriage sex, and set negative social incentives for gay behavior.


Right. The king would need to breed a lot of women so that he would have a lot of women to breed a lot of warriors from. By then he would be too old to be king any longer... if he hadn't already died from old age.

Cool
Sexual life of men are more longer,sometimes even mid 70s can give birth. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373

As an example of a valid justification, suppose a king in the Middle Ages wanted to maximize male baby production so he could have the biggest armies. He might well set social incentives for baby production both through marriage and out of marriage sex, and set negative social incentives for gay behavior.


Right. The king would need to breed a lot of women so that he would have a lot of women to breed a lot of warriors from. By then he would be too old to be king any longer... if he hadn't already died from old age.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
Sorry, you really can't apply human or even mammalian concepts of sexuality to insects.

nature involves everything in nature,

there are also mamals than run states, naked mole rats create feminist states https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_mole-rat

and if you look back into pre christian history, you will find even more, gay romans, indians, chinese, africans, and also matriachic ruled india.

human body cells also create a state the cells are gender neutral.

regards

Just a clarification. You can defend sexual behaviors all you want, and there are many valid defenses. But justification by comparison with insects is just plain ridiculous. This is also true for a comparison with different mammalian species.

the universe is a big place, there could be huge insectoid species, that live like insects,

besides there are feminists and feminist kinder gardens, there are also people that research artificial womb,

that are signs for a societial organisation similar like the one of a insect state,

not to mention muslim harems, where in a city more than 50% of the women where basically property of a single man.

you call yourself smart using a computer, then at least be smart, and open.

the universe is big, complex and diverse, if you don't like it become a farmer again.

regards
Yes, but wasn't your position (paraphrasing...) homosexuality is okay because (A) (B) (C) reasons...

An ethical or moral justification can't be made by comparison with insects. Sexuality in mammals varies widely. Some have been studied a lot, some species hardly at all.

As an example of a valid justification, suppose a king in the Middle Ages wanted to maximize male baby production so he could have the biggest armies. He might well set social incentives for baby production both through marriage and out of marriage sex, and set negative social incentives for gay behavior.

That's totally rational - in that context.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
Sorry, you really can't apply human or even mammalian concepts of sexuality to insects.

nature involves everything in nature,

there are also mamals than run states, naked mole rats create feminist states https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_mole-rat

and if you look back into pre christian history, you will find even more, gay romans, indians, chinese, africans, and also matriachic ruled india.

human body cells also create a state the cells are gender neutral.

regards

Just a clarification. You can defend sexual behaviors all you want, and there are many valid defenses. But justification by comparison with insects is just plain ridiculous. This is also true for a comparison with different mammalian species.

the universe is a big place, there could be huge insectoid species, that live like insects,

besides there are feminists and feminist kinder gardens, there are also people that research artificial womb,

that are signs for a societial organisation similar like the one of a insect state,

not to mention muslim harems, where in a city more than 50% of the women where basically property of a single man.

you call yourself smart using a computer, then at least be smart, and open.

the universe is big, complex and diverse, if you don't like it become a farmer again.

regards
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
Sorry, you really can't apply human or even mammalian concepts of sexuality to insects.

nature involves everything in nature,

there are also mamals than run states, naked mole rats create feminist states https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_mole-rat

and if you look back into pre christian history, you will find even more, gay romans, indians, chinese, africans, and also matriachic ruled india.

human body cells also create a state the cells are gender neutral.

regards

Just a clarification. You can defend sexual behaviors all you want, and there are many valid defenses. But justification by comparison with insects is just plain ridiculous. This is also true for a comparison with different mammalian species.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
but most importantly nature has clear homosexual features,
bee and ant states are almost 100% lesbian(feminist homosexuality).
termite states are almost 100% gender neutral.
so american evangelics, if you don't understand nature. or feel threatened by homosexuals, dont talk trash about nature.
comming from someone who was also once homophobic, but out of scientific truth is completely aware that it is kind of natural.
The problem with this statement is that you are picking something that suites you but if you pick those then some animals have cannibalistic instincts  Tongue. As humans do what suits you the best without harming others and if you stop judging others and keep on doing what is best for you then the world would have been a better place.

from racism to sexuality a single featue like size insektoid humanoid skincolor is interchangable and extractable from an organic konzept.
hero member
Activity: 788
Merit: 505
Homosexuality is not natural rather it's an unnatural desire that came in mind of few odds. These things are only popular in developed countries since poor people have other thing to focus. Its necessary for life human to have sex between Male n female and keep this shit out of the society
hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 505
but most importantly nature has clear homosexual features,
bee and ant states are almost 100% lesbian(feminist homosexuality).
termite states are almost 100% gender neutral.
so american evangelics, if you don't understand nature. or feel threatened by homosexuals, dont talk trash about nature.
comming from someone who was also once homophobic, but out of scientific truth is completely aware that it is kind of natural.
The problem with this statement is that you are picking something that suites you but if you pick those then some animals have cannibalistic instincts  Tongue. As humans do what suits you the best without harming others and if you stop judging others and keep on doing what is best for you then the world would have been a better place.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325

but most importantly nature has clear homosexual features,

bee and ant states are almost 100% lesbian(feminist homosexuality).

termite states are almost 100% gender neutral.

so american evangelics, if you don't understand nature. or feel threatened by homosexuals, dont talk trash about nature.


I think you don't get the point right: The thread is about humans in particular not other creatures where homo is indeed a natural thing Wink Pls do not compare apples with bananas!

humans are also just individuals, acting

if you look into historic human history most humans lived genderneutral

all the roman soldiers where basically either gay or gender neutral, few of them married

especially islam has a broad band of genderneutrality.

all mujahedin dying in wars, where gender neutral individuals,

and those few males that owned harems with several thausand women where the only ones reproducing.

tech advantage will create even more possibilities, reproduction might become some kind of a product, buyable by everyone singles; corporations, etc.

traditional marrier male and female partnerships might get into competition, just because judeo christian history dominance destroyed all evidence on the existence of genderneutral living human beings, doesn't mean it never existed. christian church simply was bigotted and fanatic regarding that marriage model, and it was also pushed by christian nobility to have a huge reproduction.

regards
IHF
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 1

but most importantly nature has clear homosexual features,

bee and ant states are almost 100% lesbian(feminist homosexuality).

termite states are almost 100% gender neutral.

so american evangelics, if you don't understand nature. or feel threatened by homosexuals, dont talk trash about nature.


I think you don't get the point right: The thread is about humans in particular not other creatures where homo is indeed a natural thing Wink Pls do not compare apples with bananas!
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325

american lefties have nothing to do with communism, i am sick and tired seeing them being compared with communism

You're right. Lefties are simply a tool of the communists.     Cool

no they are the opposition speaking for the financially excluded, that could be the tool of anyone who isnt in power also muslims islamists, black supremacists etc.

lefties have a history of weakening the establishment and strengthening hostile outsiders.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373

american lefties have nothing to do with communism, i am sick and tired seeing them being compared with communism

You're right. Lefties are simply a tool of the communists.     Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
This fits homosexuals, as well.


Don’t buy into the Left-wing propaganda: Stats show there is no “murder epidemic” of transgenders



Almost nothing Left-wing Democrats and their sycophantic allies in the media, academia and the entertainment industry say about American culture and society is true.

One of the most current and outrageous lies has to do with transgendered individuals: We’re being told that they are killed and/or hurt much more frequently, per capita, than non-transgendered Americans.

Flat out, that’s a lie — and new research data prove it.

First, the hoax. During one of the Democratic Party presidential debates last month, a pandering Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, her campaign flagging, made a solemn pledge: If she manages to miracle her way into the presidency, she’s going to amble out onto the White House lawn once a year and recite out loud the names of transgendered Americans who were killed the previous year.

Now would be a good time to roll your eyes and say something like, “Oh, brother.”

“Dying White Trans” is a ‘thing’ on the Left now, thanks to the proliferation of this hoax by journalistically unethical people in the “mainstream” media. There has been no shortage of stories claiming there is an “epidemic” of murders of transgendered Americans.


Cool

american lefties have nothing to do with communism, i am sick and tired seeing them being compared with communism
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
This fits homosexuals, as well.


Don’t buy into the Left-wing propaganda: Stats show there is no “murder epidemic” of transgenders



Almost nothing Left-wing Democrats and their sycophantic allies in the media, academia and the entertainment industry say about American culture and society is true.

One of the most current and outrageous lies has to do with transgendered individuals: We’re being told that they are killed and/or hurt much more frequently, per capita, than non-transgendered Americans.

Flat out, that’s a lie — and new research data prove it.

First, the hoax. During one of the Democratic Party presidential debates last month, a pandering Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, her campaign flagging, made a solemn pledge: If she manages to miracle her way into the presidency, she’s going to amble out onto the White House lawn once a year and recite out loud the names of transgendered Americans who were killed the previous year.

Now would be a good time to roll your eyes and say something like, “Oh, brother.”

“Dying White Trans” is a ‘thing’ on the Left now, thanks to the proliferation of this hoax by journalistically unethical people in the “mainstream” media. There has been no shortage of stories claiming there is an “epidemic” of murders of transgendered Americans.


Cool
hero member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 507
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhGQUKoH_TE&t=1s

some american evangelics and other anti homosexuality people claim it is unnatural,

homosexuality can be a threat to the sustainability and the regenerativity of a society as it reduces the amount of reproductive individual, neverthlesse it can doesnt mean it does.

homosexualts can on the other hand support the raisement of the offspring of others into adult age.

meaning if all would be heterosexual and 1 quarter of children dies before age 5, it would be ok that 1 quarter would be homosexual and support the survivability of the offspring

next to homosexuality there is also gender neutrality.


but most importantly nature has clear homosexual features,

bee and ant states are almost 100% lesbian(feminist homosexuality).

termite states are almost 100% gender neutral.

so american evangelics, if you don't understand nature. or feel threatened by homosexuals, dont talk trash about nature.

comming from someone who was also once homophobic, but out of scientific truth is completely aware that it is kind of natural.

regards

There are very few of those who chose to be homosexual but majority of homosexuals are naturally born that way and you cant blame them . For many years , society has already been cruel to them and its high time that we impart some support to them and accept the way theh are. They are already in minorities and reproduction system wont be hampered if some chose to love the same sex.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
^^^ But each person is important to God. And when they choose such a useless thing for their life as homosexuality, they are going against the purpose that God made them for... to have kids.

Poor God. He is in such a quandrie. He loves homos, but He needs to have His purposes fulfilled. Otherwise there is no use to having people at all! So, what is God going to do? Here's what.

God will give homos a chance to turn to Him... and prove it by turning away from their homosexuality. If they don't turn, He will have to give them what they are asking for by their actions... destruction.

Cool
Pages:
Jump to: